Isolation and genomic analysis of circulating tumor cells from castration resistant metastatic prostate cancer

Mark Jesus M Magbanua, Eduardo V Sosa, Janet H Scott, Jeff Simko, Colin Collins, Dan Pinkel, Charles J Ryan, John W Park, Mark Jesus M Magbanua, Eduardo V Sosa, Janet H Scott, Jeff Simko, Colin Collins, Dan Pinkel, Charles J Ryan, John W Park

Abstract

Background: The number of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in metastatic prostate cancer patients provides prognostic and predictive information. However, it is the molecular characterization of CTCs that offers insight into the biology of these tumor cells in the context of personalized treatment.

Methods: We developed a novel approach to isolate CTCs away from hematopoietic cells with high purity, enabling genomic analysis of these cells. The isolation protocol involves immunomagnetic enrichment followed by fluorescence activated cell sorting (IE/FACS). To evaluate the feasibility of isolation of CTCs by IE/FACS and downstream genomic profiling, we conducted a pilot study in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Twenty (20) sequential CRPC patients were assayed using CellSearch™. Twelve (12) patients positive for CTCs were subjected to immunomagnetic enrichment and fluorescence activated cell sorting (IE/FACS) to isolate CTCs. Genomic DNA of CTCs was subjected to whole genome amplification (WGA) followed by gene copy number analysis via array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH).

Results: CTCs from nine (9) patients successfully profiled were observed to have multiple copy number aberrations including those previously reported in primary prostate tumors such as gains in 8q and losses in 8p. High-level copy number gains at the androgen receptor (AR) locus were observed in 7 (78%) cases. Comparison of genomic profiles between CTCs and archival primary tumors from the same patients revealed common lineage. However, high-level copy number gains in the AR locus were observed in CTCs, but not in the matched archival primary tumors.

Conclusions: We developed a new approach to isolate prostate CTCs without significant leukocyte admixture, and to subject them to genome-wide copy number analysis. Our assay may be utilized to explore genomic events involved in cancer progression, e.g. development of castration resistance and to monitor therapeutic efficacy of targeted therapies in clinical trials in a relatively non-invasive manner.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Copy number analysis of spiked cells isolated from healthy blood via IE/FACS. Twenty (20) isolated (A) LNCaP, (B) PC3 and (C) VCaP cells (in duplicate) and 50 ng of genomic DNA from cell culture subjected to whole genome amplification, and unamplified genomic DNA (600 ng) from cell culture (positive control) were analyzed for copy number aberrations. The log2 ratio value for each BAC clone is plotted on the y-axis. The x-axis represents the genomic position of each BAC clone on the array, with chromosome numbers indicated. Vertical solid lines indicate chromosome boundaries, and vertical red dashed line represents the centromeric region dividing each chromosome into the p- or short arm (to the left of centromere) and the q- or long arm (to the right of the centromere). Arrows indicate high-level gains on X chromosome region containing AR observed in VCaP cells.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Copy number analysis of CTCs. Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis of (A) 20 CTCs in duplicate (B) and 100 leukocytes (CD45-positive) isolated from the same enriched blood sample from patient #9. The log2 ratio value for each BAC clone is plotted on the y-axis. The x-axis represents the genomic position of each BAC clone on the array, with chromosome numbers indicated. Vertical solid lines indicate chromosome boundaries, and vertical red dashed line represents the centromeric region dividing each chromosome into the p- or short arm (to the left of centromere) and the q- or long arm (to the right of the centromere). Arrows indicate high-level gains on X chromosome region containing AR.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Frequency of copy number alterations in CTCs from 9 metastatic CRPC patients. Gains and losses are shown in green and red, respectively. Chromosome Y was not included in the analysis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
X chromosome and AR locus copy number analysis in CTCs from 9 metastatic CRPC patients. Each plot shows log2 hybridization ratio values (y-axis) at BAC clones (blue dots) distributed from the p terminus to the q terminus (x-axis). The black horizontal lines represent log2 ratio equal to 0. Red vertical lines demarcate the centromere. Broken black lines superimposed on BAC clones are the output of segmentation analysis providing high confidence copy number calls. Transparent blue bars identify the locus containing the androgen receptor gene (AR). At the bottom of each panel is an ideogram of chromosome X with cytoband regions showing gains (green) and losses (red). Bars on top of the ideogram (long arm) show results of copy number analysis at the AR locus (double green bar- high-level copy number gain; single green bar- low level copy number gain, grey bar- no copy number change). Paired samples are enclosed in black boxes: CTCs vs. CD45-positive (leukocytes) from patient #9 and CTCs vs. archival primary tumor (PT) from patients #17 and #20.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Copy number analysis of CTCs versus matched archival tumor in two patients. Array CGH analysis of (A) 20 CTCs from patient #17 and a corresponding archival primary tumor from local extension to the bladder obtained 1 year and 3 months prior to CTC analysis; and (B) 18 CTCs from patient #20 and a matched primary tumor obtained 5 years and 1 month prior to CTC analysis. Arrows indicate high-level gains on X chromosome region containing AR in CTCs but not observed in archival primary tumors. Chromosome regions in red boxes show genomic aberrations common to both paired samples (Also see Additional file 3: Figure S3).

References

    1. Pantel K, Brakenhoff RH. Dissecting the metastatic cascade. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4(6):448–456. doi: 10.1038/nrc1370.
    1. Cristofanilli M, Mendelsohn J. Circulating tumor cells in breast cancer: Advanced tools for "tailored" therapy? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(46):17073–17074. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608651103.
    1. Pantel K, Brakenhoff RH, Brandt B. Detection, clinical relevance and specific biological properties of disseminating tumour cells. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8(5):329–340. doi: 10.1038/nrc2375.
    1. Cristofanilli M, Hayes DF, Budd GT, Ellis MJ, Stopeck A, Reuben JM, Doyle GV, Matera J, Allard WJ, Miller MC. et al.Circulating tumor cells: a novel prognostic factor for newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(7):1420–1430. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.08.140.
    1. Cristofanilli M, Budd GT, Ellis MJ, Stopeck A, Matera J, Miller MC, Reuben JM, Doyle GV, Allard WJ, Terstappen LW. et al.Circulating tumor cells, disease progression, and survival in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(8):781–791. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040766.
    1. de Bono JS, Scher HI, Montgomery RB, Parker C, Miller MC, Tissing H, Doyle GV, Terstappen LW, Pienta KJ, Raghavan D. Circulating tumor cells predict survival benefit from treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(19):6302–6309. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0872.
    1. Waldman FM, DeVries S, Chew KL, Moore DH, Kerlikowske K, Ljung BM. Chromosomal alterations in ductal carcinomas in situ and their in situ recurrences. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(4):313–320. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.4.313.
    1. Danila DC, Heller G, Gignac GA, Gonzalez-Espinoza R, Anand A, Tanaka E, Lilja H, Schwartz L, Larson S, Fleisher M. et al.Circulating tumor cell number and prognosis in progressive castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(23):7053–7058. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1506.
    1. Paez JG, Lin M, Beroukhim R, Lee JC, Zhao X, Richter DJ, Gabriel S, Herman P, Sasaki H, Altshuler D. et al.Genome coverage and sequence fidelity of phi29 polymerase-based multiple strand displacement whole genome amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(9):e71. doi: 10.1093/nar/gnh069.
    1. Devries S, Nyante S, Korkola J, Segraves R, Nakao K, Moore D, Bae H, Wilhelm M, Hwang S, Waldman F. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast tumors. J Mol Diagn. 2005;7(1):65–71. doi: 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60010-4.
    1. Klein CA, Schmidt-Kittler O, Schardt JA, Pantel K, Speicher MR, Riethmuller G. Comparative genomic hybridization, loss of heterozygosity, and DNA sequence analysis of single cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96(8):4494–4499. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4494.
    1. Fiegler H, Geigl JB, Langer S, Rigler D, Porter K, Unger K, Carter NP, Speicher MR. High resolution array-CGH analysis of single cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(3):e15. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl1030.
    1. Geigl JB, Speicher MR. Single-cell isolation from cell suspensions and whole genome amplification from single cells to provide templates for CGH analysis. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(12):3173–3184. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.476.
    1. Nowak NJ, Miecznikowski J, Moore SR, Gaile D, Bobadilla D, Smith DD, Kernstine K, Forman SJ, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Reid M. et al.Challenges in array comparative genomic hybridization for the analysis of cancer samples. Genet Med. 2007;9(9):585–595. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181461c4a.
    1. Fuhrmann C, Schmidt-Kittler O, Stoecklein NH, Petat-Dutter K, Vay C, Bockler K, Reinhardt R, Ragg T, Klein CA. High-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization of single micrometastatic tumor cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36(7):e39. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn101.
    1. Snijders AM, Nowak N, Segraves R, Blackwood S, Brown N, Conroy J, Hamilton G, Hindle AK, Huey B, Kimura K. et al.Assembly of microarrays for genome-wide measurement of DNA copy number. Nat Genet. 2001;29(3):263–264. doi: 10.1038/ng754.
    1. Hamilton G, Brown N, Oseroff V, Huey B, Segraves R, Sudar D, Kumler J, Albertson D, Pinkel D. A large field CCD system for quantitative imaging of microarrays. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(8):e58. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl160.
    1. Jain AN, Tokuyasu TA, Snijders AM, Segraves R, Albertson DG, Pinkel D. Fully automatic quantification of microarray image data. Genome Res. 2002;12(2):325–332. doi: 10.1101/gr.210902.
    1. Olshen AB, Venkatraman ES, Lucito R, Wigler M. Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data. Biostatistics. 2004;5(4):557–572. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxh008.
    1. Liu W, Xie CC, Zhu Y, Li T, Sun J, Cheng Y, Ewing CM, Dalrymple S, Turner AR, Isaacs JT. et al.Homozygous deletions and recurrent amplifications implicate new genes involved in prostate cancer. Neoplasia. 2008;10(8):897–907.
    1. Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, Clark S, Poole I, Kowbel D, Collins C, Kuo WL, Chen C, Zhai Y. et al.High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet. 1998;20(2):207–211. doi: 10.1038/2524.
    1. Sun J, Liu W, Adams TS, Sun J, Li X, Turner AR, Chang B, Kim JW, Zheng SL, Isaacs WB. et al.DNA copy number alterations in prostate cancers: a combined analysis of published CGH studies. Prostate. 2007;67(7):692–700. doi: 10.1002/pros.20543.
    1. Bubendorf L, Kononen J, Koivisto P, Schraml P, Moch H, Gasser TC, Willi N, Mihatsch MJ, Sauter G, Kallioniemi OP. Survey of gene amplifications during prostate cancer progression by high-throughout fluorescence in situ hybridization on tissue microarrays. Cancer Res. 1999;59(4):803–806.
    1. Visakorpi T, Hyytinen E, Koivisto P, Tanner M, Keinanen R, Palmberg C, Palotie A, Tammela T, Isola J, Kallioniemi OP. In vivo amplification of the androgen receptor gene and progression of human prostate cancer. Nat Genet. 1995;9(4):401–406. doi: 10.1038/ng0495-401.
    1. Jiang Y, Palma JF, Agus DB, Wang Y, Gross ME. Detection of androgen receptor mutations in circulating tumor cells in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Chem. 2010;56(9):1492–1495. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.143297.
    1. Sieuwerts AM, Kraan J, Bolt-de Vries J, van der Spoel P, Mostert B, Martens JW, Gratama JW, Sleijfer S, Foekens JA. Molecular characterization of circulating tumor cells in large quantities of contaminating leukocytes by a multiplex real-time PCR. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;118(3):455–468. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0290-0.
    1. Smirnov DA, Zweitzig DR, Foulk BW, Miller MC, Doyle GV, Pienta KJ, Meropol NJ, Weiner LM, Cohen SJ, Moreno JG. et al.Global gene expression profiling of circulating tumor cells. Cancer Res. 2005;65(12):4993–4997. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4330.
    1. Racila E, Euhus D, Weiss AJ, Rao C, McConnell J, Terstappen LW, Uhr JW. Detection and characterization of carcinoma cells in the blood. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(8):4589–4594. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4589.
    1. Scher HI, Sawyers CL. Biology of progressive, castration-resistant prostate cancer: directed therapies targeting the androgen-receptor signaling axis. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(32):8253–8261. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.4777.
    1. Liu W, Laitinen S, Khan S, Vihinen M, Kowalski J, Yu G, Chen L, Ewing CM, Eisenberger MA, Carducci MA. et al.Copy number analysis indicates monoclonal origin of lethal metastatic prostate cancer. Nat Med. 2009;15(5):559–565. doi: 10.1038/nm.1944.
    1. Sieuwerts AM, Kraan J, Bolt J, van der Spoel P, Elstrodt F, Schutte M, Martens JW, Gratama JW, Sleijfer S, Foekens JA. Anti-epithelial cell adhesion molecule antibodies and the detection of circulating normal-like breast tumor cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(1):61–66.
    1. Attard G, Swennenhuis JF, Olmos D, Reid AH, Vickers E, A'Hern R, Levink R, Coumans F, Moreira J, Riisnaes R. et al.Characterization of ERG, AR and PTEN gene status in circulating tumor cells from patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2009;69(7):2912–2918. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3667.
    1. Leversha MA, Han J, Asgari Z, Danila DC, Lin O, Gonzalez-Espinoza R, Anand A, Lilja H, Heller G, Fleisher M. et al.Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of circulating tumor cells in metastatic prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(6):2091–2097. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2036.
    1. Stott SL, Lee RJ, Nagrath S, Yu M, Miyamoto DT, Ulkus L, Inserra EJ, Ulman M, Springer S, Nakamura Z. et al.Isolation and characterization of circulating tumor cells from patients with localized and metastatic prostate cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2(25):25ra23. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000403.
    1. Holcomb IN, Grove DI, Kinnunen M, Friedman CL, Gallaher IS, Morgan TM, Sather CL, Delrow JJ, Nelson PS, Lange PH. et al.Genomic alterations indicate tumor origin and varied metastatic potential of disseminated cells from prostate cancer patients. Cancer Res. 2008;68(14):5599–5608. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0812.
    1. Weckermann D, Polzer B, Ragg T, Blana A, Schlimok G, Arnholdt H, Bertz S, Harzmann R, Klein CA. Perioperative activation of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow of patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(10):1549–1556. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.0563.
    1. Wiedswang G, Borgen E, Schirmer C, Karesen R, Kvalheim G, Nesland JM, Naume B. Comparison of the clinical significance of occult tumor cells in blood and bone marrow in breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2006;118(8):2013–2019. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21576.
    1. Paris PL, Kobayashi Y, Zhao Q, Zeng W, Sridharan S, Fan T, Adler HL, Yera ER, Zarrabi MH, Zucker S. et al.Functional phenotyping and genotyping of circulating tumor cells from patients with castration resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Lett. 2009;277(2):164–173. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.12.007.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi