The Effects of Social Presence on Adherence-Focused Guidance in Problematic Cannabis Users: Protocol for the CANreduce 2.0 Randomized Controlled Trial

Manuel Amann, Severin Haug, Andreas Wenger, Christian Baumgartner, David D Ebert, Thomas Berger, Lars Stark, Marc Walter, Michael P Schaub, Manuel Amann, Severin Haug, Andreas Wenger, Christian Baumgartner, David D Ebert, Thomas Berger, Lars Stark, Marc Walter, Michael P Schaub

Abstract

Background: In European countries, including Switzerland, cannabis is the most commonly used illicit drug. Offering a Web-based self-help tool could potentially reach users who otherwise would not seek traditional help. However, such Web-based self-help tools often suffer from low adherence.

Objective: Through adherence-focused guidance enhancements, the aim of this study was to increase adherence in cannabis users entering a Web-based self-help tool to reduce their cannabis use and, in this way, augment its effectiveness.

Methods: This paper presents the protocol for a three-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the effectiveness of (1) an adherence-focused, guidance-enhanced, Web-based self-help intervention with social presence; (2) an adherence-focused, guidance-enhanced, Web-based self-help intervention without social presence; and (3) a treatment-as-usual at reducing cannabis use in problematic users. The two active interventions, each spanning 6 weeks, consist of modules designed to reduce cannabis use and attenuate common mental disorder (CMD) symptoms, including depression, anxiety, and stress-related disorder symptoms based on the approaches of motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral therapy. With a target sample size of 528, data will be collected at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months after baseline. The primary outcome measurement will be the number of days of cannabis use on the preceding 7 days. Secondary outcomes will include the quantity of cannabis used in standardized cannabis joints, the severity of cannabis dependence, changes in CMD symptoms, and adherence to the program. Data analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle and employ (generalized) linear mixed models.

Results: The project commenced in August 2016; recruitment is anticipated to end by December 2018. First results are expected to be submitted for publication in summer 2019.

Conclusions: This study will provide detailed insights on if and how the effectiveness of a Web-based self-help intervention aiming to reduce cannabis use in frequent cannabis users can be improved by theory-driven, adherence-focused guidance enhancement.

Trial registration: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Registry: ISRCTN11086185; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN11086185 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6wspbuQ1M).

Keywords: adherence; cannabis; cognitive behavioral therapy; mental disorders; mobile health; social presence.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Manuel Amann, Severin Haug, Andreas Wenger, Christian Baumgartner, David D Ebert, Thomas Berger, Lars Stark, Marc Walter, Michael P Schaub. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 31.01.2018.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial flowchart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dashboard for study arm 1 (translated from German to English for publication purposes only).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Main menu (translated from German to English for publication purposes only).

References

    1. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Lisbon: 2016. [2018-01-22]. European Drug Report 2016: Trends and Developments .
    1. Marmet S, Notari L, Gmel C. Lausanne: 2015. [2018-01-22]. Special issue on problem cannabis use in 2014 .
    1. Wagner FA, Anthony JC. From first drug use to drug dependence: developmental periods of risk for dependence upon marijuana, cocaine, and alcohol. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2002;26:479–88. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(01)00367-0.
    1. Degenhardt L, Hall W, Lynskey M. The relationship between cannabis use and other substance use in the general population. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2001;64:319–27.
    1. Anthony JC. The epidemiology of cannabis dependence. In: Roffman RA, Stephens RS, editors. Cannabis Dependence: Its Nature, Consequences, Treatment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2006. pp. 58–105.
    1. Fischer R, Clair C, Studer J, Cornuz J, Gmel G. Prevalence and factors associated with use of smokeless tobacco in young Swiss men. Eur J Public Health. 2013 Jun 28;24(3):459–64. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt086.
    1. Degenhardt L, Ferrari AJ, Calabria B, Hall WD, Norman RE, McGrath J, Flaxman AD, Engell RE, Freedman GD, Whiteford HA, Vos T. The global epidemiology and contribution of cannabis use and dependence to the global burden of disease: results from the GBD 2010 study. PLoS ONE. 2013 Oct 24;8(10):e76635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076635.
    1. Fischer B, Jeffries V, Hall W, Room R, Goldner E, Rehm J. Lower Risk cannabis use Guidelines for Canada (LRCUG): a narrative review of evidencerecommendations. Can J Public Health. 2011;102:324–27. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303818.
    1. Lev-Ran S, Le Foll B, McKenzie K, George TP, Rehm J. Cannabis use and cannabis use disorders among individuals with mental illness. Compr Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;54(6):589–98. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.12.021.
    1. Schaub MP, Wenger A, Berg O, Beck T, Stark L, Buehler E, Haug S. A web-based self-help intervention with and without chat counseling to reduce cannabis use in problematic cannabis users: three-arm randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Oct;17(10):e232. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4860.
    1. Suchtschweiz. Lausanne: 2016. [2018-01-22]. Annual Report 2014. Addiction counseling and addiction treatment in Switzerland. Results of the monitoring system .
    1. Annaheim B, Scotto TJ, Gmel G. Revising the Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test (CUDIT) by means of Item Response Theory. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2010 Sep;19(3):142–55. doi: 10.1002/mpr.308.
    1. Schaub MP, Haug S, Wenger A, Berg O, Sullivan R, Beck T, Stark L. Can reduce--the effects of chat-counseling and web-based self-help, web-based self-help alone and a waiting list control program on cannabis use in problematic cannabis users: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Nov 14;13:305. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-305.
    1. Ellingstad TP, Sobell LC, Sobell MB, Eickleberry L, Golden CJ. Self-change: a pathway to cannabis abuse resolution. Addict Behav. 2006 Mar;31(3):519–30. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.05.033.
    1. Fernández-Artamendi S, Fernández-Hermida JR, García-Fernández G, Secades-Villa R, García-Rodríguez O. Motivation for change and barriers to treatment among young cannabis users. Eur Addict Res. 2013;19(1):29–41. doi: 10.1159/000339582.
    1. Becker J, Hungerbuehler I, Berg O, Szamrovicz M, Haubensack A, Kormann A, Schaub MP. Development of an integrative cessation program for co-smokers of cigarettes and cannabis: demand analysis, program description, and acceptability. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2013 Sep 12;8:33. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-8-33.
    1. Curry SJ. eHealth research and healthcare delivery beyond intervention effectiveness. Am J Prev Med. 2007 May;32(5):S127–S130. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.026.
    1. Riper H, Spek V, Boon B, Conijn B, Kramer J, Martin-Abello K, Smit F. Effectiveness of E-self-help interventions for curbing adult problem drinking: a meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jun;13(2):e42. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1691.
    1. Rooke S, Thorsteinsson E, Karpin A, Copeland J, Allsop D. Computer-delivered interventions for alcohol and tobacco use: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 2010 Aug;105(8):1381–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02975.x.
    1. Civljak M, Sheikh A, Stead LF, Car J. Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Sep 08;(9):CD007078. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007078.pub3.
    1. Haug S, Schaub M. Wirksamkeit internetbasierter Programme zum Tabakrauchen [in German] Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie. 2011 Oct;19(4):181–96. doi: 10.1026/0943-8149/a000052.
    1. Rooke S, Copeland J, Norberg M, Hine D, McCambridge J. Effectiveness of a self-guided web-based cannabis treatment program: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013 Feb 15;15(2):e26. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2256.
    1. Zarski A, Lehr D, Berking M, Riper H, Cuijpers P, Ebert DD. Adherence to internet-based mobile-supported stress management: a pooled analysis of individual participant data from three randomized controlled trials. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 29;18(6):e146. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4493.
    1. Ebert DD, Lehr D, Heber E, Riper H, Cuijpers P, Berking M. Internet- and mobile-based stress management for employees with adherence-focused guidance: efficacy and mechanism of change. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 Jun 01;42(5):382–94. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3573.
    1. Mohr DC, Cuijpers P, Lehman K. Supportive accountability: a model for providing human support to enhance adherence to eHealth interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(1):e30. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1602.
    1. Baumeister H, Reichler L, Munzinger M, Lin J. The impact of guidance on Internet-based mental health interventions — A systematic review. Internet Interv. 2014 Oct;1(4):205–15. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2014.08.003.
    1. Hides L, Samet S, Lubman DI. Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for the treatment of co-occurring depression and substance use: current evidence and directions for future research. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010 Sep;29(5):508–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00207.x.
    1. Platt JJ, Husband SD. An overview of problem-solving and social skills approaches in substance abuse treatment. Psychotherapy. 1993;30(2):276–83. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.30.2.276.
    1. CANreduce. [2018-01-23].
    1. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press; 1991.
    1. Marlatt GA, Donovan D. Relapse prevention: Maintenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviors. New York: Guilford Press; 2005.
    1. Kanter JW, Puspitasari AJ, Santos MM, Nagy GA. Behavioural activation: history, evidence and promise. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;200(5):361–63. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.103390.
    1. Steinberg KL, Roffman R, Carroll K, McRee B, Babor T, Miller M, Davidson C. Brief Counseling for Marijuana Dependence: A Manual for Treating Adults. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. US Department of Health and Human Services; 2005. .
    1. Jaffee WB, D'Zurilla TJ. Personality, problem solving, and adolescent substance use. Behav Ther. 2009;40(1):93–101. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2008.03.001.
    1. Hjorthøj CR, Hjorthøj AR, Nordentoft M. Validity of Timeline Follow-Back for self-reported use of cannabis and other illicit substances--systematic review and meta-analysis. Addict Behav. 2012 Mar;37(3):225–33. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.11.025.
    1. Robinson SM, Sobell LC, Sobell MB, Leo GI. Reliability of the Timeline Followback for cocaine, cannabis, and cigarette use. Psychol Addict Behav. 2014;28(1):154–162. doi: 10.1037/a0030992.
    1. Kiluk BD, Serafini K, Frankforter T, Nich C, Carroll KM. Only connect: the working alliance in computer-based cognitive behavioral therapy. Behav Res Ther. 2014 Dec;63:139–46. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.10.003.
    1. Gossop M, Darke S, Griffiths P, Hando J, Powis B, Hall W, Strang J. The Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS): psychometric properties of the SDS in English and Australian samples of heroin, cocaine and amphetamine users. Addiction. 1995 May;90(5):607–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1995.tb02199.x.
    1. Kokkevi A, Hartgers C. EuropASI: European Adaptation of a Multidimensional Assessment Instrument for Drug and Alcohol Dependence. Eur Addict Res. 1995;1:208–10. doi: 10.1159/000259089.
    1. Cole JC, Rabin AS, Smith TL, Kaufman AS. Development and validation of a Rasch-derived CES-D short form. Psychol Assess. 2004 Dec;16(4):360–72. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.16.4.360.
    1. Löwe B, Decker O, Müller S, Brähler E, Schellberg D, Herzog W, Herzberg PY. Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Med Care. 2008 Mar;46(3):266–74. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318160d093.
    1. Daigre C, Ramos-Quiroga J, Valero S. Adult ADHD self-report scale (ASRS-V1.1) symptom checklist in patients with substance use disorders. Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2009;37:299–305.
    1. Breslau N, Peterson EL, Kessler RC, Schultz LR. Short screening scale for DSM-IV posttraumatic stress disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Jun;156(6):908–11. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.6.908.
    1. Boß L, Lehr D, Reis D, Vis C, Riper H, Berking M, Ebert DD. Reliability and validity of assessing user satisfaction with web-based health interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Aug 31;18(8):e234. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5952.
    1. Rozental A, Boettcher J, Andersson G, Schmidt B, Carlbring P. Negative effects of internet interventions: a qualitative content analysis of patients' experiences with treatments delivered online. Cogn Behav Ther. 2015 Feb;44(3):223–36. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2015.1008033.
    1. Graham JW, Olchowski AE, Gilreath TD. How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prev Sci. 2007 Sep;8(3):206–13. doi: 10.1007/s11121-007-0070-9.
    1. Eysenbach G, CONSORT-EHEALTH Group CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec;13(4):e126. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1923.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi