Population and breast cancer patients' analysis reveals the diversity of genomic variation of the BRCA genes in the Mexican population

J C Fernández-Lopez, S Romero-Córdoba, R Rebollar-Vega, L A Alfaro-Ruiz, S Jiménez-Morales, F Beltrán-Anaya, R Arellano-Llamas, A Cedro-Tanda, M Rios-Romero, M Ramirez-Florencio, V Bautista-Piña, C Dominguez-Reyes, F Villegas-Carlos, A Tenorio-Torres, A Hidalgo-Miranda, J C Fernández-Lopez, S Romero-Córdoba, R Rebollar-Vega, L A Alfaro-Ruiz, S Jiménez-Morales, F Beltrán-Anaya, R Arellano-Llamas, A Cedro-Tanda, M Rios-Romero, M Ramirez-Florencio, V Bautista-Piña, C Dominguez-Reyes, F Villegas-Carlos, A Tenorio-Torres, A Hidalgo-Miranda

Abstract

Interpretation of variants of unknown significance (VUS) in genetic tests is complicated in ethnically diverse populations, given the lack of information regarding the common spectrum of genetic variation in clinically relevant genes. Public availability of data obtained from high-throughput genotyping and/or exome massive parallel sequencing (MPS)-based projects from several thousands of outbred samples might become useful tools to evaluate the pathogenicity of a VUS, based on its frequency in different populations. In the case of the Mexican and other Latino populations, several thousands of samples have been genotyped or sequenced during the last few years as part of different efforts to identify common variants associated to common diseases. In this report, we analyzed Mexican population data from a sample of 3985 outbred individuals, and additional 66 hereditary breast cancer patients were analyzed in order to better define the spectrum of common genomic variation of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Our analyses identified the most common genetic variants in these clinically relevant genes as well as the presence and frequency of specific pathogenic mutations present in the Mexican population. Analysis of the 3985 population samples by MPS identified three pathogenic mutations in BRCA1, only one population sample showed a BRCA1 exon 16-17 deletion by MLPA. This resulted in a basal prevalence of deleterious mutations of 0.10% (1:996) for BRCA1 and 11 pathogenic mutations in BRCA2, resulting in a basal prevalence of deleterious mutations of 0.276% (1:362) for BRCA2, combined of 0.376% (1:265). Separate analysis of the breast cancer patients identified the presence of pathogenic mutations in 18% (12 pathogenic mutations in 66 patients) of the samples by MPS and 13 additional alterations by MLPA. These results will support a better interpretation of clinical studies focused on the detection of BRCA mutations in Mexican and Latino populations and will help to define the general prevalence of deleterious mutations within these populations.

Keywords: BRCA; Breast cancer; Genetic testing; Germline; Populations.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests

AHM received a grant from Astra Zeneca Mexico for this paper. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Principal component analysis of the Mexican Genome Diversity Project samples included. European and African samples from the International HapMap Project were included as references. a The PCA shows that the mestizo (admixed populations) are located between the Amerindian samples (ZAP, Zapoteco; MAY, Maya; TEPEH, Tepehuano) and the European samples, in a wide distribution defined by the percentage of Amerindian-European Ancestry. b Ancestry proportions of each sample

References

    1. Robson M, et al. Olaparib for metastatic breast cancer in patients with a germline BRCA mutation. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(6):523–533. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1706450.
    1. Pujade-Lauraine E, et al. Olaparib tablets as maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer and a BRCA1/2 mutation (SOLO2/ENGOT-Ov21): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(9):1274–1284. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30469-2.
    1. Manickam K, et al. Exome sequencing–based screening for brca1/2 expected pathogenic variants among adult biobank participants. JAMA Network Open. 2018;1(5):e182140. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2140.
    1. Calderon-Garciduenas AL, et al. Clinical follow up of Mexican women with early onset of breast cancer and mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Salud Publica Mex. 2005;47(2):110–115. doi: 10.1590/S0036-36342005000200004.
    1. Ruiz-Flores P, et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation analysis of early-onset and familial breast cancer cases in Mexico. Hum Mutat. 2002;20(6):474–475. doi: 10.1002/humu.9084.
    1. Vaca-Paniagua F, et al. Full-exon pyrosequencing screening of BRCA germline mutations in Mexican women with inherited breast and ovarian cancer. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037432.
    1. Vidal-Millan S, et al. Mutational analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Mexican breast cancer patients. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2009;30(5):527–530.
    1. Villarreal-Garza C, et al. The prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among young Mexican women with triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;150(2):389–394. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3312-8.
    1. Weitzel JN, et al. Prevalence and type of BRCA mutations in Hispanics undergoing genetic cancer risk assessment in the southwestern United States: a report from the clinical cancer genetics community research network. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(2):210–216. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.41.0027.
    1. Villarreal-Garza C, et al. Significant clinical impact of recurrent BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Mexico. Cancer. 2015;121(3):372–378. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29058.
    1. Ossa CA, Torres D. Founder and recurrent mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Latin American countries: state of the art and literature review. Oncologist. 2016;21(7):832–839. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0416.
    1. Narod SA. Screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast cancer patients from Mexico: the public health perspective. Salud Publica Mex. 2009;51(Suppl 2):s191–s196. doi: 10.1590/S0036-36342009000800009.
    1. Richards S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–424. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30.
    1. Lek M, et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature. 2016;536(7616):285–291. doi: 10.1038/nature19057.
    1. Genomes Project C, et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015;526(7571):68–74. doi: 10.1038/nature15393.
    1. Consortium, S.T.D et al. Association of a low-frequency variant in HNF1A with type 2 diabetes in a Latino population. JAMA. 2014;311(22):2305–2314. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.6511.
    1. Consortium, S.T.D et al. Sequence variants in SLC16A11 are a common risk factor for type 2 diabetes in Mexico. Nature. 2014;506(7486):97–101. doi: 10.1038/nature12828.
    1. Portal, T.D.K . Type 2 diabetes knowledge Portal. 2018.
    1. Silva-Zolezzi I, et al. Analysis of genomic diversity in Mexican Mestizo populations to develop genomic medicine in Mexico. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(21):8611–8616. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903045106.
    1. NCBI . ClinVar. 2018.
    1. Manrai AK, et al. Genetic misdiagnoses and the potential for health disparities. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(7):655–665. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1507092.
    1. Gerhard GS, Fisher SG, Feldman AM. Genetic testing for inherited cardiac diseases in underserved populations of non-European ancestry: double disparity. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3(4):273–274. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.5345.
    1. Moreno-Estrada A, et al. Human genetics. The genetics of Mexico recapitulates Native American substructure and affects biomedical traits. Science. 2014;344(6189):1280–1285. doi: 10.1126/science.1251688.
    1. McKean-Cowdin R, et al. BRCA1 variants in a family study of African-American and Latina women. Hum Genet. 2005;116(6):497–506. doi: 10.1007/s00439-004-1240-5.
    1. Rebbeck TR, et al. Inheritance of deleterious mutations at both BRCA1 and BRCA2 in an international sample of 32,295 women. Breast Cancer Res. 2016;18(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0768-3.
    1. Weitzel JN, et al. Prevalence of BRCA mutations and founder effect in high-risk Hispanic families. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2005;14(7):1666–1671. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0072.
    1. Lecarpentier J, et al. Variation in breast cancer risk associated with factors related to pregnancies according to truncating mutation location, in the French national BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations carrier cohort (GENEPSO) Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14(4):R99. doi: 10.1186/bcr3218.
    1. Kwong A, et al. Comprehensive spectrum of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deleterious mutations in breast cancer in Asian countries. J Med Genet. 2016;53(1):15–23. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103132.
    1. Bolton KL, et al. Association between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and survival in women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. JAMA. 2012;307(4):382–390. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.20.
    1. Guidugli L, et al. A classification model for BRCA2 DNA binding domain missense variants based on homology-directed repair activity. Cancer Res. 2013;73(1):265–275. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2081.
    1. Borg A, et al. Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deleterious mutations and variants of unknown clinical significance in unilateral and bilateral breast cancer: the WECARE study. Hum Mutat. 2010;31(3):E1200–E1240. doi: 10.1002/humu.21202.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi