A Randomized Phase II Study of Linsitinib (OSI-906) Versus Topotecan in Patients With Relapsed Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Alberto A Chiappori, Gregory A Otterson, Afshin Dowlati, Anne M Traynor, Leora Horn, Taofeek K Owonikoko, Helen J Ross, Christine L Hann, Taher Abu Hejleh, Jorge Nieva, Xiuhua Zhao, Michael Schell, Daniel M Sullivan, Alberto A Chiappori, Gregory A Otterson, Afshin Dowlati, Anne M Traynor, Leora Horn, Taofeek K Owonikoko, Helen J Ross, Christine L Hann, Taher Abu Hejleh, Jorge Nieva, Xiuhua Zhao, Michael Schell, Daniel M Sullivan

Abstract

Lessons learned: Targeted therapy options for SCLC patients are limited; no agent, thus far, has resulted in a strategy promising enough to progress to phase III trials.Linsitinib, a potent insulin growth factor-1-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, may be one agent with activity against SCLC.Despite lack of a reliable predictive biomarker in this disease, which may have partly contributed to the negative outcome reported here, linsitinib, although safe, showed no clinical activity in unselected, relapsed SCLC patients.

Background: Treatment of relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains suboptimal. Insulin growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) signaling plays a role in growth, survival, and chemoresistance in SCLC. Linsitinib is a potent IGF-1R tyrosine kinase inhibitor that potentially may be active against SCLC.

Methods: In this phase II study, 8 eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:2 ratio to topotecan (1.5 mg/m2 intravenously or 2.3 mg/m2 orally, daily for 5 days for 4 cycles) or linsitinib (150 mg orally twice daily until progression). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Patients with relapsed SCLC, platinum sensitive or resistant, performance status (PS) 0-2, and adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function were enrolled. Patients with diabetes, cirrhosis, and those taking insulinotropic agents were excluded. Crossover to linsitinib was allowed at progression.

Results: Fifteen patients received topotecan (8 resistant, 3 with PS 2) and 29 received linsitinib (16 resistant, 5 with PS 2). Two partial responses were observed with topotecan. Only 4 of 15 patients with topotecan and 1 of 29 with linsitinib achieved stable disease. Median progression-free survival was 3.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-3.6) and 1.2 (95% CI, 1.1-1.4) months for topotecan and linsitinib, respectively (p = .0001). Median survival was 5.3 (95% CI, 2.2-7.6) and 3.4 (95% CI, 1.8-5.6) months for topotecan and linsitinib, respectively (p = .71). Grade 3/4 adverse events (>5% incidence) included anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia/leukopenia, diarrhea, fatigue, dehydration, and hypokalemia for topotecan; and thrombocytopenia, fatigue, and alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase elevations for linsitinib.

Conclusion: Linsitinib was safe but showed no clinical activity in unselected, relapsed SCLC patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01533181.

©AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary is the property of the authors.

Figures

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/5061534/bin/theoncologist_16220CTR_f1.jpg
Kaplan-Meier curves for survival from the time of randomization by treatment arm. (A): Progression-free survival. (B): Overall survival.
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Trial design. Abbreviations: ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; PD, progressive disease; Plat., platinum; PO, by mouth; PS, performance status.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan-Meier curves for survival from the time of randomization by treatment arm. (A): Progression-free survival. (B): Overall survival.

References

    1. Joshi M, Ayoola A, Belani CP. Small-cell lung cancer: An update on targeted therapies. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;779:385–404.
    1. Zinn RL, Gardner EE, Marchionni L, et al. ERK phosphorylation is predictive of resistance to IGF-1R inhibition in small cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12:1131–1139.
    1. Naito T, Tanaka F, Ono A, et al. Prognostic impact of circulating tumor cells in patients with small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7:512–519.
    1. McKinley ET, Bugaj JE, Zhao P, et al. 18FDG-PET predicts pharmacodynamic response to OSI-906, a dual IGF-1R/IR inhibitor, in preclinical mouse models of lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:3332–3340.
    1. Kim MH, Lee JS, Mok JH, et al. Metabolic burden measured by (18)f-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography is a prognostic factor in patients with small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res Treat. 2014;46:165–171.
    1. Belani CP, Dahlberg SE, Rudin CM, et al. Three-arm randomized phase II study of cisplatin and etoposide (CE) versus CE with either vismodegib (V) or cixutumumab (Cx) for patients with extensive stage-small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) (ECOG 1508) J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(suppl):7508a.
    1. Scagliotti GV, Bondarenko I, Blackhall F, et al. Randomized, phase III trial of figitumumab in combination with erlotinib versus erlotinib alone in patients with nonadenocarcinoma nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:497–504.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi