Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism limits experimental choroidal neovascularization and structural changes associated with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Min Zhao, Irmela Mantel, Emmanuelle Gelize, Xinxin Li, Xiaoyue Xie, Alejandro Arboleda, Marie Seminel, Rinath Levy-Boukris, Marilyn Dernigoghossian, Andrea Prunotto, Charlotte Andrieu-Soler, Carlo Rivolta, Jérémie Canonica, Marie-Christine Naud, Sebastian Lechner, Nicolette Farman, Irene Bravo-Osuna, Rocio Herrero-Vanrell, Frederic Jaisser, Francine Behar-Cohen, Min Zhao, Irmela Mantel, Emmanuelle Gelize, Xinxin Li, Xiaoyue Xie, Alejandro Arboleda, Marie Seminel, Rinath Levy-Boukris, Marilyn Dernigoghossian, Andrea Prunotto, Charlotte Andrieu-Soler, Carlo Rivolta, Jérémie Canonica, Marie-Christine Naud, Sebastian Lechner, Nicolette Farman, Irene Bravo-Osuna, Rocio Herrero-Vanrell, Frederic Jaisser, Francine Behar-Cohen

Abstract

Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is a major cause of visual impairment in patients suffering from wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD), particularly when refractory to intraocular anti-VEGF injections. Here we report that treatment with the oral mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist spironolactone reduces signs of CNV in patients refractory to anti-VEGF treatment. In animal models of wet AMD, pharmacological inhibition of the MR pathway or endothelial-specific deletion of MR inhibits CNV through VEGF-independent mechanisms, in part through upregulation of the extracellular matrix protein decorin. Intravitreal injections of spironolactone-loaded microspheres and systemic delivery lead to similar reductions in CNV. Together, our work suggests MR inhibition as a novel therapeutic option for wet AMD patients unresponsive to anti-VEGF drugs.

Conflict of interest statement

M.Z. and F.B.-C. are listed as inventors in a patent application related to the “Methods and pharmaceutical compositions for the treatment of choroidal neovascularization” (WO2017064121A1, https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2017064121A1/en). The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Clinical results. a Relative changes in subretinal thickness (SRF, µm) measured with Spectralis OCT during the study period, month 0 (M0) to month 6 (M6). SRF thickness is significantly reduced as compared to M0, at M1 (p = 0.012), M2 (p = 0.040), M3 (p = 0.014), M4 (p = 0.024). b Relative change in central retinal thickness (CRT, µm) automatic values with Spectralis OCT during the study period, month 0 (M0) to month 6 (M6). CRT is significantly reduced as compared to M0, at M3 (p = 0.011), M4 (p = 0.007), and M5 (p = 0.028). At each time point (Month, M), the data have been summarized using box and whisker plots, the upper and lower 95% CIs (confidence interval) are marked with the whiskers, the box represents the interquartile range, and the median is represented by the bold horizontal line bisecting the box. Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used. *p < 0.05
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Spironolactone and eplerenone reduce CNV in a rat nAMD model. a Spironolactone (Spiro) significantly reduces the CNV angiographic grades evaluated on fluorescein angiography (FA) (p = 0.0025) and the CNV volume labeled with FITC-isolectin (green) (p = 0.002) as compared to the control group (Ctrl). Infrared images (IR) are used to localize and check the efficient laser-induced burns. The effect of spironolactone is not different from anti-VEGF in reducing the choroidal neovascular leakage on FA and inhibiting the CNV in rat choroidal flat-mounts. Combining the two treatments allows an enhanced effect in reducing vascular permeability compared to anti-VEGF alone (p = 0.0335). b Eplerenone, a more specific MR antagonist, given orally, significantly reduces CNV angiographic grades (p = 0.0012) and CNV volumes (p < 0.0001). Bars: 100 µm. FA Data are expressed as the incidence of CNV angiographic grades of the total laser impacts in each group. CNV volumes are expressed as mean ± SEM of average CNV size per rat. n represents the number of rats. Linear mixed model was used for statistical analyses. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Vascular endothelial MR contributes to CNV. a Systemic spironolactone significantly reduces CNV fluorescein angiographic (FA) grades (p < 0.001) as well as CNV volume (p = 0.0348) as compared to control mice. CNV were labeled with FITC-dextran (green). Infrared (IR) images show up all the laser burns in the fundus. b Cell-type-specific MR deletion from endothelial cells using the VE-Cadherin promoter (Vecadh-MR-KO) reduces CNV leakage on FA (p = 0.0041) and decreases the volume of CNV labeled with FITC-dextran (green) in mice (p = 0.0434). IR images show up all the laser burns. Bar: 100 µm (a, b). FA Data are expressed as the incidence of CNV angiographic grades of the total laser impacts in each group. CNV volumes are expressed as mean ± SEM of the average CNV size per mouse. n represents the number of mice. Linear mixed model was used for statistical analyses. *p < 0.05. c In a model of corneal neovascularization using Vecadh-MR-KO mice, a reduction in corneal neovessels labeled with FITC-dextran was observed compared to control mice. Quantification of the neovascular surface on mosaic images confirms a significant decrease in the neovascularization/whole corneal area ratio in Vecadh-MR-KO mice. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. n represents the number of mice. Non-parametric Mann–Whitney U-test was used. **p < 0.01
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Spironolactone inhibits CNV through induction of anti-angiogenic decorin protein. a On western blot, the decorin (DCN) level decreases in the rat retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)-choroid at different time point (day 1, 3, 7, and 10) after laser induction compared to the normal rat RPE-choroid (ctrl). Densitometric quantification shows significant decrease of DCN protein in rat RPE-choroid at day 3 after laser induction. b Intravitreal injection (IVT) of recombinant mDCN protein in rat eyes inhibits choroidal vascular leakage on fluorescein angiography (FA); DCN 10 µg/ml significantly reduces the CNV angiographic grades (p = 0.02), whereas DCN at both 1 µg/ml (p = 0.0461) and 10 µg/ml (p = 0.0388) decrease the size of CNV induced by laser. c IVT of DCN siRNA in rat eyes with laser-induced CNV. Treatment with spironolactone (Spiro) in the presence of control siRNA significantly increases the DCN protein level in the rat RPE-choroid 48 h after laser induction. IVT of DCN siRNA prevents the increase in the DCN protein induced by spironolactone. d Treatment with spironolactone in the presence of control siRNA inhibits choroidal neovascular leakage on FA at day 14 after laser induction (p = 0.0194). IVT of DCN siRNA at day 0 and 3 after laser induction abrogates the effect of spironolactone on vascular leakage (p = 0.0344). Spironolactone in the presence of control siRNA reduces significantly CNV volume as compared to laser control (p < 0.0001). DCN siRNA injected at day 0 and 3 after laser induction abrogates the effect of spironolactone on CNV volume (p = 0.0003). Western blot data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Dots represent individual RPE-choroid sample. Non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test was used. FA Data are expressed as the incidence of CNV angiographic grades of the total laser impacts in each group. CNV volumes are expressed as mean ± SEM of the average CNV size per rat. n represents the number of rats. Linear mixed model was used for statistical analyses. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

References

    1. Wong, W. al. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob. Health 2, e106–e116 (2014).
    1. Mitchell P, Liew G, Gopinath B, Wong TY. Age-related macular degeneration. Lancet. 2018;392:1147–1159. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31550-2.
    1. Kaneko H, et al. DICER1 deficit induces Alu RNA toxicity in age-related macular degeneration. Nature. 2011;471:325–330. doi: 10.1038/nature09830.
    1. Celkova L, Doyle SL, Campbell M . NLRP3 inflammasome and pathobiology in AMD. J. Clin. Med. 2015;4:172–192. doi: 10.3390/jcm4010172.
    1. Whitmore SS, et al. Complement activation and choriocapillaris loss in early AMD: implications for pathophysiology and therapy. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2015;45:1–29. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.11.005.
    1. Witmer AN, Vrensen GFJM, Van Noorden CJF, Schlingemann RO. Vascular endothelial growth factors and angiogenesis in eye disease. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2003;22:1–29. doi: 10.1016/S1350-9462(02)00043-5.
    1. Bhutto I, Lutty G. Understanding age-related macular degeneration (AMD): relationships between the photoreceptor/retinal pigment epithelium/Bruch’s membrane/choriocapillaris complex. Mol. Asp. Med. 2012;33:295–317. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2012.04.005.
    1. Campochiaro PA. Molecular pathogenesis of retinal and choroidal vascular diseases. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2015;49:67–81. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.06.002.
    1. Zhang SX, Ma J. Ocular neovascularization: Implication of endogenous angiogenic inhibitors and potential therapy. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2007;26:1–37. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2006.09.002.
    1. Ba J, et al. Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for treating wet age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2015;9:5397–5405.
    1. Rezar-Dreindl S, et al. The intraocular cytokine profile and therapeutic response in persistent neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57:4144–4150. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19772.
    1. Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT) Research Group. et al. Five-year outcomes with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: The comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1751–1761. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.03.045.
    1. Rush RB, Rush SW, Aragon AV, Ysasaga JE. Evaluation of choroidal neovascularization with indocyanine green angiography in neovascular age-related macular degeneration subjects undergoing intravitreal bevacizumab therapy. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2014;158:337–344. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.05.007.
    1. Framme C, Panagakis G, Birngruber R. Effects on choroidal neovascularization after anti-VEGF Upload using intravitreal ranibizumab, as determined by spectral domain-optical coherence tomography. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51:1671–1676. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4496.
    1. Yang S, Zhao J, Sun X. Resistance to anti-VEGF therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a comprehensive review. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2016;10:1857–1867. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S115121.
    1. Miller JW. Beyond VEGF-the weisenfeld lecture. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57:6911–6918. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-21201.
    1. Arnold JJ, Markey CM, Kurstjens NP, Guymer RH. The role of sub-retinal fluid in determining treatment outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration–a phase IV randomised clinical trial with ranibizumab: the FLUID study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16:31. doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0207-3.
    1. CATT Research Group, .et al. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 1897–1908 (2011).
    1. Gewaily, D., Muthuswamy, K. & Greenberg, P. B. Intravitreal steroids versus observation for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. CD007324 (2015). 10.1002/14651858.CD007324.pub3
    1. Cao JH, Mulvahill M, Zhang L, Joondeph BC, Dacey MS. Dexamethasone intravitreal implant in the treatment of persistent uveitic macular edema in the absence of active inflammation. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:1871–1876. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.04.012.
    1. Whitcup SM, Cidlowski JA, Csaky KG, Ambati J. Pharmacology of corticosteroids for diabetic macular edema. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018;59:1–12. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-22259.
    1. Zhao M, et al. The neuroretina is a novel mineralocorticoid target: aldosterone up-regulates ion and water channels in Müller glial cells. Faseb J. 2010;24:3405–3415. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-154344.
    1. Zhao M, et al. Mineralocorticoid receptor is involved in rat and human ocular chorioretinopathy. J. Clin. Invest. 2012;122:2672–2679. doi: 10.1172/JCI61427.
    1. Daruich A, et al. Central serous chorioretinopathy: Recent findings and new physiopathology hypothesis. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2015;48:82–118. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.05.003.
    1. Daruich A, et al. Oral mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists: Real-life experience in clinical subtypes of nonresolving central serous chorioretinopathy with chronic epitheliopathy. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2016;5:2. doi: 10.1167/tvst.5.2.2.
    1. Bousquet E, et al. Spironolactone for nonresolving central serous chorioretinopathy: A randomized controlled crossover study. Retina. 2015;35:2505–2515. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000614.
    1. Jaisser F, Farman N. Emerging roles of the mineralocorticoid receptor in pathology: Toward new paradigms in clinical pharmacology. Pharmacol. Rev. 2016;68:49–75. doi: 10.1124/pr.115.011106.
    1. Crum R, Szabo S, Folkman J. A new class of steroids inhibits angiogenesis in the presence of heparin or a heparin fragment. Science. 1985;230:1375–1378. doi: 10.1126/science.2416056.
    1. Fujii M, et al. Aldosterone inhibits endothelial morphogenesis and angiogenesis through the downregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 expression subsequent to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2012;129:145–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.12.014.
    1. Michel F, et al. Aldosterone enhances ischemia-induced neovascularization through angiotensin II-dependent pathway. Circulation. 2004;109:1933–1937. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000127112.36796.9B.
    1. Miternique-Grosse A, et al. Antiangiogenic effects of spironolactone and other potassium-sparing diuretics in human umbilical vein endothelial cells and in fibrin gel chambers implanted in rats. J. Hypertens. 2006;24:2207–2213. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000249698.26983.4e.
    1. Wilkinson-Berka JL, Tan G, Jaworski K, Miller AG. Identification of a retinal aldosterone system and the protective effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism on retinal vascular pathology. Circ. Res. 2009;104:124–133. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.176008.
    1. Grossniklaus HE, Kang SJ, Berglin L. Animal models of choroidal and retinal neovascularization. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2010;29:500–519. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2010.05.003.
    1. Kolkhof P, Bärfacker L. 30 Years of the mineralocorticoid receptor: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: 60 years of research and development. J. Endocrinol. 2017;234:T125–T140. doi: 10.1530/JOE-16-0600.
    1. Zhao M, et al. Tolerance of high and low amounts of PLGA microspheres loaded with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist in retinal target site. J. Control. Release. 2017;266:187–197. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.09.029.
    1. Schäfer N, et al. Endothelial mineralocorticoid receptor activation mediates endothelial dysfunction in diet-induced obesity. Eur. Heart J. 2013;34:3515–3524. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht095.
    1. Miller JW, Le Couter J, Strauss EC, Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor a in intraocular vascular disease. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:106–114. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.07.038.
    1. Olsen TW, Feng X, Kasper TJ, Rath PP, Steuer ER. Fluorescein angiographic lesion type frequency in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:250–255. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.05.030.
    1. Jung JJ, et al. The incidence of neovascular subtypes in newly diagnosed neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2014;158:769–779.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.07.006.
    1. Heier JS, et al. Intravitreal aflibercept (VEGF trap-eye) in wet age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:2537–2548. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.006.
    1. Hussain RM, Ciulla TA. Emerging vascular endothelial growth factor antagonists to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Exp. Opin. Emerg. Drugs. 2017;22:235–246. doi: 10.1080/14728214.2017.1362390.
    1. Kapoor KG, Todi N, Wagner AL. Mineralocorticoid antagonists as adjuncts in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmol. Ther. 2017;6:141–146. doi: 10.1007/s40123-016-0075-1.
    1. Grunin M, Hagbi-Levi S, Chowers I. The role of monocytes and macrophages in age-related macular degeneration. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2014;801:199–205. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3209-8_26.
    1. Combadière C, et al. CX3CR1-dependent subretinal microglia cell accumulation is associated with cardinal features of age-related macular degeneration. J. Clin. Invest. 2007;117:2920–2928. doi: 10.1172/JCI31692.
    1. Usher MG, et al. Myeloid mineralocorticoid receptor controls macrophage polarization and cardiovascular hypertrophy and remodeling in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2010;120:3350–3364. doi: 10.1172/JCI41080.
    1. Barrera-Chimal J, et al. The myeloid mineralocorticoid receptor controls inflammatory and fibrotic responses after renal injury via macrophage interleukin-4 receptor signaling. Kidney Int. 2018;93:1344–1355. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.12.016.
    1. Järveläinen H, Sainio A, Wight TN. Pivotal role for decorin in angiogenesis. Matrix Biol. 2015;43:15–26. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2015.01.023.
    1. Frikeche J, Maiti G, Chakravarti S. Small leucine-rich repeat proteoglycans in corneal inflammation and wound healing. Exp. Eye Res. 2016;151:142–149. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2016.08.015.
    1. Keenan TDL, et al. Mapping the differential distribution of proteoglycan core proteins in the adult human retina, choroid, and sclera. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53:7528–7538. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10797.
    1. Gubbiotti MA, Vallet SD, Ricard-Blum S, Iozzo RV. Decorin interacting network: A comprehensive analysis of decorin-binding partners and their versatile functions. Matrix Biol. 2016;55:7–21. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2016.09.009.
    1. Nelimarkka L, et al. Decorin is produced by capillary endothelial cells in inflammation-associated angiogenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 2001;158:345–353. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63975-2.
    1. Schönherr E, et al. Decorin deficiency leads to impaired angiogenesis in injured mouse cornea. J. Vasc. Res. 2004;41:499–508. doi: 10.1159/000081806.
    1. Neill T, Schaefer L, Iozzo RV. Decorin as a multivalent therapeutic agent against cancer. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016;97:174–185. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.10.016.
    1. Neill T, et al. Decorin antagonizes the angiogenic network: concurrent inhibition of Met, hypoxia inducible factor 1α, vascular endothelial growth factor A, and induction of thrombospondin-1 and TIMP3. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:5492–5506. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.283499.
    1. Du S, Wang S, Wu Q, Hu J, Li T. Decorin inhibits angiogenic potential of choroid-retinal endothelial cells by downregulating hypoxia-induced Met, Rac1, HIF-1α and VEGF expression in cocultured retinal pigment epithelial cells. Exp. Eye Res. 2013;116:151–160. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2013.08.019.
    1. Xaus J, Comalada M, Cardó M, Valledor AF, Celada A. Decorin inhibits macrophage colony-stimulating factor proliferation of macrophages and enhances cell survival through induction of p27(Kip1) and p21(Waf1) Blood. 2001;98:2124–2133. doi: 10.1182/blood.V98.7.2124.
    1. Mohan RR, et al. Targeted decorin gene therapy delivered with adeno-associated virus effectively retards corneal neovascularization in vivo. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e26432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026432.
    1. Wang X, et al. TGF-β participates choroid neovascularization through Smad2/3-VEGF/TNF-α signaling in mice with Laser-induced wet age-related macular degeneration. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:9672. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10124-4.
    1. Yuan X, et al. Quantitative proteomics: comparison of the macular Bruch membrane/choroid complex from age-related macular degeneration and normal eyes. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2010;9:1031–1046. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M900523-MCP200.
    1. Gergely R, et al. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist treatment in bilateral chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: A comparative study of exudative and nonexudative fellow eyes. Retina. 2017;37:1084–1091. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001303.
    1. Funder J. 30 years of the mineralocorticoid receptor: Mineralocorticoid receptor activation and specificity-conferring mechanisms: a brief history. J. Endocrinol. 2017;234:T17–T21. doi: 10.1530/JOE-17-0119.
    1. Barrera-Chimal J, et al. Benefit of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism in AKI: Role of vascular smooth muscle Rac1. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2017;28:1216–1226. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016040477.
    1. Clausen BE, Burkhardt C, Reith W, Renkawitz R, Förster I. Conditional gene targeting in macrophages and granulocytes using LysMcre mice. Transgenic. Res. 1999;8:265–277. doi: 10.1023/A:1008942828960.
    1. Mueller KB, et al. Endothelial mineralocorticoid receptors differentially contribute to coronary and mesenteric vascular function without modulating blood pressure. Hypertension. 2015;66:988–997. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06172.
    1. Fraccarollo D, et al. Deletion of cardiomyocyte mineralocorticoid receptor ameliorates adverse remodeling after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2011;123:400–408. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.983023.
    1. Wang Y, et al. Ephrin-B2 controls VEGF-induced angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Nature. 2010;465:483–486. doi: 10.1038/nature09002.
    1. Wendling O, Bornert JM, Chambon P, Metzger D. Efficient temporally-controlled targeted mutagenesis in smooth muscle cells of the adult mouse. Genesis. 2009;47:14–18. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20448.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi