Accuracy of Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Image-Guided Breast Biopsy to Predict Residual Cancer

Marios Konstantinos Tasoulis, Han-Byoel Lee, Wei Yang, Romney Pope, Savitri Krishnamurthy, Soo-Yeon Kim, Nariya Cho, Victoria Teoh, Gaiane M Rauch, Benjamin D Smith, Vicente Valero, Kabir Mohammed, Wonshik Han, Fiona MacNeill, Henry M Kuerer, Marios Konstantinos Tasoulis, Han-Byoel Lee, Wei Yang, Romney Pope, Savitri Krishnamurthy, Soo-Yeon Kim, Nariya Cho, Victoria Teoh, Gaiane M Rauch, Benjamin D Smith, Vicente Valero, Kabir Mohammed, Wonshik Han, Fiona MacNeill, Henry M Kuerer

Abstract

Importance: Image-guided breast biopsy of a residual imaging abnormality or tumor bed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is increasingly used to assess residual cancer, facilitate risk-adaptive surgery, and potentially identify exceptional responders in whom local therapy may be de-escalated.

Objective: To further assess the accuracy of post-NACT image-guided biopsy to predict residual cancer in the breast.

Design, setting, and participants: This diagnostic study analyzed multicenter patient-level data of patients with breast cancer who were treated with NACT and underwent image-guided biopsy before surgery at Royal Marsden Hospital in London, UK; Seoul National University Hospital in Seoul, South Korea; and MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas. Data were analyzed from June to July 2019.

Main outcomes and measures: Diagnostic accuracy of post-NACT image-guided biopsy. Final surgical pathology was used as reference standard.

Results: Data from 166 women were analyzed. The median (range) age was 49 (25-76) years. The median (range) tumor size on pretreatment and posttreatment imaging was 33.5 (12-100) mm and 10 (0-100) mm, respectively. The overall pathologic complete response rate was 51.2% (n = 85) (16.1% [5 of 31] for hormone receptor-positive/ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative; 44.7% [21 of 47] for hormone receptor-positive/ERBB2-positive; 69% [20 of 29] for hormone receptor-negative/ERBB2-positive; and 66.1% [39 of 59] for triple negative). The majority (143 [86.1%]) underwent image-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB), and 23 had core-cut biopsy. The median (range) needle gauge was 10 (7-14), and the median (range) number of samples was 6 (2-18). When image-guided biopsy (VAB and core-cut biopsy) was representative (159 [95.8%]), the false-negative rate across the whole cohort was 18.7% (95% CI, 10.6%-29.3%). Subgroup analysis of patients with a complete/partial clinical response and residual imaging abnormality of 2 cm or smaller with at least 6 VABs taken (76 [45.8%]) demonstrated a false-negative rate of 3.2% (95% CI, 0.1%-16.7%), a negative predictive value of 97.4% (95% CI, 86.5%-99.9%), and an overall accuracy of 89.5% (95% CI, 80.3%-95.3%).

Conclusions and relevance: This large multicenter pooled data analysis suggests that a standardized protocol using image-guided VAB of a tumor bed measuring 2 cm or smaller with 6 or more representative samples allows reliable prediction of residual disease. These results could inform the design of de-escalation trials in NACT exceptional responders testing the safety of eliminating surgery.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Lee is a member on the board of directors and has hand stock and ownership interests in DCGen outside the submitted work. Dr Yang reports textbook royalties from Elsevier. Dr Smith reports grants from Varian Medical Systems and equity interest from Oncora Medical outside the submitted work. Dr Kuerer reports personal fees for serving as associate editor of the NEJM Group and personal fees for serving on the advisory board of Genomic Health outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.. Flow Diagram of Patients in the…
Figure.. Flow Diagram of Patients in the Pooled Analysis
NACT indicates neoadjuvant chemotherapy; VAB, vacuum-assisted biopsy.

References

    1. Killelea BK, Yang VQ, Mougalian S, et al. . Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer increases the rate of breast conservation: results from the National Cancer Database. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(6):1063-1069. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.011
    1. Masuda N, Lee SJ, Ohtani S, et al. . Adjuvant capecitabine for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(22):2147-2159. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1612645
    1. von Minckwitz G, Huang CS, Mano MS, et al. ; KATHERINE Investigators . Trastuzumab emtansine for residual invasive HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(7):617-628. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1814017
    1. Sikov WM, Berry DA, Perou CM, et al. . Impact of the addition of carboplatin and/or bevacizumab to neoadjuvant once-per-week paclitaxel followed by dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide on pathologic complete response rates in stage II to III triple-negative breast cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(1):13-21. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.57.0572
    1. Schneeweiss A, Chia S, Hickish T, et al. . Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in combination with standard neoadjuvant anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free chemotherapy regimens in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a randomized phase II cardiac safety study (TRYPHAENA). Ann Oncol. 2013;24(9):2278-2284. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt182
    1. van Ramshorst MS, van der Voort A, van Werkhoven ED, et al. ; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG) . Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without anthracyclines in the presence of dual HER2 blockade for HER2-positive breast cancer (TRAIN-2): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(12):1630-1640. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30570-9
    1. Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA, et al. ; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology . Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310(14):1455-1461. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.278932
    1. Barron AU, Hoskin TL, Day CN, Hwang ES, Kuerer HM, Boughey JC. Association of low nodal positivity rate among patients with ERBB2-positive or triple-negative breast cancer and breast pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(12):1120-1126. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2696
    1. Caudle AS, Yang WT, Krishnamurthy S, et al. . Improved axillary evaluation following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer using selective evaluation of clipped nodes: implementation of targeted axillary dissection. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(10):1072-1078. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.64.0094
    1. Mak KS, Harris JR. Radiotherapy issues after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2015;2015(51):87-89. doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgv003
    1. van la Parra RFD, Kuerer HM. Selective elimination of breast cancer surgery in exceptional responders: historical perspective and current trials. Breast Cancer Res. 2016;18(1):28. doi:10.1186/s13058-016-0684-6
    1. Heil J, Schaefgen B, Sinn P, et al. . Can a pathological complete response of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy be diagnosed by minimal invasive biopsy? Eur J Cancer. 2016;69:142-150. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2016.09.034
    1. Heil J, Kümmel S, Schaefgen B, et al. . Diagnosis of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer by minimal invasive biopsy techniques. Br J Cancer. 2015;113(11):1565-1570. doi:10.1038/bjc.2015.381
    1. Kuerer HM, Rauch GM, Krishnamurthy S, et al. . A clinical feasibility trial for identification of exceptional responders in whom breast cancer surgery can be eliminated following neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Ann Surg. 2018;267(5):946-951. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002313
    1. Tasoulis MK, Roche N, Rusby JE, et al. . Post neoadjuvant chemotherapy vacuum assisted biopsy in breast cancer: can it determine pathologic complete response before surgery? J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(15_suppl):567-567.
    1. Lee HB, Han W, Kim SY, et al. . Prediction of pathologic complete response using image-guided biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients selected based on MRI findings: a prospective feasibility trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020;182(1):97-105. doi:10.1007/s10549-020-05678-3
    1. Teoh V, MAcNeill F, Roche N, et al. . Image-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy to assess pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients with exceptional response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Global Oncol. 2019;5(suppl 1):abstr 39.
    1. O’Flynn EA, Wilson AR, Michell MJ. Image-guided breast biopsy: state-of-the-art. Clin Radiol. 2010;65(4):259-270. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2010.01.008
    1. Heil J, Pfob A, Sinn H-PP, et al. . Abstract GS5-03: diagnosing residual disease and pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients by image-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results of a prospective multicenter trial. Cancer Res. 2020;80(4 suppl):GS5-03-GS05-03.
    1. Peeters M-JTFDV, van Loevezijn A, van der Noordaa ME, et al. . Abstract GS5-06: towards omitting breast surgery in patients with a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant systemic treatment: interim analysis of the MICRA trial (Minimally Invasive Complete Response Assessment). Cancer Res. 2020;80(4 suppl):GS5-06-GS05-06.
    1. Karakatsanis A, Tasoulis MK, Wärnberg F, Nilsson G, MacNeill F. Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant therapy and its impact in facilitating breast conservation in operable breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2018;105(5):469-481. doi:10.1002/bjs.10807
    1. Schmid P, Cortés J, Dent R, et al. . LBA8_PRKEYNOTE-522: phase III study of pembrolizumab (pembro) + chemotherapy (chemo) vs placebo (pbo) + chemo as neoadjuvant treatment, followed by pembro vs pbo as adjuvant treatment for early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Ann Oncol. 2019;30(suppl 5).
    1. Tadros AB, Yang WT, Krishnamurthy S, et al. . Identification of patients with documented pathologic complete response in the breast after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for omission of axillary surgery. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(7):665-670. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0562

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi