Harmonized procedure coding system for surgical procedures and analysis of surgical site infections (SSI) of five European countries

Sibylle C Mellinghoff, Caroline Bruns, Rouvier Al-Monajjed, Florian B Cornely, Maria Grosheva, Jürgen A Hampl, Carolin Jakob, Felix C Koehler, Max Lechmann, Bijan Maged, Christina Otto-Lambertz, Robert Rongisch, Jule Rutz, Jon Salmanton-Garcia, Georg Schlachtenberger, Jannik Stemler, Janne Vehreschild, Sophia Wülfing, Oliver A Cornely, Blasius J Liss, Sibylle C Mellinghoff, Caroline Bruns, Rouvier Al-Monajjed, Florian B Cornely, Maria Grosheva, Jürgen A Hampl, Carolin Jakob, Felix C Koehler, Max Lechmann, Bijan Maged, Christina Otto-Lambertz, Robert Rongisch, Jule Rutz, Jon Salmanton-Garcia, Georg Schlachtenberger, Jannik Stemler, Janne Vehreschild, Sophia Wülfing, Oliver A Cornely, Blasius J Liss

Abstract

Background: The use of routine data will be essential in future healthcare research. Therefore, harmonizing procedure codes is a first step to facilitate this approach as international research endeavour. An example for the use of routine data on a large scope is the investigation of surgical site infections (SSI). Ongoing surveillance programs evaluate the incidence of SSI on a national or regional basis in a limited number of procedures. For example, analyses by the European Centre for Disease Prevention (ECDC) nine procedures and provides a mapping table for two coding systems (ICD9, National Healthcare Safety Network [NHSN]). However, indicator procedures do not reliably depict overall SSI epidemiology. Thus, a broader analysis of all surgical procedures is desirable. The need for manual translation of country specific procedures codes, however, impedes the use of routine data for such an analysis on an international level. This project aimed to create an international surgical procedure coding systems allowing for automatic translation and categorization of procedures documented in country-specific codes.

Methods: We included the existing surgical procedure coding systems of five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom [UK]). In an iterative process, country specific codes were grouped in ever more categories until each group represented a coherent unit based on method of surgery, interventions performed, extent and site of the surgical procedure. Next two ID specialist (arbitrated by a third in case of disagreement) independently assigned country-specific codes to the resulting categories. Finally, specialist from each surgical discipline reviewed these assignments for their respective field.

Results: A total number of 153 SALT (Staphylococcus aureus Surgical Site Infection Multinational Epidemiology in Europe) codes from 10 specialties were assigned to 15,432 surgical procedures. Almost 4000 (26%) procedure codes from the SALT coding system were classified as orthopaedic and trauma surgeries, thus this medical field represents the most diverse group within the SALT coding system, followed by abdominal surgical procedures with 2390 (15%) procedure codes.

Conclusion: Mapping country-specific codes procedure codes onto to a limited number of coherent, internally and externally validated codes proofed feasible. The resultant SALT procedure code gives the opportunity to harmonize big data sets containing surgical procedures from international centres, and may simplify comparability of future international trial findings.

Trial registration: The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov under NCT03353532 on November 27th, 2017.

Keywords: International procedure code; Surgical procedure.

Conflict of interest statement

OAC is supported by the German Federal Ministry of Research and Education, is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy – CECAD, EXC 2030 – 390661388 and has received research grants from Actelion, Amplyx, Astellas, Basilea, Cidara, Da Volterra, F2G, Gilead, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Medicines Company, MedPace, Melinta Therapeutics, Merck/MSD, Pfizer, Scynexis, is a consultant to Actelion, Allecra Therapeutics, Al-Jazeera Pharmaceuticals, Amplyx, Astellas, Basilea, Biosys UK Limited, Cidara, Da Volterra, Entasis, F2G, Gilead, Matinas, MedPace, Menarini Ricerche,, Merck/MSD, Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Nabriva Therapeutics, Octapharma, Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, PSI, Rempex, Roche Diagnostics Scynexis, Seres Therapeutics, Tetraphase, Vical, and received lecture honoraria from Astellas, Basilea, Gilead, Grupo Biotoscana, Merck/MSD and Pfizer.. BJL reports grants from Pfizer during the conduct of the study. SCM was a consultant to Octapharma. She has been receiving research grants from the University Hospital of Cologne (KoelnFortune), from the German center for infection research (DZIF; Clinical Leave Stipend), and from the German Mycological Society (Dr. Manfred Plepmpel Stipend). JS Stemler reports travel grants from German Society for Infectious Diseases (DGI) and from Meta-Alexander Foundation, and grants from Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd outside the submitted work. The remaining authors have nothing to declare.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Composition of the SALT Code

References

    1. Surveillance of surgical site infections in Europe 2010–2011. Stockholm: European Center for Disease Prevention and Control. 2013.
    1. Collins AS. Preventing health care-associated infections, in patient safety and quality: an evidence-based handbook for nurses, R.G. Hughes, editor. Rockville: Advances in Patient Safety; 2008.
    1. Abbas M, et al. Temporal trends and epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection in the Swiss surveillance network: a cohort study. J Hosp Infect. 2017;98(2):118–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.09.025.
    1. de Lissovoy G, et al. Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37(5):387–397. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.12.010.
    1. Rosenthal VD, et al. Surgical site infections, International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) report, data summary of 30 countries, 2005–2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013;34(6):597–604. doi: 10.1086/670626.
    1. Saeed MJ, et al. Procedure-specific surgical site infection incidence varies widely within certain National Healthcare Safety Network surgery groups. Am J Infect Control. 2015;43(6):617–623. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.02.012.
    1. Mellinghoff SC, et al. Epidemiology of Surgical Site Infections With Staphylococcus aureus in Europe: Protocol for a Retrospective, Multicenter Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018;7(3):e63. doi: 10.2196/resprot.8177.
    1. Sandberg CEJ, et al. Using Telemedicine to diagnose surgical site infections in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(8):e13309. doi: 10.2196/13309.
    1. Fan Y, et al. Automated cluster detection of health care-associated infection based on the multisource surveillance of process data in the area network: retrospective study of algorithm development and validation. JMIR Med Inform. 2020;8(10):e16901. doi: 10.2196/16901.
    1. . 2021 [cited 2021 December 4th].
    1. Wilson AP, et al. A scoring method (ASEPSIS) for postoperative wound infections for use in clinical trials of antibiotic prophylaxis. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):311–313. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90838-X.
    1. Campwala I, Unsell K, Gupta S. A Comparative Analysis of Surgical Wound Infection Methods: Predictive Values of the CDC, ASEPSIS, and Southampton Scoring Systems in Evaluating Breast Reconstruction Surgical Site Infections. Plast surg (Oakv) 2019;27(2):93–99. doi: 10.1177/2292550319826095.
    1. Romero-Lopez-Alberca C, et al. A semiautomated classification system for producing service directories in social and health care (DESDE-AND): maturity assessment study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(3):e24930. doi: 10.2196/24930.
    1. Joo H, et al. Neural Machine Translation-Based Automated Current Procedural Terminology Classification System Using Procedure Text: Development and Validation Study. JMIR Form Res. 2021;5(5):e22461. doi: 10.2196/22461.
    1. Bundesarztekammer, Berufsordnung für Aerztinnen und Aerzte, . 2021.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi