Whole-body vibration-induced muscular reflex: Is it a stretch-induced reflex?

Halil Ibrahim Cakar, Muharrem Cidem, Oguz Sebik, Gizem Yilmaz, Safak Sahir Karamehmetoglu, Sadik Kara, Ilhan Karacan, Kemal Sıtkı Türker, Halil Ibrahim Cakar, Muharrem Cidem, Oguz Sebik, Gizem Yilmaz, Safak Sahir Karamehmetoglu, Sadik Kara, Ilhan Karacan, Kemal Sıtkı Türker

Abstract

[Purpose] Whole-body vibration (WBV) can induce reflex responses in muscles. A number of studies have reported that the physiological mechanisms underlying this type of reflex activity can be explained by reference to a stretch-induced reflex. Thus, the primary objective of this study was to test whether the WBV-induced muscular reflex (WBV-IMR) can be explained as a stretch-induced reflex. [Subjects and Methods] The present study assessed 20 healthy males using surface electrodes placed on their right soleus muscle. The latency of the tendon reflex (T-reflex) as a stretch-induced reflex was compared with the reflex latency of the WBV-IMR. In addition, simulations were performed at 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, and 50 Hz to determine the stretch frequency of the muscle during WBV. [Results] WBV-IMR latency (40.5 ± 0.8 ms; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 39.0-41.9 ms) was significantly longer than T-reflex latency (34.6 ± 0.5 ms; 95% CI: 33.6-35.5 ms) and the mean difference was 6.2 ms (95% CI of the difference: 4.7-7.7 ms). The simulations performed in the present study demonstrated that the frequency of the stretch signal would be twice the frequency of the vibration. [Conclusion] These findings do not support the notion that WBV-IMR can be explained by reference to a stretch-induced reflex.

Keywords: Gravitational physiology; Skeletal muscle function; Tonic vibration reflex.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Experimental setup of simulation 1. (A) Upper figure: the horizontal line represents the position of the tip of the pen prior to WBV. (B) Middle and (C) lower figures: the vertical lines show that the elastic band simulated muscle movement in both the upward and downward directions during WBV. The displayed trace was plotted during 25 Hz WBV.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Measurements of the reflex latencies. Representative latency values of one male participant. The solid circle represents the onset of the EMG spike, and the open circle represents the stimulus onset point. The dotted arrow represents the positive peak of the time derivative of the rectified EMG that was used as the trigger to average the accelerometer data and the rectified EMG data. The solid square shows the lowest position of the vibration platform during the vibration cycle and the onset point of the increase in force of the upward thrust of the platform. The mean time difference between the stimulus onset and the lowest position of the vibration platform was 3.5 ± 1.9 ms (n = 20). ACC: acceleration
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Simulation 2. (a) Platform Accelerometer Record: the peak appears at a vibration frequency of 50 Hz. (b) Stretch Sensor Record: the sensor stretches two times during a complete vibration cycle, once during the upward movement and once during the downward movement. (c) Stretch Sensor Record (Rectified): the cumulative frequency of the upward and downward stretches was 100 Hz. (d) SEMG Record: the rectified SEMG; the vertical arrows separate the vibration cycles in the time domain traces.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Measurements of the reflex latencies using the method of Ritzmann et al.14). Drawn using data from the present study, this figure illustrates that the time period between the lowest point of the vibration platform and the onset of the first spike in the EMG signal varies depending on the frequency of vibration. The vertical arrow indicates the lowest point of the vibration platform.

References

    1. Cochrane DJ: Vibration exercise: the potential benefits. Int J Sports Med, 2011, 32: 75–99.
    1. Delecluse C, Roelants M, Verschueren S: Strength increase after whole-body vibration compared with resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2003, 35: 1033–1041.
    1. Di Giminiani R, Manno R, Scrimaglio R, et al. : Effects of individualized whole-body vibration on muscle flexibility and mechanical power. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 2010, 50: 139–151.
    1. Wilcock IM, Whatman C, Harris N, et al. : Vibration training: could it enhance the strength, power, or speed of athletes? J Strength Cond Res, 2009, 23: 593–603.
    1. Choi Y, Kang H: The effects of sling exercise using vibration on trunk muscle activities of healthy adults. J Phys Ther Sci, 2013, 25: 1291–1294.
    1. Han J, Jung J, Lee J, et al. : Effect of muscle vibration on postural balance of Parkinson’s diseases patients in bipedal quiet standing. J Phys Ther Sci, 2013, 25: 1433–1435.
    1. Koh HW, Cho SH, Kim CY, et al. : Effects of vibratory stimulations on maximal voluntary isometric contraction from delayed onset muscle soreness. J Phys Ther Sci, 2013, 25: 1093–1095.
    1. Shim C, Lee Y, Lee D, et al. : Effect of whole body vibration exercise in the horizontal direction on balance and fear of falling in elderly people: a pilot study. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014, 26: 1083–1086.
    1. Choi SJ, Shin WS, Oh BK, et al. : Effect of training with whole body vibration on the sitting balance of stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014, 26: 1411–1414.
    1. Bosco C, Colli R, Introini E, et al. : Adaptive responses of human skeletal muscle to vibration exposure. Clin Physiol, 1999, 19: 183–187.
    1. Martin BJ, Park HS: Analysis of the tonic vibration reflex: influence of vibration variables on motor unit synchronization and fatigue. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol, 1997, 75: 504–511.
    1. Pollock RD, Woledge RC, Martin FC, et al. : Effects of whole body vibration on motor unit recruitment and threshold. J Appl Physiol 1985, 2012, 112: 388–395.
    1. Ritzmann R, Kramer A, Gollhofer A, et al. : The effect of whole body vibration on the H-reflex, the stretch reflex, and the short-latency response during hopping. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2013, 23: 331–339.
    1. Ritzmann R, Kramer A, Gruber M, et al. : EMG activity during whole body vibration: motion artifacts or stretch reflexes? Eur J Appl Physiol, 2010, 110: 143–151.
    1. Rittweger J: Vibration as an exercise modality: how it may work, and what its potential might be. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2010, 108: 877–904.
    1. Ashby P, Stålberg E, Winkler T, et al. : Further observations on the depression of group Ia facilitation of motoneurons by vibration in man. Exp Brain Res, 1987, 69: 1–6.
    1. Desmedt JE, Godaux E: Mechanism of the vibration paradox: excitatory and inhibitory effects of tendon vibration on single soleus muscle motor units in man. J Physiol, 1978, 285: 197–207.
    1. Dindar F, Verrier M: Studies on the receptor responsible for vibration induced inhibition of monosynaptic reflexes in man. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1975, 38: 155–160.
    1. Gillies JD, Lance JW, Neilson PD, et al. : Presynaptic inhibition of the monosynaptic reflex by vibration. J Physiol, 1969, 205: 329–339.
    1. Zehr EP: Considerations for use of the Hoffmann reflex in exercise studies. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2002, 86: 455–468.
    1. Fernandes IA, Kawchuk G, Bhambhani Y, et al. : Does whole-body vibration acutely improve power performance via increased short latency stretch reflex response? J Sci Med Sport, 2013, 16: 360–364.
    1. Hopkins JT, Fredericks D, Guyon PW, et al. : Whole body vibration does not potentiate the stretch reflex. Int J Sports Med, 2009, 30: 124–129.
    1. Richardson MS, Cramer JT, Bemben DA, et al. : Effects of age and ACL reconstruction on quadriceps gamma loop function. J Geriatr Phys Ther, 2006, 29: 28–34.
    1. Min JH, Shin YI, Joa KL, et al. : The correlation between modified Ashworth scale and biceps T-reflex and inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of biceps T-reflex. Ann Rehabil Med, 2012, 36: 538–543.
    1. Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, et al. : Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 2000, 10: 361–374.
    1. Sebik O, Karacan I, Cidem M, et al. : Rectification of SEMG as a tool to demonstrate synchronous motor unit activity during vibration. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 2013, 23: 275–284.
    1. Karacan I, Cakar HI, Sebik O, et al. : A new method to determine reflex latency induced by high rate stimulation of the nervous system. Front Hum Neurosci, 2014, 8: 536.
    1. Cidem M, Karacan I, Uludag M: Normal range of spinal mobility for healthy young adult Turkish men. Rheumatol Int, 2012, 32: 2265–2269.
    1. Hall JE: Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2011.
    1. Newton I: Andrew Motte’s English translation: Newton’s Principia: the mathematical principles of natural philosophy, New York: Daniel Adee, 1846.
    1. Oh SJ: Clinical Electromyography: Nerve Conduction Studies. Chap 13, Physiological Factors Affecting Nerve Conduction Velocity. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003,. pp 327–345.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi