Hydroxyurea Optimization through Precision Study (HOPS): study protocol for a randomized, multicenter trial in children with sickle cell anemia

Emily R Meier, Susan E Creary, Matthew M Heeney, Min Dong, Abena O Appiah-Kubi, Stephen C Nelson, Omar Niss, Connie Piccone, Maa-Ohui Quarmyne, Charles T Quinn, Kay L Saving, John P Scott, Ravi Talati, Teresa S Latham, Amanda Pfeiffer, Lisa M Shook, Alexander A Vinks, Adam Lane, Patrick T McGann, Emily R Meier, Susan E Creary, Matthew M Heeney, Min Dong, Abena O Appiah-Kubi, Stephen C Nelson, Omar Niss, Connie Piccone, Maa-Ohui Quarmyne, Charles T Quinn, Kay L Saving, John P Scott, Ravi Talati, Teresa S Latham, Amanda Pfeiffer, Lisa M Shook, Alexander A Vinks, Adam Lane, Patrick T McGann

Abstract

Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a severe and devastating hematological disorder that affects over 100,000 persons in the USA and millions worldwide. Hydroxyurea is the primary disease-modifying therapy for the SCD, with proven benefits to reduce both short-term and long-term complications. Despite the well-described inter-patient variability in pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and optimal dose, hydroxyurea is traditionally initiated at a weight-based dose with a subsequent conservative dose escalation strategy to avoid myelosuppression. Because the dose escalation process is time consuming and requires frequent laboratory checks, many providers default to a fixed dose, resulting in inadequate hydroxyurea exposure and suboptimal benefits for many patients. Results from a single-center trial of individualized, PK-guided dosing of hydroxyurea for children with SCD suggest that individualized dosing achieves the optimal dose more rapidly and provides superior clinical and laboratory benefits than traditional dosing strategies. However, it is not clear whether these results were due to individualized dosing, the young age that hydroxyurea treatment was initiated in the study, or both. The Hydroxyurea Optimization through Precision Study (HOPS) aims to validate the feasibility and benefits of this PK-guided dosing approach in a multi-center trial.

Methods: HOPS is a randomized, multicenter trial comparing standard vs. PK-guided dosing for children with SCD as they initiate hydroxyurea therapy. Participants (ages 6 months through 21 years), recruited from 11 pediatric sickle cell centers across the USA, are randomized to receive hydroxyurea either using a starting dose of 20 mg/kg/day (Standard Arm) or a PK-guided dose (Alternative Arm). PK data will be collected using a novel sparse microsampling approach requiring only 10 μL of blood collected at 3 time-points over 3 h. A protocol-guided strategy more aggressive protocols is then used to guide dose escalations and reductions in both arms following initiation of hydroxyurea. The primary endpoint is the mean %HbF after 6 months of hydroxyurea.

Discussion: HOPS will answer important questions about the clinical feasibility, benefits, and safety of PK-guided dosing of hydroxyurea for children with SCD with potential to change the treatment paradigm from a standard weight-based approach to one that safely and effectively optimize the laboratory and clinical response.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03789591 . Registered on 28 December 2018.

Keywords: Hydroxyurea; Pediatrics; Pharmacokinetics; Sickle cell anemia.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
HOPS schedule of evaluations. All study-related procedures are outlined in this figure. The primary endpoint will be assessed at month 6 and the study will continue for a total of 12 months of hydroxyurea therapy
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
HOPS study sites. HOPS is a multi-center trial that is performed at 11 pediatric sickle cell centers across the USA. Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center serves as the study sponsor and Medical and Data Coordinating Center
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
HOPS pharmacokinetics microsampling procedures. This figure, provided within the study Manual of Operations, details the sample collection process for pharmacokinetics samples collected by finger or heel stick using novel microsampling devices
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparison of methods to measure hydroxyurea concentrations. The novel LC-MS/MS method of hydroxyurea measurement was validated in comparison to the more standard HPLC technique. a The excellent correlation (r = 0.92) with individual hydroxyurea concentrations. b The correlation is similarly strong (r = 0.90) when each patient’s samples are combined using both measure to calculate hydroxyurea area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
HOPS study dosing calculator. The HOPS study website includes a dosing calculator to allow for easy dose adjustments. Study personnel enter the Site # and Participant ID (a); current laboratory results, weight, and dosing information (b); and the calculator provides the new recommended dose (c)

References

    1. Piel FB, Hay SI, Gupta S, Weatherall DJ, Williams TN. Global burden of sickle cell anaemia in children under five, 2010-2050: modelling based on demographics, excess mortality, and interventions. PLoS Med. 2013;10(7):e1001484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001484.
    1. Piel FB, Patil AP, Howes RE, et al. Global epidemiology of sickle haemoglobin in neonates: a contemporary geostatistical model-based map and population estimates. Lancet. 2013;381(9861):142–151. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61229-X.
    1. Hassell KL. Population estimates of sickle cell disease in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(4 Suppl):S512–S521. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.022.
    1. Gill FM, Sleeper LA, Weiner SJ, et al. Clinical events in the first decade in a cohort of infants with sickle cell disease. Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease. Blood. 1995;86(2):776–783. doi: 10.1182/blood.V86.2.776.bloodjournal862776.
    1. Ohene-Frempong K, Weiner SJ, Sleeper LA, et al. Cerebrovascular accidents in sickle cell disease: rates and risk factors. Blood. 1998;91(1):288–294.
    1. Marcus SJ, Ware RE. Physiologic decline in fetal hemoglobin parameters in infants with sickle cell disease: implications for pharmacological intervention. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1999;21(5):407–411. doi: 10.1097/00043426-199909000-00013.
    1. Brousse V, Buffet P, Rees D. The spleen and sickle cell disease: the sick(led) spleen. Br J Haematol. 2014;166(2):165–176. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12950.
    1. Quinn CT. Sickle cell disease in childhood: from newborn screening through transition to adult medical care. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2013;60(6):1363–1381. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2013.09.006.
    1. Platt OS. Hydroxyurea for the treatment of sickle cell anemia. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(13):1362–1369. doi: 10.1056/NEJMct0708272.
    1. Charache S, Terrin ML, Moore RD, et al. Effect of hydroxyurea on the frequency of painful crises in sickle cell anemia. Investigators of the Multicenter Study of Hydroxyurea in Sickle Cell Anemia. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(20):1317–1322. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199505183322001.
    1. Strouse JJ, Heeney MM. Hydroxyurea for the treatment of sickle cell disease: efficacy, barriers, toxicity, and management in children. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012;59(2):365–371. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24178.
    1. Lanzkron S, Strouse JJ, Wilson R, et al. Systematic review: Hydroxyurea for the treatment of adults with sickle cell disease. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(12):939–955. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-12-200806170-00221.
    1. Steinberg MH, McCarthy WF, Castro O, et al. The risks and benefits of long-term use of hydroxyurea in sickle cell anemia: a 17.5 year follow-up. Am J Hematol. 2010;85(6):403–408.
    1. Le PQ, Gulbis B, Dedeken L, et al. Survival among children and adults with sickle cell disease in Belgium: benefit from hydroxyurea treatment. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015;62(11):1956–1961. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25608.
    1. Voskaridou E, Christoulas D, Bilalis A, et al. The effect of prolonged administration of hydroxyurea on morbidity and mortality in adult patients with sickle cell syndromes: results of a 17-year, single-center trial (LaSHS) Blood. 2010;115(12):2354–2363. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-05-221333.
    1. Lobo CL, Pinto JF, Nascimento EM, Moura PG, Cardoso GP, Hankins JS. The effect of hydroxcarbamide therapy on survival of children with sickle cell disease. Br J Haematol. 2013;161(6):852–860. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12323.
    1. McGann PT, Ware RE. Hydroxyurea for sickle cell anemia: what have we learned and what questions still remain? Curr Opin Hematol. 2011;18(3):158–165. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e32834521dd.
    1. Yawn BP, Buchanan GR, Afenyi-Annan AN, et al. Management of sickle cell disease: summary of the 2014 evidence-based report by expert panel members. JAMA. 2014;312(10):1033–1048. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.10517.
    1. Schuchard SB, Lissick JR, Nickel A, et al. Hydroxyurea use in young infants with sickle cell disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019;66(7):e27650. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27650.
    1. Brousseau DC, Richardson T, Hall M, et al. Hydroxyurea use for sickle cell disease among Medicaid-enrolled children. Pediatrics. 2019;144(1):e20183285. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-3285.
    1. Su ZT, Segal JB, Lanzkron S, Ogunsile FJ. National trends in hydroxyurea and opioid prescribing for sickle cell disease by office-based physicians in the United States, 1997-2017. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019;28(9):1246–1250. doi: 10.1002/pds.4860.
    1. Ware RE. Optimizing hydroxyurea therapy for sickle cell anemia. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2015;2015:436–443. doi: 10.1182/asheducation.V2015.1.436.3917688.
    1. Ware RE, Despotovic JM, Mortier NA, et al. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics of hydroxyurea treatment for children with sickle cell anemia. Blood. 2011;118(18):4985–4991. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-07-364190.
    1. Paule I, Sassi H, Habibi A, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of hydroxyurea in sickle cell anemia patients, a basis for optimizing the dosing regimen. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011;6:30. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-6-30.
    1. Alvarez O, Miller ST, Wang WC, et al. Effect of hydroxyurea treatment on renal function parameters: results from the multi-center placebo-controlled BABY HUG clinical trial for infants with sickle cell anemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012;59(4):668–674. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24100.
    1. Ware RE, Rees RC, Sarnaik SA, et al. Renal function in infants with sickle cell anemia: baseline data from the BABY HUG trial. J Pediatr. 2010;156(1):66–70.e61. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.06.060.
    1. Steinberg MH, Chui DH, Dover GJ, Sebastiani P, Alsultan A. Fetal hemoglobin in sickle cell anemia: a glass half full? Blood. 2014;123(4):481–485. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-09-528067.
    1. Buchanan GR. “Packaging” of fetal hemoglobin in sickle cell anemia. Blood. 2014;123(4):464–465. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-11-539981.
    1. McGann PT, Niss O, Dong M, et al. Robust clinical and laboratory response to hydroxyurea using pharmacokinetically guided dosing for young children with sickle cell anemia. Am J Hematol. 2019;94(8):871–879. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25510.
    1. Shook LM, Farrell CB, Kalinyak KA, et al. Translating sickle cell guidelines into practice for primary care providers with Project ECHO. Med Educ Online. 2016;21:33616. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.33616.
    1. Dong M, McGann PT, Mizuno T, Ware RE, Vinks AA. Development of a pharmacokinetic-guided dose individualization strategy for hydroxyurea treatment in children with sickle cell anaemia. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;81(4):742–752. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12851.
    1. Marahatta A, Ware RE. Hydroxyurea: analytical techniques and quantitative analysis. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2017;67:135–142. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2017.08.009.
    1. Heeney MM, Whorton MR, Howard TA, Johnson CA, Ware RE. Chemical and functional analysis of hydroxyurea oral solutions. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2004;26(3):179–184. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200403000-00007.
    1. Fabricius E, Rajewsky F. Determination of hydroxyurea in mammalian tissues and blood. Rev Eur Etud Clin Biol. 1971;16(7):679–683.
    1. Marahatta A, Megaraj V, McGann PT, Ware RE, Setchell KD. Stable-isotope dilution HPLC-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry method for quantifying hydroxyurea in dried blood samples. Clin Chem. 2016;62(12):1593–1601. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.263715.
    1. Proost JH, Meijer DK. MW/Pharm, an integrated software package for drug dosage regimen calculation and therapeutic drug monitoring. Comput Biol Med. 1992;22(3):155–163. doi: 10.1016/0010-4825(92)90011-B.
    1. Ware RE, Helms RW, Investigators SW. Stroke with transfusions changing to hydroxyurea (SWiTCH) Blood. 2012;119(17):3925–3932. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-11-392340.
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208.
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.
    1. Wang WC, Ware RE, Miller ST, et al. Hydroxycarbamide in very young children with sickle-cell anaemia: a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial (BABY HUG) Lancet. 2011;377(9778):1663–1672. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60355-3.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi