Comparison of the ELISA and ECL Assay for Vedolizumab Anti-drug Antibodies: Assessing the Impact on Pharmacokinetics and Safety Outcomes of the Phase 3 GEMINI Trials

Timothy Wyant, Lili Yang, Maria Rosario, Timothy Wyant, Lili Yang, Maria Rosario

Abstract

Vedolizumab immunogenicity has been assessed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with a ~ 0.5 μg/mL drug interference, which may underestimate on-drug immunogenicity. We aimed to compare immunogenicity results between ELISA and the new drug-tolerant electrochemiluminescence (ECL) assay (and the two versions of neutralizing assays, drug-sensitive versus drug-tolerant). The ECL assay drug tolerance is ~ 100 times higher than that of the ELISA (≥ 50 μg/mL vs. 0.5 μg/mL with a 500 ng/mL positive control), and assay sensitivity is < 5 ng/mL for both assays. Vedolizumab immunogenicity was assessed in 2000 GEMINI 1 and 2 patients originally tested by ELISA and retested by ECL assay. Anti-drug antibody (ADA) impact on infusion-related reactions and pharmacokinetics (PK) was examined using descriptive statistics and population PK analyses. By ECL assay, 6% (86/1427) of patients treated with vedolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy tested ADA-positive. Of these, 20 patients were persistently positive and 56 had neutralizing antibodies. By ELISA, 4% (56/1434) of these patients were ADA-positive, 9 were persistently positive, and 33 had neutralizing antibodies. Among 61 patients with infusion-related reactions, 6 (10%) were ADA-positive (2 persistently positive) by ECL assay. By ELISA, 3 (5%) patients were both ADA-positive and persistently positive. Most results (96%) were similar with both assays. In the updated population PK model, ADA-positive status was estimated to increase vedolizumab linear clearance by a factor of 1.10 (95% credible interval 1.03-1.17), which is consistent with previous reports. The impact of ADA on safety and PK modeling remained generally consistent using either ELISA or ECL assay. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00783718 and NCT00783692.

Keywords: ELISA; electrochemiluminescence; immunogenicity; vedolizumab.

Conflict of interest statement

Timothy Wyant and Maria Rosario were employees of Takeda at the time this research was conducted. Lili Yang is an employee of Takeda and holds Takeda stocks or stock options.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Modeled effect of covariates on vedolizumab linear clearance (CLL) using the ECL assay data. CLL for a patients with UC and b patients with CD relative to a typical reference patient (UC referent 70 kg, albumin 4 g/dL, fecal calprotectin 700 mg/kg, partial Mayo score 6, 40 years old, naive anti-TNFα therapy, ADASUB-negative, and no adjuvant azathioprine, mercaptopurine, methotrexate, or aminosalicylate therapy; CD referent 70 kg, albumin 4 g/dL, fecal calprotectin 700 mg/kg, CDAI score 300, 40 years old, anti-TNF therapy naive, ADA-negative, and no adjuvant azathioprine, mercaptopurine, methotrexate, or aminosalicylate therapy) is plotted by covariate value. Covariates were fixed to the reference values except when they were the subject of perturbation. Body weight and albumin were evaluated at the observed 5th, 25th, 75th, and 95th percentiles in the data set. The closed circles represent the median and the horizontal lines represent the derived 95% CDI. The vertical dashed line at x = 1 represents the typical reference patient, and the grey-shaded region represents a parameter change of ± 25% from the reference value of 1 (null effect). ADA vedolizumab anti-drug antibody, ADASUB patient-level vedolizumab ADA incidence indicator, CD Crohn’s disease, CDAI Crohn’s Disease Activity Index, CDI credible interval, ECL electrochemiluminescence, TNF tumor necrosis factor alpha, UC ulcerative colitis

References

    1. Vermeire S, Gils A, Accossato P, Lula S, Marren A. Immunogenicity of biologics in inflammatory bowel disease. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2018;11:1756283X17750355. doi: 10.1177/1756283X17750355.
    1. Soler D, Chapman T, Yang LL, Wyant T, Egan R, Fedyk ER. The binding specificity and selective antagonism of vedolizumab, an anti-alpha4beta7 integrin therapeutic antibody in development for inflammatory bowel diseases. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009;330(3):864–875. doi: 10.1124/jpet.109.153973.
    1. Feagan BG, Rutgeerts P, Sands BE, Hanauer S, Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, van Assche G, Axler J, Kim HJ, Danese S, Fox I, Milch C, Sankoh S, Wyant T, Xu J, Parikh A. Vedolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(8):699–710. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1215734.
    1. Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Rutgeerts P, Hanauer S, Colombel JF, Sands BE, Lukas M, Fedorak RN, Lee S, Bressler B, Fox I, Rosario M, Sankoh S, Xu J, Stephens K, Milch C, Parikh A, GEMINI 2 Study Group Vedolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy for Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(8):711–721. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1215739.
    1. Sandborn WJ, Lee SD, Tarabar D, Louis E, Klopocka M, Klaus J, Reinisch W, Hébuterne X, Park DI, Schreiber S, Nayak S, Ahmad A, Banerjee A, Brown LS, Cataldi F, Gorelick KJ, Cheng JB, Hassan-Zahraee M, Clare R, D’Haens GR. Phase II evaluation of anti-MAdCAM antibody PF-00547659 in the treatment of Crohn’s disease: report of the OPERA study. Gut. 2018;67(10):1824–1835. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313457.
    1. Vedolizumab [package insert]. Deerfield, IL: Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc; 2020.
    1. Vedolizumab [summary of product characteristics]. Taastrup, Denmark: Takeda Pharma A/S; Revised 28 April 2020.
    1. Curtis JR, Yang S, Patkar NM, Chen L, Singh JA, Cannon GW, Mikuls TR, Delzell E, Saag KG, Safford MM, DuVall S, Alexander K, Napalkov P, Winthrop KL, Burton MJ, Kamauu A, Baddley JW. Risk of hospitalized bacterial infections associated with biologic treatment among US veterans with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2014;66(7):990–997. doi: 10.1002/acr.22281.
    1. McLean LP, Cross RK. Pharmacodynamic assessment of vedolizumab for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2016;12(7):833–842. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2016.1181171.
    1. Sands BE, Feagan BG, Rutgeerts P, Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, Sy R, et al. Effects of vedolizumab induction therapy for patients with Crohn’s disease in whom tumor necrosis factor antagonist treatment failed. Gastroenterology. 2014;147(3):618–27.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.05.008.
    1. Rosario M, Dirks NL, Milch C, Parikh A, Bargfrede M, Wyant T, Fedyk E, Fox I. A review of the clinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of vedolizumab. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017;56(11):1287–1301. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0546-0.
    1. Rosario M, Dirks NL, Gastonguay MR, Fasanmade AA, Wyant T, Parikh A, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Reinisch W, Fox I. Population pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of vedolizumab in patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;42(2):188–202. doi: 10.1111/apt.13243.
    1. Rosario M, Fox I, Milch C, Pariky A, Feagan B, Sandborn W, et al. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship and immunologenicity of vedolizumab in adults with inflammatory bowel disease: additional results from GEMINI 1 and 2. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19(Suppl 1):S80. doi: 10.1097/01.MIB.0000438818.81129.5b.
    1. Kloks C, Berger C, Cortez P, Dean Y, Heinrich J, Bjerring Jensen L, Koppenburg V, Kostense S, Kramer D, Spindeldreher S, Kirby H. A fit-for-purpose strategy for the risk-based immunogenicity testing of biotherapeutics: a European industry perspective. J Immunol Methods. 2015;417:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2015.01.003.
    1. Colombel JF, Sands BE, Rutgeerts P, Sandborn W, Danese S, D’Haens G, Panaccione R, Loftus EV, Jr, Sankoh S, Fox I, Parikh A, Milch C, Abhyankar B, Feagan BG. The safety of vedolizumab for ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2017;66(5):839–851. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311079.
    1. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna; 2015.
    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Immunogenicity testing of therapeutic protein products —developing and validating assays for anti-drug antibody detection. Guidance for industry: Department of Health and Human Services; 2019.
    1. Goodman J, Cowen S, Devanarayan V, Egging D, Emrich T, Golob M, et al. Feedback from the European Bioanalysis Forum: focus workshop on current analysis of immunogenicity: best practices and regulatory hurdles. Bioanalysis. 2018;10(4):197–204. 10.4155/bio-2017-4971
    1. Shankar G, Pendley C, Stein KE. A risk-based bioanalytical strategy for the assessment of antibody immune responses against biological drugs. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25(5):555–561. doi: 10.1038/nbt1303.
    1. Sandborn WJ, Baert F, Danese S, Krznaric Z, Kobayashi T, Yao X, et al. Efficacy and safety of vedolizumab subcutaneous formulation in a randomized trial of patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(3):562–572. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.027.
    1. Paramsothy S, Rosenstein AK, Mehandru S, Colombel JF. The current state of the art for biological therapies and new small molecules in inflammatory bowel disease. Mucosal Immunol. 2018;11(6):1558–1570. doi: 10.1038/s41385-018-0050-3.
    1. Hanauer SB, Wagner CL, Bala M, Mayer L, Travers S, Diamond RH, Olson A, Bao W, Rutgeerts P. Incidence and importance of antibody responses to infliximab after maintenance or episodic treatment in Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2(7):542–553. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00238-1.
    1. Stein DJ, Ananthakrishnan AN, Issa M, Williams JB, Beaulieu DB, Zadvornova Y, Ward A, Johnson K, Knox JF, Skaros S, Binion DG. Impact of prior irregular infliximab dosing on performance of long-term infliximab maintenance therapy in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;16(7):1173–1179. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21164.
    1. Baert F, Drobne D, Gils A, Vande Casteele N, Hauenstein S, Singh S, et al. Early trough levels and antibodies to infliximab predict safety and success of reinitiation of infliximab therapy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12(9):1474–81 e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.01.033.
    1. Thomas SS, Borazan N, Barroso N, Duan L, Taroumian S, Kretzmann B, Bardales R, Elashoff D, Vangala S, Furst DE. Comparative immunogenicity of TNF inhibitors: impact on clinical efficacy and tolerability in the management of autoimmune diseases. A systematic review and meta-analysis. BioDrugs. 2015;29(4):241–258. doi: 10.1007/s40259-015-0134-5.
    1. Michallet MC, Saltel F, Flacher M, Revillard JP, Genestier L. Cathepsin-dependent apoptosis triggered by supraoptimal activation of T lymphocytes: a possible mechanism of high dose tolerance. J Immunol. 2004;172(9):5405–5414. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.9.5405.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi