Outcome of contemporary surgery for chronic subdural haematoma: evidence based review

R Weigel, P Schmiedek, J K Krauss, R Weigel, P Schmiedek, J K Krauss

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the results of surgical treatment options for chronic subdural haematoma in contemporary neurosurgery according to evidence based criteria.

Methods: A review based on a Medline search from 1981 to October 2001 using the phrases "subdural haematoma" and "subdural haematoma AND chronic". Articles selected for evaluation had at least 10 patients and less than 10% of patients were lost to follow up. The articles were classified by three classes of evidence according to criteria of the American Academy of Neurology. Strength of recommendation for different treatment options was derived from the resulting degrees of certainty.

Results: 48 publications were reviewed. There was no article that provided class I evidence. Six articles met criteria for class II evidence and the remainder provided class III evidence. Evaluation of the results showed that twist drill and burr hole craniostomy are safer than craniotomy; burr hole craniostomy and craniotomy are the most effective procedures; and burr hole craniostomy has the best cure to complication ratio (type C recommendation). Irrigation lowers the risk of recurrence in twist drill craniostomy and does not increase the risk of infection (type C recommendation). Drainage reduces the risk of recurrence in burr hole craniostomy, and a frontal position of the drain reduces the risk of recurrence (type B recommendation). Drainage reduces the risk of recurrence in twist drill craniostomy, and the use of a drain does not increase the risk of infection (type C recommendation). Burr hole craniostomy appears to be more effective in treating recurrent haematomas than twist drill craniostomy, and craniotomy should be considered the treatment of last choice for recurrences (type C recommendation).

Conclusions: The three principal techniques-twist drill craniostomy, burr hole craniostomy, and craniotomy-used in contemporary neurosurgery for chronic subdural haematoma have different profiles for morbidity, mortality, recurrence rate, and cure rate. Twist drill and burr hole craniostomy can be considered first tier treatment, while craniotomy may be used as second tier treatment. A cumulative summary of data shows that, overall, the postoperative outcome of chronic subdural haematoma has not improved substantially over the past 20 years.

References

    1. Br J Neurosurg. 1991;5(5):461-5
    1. Br J Neurosurg. 1991;5(5):467-73
    1. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1991;113(1-2):38-41
    1. Surg Neurol. 1992 Oct;38(4):253-6
    1. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1993;120(1-2):40-3
    1. Neurosurgery. 1993 Jul;33(1):67-72
    1. J Trauma. 1994 Feb;36(2):190-4
    1. Electrophoresis. 1993 Dec;14(12):1318-21
    1. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1994 Mar;34(3):131-5
    1. No Shinkei Geka. 1994 Sep;22(9):857-62
    1. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1994;127(1-2):37-40
    1. J Neurosurg. 1994 Dec;81(6):910-3
    1. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1994;129(1-2):15-9
    1. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995 Oct;59(4):388-94
    1. Surg Neurol. 1995 Jun;43(6):569-72; discussion 572-3
    1. Surg Neurol. 1995 Jun;43(6):574-7; discussion 577-8
    1. Br J Neurosurg. 1995;9(5):619-27
    1. Surg Neurol. 1996 Mar;45(3):272-7
    1. Neurosurg Rev. 1995;18(4):247-51
    1. Neurology. 1999 Dec 10;53(9):1910-21
    1. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Jul;69(1):40-7
    1. J Neurosurg. 2000 Nov;93(5):791-5
    1. J Neurosurg. 2000 Nov;93(5):796-9
    1. Neurosurgery. 2000 Dec;47(6):1359-71; discussion 1371-2
    1. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001;143(6):613-618; discussion 618-9
    1. Br J Neurosurg. 1996 Feb;10(1):35-9
    1. Unfallchirurgie. 1996 Jun;22(3):110-6
    1. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1995;137(1-2):6-14
    1. J Korean Med Sci. 1995 Oct;10(5):373-8
    1. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1996;138(6):708-13
    1. Electrophoresis. 1997 Jan;18(1):118-21
    1. Br J Neurosurg. 1997 Apr;11(2):150-1
    1. Surg Neurol. 1997 Sep;48(3):220-5
    1. Surg Neurol. 1997 Oct;48(4):427
    1. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1997;139(9):818-25, discussion 825-6
    1. J Neurosurg. 1997 Dec;87(6):870-5
    1. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1997 Dec;27(6):292-5
    1. Surg Neurol. 1998 Sep;50(3):231-4
    1. J Trauma. 1999 Mar;46(3):532-3
    1. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1999;141(2):171-6
    1. Neurol Res. 1999 Apr;21(3):277-80
    1. Br J Neurosurg. 1999 Feb;13(1):60-4
    1. Br Med J. 1955 Jan 1;1(4904):21-2
    1. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001 Aug;143(8):811-8; discussion 819
    1. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001 Oct;143(10):1041-4
    1. Arch Neurol. 1974 Aug;31(2):73-9
    1. Can J Neurol Sci. 1974 Nov;1(4):222-5
    1. Lancet. 1975 Mar 1;1(7905):480-4
    1. J Neurosurg. 1976 Jul;45(1):26-31
    1. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1975;15 pt 1:51-5
    1. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1977 Nov;17 Pt 2(6):499-505
    1. J Neurosurg. 1978 Feb;48(2):197-200
    1. J Neurosurg. 1981 May;54(5):637-45
    1. J Neurosurg. 1981 Sep;55(3):390-6
    1. Injury. 1981 Jul;13(1):23-6
    1. Neurosurgery. 1981 Nov;9(5):531-4
    1. J Neurosurg. 1983 Feb;58(2):242-5
    1. Neurochirurgia (Stuttg). 1982 Sep;25(5):147-52
    1. Can J Neurol Sci. 1983 Feb;10(1):22-6
    1. Neurosurgery. 1983 Aug;13(2):153-9
    1. Neurosurgery. 1984 May;14(5):545-8
    1. J Neurosurg. 1984 Aug;61(2):263-8
    1. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1984;71(3-4):179-88
    1. Age Ageing. 1984 Nov;13(6):367-9
    1. Neurosurgery. 1985 Feb;16(2):185-8
    1. J Neurosurg. 1986 Aug;65(2):183-7
    1. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1987 Jun;27(6):498-504
    1. Zentralbl Neurochir. 1987;48(4):308-11
    1. J Neurosurg. 1988 Jun;68(6):908-11
    1. Neurosurgery. 1988 Nov;23(5):616-21
    1. J Neurosurg. 1989 Jan;70(1):68-72
    1. Eur Neurol. 1989;29(1):18-22
    1. No Shinkei Geka. 1989 Jan;17(1):15-20
    1. Zentralbl Neurochir. 1988;49(4):280-9
    1. Neurosurgery. 1989 Jul;25(1):25-9
    1. Neurosurgery. 1990 May;26(5):771-3
    1. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1991 Jan;31(1):32-6

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi