Feasibility and Outcomes of an Internet-Based Mindfulness Training Program: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Pia Kvillemo, Yvonne Brandberg, Richard Bränström, Pia Kvillemo, Yvonne Brandberg, Richard Bränström

Abstract

Background: Interventions based on meditation and mindfulness techniques have been shown to reduce stress and increase psychological well-being in a wide variety of populations. Self-administrated Internet-based mindfulness training programs have the potential to be a convenient, cost-effective, easily disseminated, and accessible alternative to group-based programs.

Objective: This randomized controlled pilot trial with 90 university students in Stockholm, Sweden, explored the feasibility, usability, acceptability, and outcomes of an 8-week Internet-based mindfulness training program.

Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to either an intervention (n=46) or an active control condition (n=44). Intervention participants were invited to an Internet-based 8-week mindfulness program, and control participants were invited to an Internet-based 4-week expressive writing program. The programs were automated apart from weekly reminders via email. Main outcomes in pre- and postassessments were psychological well-being and depression symptoms. To assess the participant's experiences, those completing the full programs were asked to fill out an assessment questionnaire and 8 of the participants were interviewed using a semistructured interview guide. Descriptive and inferential statistics, as well as content analysis, were performed.

Results: In the mindfulness program, 28 out of 46 students (60%) completed the first week and 18 out of 46 (39%) completed the full program. In the expressive writing program, 35 out of 44 students (80%) completed the first week and 31 out of 44 (70%) completed the full program. There was no statistically significantly stronger intervention effect for the mindfulness intervention compared to the active control intervention. Those completing the mindfulness group reported high satisfaction with the program. Most of those interviewed were satisfied with the layout and technique and with the support provided by the study coordinators. More frequent contact with study coordinators was suggested as a way to improve program adherence and completion. Most participants considered the program to be meaningful and helpful but also challenging. The flexibility in performing the exercises at a suitable time and place was appreciated. A major difficulty was, however, finding enough time to practice.

Conclusions: The program was usable, acceptable, and showed potential for increasing psychological well-being for those completing it. However, additional modification of the program might be needed to increase retention and compliance.

Clinicaltrial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02062762; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT0206276 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6j9I5SGJ4).

Keywords: Internet; Internet-based intervention; acceptability; feasibility; mindfulness; randomized controlled trial; usability.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart showing enrollment and number of participants at each phase of the study.

References

    1. Kabat-Zinn J. Wherever you go, there you are: mindfulness meditation in everyday life. New York: Hyperion; 1994.
    1. Kabat-Zinn J. Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future. Clin Psychol Science Practice. 2003;10(2):144–156. doi: 10.1093/clipsy.bpg016.
    1. Kabat-Zinn J. Full Catastrophe Living : Using the Wisdom of Your Body and Mind to Face Stress, Pain, Illness. New York: Delacorte Press; 1990.
    1. Eberth J, Sedlmeier P. The effects of mindfulness meditation: A meta-analysis. Mindfulness. 2012 May 2;3(3):174–189. doi: 10.1007/s12671-012-0101-x.
    1. Gerber B, Eiser A. The patient physician relationship in the Internet age: future prospects and the research agenda. J Med Internet Res. 2001;3(2) doi: 10.2196/jmir.3.2.e15.
    1. Klein B, Cook S. Preferences for e-mental health services amongst an online Australian sample. E-Journal Appl Psychol. 2010;6(1):28–39.
    1. Powell JD, Gray J. The doctor, the patient and the world-wide web: how the internet is changing healthcare. J Royal Soc Med. 2003;96(2):74–76.
    1. Wald H, Dube C, Anthony D. Untangling the Web: the impact of Internet use on health care and the physician-patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;68(3):218–224. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.016.
    1. Internet World Stats. 2016. [2016-06-08]. Usage and Population Statistics .
    1. Andersson G, Cuijpers P. Pros and cons of online cognitive-behavioural therapy. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;193(4):270–271. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.054080.
    1. Andersson G, Cuijpers P, Carlbring P, Riper H, Hedman E. Guided Internet-based vs face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry. 2014;13(3):288–295. doi: 10.1002/wps.20151.
    1. Espie C, Kyle S, Williams C, Ong J, Douglas N, Hames P, Brown J. A randomised, placebo-controlled trial of online cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic insomnia disorder delivered via an automated media-rich web application. Sleep. 2012;35:769–781. doi: 10.5665/sleep.1872.
    1. Shahab L, McEwen A. Online support for smoking cessation: a systematic review of the literature. Addiction. 2009;104(11):1792–1804. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02710.x.
    1. Bergstrom J, Andersson G, Ljotsson B, Ruck C, Andreewitch S, Karlsson A, Carlbring P, Andersson E, Lindefors N. Internet-versus group-administered cognitive behaviour therapy for panic disorder in a psychiatric setting: a randomised trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2010;10(54) doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-10-54.
    1. Carlbring P, Hagglund M, Luthstrom A, Dahlin M, Kadowaki A, Vernmark K, Andersson G. Internet-based behavioral activation and acceptance-based treatment for depression: a randomized controlled trial. J Affect Disorders. 2013;148(2-3):331–337. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.12.020.
    1. Christensen H, Griffiths K, Jorm A. Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2004;328(7434):265. doi: 10.1136/.
    1. Tarraga L, Boada M, Modinos G, Espinosa A, Diego S, Morera A, Guitart M, Balcells J, Lopez O, Becker J. A randomised pilot study to assess the efficacy of an interactive, multimedia tool of cognitive stimulation in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. 2006;77(10):1116–1121. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.086074.
    1. Zernicke K, Campbell T, Speca M, McCabe-Ruff K, Flowers S, Carlson L. A randomized wait-list controlled trial of feasibility and efficacy of an online mindfulness-based cancer recovery program: the eTherapy for cancer applying mindfulness trial. Psychosom Med. 2014;76(4):257–267. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000053.
    1. Boettcher J, Astrom V, Pahlsson D, Schenstrom O, Andersson G, Carlbring P. Internet-based mindfulness treatment for anxiety disorders: a randomized controlled trial. Behav Ther. 2014;45(2):241–253. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.11.003.
    1. Krusche A, Cyhlarova E, Williams J. Mindfulness online: an evaluation of the feasibility of a web-based mindfulness course for stress, anxiety and depression. BMJ Open. 2013;3(11) doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003498.
    1. Krusche A, Cyhlarova E, King S, Williams J. Mindfulness online: a preliminary evaluation of the feasibility of a web-based mindfulness course and the impact on stress. BMJ open. 2012;2(3) doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000803.
    1. Morledge T, Allexandre D, Fox E, Fu A, Higashi M, Kruzikas D, Pham S, Reese P. Feasibility of an online mindfulness program for stress management--a randomized, controlled trial. Annals of behavioral medicine. 2013;46(2):137–148. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9490-x.
    1. Cavanagh K, Strauss C, Cicconi F, Griffiths N, Wyper A, Jones F. A randomised controlled trial of a brief online mindfulness-based intervention. Behav Res Ther. 2013;51(9):573–578. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2013.06.003.
    1. Gluck T, Maercker A. A randomized controlled pilot study of a brief web-based mindfulness training. BMC Psychiatry. 2011;11:175. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-175.
    1. Boggs J, Beck A, Felder J, Dimidjian S, Metcalf C, Segal Z. Web-based intervention in mindfulness meditation for reducing residual depressive symptoms and relapse prophylaxis: a qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(3) doi: 10.2196/jmir.3129.
    1. Santorelli S. Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR): Standards of Practice. Massachusetts: Center for Mindfulness in Medicine, Health Care, and Society, University of Massachusetts Medical School; 2014. Feb,
    1. Brouwer W, Oenema A, Crutzen R, de Nooijer J, de Vries N, Brug J. An exploration of factors related to dissemination of and exposure to internet-delivered behavior change interventions aimed at adults: a Delphi study approach. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(2) doi: 10.2196/jmir.956.
    1. Brouwer W, Oenema A, Crutzen R, de Nooijer J, de Vries N, Brug J. What makes people decide to visit and use an internet-delivered behavior-change intervention?: A qualitative study among adults. Health Education. 2009;109 doi: 10.1108/09654280911001149.
    1. Christensen H, Griffiths K, Farrer L. Adherence in internet interventions for anxiety and depressionystematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11 doi: 10.2196/jmir.1194.
    1. Mathieu E, Barratt A, Carter S, Jamtvedt G. Internet trials: participant experiences and perspective. BMC Medical Res Methodol. 2012;12:162. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-162.
    1. Ayala G, Elder J. Qualitative methods to ensure acceptability of behavioral and social interventions to the target population. J Public Health Dent. 2011;71:S69–S79.
    1. Quesenbery W. The five dimensions of usability. In: Albers M, Mazur B, editors. Content and Complexity. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc; 2003.
    1. Pennebaker J, Beall S. Confronting a traumatic event: toward an understanding of inhibition and disease. J Abnormal Psych. 1986;95(3):274–281.
    1. Ryff CD, Singer B. Psychological well-being: meaning, measurement, and implications for psychotherapy research. Psychother Psychosom. 1996;65(1):14–23.
    1. Sheehan TJ, Fifield J, Reisine S, Tennen H. The measurement structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. J Pers Assess. 1995 Jun;64(3):507–521. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6403_9.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale: L Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
    1. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24:105–112. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.
    1. Hsieh H, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
    1. MacQueen KM, McLellan E, Kay K, Milstein B. Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysis. Cultural Anthropol Methods J. 1998;10(2):31–36. doi: 10.1177/1525822X980100020301.
    1. Kvale S. Interviews: An introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 1996.
    1. Schafer JL, Graham JW. Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods. 2002;7(2):147–177.
    1. Molnar FJ, Hutton B, Fergusson D. Does analysis using “last observation carried forward” introduce bias in dementia research? Can Med Assoc J. 2008;179(8):751–753. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080820.
    1. Molnar FJ, Man-Son-Hing M, Hutton B, Fergusson DA. Have last-observation-carried-forward analyses caused us to favour more toxic dementia therapies over less toxic alternatives? A systematic review. Open Med. 2009;3(2):e31–e50.
    1. Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(1):e11. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11.
    1. Bränström R, Kvillemo P, Moskowitz JT. A randomized study of the effects of mindfulness training on psychological well-being and symptoms of stress in patients treated for cancer at 6-month follow-up. Int J Behav Med. 2012;19(4):535–542. doi: 10.1007/s12529-011-9192-3.
    1. Hudlicka E. Virtual training and coaching of health behavior: Example from mindfulness meditation training. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;92:160–166. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.05.007.
    1. Johansson R, Andersson G. Internet-based psychological treatments for depression. Expert Rev Neurother. 2012 Jul;12(7):861–869. doi: 10.1586/ern.12.63.
    1. Praissman S. Mindfulness-based stress reduction: A literature review and clinician's guide. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008;20:212–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00306.x.
    1. Rozental A, Andersson G, Boettcher J, Ebert D, Cuijpers P, Knaevelsrud C, Ljótsson B, Kaldo V, Titov N, Carlbring P. Consensus statement on defining and measuring negative effects of Internet interventions. Internet Interventions. 2014;1:12–19. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2014.02.001.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi