Surgical mask to prevent influenza transmission in households: a cluster randomized trial

Laetitia Canini, Laurent Andréoletti, Pascal Ferrari, Romina D'Angelo, Thierry Blanchon, Magali Lemaitre, Laurent Filleul, Jean-Pierre Ferry, Michel Desmaizieres, Serge Smadja, Alain-Jacques Valleron, Fabrice Carrat, Laetitia Canini, Laurent Andréoletti, Pascal Ferrari, Romina D'Angelo, Thierry Blanchon, Magali Lemaitre, Laurent Filleul, Jean-Pierre Ferry, Michel Desmaizieres, Serge Smadja, Alain-Jacques Valleron, Fabrice Carrat

Abstract

Background: Facemasks and respirators have been stockpiled during pandemic preparedness. However, data on their effectiveness for limiting transmission are scarce. We evaluated the effectiveness of facemask use by index cases for limiting influenza transmission by large droplets produced during coughing in households.

Methodology and principal findings: A cluster randomized intervention trial was conducted in France during the 2008-2009 influenza season. Households were recruited during a medical visit of a household member with a positive rapid influenza A test and symptoms lasting less than 48 hours. Households were randomized either to the mask or control group for 7 days. In the intervention arm, the index case had to wear a surgical mask from the medical visit and for a period of 5 days. The trial was initially intended to include 372 households but was prematurely interrupted after the inclusion of 105 households (306 contacts) following the advice of an independent steering committee. We used generalized estimating equations to test the association between the intervention and the proportion of household contacts who developed an influenza-like illness during the 7 days following the inclusion. Influenza-like illness was reported in 24/148 (16.2%) of the contacts in the intervention arm and in 25/158 (15.8%) of the contacts in the control arm and the difference between arms was 0.40% (95%CI: -10% to 11%, P = 1.00). We observed a good adherence to the intervention. In various sensitivity analyses, we did not identify any trend in the results suggesting effectiveness of facemasks.

Conclusion: This study should be interpreted with caution since the lack of statistical power prevents us to draw formal conclusion regarding effectiveness of facemasks in the context of a seasonal epidemic.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT00774774.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Flow diagram.
Figure 1. Flow diagram.

References

    1. Brankston G, Gitterman L, Hirji Z, Lemieux C, Gardam M. Transmission of influenza A in human beings. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7:257–265.
    1. Aiello AE, Murray GF, Perez V, Coulborn RM, Davis BM, et al. Mask use, hand hygiene, and seasonal influenza like illness among young adults: a randomized intervention trial. J Infect Dis. 2010;201:491–498.
    1. Cowling BJ, Chan KH, Fang VJ, Cheng CKY, Fung ROP, et al. Facemasks and hand hygiene to prevent influenza transmission in households: A cluster randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:437–446.
    1. Cowling BJ, Fung ROP, Cheng CKY, Fang VJ, Chan KH, et al. Preliminary findings of a randomized trial of non-pharmaceutical interventions to prevent influenza transmission in households. PLoS One. 2008;3:2101.
    1. Loeb M, Dafoe N, Mahony J, John M, Sarabia A, et al. Surgical Mask vs N95 Respirator for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Workers: A Randomized Trial. J Amer Med Assoc. 2009;302:1865–1871.
    1. MacIntyre CR, Cauchemez S, Dwyer DE, Seale H, Cheung P, et al. Face mask use and control of respiratory virus transmission in households. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;15:233.
    1. Cowling BJ, Zhou Y, Ip DKM, Leung GM, Aiello AE. Face masks to prevent transmission of influenza virus: a systematic review. Epidemiol Infect. 2010;138:449–456.
    1. Carrat F, Flahault A, Boussard E, Farran N, Dangoumau L, et al. Surveillance of influenza-like illness in France. The example of the 1995/1996 epidemic. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52(Suppl 1):32S–38S.
    1. Viboud C, Boelle PY, Cauchemez S, Lavenu A, Valleron AJ, et al. Risk factors of influenza transmission in households. Brit J Gen Pract. 2004;54:684–689.
    1. Carrat F, Sahler C, Rogez S, Leruez-Ville M, Freymuth F, et al. Influenza burden of illness: estimates from a national prospective survey of household contacts in France. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1842.
    1. INSEE Résultats du recensement de la population. 2006. Available: . Accessed January 6 2010.
    1. Bridges CB, Thompson WW, Meltzer MI, Reeve GR, Talamonti WJ, et al. Effectiveness and cost-benefit of influenza vaccination of healthy working adults: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000;284:1655–1663.
    1. Field CA, Welsh AH. Bootstrapping clustered data. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2007;69:369–390.
    1. Carey V, Zeger SL, Diggle P. Modelling multivariate binary data with alternating logistic regressions. Biometrika. 1993;80:517–526.
    1. RéseauSentinelles Bulletin hebdomadaire du 04/09/2009. 2009. Available: . Accessed November 4 2009.
    1. Cauchemez S, Donnelly CA, Reed C, Ghani AC, Fraser C, et al. Household transmission of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2619–2627.
    1. France AM, Jackson M, Schrag S, Lynch M, Zimmerman C, et al. Household transmission of 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus after a school-based outbreak in New York City, April-May 2009. J Infect Dis. 2010;201:984–992.
    1. Carrat F, Vergu E, Ferguson NM, Lemaitre M, Cauchemez S, et al. Time lines of infection and disease in human influenza: a review of volunteer challenge studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167:775–785.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi