Mediators of physical activity behaviour change among adult non-clinical populations: a review update

Ryan E Rhodes, Leila A Pfaeffli, Ryan E Rhodes, Leila A Pfaeffli

Abstract

Background: An understanding of the determinants of physical activity through mediators of behaviour change is important in order to evaluate the efficacy of interventions. Prior reviews on this topic noted that few studies employed mediator analyses in experimental physical activity trials; the purpose of this review is to update these prior reviews in order to evaluate the state of our present understanding of interventions that include proposed mediators of behaviour change.

Methods: Literature was identified through electronic database (e.g., MEDLINE, psychINFO) searching. Studies were eligible if they described a published experimental or quasi-experimental trial examining the effect of an intervention on physical activity behaviour and mediator change in non-clinical adult populations. Quality of included studies was assessed and the analyses examined the symmetry between mediators and behaviour change.

Results: Twenty seven unique trials passed the eligibility criteria and 22 were included in the analysis with scores of moderate or higher quality. Half of the studies reviewed failed to show an intervention effect on PA. The remaining studies showed evidence that the intervention affected changes in the proposed mediators, but tests of mediated effect were performed in only six of these 11 cases and demonstrated mixed outcomes. Differences by theory were not discernable at this time, but self-regulation constructs had the most evidence for mediation.

Conclusion: Published literature employing mediators of change analyses in experimental designs is still relatively elusive since the time of prior reviews; however, the general null findings of changes in mediating constructs from these interventions are a more timely concern. Changes in self-regulation constructs may have the most effect on changes in PA while self-efficacy and outcome expectation type constructs have negligible but limited findings. Innovation and increased fidelity of interventions is needed and should be a priority for future research.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Results of the Literature Search.

References

    1. Warburton DER, Katzmarzyk PT, Rhodes RE, Shephard RJ. Evidence-informed physical activity guidelines for Canadian adults. Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism. 2007;32:S16–S68. doi: 10.1139/H07-123.
    1. Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute. 2002 Physical Activity Monitor.
    1. Baranowski TC, Anderson, Carmack C. Mediating variable framework in physical activity interventions: How are we doing? How might we do better? American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1998;15:266–297. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00080-4.
    1. Hillsdon M, Foster C, Thorogood M. Interventions for promoting physical activity. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2005;1
    1. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin. 1992;112:155–159. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.
    1. Noar SM, Zimmerman RS. Health behavior theory and cumulative knowledge regarding health behaviors: are we moving in the right direction? Health Education Research. 2005;20:275–290. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg113.
    1. Sheeran P. In: European Review of Social Psychology. Hewstone M, Stroebe W, editor. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2002. Intention-behaviour relations: A conceptual and empirical review; pp. 1–36.
    1. Weinstein ND. Misleading tests of health behavior theories. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2007;33:1–10. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3301_1.
    1. Lewis BA, Marcus BH, Pate RR, Dunn AL. Psychosocial mediators of physical activity behavior among adults and children. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2002;23(Suppl 2):6–35.
    1. Mackinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods. 2002;7:83–103. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83.
    1. Cerin E, Mackinnon DP. A commentary on current practice in mediating variable analyses in behavioural nutrition and physical activity. Public Health Nutrition. 2008;12:1182–1188. doi: 10.1017/S1368980008003649.
    1. Bandura A. Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychology and Health. 1998;13:623–649. doi: 10.1080/08870449808407422.
    1. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. American Journal of Health Promotion. 1997;12:38–48.
    1. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press; 1985.
    1. Ajzen I, Driver BL. Prediction of leisure participation from behavioral, normative, and control beliefs: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Sciences. 1991;13:185–204. doi: 10.1080/01490409109513137.
    1. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. 1986;51:1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
    1. Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education and Behavior. 2004;31:143–164. doi: 10.1177/1090198104263660.
    1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50:179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
    1. Rogers RW. In: Social Psychophysiology. Cacioppo JT, Petty RE, editor. New York: Guilford Press; 1983. Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation; pp. 153–176.
    1. Fishbein M, Triandis HC, Kanfer FH, Becker M, Middlestadt SE, Eichler A. In: Handbook of health psychology. Baum A, Revenson TA, editor. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001. Factors influencing behavior and behavior change; pp. 3–17.
    1. Lubans DR, Foster C, Biddle SJH. A review of mediators of behavior in interventions to promote physical activity among children and adolescents. Preventive Medicine. 2008;47:463–470. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.07.011.
    1. Cerin E, Barnett A, Baranowski T. Testing theories of dietary behavior change in youth using the mediating variable model with intervention programs. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. 2009;41:309–318. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2009.03.129.
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Vol. Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008.
    1. Grade Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. British Medical Journal. 2004;328:1490–1498. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490.
    1. Ash S, Reeves M, Bauer J, Dover T, Vivanti A, Leong C, O'Moore Sullivan T, Capra S. A randomised control trial comparing lifestyle groups, individual counselling and written information in the management of weight and health outcomes over 12 months. International Journal of Obesity. 2006;30:1557–1564. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803263.
    1. Bennett JA, Young HM, Nail LM, Winters-Stone K, Hanson G. A telephone-only motivational intervention to increase physical activity in rural adults. Nursing Research. 2008;57:24–32. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000280661.34502.c1.
    1. Blanchard CM, Fortier M, Sweet S, O'Sullivan T, Hogg W, Reid RD, Sigal RJ. Explaining physical activity levels from a self-efficacy perspective: The physical activity counselling trial. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2007;34:323–328. doi: 10.1007/BF02874557.
    1. Bock B, Marcus BH, Pinto BM, Forsyth LH. Maintenance of physical activity following an individualized motivationally tailored intervention. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2001;23:79–87. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2302_2.
    1. Cerin E, Taylor L, Leslie E, Owen N. Small-scale randomized controlled trials need more powerful methods of mediational analysis than the Baron-Kenny method. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2006;59:457–464. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.008.
    1. Cramp AG, Brawley LR. Moms in motion: A group-mediated cognitive-behavioral physical activity intervention. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2006;3:1479. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-3-23.
    1. Dallow CB, Anderson J. Using self-efficacy and a transtheoretical model to develop a physical activity intervention for obese women. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2003;17:373–381.
    1. Dinger MK, Heesch K, Cipriani G, Qualls M. Comparison of two email-delivered, pedometer-based interventions to promote walking among insufficiently active women. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2007;10:297–302. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.07.011.
    1. Elbel R, Aldana S, Bloswick D, Lyon JL. A pilot study evaluating a peer led and professional led physical activity intervention with blue-collar employees. Work. 2003;21:199–210.
    1. Fahrenwald NL, Atwood JR, Noble Walker S, Johnson DR, Berg K. A randomized pilot test of "moms on the move": A physical activity intervention for WIC mothers. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2004;27:82–90. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2702_2.
    1. Fortier MS, Sweet SN, O'Sullivan TL, Williams GC. A self-determination process model of physical activity adoption in the context of a randomized controlled trial. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2007;8:741–757. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.10.006.
    1. Gallagher KI, Jakicic JM, Napolitano MA, Marcus BH. Psychosocial factors related to physical activity and weight loss in overweight women. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2006;38:971–980. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000218137.25970.c6.
    1. Hallam JS, Petosa R. The long-term impact of a four-session work-site intervention on selected social cognitive theory variables linked to adult exercise adherence. Health Education and Behavior. 2004;31:88–100. doi: 10.1177/1090198103259164.
    1. Hurling R, Catt M, De Boni M, Fairley BW, Hurst T, Murray P, Richardson A, Singh Sodhi J. Using internet and mobile phone technology to deliver an automated physical activity program: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2007;9:e7. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e7.
    1. Jacobs AD, Ammerman AS, Ennett ST, Campbell MK, Tawney KW, Aytur SA, Marshall SW, Will JC, Rosamond WD. Effects of a tailored follow-up intervention on health behaviors, beliefs, and attitudes. Journal of Women's Health. 2004;13:557–568. doi: 10.1089/1540999041281016.
    1. Jones LW, Sinclair RC, Rhodes RE, Courneya KS. Promoting exercise behaviour: An integration of persuasion theories and the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Health Psychology. 2004;9:505–521. doi: 10.1348/1359107042304605.
    1. Kinmonth AL, Wareham NJ, Hardeman W, Sutton S, Prevost AT, Fanshawe T, William KM, Ekelund U, Spiegelhalter D, Griffin SJ. Efficacy of a theory-based behavioural intervention to increase physical activity in an at-risk group in primary care (ProActive UK): A randomised trial. Lancet. 2008;371:41–48. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60070-7.
    1. Kloek GC, van Lenthe FJ, van Nierop PWM, Koelen MA, Mackenbach JP. Impact evaluation of a Dutch community intervention to improve health related behaviour in deprived neighbourhoods. Health and Place. 2006;12:665–677. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.09.002.
    1. Levy SS, Cardinal BJ. Effects of a self-determination theory-based mail-mediated intervention on adults' exercise behavior. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2004;18:345–349.
    1. Lewis BA, Forsyth LH, Pinto BM, Bock BC, Roberts M, Marcus BH. Psychosocial mediators of physical activity in a randomized controlled intervention trial. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2006;28:193–204.
    1. Little P, Doward M, Gralton S, Hammerton L, Pillinger J, White P, Moore M, McKenna J, Payne S. A randomized controlled trial of three pragmatic approaches to initiate increased physical activity in sedentary patients with risk factors for cardiovascular disease. British Journal of General Practice. 2004;54:189–195.
    1. Milne S, Orbell S, Sheeran P. Combining motivational and volitional interventions to promote exercise participation: Protection motivation theory and implementation intentions. British Journal of Health Psychology. 2002;7:163–184. doi: 10.1348/135910702169420.
    1. Napolitano MA, Papandonatos GD, Lewis BA, Whiteley JA, Williams DM, King AC, Bock BC, Pinto B, Marcus BH. Mediators of physical activity behavior change: A multivariate approach. Health Psychology. 2008;27:409–418. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.4.409.
    1. Parrott MW, Tennant LK, Olejnik S, Poudevigne MS. Theory of planned behavior: Implications for an email-based physical activity intervention. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2008;9:511–526. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.07.002.
    1. Plotnikoff RC, Brunet S, Courneya K, Spence J, Birkett N, Marcus B, Whitely J. The efficacy of stage-matched and standard public health materials for promoting physical activity in the workplace: The Physical Activity Workplace Study (PAWS) American Journal of Health Promotion. 2007;21:501–509.
    1. Reger B, Cooper L, Booth-Butterfield S, Smith H, Bauman A, Wootan M, Middlestadt S, Marcus B, Greer F. Wheeling walks: a community campaign using paid media to encourage walking among sedentary older adults. Preventive Medicine. 2002;35:285–292. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2002.1074.
    1. Rovniak LS, Hovell MF, Wojcik JR, Winett RA, Martinez-Donate AP. Enhancing theoretical fidelity: An e-mail-based walking program demonstration. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2005;20:85–95.
    1. Fahrenwald NL, Atwood JR, Johnson DR. Mediator analysis of moms on the move. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2005;27:271–291. doi: 10.1177/0193945904273275.
    1. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. Lancet. 1999;354:1896–1900. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5.
    1. Cardinal BJ, Spaziani MD. Effects of Classroom and Virtual "Lifetime Fitness for Health" Instruction on College Students' Exercise Behavior. Physical Educator. 2007;64:205–213.
    1. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice. 1982;19:276–288. doi: 10.1037/h0088437.
    1. Plotnikoff RC, McCargar L, Wilson PM, Loucaides CA. Efficacy of an email intervention for the promotion of physical activity and nutrition behavior in the workplace context. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2005;19:422–429.
    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy, the exercise of control. New York: Freeman; 1997.
    1. Plotnikoff RC, Blanchard C, Hotz SB, Rhodes R. Validation of the decisional balance scales in the exercise domain from the transtheoretical model: A longitudinal test. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. 2001;5:191–206. doi: 10.1207/S15327841MPEE0504_01.
    1. Chen HT. Theory-Driven Evaluations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990.
    1. Rhodes RE, Fiala B, Conner M. Affective judgments and physical activity: A review and meta-analysis. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2009;38(3):180–204. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9147-y.
    1. Symons Downs D, Hausenblas HA. Exercise behavior and the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior: A meta-analytic update. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2005;2:76–97.
    1. McKinlay JB, Marceau LD. To boldly go... American Journal of Public Health. 2000;90:25–33. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.90.1.25.
    1. Sallis JF, Owen N. In: Health Behavior and Health Education. Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, editor. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass; 1997. Ecological models; pp. 403–424.
    1. Rhodes RE. The built-in environment: The role of personality with physical activity. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. 2006;34:83–88. doi: 10.1249/00003677-200604000-00008.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi