Adverse muscle composition predicts all-cause mortality in the UK Biobank imaging study

Jennifer Linge, Mikael Petersson, Mikael F Forsgren, Arun J Sanyal, Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard, Jennifer Linge, Mikael Petersson, Mikael F Forsgren, Arun J Sanyal, Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard

Abstract

Background: Adverse muscle composition (MC) as measured by magnetic resonance imaging has previously been linked to poor function, comorbidity, and increased hospitalization. The aim of this study was to investigate if adverse MC predicts all-cause mortality using data from UK Biobank.

Methods: There were 40 178 participants scanned using a 6 min magnetic resonance imaging protocol. Images were analysed for thigh fat-tissue free muscle volume and muscle fat infiltration (MFI) using AMRA® Researcher (AMRA Medical, Linköping, Sweden). For each participant, a sex, weight, and height invariant muscle volume z-score was calculated. Participants were partitioned into four MC groups: (i) normal MC, (ii) only low muscle volume [<25th percentile for muscle volume z-score (population wide)], (iii) only high MFI [>75th percentile (population wide, sex-specific)], and (iv) adverse MC (low muscle volume z-score and high MFI). Association of MC groups with mortality was investigated using Cox proportional-hazard modelling with normal MC as referent (unadjusted and adjusted for low hand grip strength, sex, age, body mass index, previous diagnosis of disease (cancer, type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease), lifestyle, and socioeconomic factors (smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and Townsend deprivation index).

Results: Muscle composition measurements were complete for 39 804 participants [52% female, mean (SD) age 64.2 (7.6) years and body mass index 26.4 (4.4) kg/m2 ]. Three hundred twenty-eight deaths were recorded during a follow-up period of 2.9 (1.4) years after imaging. At imaging, adverse MC was detected in 10.5% of participants. The risk of death from any cause in adverse MC compared with normal MC was 3.71 (95% confidence interval 2.81-4.91, P < 0.001). Only low muscle volume and only high MFI were independently associated with all-cause mortality [1.58 (1.13-2.21), P = 0.007, and 2.02 (1.51-2.71), P < 0.001, respectively]. Adjustment of low hand grip strength [1.77 (1.28-2.44), P < 0.001] did not attenuate the associations with any of the MC groups. In the fully adjusted model, adverse MC and only high MFI remained significant (P < 0.001 and P = 0.020) while the association with only low muscle volume was attenuated to non-significance (P = 0.560). The predictive performance of adverse MC [1.96 (1.42-2.71), P < 0.001] was comparable with that of previous cancer diagnosis [1.93 (1.47-2.53), P < 0.001] and smoking [1.71 (1.02-2.84), P = 0.040]. Low hand grip strength was borderline non-significant [1.34 (0.96-1.88), P = 0.090].

Conclusions: Adverse MC was a strong and independent predictor of all-cause mortality. Sarcopenia guidelines can be strengthened by including cut-offs for myosteatosis enabling detection of adverse MC.

Keywords: Frailty; Magnetic resonance imaging; Muscle fat infiltration; Myosteatosis; Sarcopenia.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form online (www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf; available on request from the corresponding author). J. L., M. F. F., M. P., and O. D. L. reports other from Pfizer Inc., during the conduct of the study; other from AMRA Medical, outside the submitted work. In addition, J. L. and O. D. L. have a patent METHOD OF EVALUATING A MUSCLE RELATED CONDITION pending to PCT/EP2020/053068. A. J. S. reports grants from Intercept, during the conduct of the study; other from Sanyal Bio, Genfit, Indalo, Tiziana, Durect, Exhalenz, Galmed, second genome, Cymabay, Prosciento, Labcorp, Medimmune, Astra Zeneca, Albireo; grants from Merck, Bristol Myers, Boehringer Ingelhiem, Immuron, Malinkrodt, Cumberland, Sequana; grants and personal fees from Novartis, Gilead, Conatus, Echosens; personal fees from Pfizer, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Tern, Hemoshear, Glympse, Birdrock, Blade, Teva, Artham, Salix, NASH pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work.

© 2021 AMRA Medical AB. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Breakdown of primary and secondary causes of death across ICD‐10 blocks and chapters.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier survival curves for all‐cause mortality across muscle composition (MC) groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cox proportional‐hazard ratios of all‐cause mortality for muscle composition (MC) phenotypes (green, light green, yellow, and pink) adjusted for low hand grip strength, sex, age, body mass index BMI, previous diagnosis of disease, lifestyle‐ and socioeconomic factors.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cox proportional‐hazard ratios (unadjusted) of all cause‐mortality for the combined assessment of functional performance (high or low hand grip strength, slow or average/brisk).

References

    1. Bone AE, Hepgul N, Kon S, Maddocks M. Sarcopenia and frailty in chronic respiratory disease. Chron Respir Dis 2017;14:85–99.
    1. Bahat G, Ilhan B. Sarcopenia and the cardiometabolic syndrome: a narrative review. Eur Geriatr Med 2016;7:220–223.
    1. Cruz‐Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 2019;48:16–31.
    1. Cawthon PM, Manini T, Patel SM, Newman A, Travison T, Kiel DP, et al. Putative cut‐points in sarcopenia components and incident adverse health outcomes: an SDOC analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc 2020;68:1429–1437.
    1. Volpi E, Nazemi R, Fujita S. Muscle tissue changes with aging. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2004;7:405–410.
    1. Mesinovic J, Zengin A, De Courten B, Ebeling PR, Scott D. Sarcopenia and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a bidirectional relationship. Diab Metab Syndr Obes 2019;12:1057–1072.
    1. Chakravarthy MV, Siddiqui MS, Forsgren MF, Sanyal AJ. Harnessing muscle–liver crosstalk to treat nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020;11592373, 10.3389/fendo.2020.592373
    1. Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:489–495.
    1. Dasarthy S. Etiology and management of muscle wasting in chronic liver disease. Curr Opin Gastroentrol 2016;32:159–165.
    1. Mak RH, Ikizer AT, Kovesdy CP, Raj DS, Stenvinkel P, Kalantar‐Zadeh K. Wasting in chronic kidney disease. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2011;2:9–25.
    1. Montano‐Loza AJ, Angulo P, Meza‐Junco J, Prado CMM, Sawyer MB, Beaumont C, et al. Sarcopenic obesity and myosteatosis are associated with higher mortality in patients with cirrhosis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2016;7:126–135.
    1. Nachit M, Leclercq IA. Emerging awareness on the importance of skeletal muscle in liver diseases: time to dig deeper into mechanisms! Clin Sci (Lond) 2019;133:465–481.
    1. Linge J, Heymsfield SB, Dahlqvist LO. On the definition of sarcopenia in the presence of aging and obesity—initial results from UK Biobank. J Gerontol A Biol Med Sci 2020;75:1309–1316.
    1. Linge J, Ekstedt M, Dahlqvist LO. Adverse muscle composition is linked to poor functional performance and metabolic comorbidities in NAFLD. JHEP Rep 2020;3:100197, 10.1016/j.jhepr.2020.100197
    1. Newman AB, Kupelian V, Visser M, Simonsick EM, Goodpaster BH, Kritchevesky SB, et al. Strength, but not muscle mass, is associated with mortality in the health, aging and body composition study cohort. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2006;61:72–77.
    1. Batsis AJ, Mackenzie TA, Emeny RT, Lopez‐Jimenez F, Bartels SJ. Low lean mass with and without obesity, and mortality: results from the 1999–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2017;72:1445–1451.
    1. Cawthon PM, Blackwell T, Cummings SR, Orwoll ES, Duchowny KA, Kado DM, et al. Muscle mass assessed by the D3‐creatine dilution method and incident self‐reported disability and mortality in a prospective observational study of community‐dwelling older men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2021;76:123–130.
    1. Cawthon PM, Orwoll ES, Peters KE, Ensrud KE, Cauley JA, Kado DM, et al. Strong relation between muscle mass determined by D3‐creatine dilution, physical performance, and incidence of falls and mobility limitations in a prospective cohort of older men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2019;74:844–852.
    1. Linge J, Ekstedt M, Dahlqvist LO. Reply to: “Rationale of adding muscle volume to muscle fat infiltration in the definition of an adverse muscle composition is unclear”. JHEP Rep 2021;3:100257, 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100257
    1. Correa‐de‐Araujo R, Addison O, Miljkovic I, Goodpaster BH, Bergman BC, Clark RV, et al. Myosteatosis in the context of skeletal muscle function deficit: an interdisciplinary workshop at the National Institute on Aging. Front Physiol 2020;11:963.
    1. Rier HN, Jager A, Sleijfer S, van Rosmalen J, Kock MCJM, Levin MD. Low muscle attenuation is a prognostic factor for survival in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with first line palliative chemotherapy. Breast 2017;31:9–15.
    1. Loosen SH, Schulze‐Hagen M, Püngel T, Bündgens L, Wirtz T, Kather JN, et al. Skeletal muscle composition predicts outcome in critically ill patients. Crit Care Explor 2020;2:e0171, 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000171
    1. Kumar A, Moynagh MR, Multinu F, Cliby WA, McGree ME, Weaver AL, et al. Muscle composition measured by CT scan is a measurable predictor of overall survival in advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2016;142:311–316.
    1. Stretch C, Aubin JM, Mickiewicz B, Leugner D, Al‐Manasra T, Tobola E, et al. Sarcopenia and myosteatosis are accompanied by distinct biological profiles in patients with pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinomas. PloS one 2018;13:e0196235, 10.1371/journal.pone.0196235
    1. Linge J, Borga M, West J, Tuthill T, Miller MR, Dumitriu A, et al. Body composition profiling in the UK Biobank imaging study. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2018;26:1785–1795.
    1. Karlsson A, Rosander J, Romu T, Tallberg J, Grönqvist A, Borga M, et al. Automatic and quantitative assessment of regional muscle volume by multi‐atlas segmentation using whole‐body water‐fat MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41:1558–1569.
    1. West J, Romu T, Thorell S, Lindblom H, Berin E, Spetz Holm AC, et al. Precision of MRI‐based body composition measurements of postmenopausal women. PLoS One 2018;13:e0192495.
    1. Borga M, Ahlgren A, Romu T, Widholm P, Dahlqvist Leinhard O, West J. Reproducibility and repeatability of MRI‐based body composition analysis. Magn Reson Med 2020;84:3146–3156.
    1. Sudlow C, Gallacher J, Allen N, Beral V, Burton P, Danesh J, et al. UK Biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med 2015;12:e1001779.
    1. Santanasto AJ, Miljkovic I, Cvejkus RC, Gordon CL, Bunker CH, Patrick AL, et al. Body composition remodeling and incident mobility limitations in African ancestry men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2019;74:400–405.
    1. Peng TC, Wu LW, Chen WL, Liaw FY, Chang YW, Kao TW. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and sarcopenia in a Western population (NHANES III): the importance of sarcopenia definition. Clin Nutr 2019;38:422–428.
    1. Gu DH, Kim MY, Seo YS, Kim SG, Lee HA, Kim TH, et al. Clinical usefulness of psoas muscle thickness for the diagnosis of sarcopenia in patients with liver cirrhosis. Clin Mol Hepatol 2018;24:319–330.
    1. Carey EJ, Lai JC, Sonnenday C, Tapper EB, Tandon P, Duarte‐Rojo A, et al. A North American expert opinion statement on sarcopenia in liver transplantation. Hepatology 2019;70:1816–1829.
    1. Prado CMM, Heymsfield SB. Lean tissue imaging: a new era for nutritional assessment and intervention. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2014;38 (8):940–953.
    1. Poltronieri TS, de Paula NS, Chaves G. Assessing skeletal muscle radiodensity by computed tomography: An integrative review of the applied methodologies. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2020;40:207–223.
    1. Fuchs G, Chretien YR, Mario J, Do S, Eikermann M, Liu B, et al. Quantifying the effect of slice thickness, intravenous contrast and tube current on muscle segmentation: implications for body composition analysis. Eur Radiol 2018;28:2455–2463.
    1. van der Werf A, Dekker IM, Meijerink MR, Wierdsma NJ, de van der Schueren MAE, Langius JAE. Skeletal muscle analyses: agreement between non‐contrast and contrast CT scan measurements of skeletal muscle area and mean muscle attenuation. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2018;38:366–372.
    1. Fry A, Littlejohns TJ, Sudlow C, Doherty N, Adamska L, Sprosen T, et al. Comparison of sociodemographic and health‐related characteristics of UK Biobank participants with the general population. Am J Epidemiol 2017;186:1026–1034.
    1. Marcus RL, Addison O, Kidde JP, Dibble LE, Lastayo PC. Skeletal muscle fat infiltration: impact of age, inactivity, and exercise. J Nutr Health Aging 2010;14 (5):362–366.
    1. von Haehling S, Morley JE, Coats AJS, Anker SD. Ethical guidelines for publishing in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle: update 2019. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2019;10:1143–1145.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi