Lorlatinib in non-small-cell lung cancer with ALK or ROS1 rearrangement: an international, multicentre, open-label, single-arm first-in-man phase 1 trial

Alice T Shaw, Enriqueta Felip, Todd M Bauer, Benjamin Besse, Alejandro Navarro, Sophie Postel-Vinay, Justin F Gainor, Melissa Johnson, Jorg Dietrich, Leonard P James, Jill S Clancy, Joseph Chen, Jean-François Martini, Antonello Abbattista, Benjamin J Solomon, Alice T Shaw, Enriqueta Felip, Todd M Bauer, Benjamin Besse, Alejandro Navarro, Sophie Postel-Vinay, Justin F Gainor, Melissa Johnson, Jorg Dietrich, Leonard P James, Jill S Clancy, Joseph Chen, Jean-François Martini, Antonello Abbattista, Benjamin J Solomon

Abstract

Background: Most patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged or ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1)-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are sensitive to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy, but resistance invariably develops, commonly within the CNS. This study aimed to analyse the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic properties of lorlatinib, a novel, highly potent, selective, and brain-penetrant ALK and ROS1 TKI with preclinical activity against most known resistance mutations, in patients with advanced ALK-positive or ROS1-positive NSCLC.

Methods: In this international multicentre, open-label, single-arm, first-in-man phase 1 dose-escalation study, eligible patients had advanced ALK-positive or ROS1-positive NSCLC and were older than 18 years, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate end-organ function. Lorlatinib was administered orally to patients at doses ranging from 10 mg to 200 mg once daily or 35 mg to 100 mg twice daily, with a minimum of three patients receiving each dose. For some patients, tumour biopsy was done before lorlatinib treatment to identify ALK resistance mutations. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of lorlatinib; efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population (patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and had either ALK or ROS1 rearrangement). The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicities during cycle 1 according to investigator assessment; secondary endpoints included safety, pharmacokinetics, and overall response. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01970865.

Findings: Between Jan 22, 2014, and July 10, 2015, 54 patients received at least one dose of lorlatinib, including 41 (77%) with ALK-positive and 12 (23%) with ROS1-positive NSCLC; one patient had unconfirmed ALK and ROS1 status. 28 (52%) patients had received two or more TKIs, and 39 (72%) patients had CNS metastases. The most common treatment-related adverse events among the 54 patients were hypercholesterolaemia (39 [72%] of 54 patients), hypertriglyceridaemia (21 [39%] of 54 patients), peripheral neuropathy (21 [39%] of 54 patients), and peripheral oedema (21 [39%] of 54 patients). One dose-limiting toxicity occurred at 200 mg (the patient did not take at least 16 of 21 prescribed total daily doses in cycle 1 because of toxicities attributable to study drug, which were grade 2 neurocognitive adverse events comprising slowed speech and mentation and word-finding difficulty). No maximum tolerated dose was identified. The recommended phase 2 dose was selected as 100 mg once daily. For ALK-positive patients, the proportion of patients who achieved an objective response was 19 (46%) of 41 patients (95% CI 31-63); for those who had received two or more TKIs, the proportion of patients with an objective response was 11 (42%) of 26 patients (23-63). In ROS1-positive patients, including seven crizotinib-pretreated patients, an objective response was achieved by six (50%) of 12 patients (95% CI 21-79).

Interpretation: In this phase 1, dose-escalation study, lorlatinib showed both systemic and intracranial activity in patients with advanced ALK-positive or ROS1-positive NSCLC, most of whom had CNS metastases and had previously had two or more TKI treatments fail. Therefore, lorlatinib might be an effective therapeutic strategy for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who have become resistant to currently available TKIs, including second-generation ALK TKIs, and is being investigated in a phase 3 randomised controlled trial comparing lorlatinib to crizotinib (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03052608).

Funding: Pfizer.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Interests

ATS has received fees for consulting/advisory board roles from Ariad, Blueprint Medicines, Daiichi Sankyo, EMD Serono, Genentech/Roche, Ignyta, KSQ, Loxo, Novartis, Pfizer, and Taiho, honoraria from Foundation Medicine, Novartis, Pfizer, and Genentech/Roche, and her institution has received research funding from Pfizer, Novartis, and Genentech/Roche. EF has received fees for consulting or advisory roles from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, and Genentech/Roche, and fees for serving on speaker bureaus from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Novartis. TMB’s institution has received research funding from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Calithera Biosciences, Daiichi Sankyo, Deciphera, Eli Lilly, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Ignyta, ImmunoGen, Incyte, Kolltan Pharmaceuticals, Leap Therapeutics, MabVax, MedImmune, Medpacto Inc., Merck, Merrimack, Millennium, Mirati Therapeutics, Novartis, Peleton, Pfizer, Principia Biopharma, and Stemline Therapeutics. BB has received research funding from Pfizer. JFG has received personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clovis, Genentech/Roche, Incyte, Loxo, Merck, Novartis, and Theravance, and travel expenses from Affymetrix. MJ reports that her institution has received research funding from AbbVie, Adaptimmune, Apexigen, Array BioPharma, AstraZeneca, BerGenBio, Checkpoint Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech/Roche, Genmab, Janssen, Kadmon, Mirati Therapeutics, Merrimack, Novartis, OncoMed, Pfizer, Regeneron, Stemcentrix, and Tarveda, and fees for consulting/advisory board roles from Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, and Genentech/Roche. AA, JC, J-FM, and LPJ are employees of and own stock in Pfizer. JSC is an employee of InVentiv Health and works as a contractor for Pfizer. BJS has received fees for serving on advisory boards for and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech/Roche, Merck, Novartis, and Pfizer, and his institution has received clinical trial support from Pfizer. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1. Tumor responses to lorlatinib in…
Figure 1. Tumor responses to lorlatinib in ALK-positive NSCLC
(A) Best confirmed tumor responses of 41 ALK-positive patients treated with lorlatinib across all dose levels based on investigator assessment. The bars indicate best percent change in target tumor burden from baseline. The number above each bar indicates the number of different ALK TKIs each patient received prior to lorlatinib; 1+ indicates that the patient received one prior ALK TKI and that TKI was a second-generation TKI (not crizotinib). Filled circles indicate ongoing treatment. Data for three patients are not included: two with objective progression in whom not all target lesions were assessed and one who was not assessed on treatment. (B) Best intracranial tumor response of ALK-positive patients who had evaluable central nervous system metastases at baseline according to investigator assessment. The bars indicate best percent change in intracranial lesions from baseline. The numbers are as described above. Two patients who were not evaluable on treatment were not included. ALK=anaplastic lymphoma kinase; NSCLC=non-small cell lung cancer; TKI=tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
Figure 1. Tumor responses to lorlatinib in…
Figure 1. Tumor responses to lorlatinib in ALK-positive NSCLC
(A) Best confirmed tumor responses of 41 ALK-positive patients treated with lorlatinib across all dose levels based on investigator assessment. The bars indicate best percent change in target tumor burden from baseline. The number above each bar indicates the number of different ALK TKIs each patient received prior to lorlatinib; 1+ indicates that the patient received one prior ALK TKI and that TKI was a second-generation TKI (not crizotinib). Filled circles indicate ongoing treatment. Data for three patients are not included: two with objective progression in whom not all target lesions were assessed and one who was not assessed on treatment. (B) Best intracranial tumor response of ALK-positive patients who had evaluable central nervous system metastases at baseline according to investigator assessment. The bars indicate best percent change in intracranial lesions from baseline. The numbers are as described above. Two patients who were not evaluable on treatment were not included. ALK=anaplastic lymphoma kinase; NSCLC=non-small cell lung cancer; TKI=tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
Figure 2. Progression-free survival of patients with…
Figure 2. Progression-free survival of patients with ALK-positive NSCLC
Shown are Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival in patients with advanced, ALK-positive NSCLC treated with lorlatinib. Among all 41 ALK-positive patients, median progression-free survival was 9·6 months (blue). In the subset of 14 patients who had received one prior ALK TKI, median progression-free survival was 13·5 months (orange). In the subset of 26 patients who had received two or more ALK TKIs (including at least one second-generation TKI), median progression-free survival was 9·2 months (yellow). One ALK-positive patient who had received no prior ALK TKIs is included in the total but is not shown separately. Vertical lines on the survival curves indicate censoring of data. ALK=anaplastic lymphoma kinase; NSCLC=non-small cell lung cancer; TKI=tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
Figure 3. Response to lorlatinib and correlation…
Figure 3. Response to lorlatinib and correlation with ALK resistance mutations in patients treated with ≥2 ALK TKIs
(A) Waterfall plot of 12 ALK-positive patients who had received ≥2 prior ALK TKIs and who underwent repeat biopsy before study enrollment. These biopsies may have been collected as de novo samples for the study or may have been collected outside of this study. All biopsies were taken from extracranial sites of disease. For ten samples from Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), sequencing was performed using local sequencing platforms and these data were stored, summarized, and validated by MGH; for the remaining two samples, next-generation sequencing was performed in a central laboratory and additionally summarized and validated by MGH (see Methods). For each patient, the ALK resistance mutation is shown above the bar corresponding to the patient’s best percent change in systemic (ie, extracranial) target lesions according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1·1. WT (wildtype) indicates that no ALK mutation was identified in the resistant specimen. One patient whose resistant tumor showed no ALK mutation on biopsy was not evaluable because of rapid progression and is not shown here. (B) The duration of treatment in days for the same group of ALK-positive patients. ALK mutation status is indicated to the left of each bar. Arrows indicate patients who were still receiving lorlatinib at the time of data cutoff. ALK=anaplastic lymphoma kinase; TKI=tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
Figure 3. Response to lorlatinib and correlation…
Figure 3. Response to lorlatinib and correlation with ALK resistance mutations in patients treated with ≥2 ALK TKIs
(A) Waterfall plot of 12 ALK-positive patients who had received ≥2 prior ALK TKIs and who underwent repeat biopsy before study enrollment. These biopsies may have been collected as de novo samples for the study or may have been collected outside of this study. All biopsies were taken from extracranial sites of disease. For ten samples from Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), sequencing was performed using local sequencing platforms and these data were stored, summarized, and validated by MGH; for the remaining two samples, next-generation sequencing was performed in a central laboratory and additionally summarized and validated by MGH (see Methods). For each patient, the ALK resistance mutation is shown above the bar corresponding to the patient’s best percent change in systemic (ie, extracranial) target lesions according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1·1. WT (wildtype) indicates that no ALK mutation was identified in the resistant specimen. One patient whose resistant tumor showed no ALK mutation on biopsy was not evaluable because of rapid progression and is not shown here. (B) The duration of treatment in days for the same group of ALK-positive patients. ALK mutation status is indicated to the left of each bar. Arrows indicate patients who were still receiving lorlatinib at the time of data cutoff. ALK=anaplastic lymphoma kinase; TKI=tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

References

    1. Bergethon K, Shaw AT, Ignatius Ou SH, et al. ROS1 rearrangements define a unique molecular class of lung cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:863–70.
    1. Rikova K, Guo A, Zeng Q, et al. Global survey of phosphotyrosine signaling identifies oncogenic kinases in lung cancer. Cell. 2007;131:1190–203.
    1. Soda M, Choi YL, Enomoto M, et al. Identification of the transforming EML4-ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer. Nature. 2007;448:561–6.
    1. Shaw AT, Ou SH, Bang YJ, et al. Crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1963–71.
    1. Solomon BJ, Mok T, Kim DW, et al. First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2167–77.
    1. Lovly CM, Shaw AT. Molecular pathways: resistance to kinase inhibitors and implications for therapeutic strategies. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:2249–56.
    1. Huang WS, Liu S, Zou D, et al. Discovery of brigatinib (AP26113), a phosphine oxide-containing, potent, orally active inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase. J Med Chem. 2016;59:4948–64.
    1. Marsilje TH, Pei W, Chen B, et al. Synthesis, structure-activity relationships, and in vivo efficacy of the novel potent and selective anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor 5-chloro-N2-(2-isopropoxy-5-methyl-4-(piperidin-4-yl)phenyl)-N4-(2-(isopropylsulf onyl)phenyl)pyrimidine-2,4-diamine (LDK378) currently in phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials. J Med Chem. 2013;56:5675–90.
    1. Sakamoto H, Tsukaguchi T, Hiroshima S, et al. CH5424802, a selective ALK inhibitor capable of blocking the resistant gatekeeper mutant. Cancer Cell. 2011;19:679–90.
    1. Shaw AT, Kim DW, Mehra R, et al. Ceritinib in ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1189–97.
    1. Kim DW, Tiseo M, Ahn MJ, et al. Brigatinib in patients with crizotinib-refractory anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized, multicenter phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017 May 5; doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.5904. Epub ahead of print.
    1. Ou SH, Ahn JS, De Petris L, et al. Alectinib in crizotinib-refractory ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II global study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:661–8.
    1. Soria JC, Tan DS, Chiari R, et al. First-line ceritinib versus platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (ASCEND-4): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2017;389:917–29.
    1. Peters S, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, et al. Alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 6; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1704795. Epub ahead of print.
    1. Gainor JF, Dardaei L, Yoda S, et al. Molecular mechanisms of resistance to first- and second-generation ALK inhibitors in ALK-rearranged lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2016;6:1118–33.
    1. Awad MM, Katayama R, McTigue M, et al. Acquired resistance to crizotinib from a mutation in CD74-ROS1. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2395–401.
    1. Gainor JF, Friboulet L, Yoda S, et al. Frequency and spectrum of ROS1 resistance mutations in ROS1-positive lung cancer patients progressing on crizotinib. J Clin Oncol Precision Oncol. 2017 in press.
    1. Katayama R, Kobayashi Y, Friboulet L, et al. Cabozantinib overcomes crizotinib resistance in ROS1 fusion-positive cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:166–74.
    1. Johnson TW, Richardson PF, Bailey S, et al. Discovery of (10R)-7-amino-12-fluoro-2,10,16-trimethyl-15-oxo-10,15,16,17-tetrahydro-2H-8,4-(m etheno)pyrazolo[4,3-h][2,5,11]-benzoxadiazacyclotetradecine-3-carbonitrile (PF-06463922), a macrocyclic inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) with preclinical brain exposure and broad-spectrum potency against ALK-resistant mutations. J Med Chem. 2014;57:4720–44.
    1. Zou HY, Li Q, Engstrom LD, et al. PF-06463922 is a potent and selective next-generation ROS1/ALK inhibitor capable of blocking crizotinib-resistant ROS1 mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:3493–8.
    1. Zou HY, Friboulet L, Kodack DP, et al. PF-06463922, an ALK/ROS1 inhibitor, overcomes resistance to first and second generation ALK inhibitors in preclinical models. Cancer Cell. 2015;28:70–81.
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1. 1) Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.
    1. Long GV, Trefzer U, Davies MA, et al. Dabrafenib in patients with Val600Glu or Val600Lys BRAF-mutant melanoma metastatic to the brain (BREAK-MB): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:1087–95.
    1. Zheng Z, Liebers M, Zhelyazkova B, et al. Anchored multiplex PCR for targeted next-generation sequencing. Nat Med. 2014;20:1479–84.
    1. Friboulet L, Li N, Katayama R, et al. The ALK inhibitor ceritinib overcomes crizotinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2014;4:662–73.
    1. Costa DB, Shaw AT, Ou SH, et al. Clinical experience with crizotinib in patients with advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer and brain metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1881–8.
    1. Schinkel AH. P-Glycoprotein, a gatekeeper in the blood-brain barrier. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1999;36:179–94.
    1. Costa DB, Kobayashi S, Pandya SS, et al. CSF concentration of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor crizotinib. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:e443–5.
    1. Gadgeel SM, Gandhi L, Riely GJ, et al. Safety and activity of alectinib against systemic disease and brain metastases in patients with crizotinib-resistant ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (AF-002JG): results from the dose-finding portion of a phase 1/2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1119–28.
    1. Seto T, Kiura K, Nishio M, et al. CH5424802 (RO5424802) for patients with ALK-rearranged advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (AF-001JP study): a single-arm, open-label, phase 1–2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:590–8.
    1. Hida T, Nokihara H, Kondo M, et al. Alectinib versus crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (J-ALEX): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;390:29–39.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi