fNIRS Optodes' Location Decider (fOLD): a toolbox for probe arrangement guided by brain regions-of-interest

Guilherme Augusto Zimeo Morais, Joana Bisol Balardin, João Ricardo Sato, Guilherme Augusto Zimeo Morais, Joana Bisol Balardin, João Ricardo Sato

Abstract

The employment of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) as a method of brain imaging has increased over the last few years due to its portability, low-cost and robustness to subject movement. Experiments with fNIRS are designed in the face of a limited number of sources and detectors (optodes) to be positioned on selected portion(s) of the scalp. The optodes locations represent an expectation of assessing cortical regions relevant to the experiment's hypothesis. However, this translation process remains a challenge for fNIRS experimental design. In the present study, we propose an approach that automatically decides the location of fNIRS optodes from a set of predefined positions with the aim of maximizing the anatomical specificity to brain regions-of-interest. The implemented method is based on photon transport simulations on two head atlases. The results are compiled into the publicly available "fNIRS Optodes' Location Decider" (fOLD). This toolbox is a first-order approach to bring the achieved advancements of parcellation methods and meta-analyses from functional magnetic resonance imaging to more precisely guide the selection of optode positions for fNIRS experiments.

Conflict of interest statement

G.A.Z.M. was a full-time employee at NIRx Medizintechnik GmbH during the manuscript preparation and toolbox development. J.B.B. and J.R.S. declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Challenge commonly faced when designing an fNIRS experiment to assess a set of regions of interest expected to be activated according to a study hypothesis: the translation to an fNIRS optode layout by choosing appropriate sources and detectors positions to maximize anatomical specificity to regions of interest. Illustrated are Brodmann areas 4, 9 and 19 and 21 and the fNIRS cap layout with corresponding color-coded channels.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Axial view of the tissue segmentation of (A) Colin27 template and (B) SPM12 tissue probability maps (TPM.nii). This resulted on five layers: scalp (blue), skull (cyan), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF, yellow), gray matter (red) and white matter (black).
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) MNI space localization (in mm) of fiducial points on mesh of Colin27. (B) Left view of sources (red) and detectors (green) positions on the 10–10 international system that have been initially considered for photon transport simulation (Methods section).
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Illustration of a single-channel photon transport simulation after sensitivity normalization. (B) Normalized sensitivity results for all channels considered based on sources and detectors positions depicted in Fig. 3B. In both cases, the color scale has been set from 10−6 (black) to 3*10−3 (white) and the head atlas was Colin27.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Illustration of brain parcellation atlases’ results incorporated in the toolbox: (A) Automated Anatomical Labeling (AAL2),, (B) Atlas of Intrinsic Connectivity of Homotopic Areas (AICHA), (C) Brodmann, (D) Jülich (SPM Anatomy Toolbox)–, (E) LONI Probabilistic Brain Atlas (LPBA40). (A,C,D) were overlaid on Colin27. And (B,E) overlaid on head atlas generated from tissue probability maps of SPM12.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(A) Expansion of the method described for 10–10 international system to (B) the 10–5 system to allow for multi-modal measurements with EEG, either 32 or 64 electrodes. EEG and fNIRS positions are based on a layout accommodating 130 positions in total. EEG 1–32 electrodes positions are depicted in green, while the complimentary 33–64 are in yellow; fNIRS sources positions are in red and the detectors are in blue.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Graphical user interface of the fNIRS Optodes’ Location Decider (fOLD). Depicted is the blank 10–10 layout as displayed upon toolbox initialization.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Illustration of further tabs available under “Summary”. ‘Landmarks’ (top), ‘Channels’ (center) and ‘Sources and Detectors’ (bottom), each of them presenting tables with summarized information about the fNIRS optode layout designed.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Representative NIfTI file for posterior temporal-parietal junction (pTPJ) as obtained from Archive of Neuroimaging Meta-Analyses (ANIMA) and published by Bzdok et al.. was loaded in the fOLD toolbox in the ‘Image Mask’ Mode, (A) resulting on channel formed by positions CP6 and P6. (B) Overlay of pTPJ (in violet) on Colin27 segmented atlas with an additional overlay of sensitivity for channel CP6-P6.

References

    1. Scholkmann F, et al. A review on continuous wave functional near-infrared spectroscopy and imaging instrumentation and methodology. NeuroImage. 2014;85(Pt 1):6–27. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.004.
    1. Balardin JB, Morais GAZ, Furucho RA, Trambaiolli LR, Sato JR. Impact of communicative head movements on the quality of functional near-infrared spectroscopy signals: negligible effects for affirmative and negative gestures and consistent artifacts related to raising eyebrows. J. Biomed. Opt. 2017;22:046010. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.22.4.046010.
    1. Piper SK, et al. A wearable multi-channel fNIRS system for brain imaging in freely moving subjects. NeuroImage. 2014;85:64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.062.
    1. Balardin, J. B. et al. Imaging Brain Function with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Unconstrained Environments. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11, (2017).
    1. Pinti, P. et al. Using Fiberless, Wearable fNIRS to Monitor Brain Activity in Real-world Cognitive Tasks. J. Vis. Exp. 10.3791/53336, (2015).
    1. Noah, J. A. et al. fMRI Validation of fNIRS Measurements During a Naturalistic Task. J. Vis. Exp. 10.3791/52116 (2015).
    1. de Lima-Pardini AC, et al. Measuring cortical motor hemodynamics during assisted stepping – An fNIRS feasibility study of using a walker. Gait Posture. 2017;56:112–118. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.05.018.
    1. McKendrick, R. et al. Into the Wild: Neuroergonomic Differentiation of Hand-Held and Augmented Reality Wearable Displays during Outdoor Navigation with Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10, (2016).
    1. Machado A, Marcotte O, Lina JM, Kobayashi E, Grova C. Optimal optode montage on electroencephalography/functional near-infrared spectroscopy caps dedicated to study epileptic discharges. J. Biomed. Opt. 2014;19:026010. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.2.026010.
    1. Wijeakumar S, Spencer JP, Bohache K, Boas DA, Magnotta VA. Validating a new methodology for optical probe design and image registration in fNIRS studies. NeuroImage. 2015;106:86–100. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.022.
    1. Wijeakumar S, Huppert TJ, Magnotta VA, Buss AT, Spencer JP. Validating an image-based fNIRS approach with fMRI and a working memory task. NeuroImage. 2017;147:204–218. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.007.
    1. Jurcak V, Tsuzuki D, Dan I. 10/20, 10/10, and 10/5 systems revisited: Their validity as relative head-surface-based positioning systems. NeuroImage. 2007;34:1600–1611. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.024.
    1. Bevilacqua F, et al. In vivo local determination of tissue optical properties: applications to human brain. Appl. Opt. 1999;38:4939. doi: 10.1364/AO.38.004939.
    1. Torricelli A, Pifferi A, Taroni P, Giambattistelli E, Cubeddu R. In vivo optical characterization of human tissues from 610 to 1010 nm by time-resolved reflectance spectroscopy. Phys. Med. Biol. 2001;46:2227–2237. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/46/8/313.
    1. SPM12 - Statistical Parametric Mapping. Available at:, , (Accessed: 4th July 2017).
    1. Holmes CJ, et al. Enhancement of MR Images Using Registration for Signal Averaging. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1998;22:324–333. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199803000-00032.
    1. MRIcron Index Page. Available at:, , (Accessed: 4th July 2017)
    1. Brain Development - IXI Dataset. Available at:, , (Accessed: 4th July 2017).
    1. spm12: analysis of brain imaging data sequences. Available at:, , (2017).
    1. SPM/How-to - Wikibooks, open books for an open world. Available at:, , (Accessed: 4th July 2017).
    1. iso2mesh. Available at:, , (Accessed: 4th July 2017).
    1. Qianqian F & Boas, D. A. Tetrahedral mesh generation from volumetric binary and grayscale images. in 1142–1145 (IEEE, 2009), 10.1109/ISBI.2009.5193259.
    1. Mesh2EEG|Multimodal Neuroimaging Laboratory. Available at:, , (Accessed: 4th July 2017).
    1. Giacometti P, Perdue KL, Diamond SG. Algorithm to find high density EEG scalp coordinates and analysis of their correspondence to structural and functional regions of the brain. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2014;229:84–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.04.020.
    1. Monte Carlo eXtreme - the photon player. Available at:, , (Accessed: 4th July 2017).
    1. Fang Q, Boas DA. Monte Carlo Simulation of Photon Migration in 3D Turbid Media Accelerated by Graphics Processing Units. Opt. Express. 2009;17:20178. doi: 10.1364/OE.17.020178.
    1. Strangman GE, Li Z, Zhang Q. Depth Sensitivity and Source-Detector Separations for Near Infrared Spectroscopy Based on the Colin27 Brain Template. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e66319. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066319.
    1. Monte Carlo eXtreme: GPU-based Monte Carlo Simulations: Doc/FAQ. Available at:, , (Accessed: 5th July 2017)
    1. Boas DA, Culver JP, Stott JJ, Dunn AK. Three dimensional Monte Carlo code for photon migration through complex heterogeneous media including the adult human head. Opt. Express. 2002;10:159. doi: 10.1364/OE.10.000159.
    1. Aasted CM, et al. Anatomical guidance for functional near-infrared spectroscopy: AtlasViewer tutorial. Neurophotonics. 2015;2:020801. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.2.2.020801.
    1. Brigadoi S, Cooper RJ. How short is short? Optimum source-detector distance for short-separation channels in functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Neurophotonics. 2015;2:025005. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.2.2.025005.
    1. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. NeuroImage. 2002;15:273–289. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0978.
    1. Rolls ET, Joliot M, Tzourio-Mazoyer N. Implementation of a new parcellation of the orbitofrontal cortex in the automated anatomical labeling atlas. NeuroImage. 2015;122:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.075.
    1. Joliot M, et al. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2015. AICHA: An atlas of intrinsic connectivity of homotopic areas; pp. 46–59.
    1. Rorden C, Brett M. Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav. Neurol. 2000;12:191–200. doi: 10.1155/2000/421719.
    1. Eickhoff SB, et al. A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. NeuroImage. 2005;25:1325–1335. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.034.
    1. Eickhoff SB, Heim S, Zilles K, Amunts K. Testing anatomically specified hypotheses in functional imaging using cytoarchitectonic maps. NeuroImage. 2006;32:570–582. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.204.
    1. Eickhoff SB, et al. Assignment of functional activations to probabilistic cytoarchitectonic areas revisited. NeuroImage. 2007;36:511–521. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.060.
    1. Shattuck DW, et al. Construction of a 3D probabilistic atlas of human cortical structures. NeuroImage. 2008;39:1064–1080. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.031.
    1. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Unified segmentation. NeuroImage. 2005;26:839–851. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018.
    1. Collignon, A. et al. Automated multi-modality image registration based on information theory. Bizais (1995).
    1. MATLAB App Designer - MATLAB. Available at:, , (Accessed: 6th July 2017).
    1. Bluestone AY, Abdoulaev G, Schmitz CH, Barbour RL, Hielscher AH. Three-dimensional optical tomography of hemodynamics in the human head. Opt. Express. 2001;9:272. doi: 10.1364/OE.9.000272.
    1. Habermehl C, et al. Somatosensory activation of two fingers can be discriminated with ultrahigh-density diffuse optical tomography. NeuroImage. 2012;59:3201–3211. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.062.
    1. Brigadoi S, Aljabar P, Kuklisova-Murgasova M, Arridge SR, Cooper RJ. A 4D neonatal head model for diffuse optical imaging of pre-term to term infants. NeuroImage. 2014;100:385–394. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.028.
    1. Fang Q. Mesh-based Monte Carlo method using fast ray-tracing in Plücker coordinates. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2010;1:165. doi: 10.1364/BOE.1.000165.
    1. Tsuzuki D, Dan I. Spatial registration for functional near-infrared spectroscopy: From channel position on the scalp to cortical location in individual and group analyses. NeuroImage. 2014;85:92–103. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.025.
    1. Perdue KL, Diamond SG. T1 magnetic resonance imaging head segmentation for diffuse optical tomography and electroencephalography. J. Biomed. Opt. 2014;19:026011. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.2.026011.
    1. Tachtsidis I, Scholkmann F. False positives and false negatives in functional near-infrared spectroscopy: issues, challenges, and the way forward. Neurophotonics. 2016;3:030401. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.3.3.030401.
    1. Archive of Neuroimaging Meta-Analyses (ANIMA). Available at:, , (Accessed: 1st June 2017).
    1. Neurosynth|Term-based meta-analyses. Available at:, , (Accessed: 10th July 2017).
    1. |Home. Available at:, , (Accessed: 10th July 2017).
    1. Bzdok D, et al. Characterization of the temporo-parietal junction by combining data-driven parcellation, complementary connectivity analyses, and functional decoding. NeuroImage. 2013;81:381–392. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.046.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi