Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of single-dose denosumab in healthy Chinese volunteers: A randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study

Qian Chen, Chaoying Hu, Yanmei Liu, Rong Song, Wenjing Zhu, Hongxin Zhao, Antonio Nino, Fan Zhang, Yun Liu, Qian Chen, Chaoying Hu, Yanmei Liu, Rong Song, Wenjing Zhu, Hongxin Zhao, Antonio Nino, Fan Zhang, Yun Liu

Abstract

Background: Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand, a cytokine essential for the formation, function and survival of osteoclasts. This study assessed the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of single-dose denosumab (60 and 120 mg) in healthy Chinese volunteers.

Methods: This randomized (3:3:2), single-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled healthy Chinese volunteers to receive single subcutaneous injection of denosumab 60 mg, 120 mg, or placebo. Study consisted of screening period (up to 21 days), treatment and assessment period (19 weeks), and an end-of-study visit (at week 26). Denosumab pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics parameters were estimated using non-compartmental analysis. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study.

Results: A total of 63 volunteers received the study treatment and 62 (98.4%) completed the study. Denosumab serum concentrations peaked at around Day 10 with dose-proportional increase from 60 mg to 120 mg. The mean terminal half-life of denosumab 60 mg and 120 mg was 15 days and 26 days, respectively. The serum C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen concentration-time profiles were similar (>80% decrease within 5 days) between denosumab 60 mg and 120 mg groups. The most commonly reported adverse event (AE) was decreased blood calcium levels (denosumab 60 mg, n = 13; denosumab 120 mg, n = 13; placebo, n = 1); however only one volunteer had calcium level below the abnormality value of potential clinical importance and none of the volunteers developed symptoms of hypocalcemia. The majority of AEs were of mild to moderate intensity. There were no deaths, serious AEs, or withdrawal from study due to AEs. No clinically significant findings in vital signs or electrocardiogram were observed.

Conclusions: Both denosumab 60 mg and 120 mg were well tolerated with no new safety concerns identified in healthy Chinese volunteers with similar pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics profiles to that of Caucasians.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT02135640.

Conflict of interest statement

We have the following interests. Funding for this study was provided by GlaxoSmithKline (China) R&D Company Limited, Shanghai, China. Wenjing Zhu, Antonio Nino and Fan Zhang are employees of GSK and Antonio Nino owns GSK stock options. Hongxin Zhao was an employee of GSK during the conduct of study and during the manuscript development. Currently, he is affiliated with Shanghai Roche Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Qian Chen, Chaoying Hu, Yanmei Liu, Rong Song and Yun Liu were investigators for the study and have nothing to disclose. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter our adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, as detailed online in the guide for authors.

Figures

Fig 1. Study design and volunteers disposition.
Fig 1. Study design and volunteers disposition.
aOne volunteer withdrew consent before administration of study treatment. bVolunteers from placebo group were not included for PK assessment. cOne volunteer who received denosumab 60 mg withdrew from study (investigator discretion; study day 147). PK, pharmacokinetic; PD, pharmacodynamic; Wk, week.
Fig 2. Mean serum concentration-time plot of…
Fig 2. Mean serum concentration-time plot of denosumab following single subcutaneous administration at doses of 60 mg and 120 mg.
Error bar represents standard deviation.
Fig 3. Change from baseline in median…
Fig 3. Change from baseline in median serum CTX1.
Error bar represents range. CTX1, C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen.

References

    1. Boyle WJ, Simonet WS, Lacey DL. Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature. 2003;423:337–342. doi:
    1. Delmas PD. Clinical potential of RANKL inhibition for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases. J Clin Densitom. 2008;11:325–338. doi:
    1. Prolia (denosumab) injection [summary of product characterestics]. Available: . Accessed 27 May 2016.
    1. Scott LJ. Denosumab: a review of its use in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Drugs Aging. 2014;31:555–576. doi:
    1. Bekker PJ, Holloway DL, Rasmussen AS, Murphy R, Martin SW, Leese PT, et al. A single-dose placebo-controlled study of AMG 162, a fully human monoclonal antibody to RANKL, in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19:1059–1066. doi:
    1. Bone HG, Bolognese MA, Yuen CK, Kendler DL, Wang H, Liu Y, et al. Effects of denosumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:2149–2157. doi:
    1. Bone HG, Bolognese MA, Yuen CK, Kendler DL, Miller PD, Yang YC, et al. Effects of denosumab treatment and discontinuation on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:972–980. doi:
    1. Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, Siris ES, Eastell R, Reid IR, et al. Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:756–765. doi:
    1. Kumagai Y, Hasunuma T, Padhi D. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of denosumab administered subcutaneously to postmenopausal Japanese women. Bone. 2011;49:1101–1107. doi:
    1. Lewiecki EM, Miller PD, McClung MR, Cohen SB, Bolognese MA, Liu Y, et al. Two-year treatment with denosumab (AMG 162) in a randomized phase 2 study of postmenopausal women with low BMD. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:1832–1841. doi:
    1. McClung MR, Boonen S, Törring O, Roux C, Rizzoli R, Bone HG, et al. Effect of denosumab treatment on the risk of fractures in subgroups of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27:211–218. doi:
    1. Miller PD, Wagman RB, Peacock M, Lewiecki EM, Bolognese MA, Weinstein RL, et al. Effect of denosumab on bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover: six-year results of a phase 2 clinical trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:394–402. doi:
    1. Nakamura T, Matsumoto T, Sugimoto T, Shiraki M. Dose-response study of denosumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23:1131–1140. doi:
    1. Pitale S, Thomas M, Rathi G, Deshmukh V, Kumar P, Reddy S, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy of denosumab in Indian postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2015;19:148–154. doi:
    1. Smith MR, Egerdie B, Hernández Toriz N, Feldman R, Tammela TL, Saad F, et al. Denosumab in men receiving androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:745–755. doi:
    1. Smith MR, Saad F, Egerdie B, Szwedowski M, Tammela TL, Ke C, et al. Effects of denosumab on bone mineral density in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2009;182:2670–2675. doi:
    1. Xgeva (denosumab) injection [summary of opinion]. CHMP 2014. Available: . Accessed 27 May 2016.
    1. Peddi P, Lopez-Olivo MA, Pratt GF, Suarez-Almazor ME. Denosumab in patients with cancer and skeletal metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2013;39:97–104. doi:
    1. Sun L, Yu S. Efficacy and safety of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in patients with bone metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Oncol. 2013;36:399–403. doi:
    1. Wang Z, Qiao D, Lu Y, Curtis D, Wen X, Yao Y, et al. Systematic literature review and network meta-analysis comparing bone-targeted agents for the prevention of skeletal-related events in cancer patients with bone metastasis. Oncologist. 2015;20:440–449. doi:
    1. Prolia (denosumab) injection [prescribing information]. Thousand Oaks; CA: Amgen Inc.; 2015. Available: . Accessed on 25 January 2016.
    1. Amgen Canada Inc. Prolia® (denosumab) solution for injection. Product monograph. February 4, 2016. Available: . Accessed 1 March 2016.
    1. Xgeva (denosumab) injection [prescribing information]. Thousand Oaks; CA Amgen Inc.; 2015. Available: . Accessed on 25 January 2016.
    1. Kendler DL, Roux C, Benhamou CL, Brown JP, Lillestol M, Siddhanti S, et al. Effects of denosumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover in postmenopausal women transitioning from alendronate therapy. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:72–81. doi:
    1. Nakamura T, Matsumoto T, Sugimoto T, Hosoi T, Miki T, Gorai I, et al. Clinical Trials Express: fracture risk reduction with denosumab in Japanese postmenopausal women and men with osteoporosis: denosumab fracture intervention randomized placebo controlled trial (DIRECT). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:2599–2607. doi:
    1. Recknor C, Czerwinski E, Bone HG, Bonnick SL, Binkley N, Palacios S, et al. Denosumab compared with ibandronate in postmenopausal women previously treated with bisphosphonate therapy: a randomized open-label trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:1291–1299. doi:
    1. Seeman E, Delmas PD, Hanley DA, Sellmeyer D, Cheung AM, Shane E, et al. Microarchitectural deterioration of cortical and trabecular bone: differing effects of denosumab and alendronate. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:1886–1894. doi:

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi