Use of the ONCO-TreC electronic diary compared with a standard paper diary to improve adherence to oral cancer therapy in patients with solid and haematological tumours: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Alessandro Passardi, Patrizia Serra, Orazio Caffo, Carla Masini, Erika Brugugnoli, Roberto Vespignani, Valeria Giardino, Elisabetta Petracci, Giulia Bartolini, Francesco Sullo, Cecilia Anesi, Marco Dianti, Claudio Eccher, Enrico Maria Piras, Lorenzo Gios, Annalisa Campomori, Valentina Oberosler, Stefano Forti, Alessandro Passardi, Patrizia Serra, Orazio Caffo, Carla Masini, Erika Brugugnoli, Roberto Vespignani, Valeria Giardino, Elisabetta Petracci, Giulia Bartolini, Francesco Sullo, Cecilia Anesi, Marco Dianti, Claudio Eccher, Enrico Maria Piras, Lorenzo Gios, Annalisa Campomori, Valentina Oberosler, Stefano Forti

Abstract

Introduction: ONCO-TreC platform consists of a mobile application delivered to patients as electronic diary and a web-based dashboard managed by healthcare professionals. We aim to compare the effectiveness of ONCO-TreC electronic diary with a standard paper diary, in improving adherence to oral cancer therapy in patients with solid and haematological tumours.

Methods and analysis: This is an open label, superiority, randomised controlled trial conducted in two Italian oncology units. Patients will be randomised with a 1:1 ratio to electronic or paper diary. For both groups a counsellor will be responsible for drug and diary delivery. The evaluation period will end after six cycles of therapy. The primary aim is to compare the proportion of non-adherent patients in the two arms. Adherence will be measured through pill count; anyone who takes less than 90% of the total prescribed drug dose will be considered non-adherent. Assuming a percentage of non-adherent patients to oral therapy of 40% in arm B, and a 60% reduction in this percentage in arm A, a sample of 124 patients will provide 80% power to identify an absolute difference greater than 24 percentage points using a bilateral Fisher's exact test with a significance level of 0.05. Considering a dropout rate of 10%, approximately 136 patients will have to be enrolled. The primary analysis will be performed on the intention-to-treat population. Secondary aims are to describe the reasons for non-adherence, the level of satisfaction of patients and healthcare professionals with the paper and electronic diary, and the impact of non-adherence in terms of healthcare costs.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from Romagna Ethics Committee (CEROM), study ID 2108, prot. n. IRST 100.28 of 10/04/2020. Informed consent will be obtained from all study participants. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conferences and event presentations.

Protocol version: Version 2, 6 April 2021.

Trial registration number: NCT04826458.

Keywords: information management; oncology; oral medicine.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med 2005;353:487–97. 10.1056/NEJMra050100
    1. Brown MT, Bussell JK. Medication adherence: WHO cares? Mayo Clin Proc 2011;86:304–14. 10.4065/mcp.2010.0575
    1. Huang W-C, Chen C-Y, Lin S-J, et al. . Medication adherence to oral anticancer drugs: systematic review. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2016;16:423–32. 10.1586/14737140.2016.1159515
    1. Bergsbaken JJ, Eickhoff JC, Buss BA, et al. . Assessment of adherence with oral anticancer agents in oncology clinical trials: a systematic review. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2016;22:105–13. 10.1177/1078155214567163
    1. Greer JA, Amoyal N, Nisotel L, et al. . A systematic review of adherence to oral antineoplastic therapies. Oncologist 2016;21:354–76. 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0405
    1. Fenerty SD, West C, Davis SA, et al. . The effect of reminder systems on patients' adherence to treatment. Patient Prefer Adherence 2012;6:127–35. 10.2147/PPA.S26314
    1. Vervloet M, van Dijk L, Santen-Reestman J, et al. . SMS reminders improve adherence to oral medication in type 2 diabetes patients who are real time electronically monitored. Int J Med Inform 2012;81:594–604. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.05.005
    1. Oakley C, Lennan E, Roe H, et al. . Safe practice and nursing care of patients receiving oral anti-cancer medicines: a position statement from UKONS. Ecancermedicalscience 2010;4:177. 10.3332/ecancer.2010.177
    1. Mathes T, Antoine S-L, Pieper D, et al. . Adherence enhancing interventions for oral anticancer agents: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev 2014;40:102–8. 10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.07.004
    1. Gebbia V, Bellavia M, Banna GL, et al. . Treatment monitoring program for implementation of adherence to second-line erlotinib for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2013;14:390–8. 10.1016/j.cllc.2012.11.007
    1. Simons S, Ringsdorf S, Braun M, et al. . Enhancing adherence to capecitabine chemotherapy by means of multidisciplinary pharmaceutical care. Support Care Cancer 2011;19:1009–18. 10.1007/s00520-010-0927-5
    1. Weaver A, Young AM, Rowntree J, et al. . Application of mobile phone technology for managing chemotherapy-associated side-effects. Ann Oncol 2007;18:1887–92. 10.1093/annonc/mdm354
    1. Paré G, Moqadem K, Pineau G, et al. . Clinical effects of home telemonitoring in the context of diabetes, asthma, heart failure and hypertension: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2010;12:e21. 10.2196/jmir.1357
    1. Polisena J, Tran K, Cimon K, et al. . Home telehealth for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare 2010;16:120–7. 10.1258/jtt.2009.090812
    1. Polisena J, Tran K, Cimon K, et al. . Home telemonitoring for congestive heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare 2010;16:68–76. 10.1258/jtt.2009.090406
    1. Galligioni E, Piras EM, Galvagni M, et al. . Integrating mHealth in oncology: experience in the province of Trento. J Med Internet Res 2015;17:e114. 10.2196/jmir.3743
    1. Galligioni E, Berloffa F, Caffo O, et al. . Development and daily use of an electronic oncological patient record for the total management of cancer patients: 7 years' experience. Ann Oncol 2009;20:349–52. 10.1093/annonc/mdn567
    1. Eccher C, Gios L, Zanutto A, et al. . TreC platform. An integrated and evolving care model for patients' empowerment and data Repository. J Biomed Inform 2020;102:103359. 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103359
    1. Eccher C, Piras EM, Stenico M. TreC - a REST-based regional PHR. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011;169:108–12.
    1. Passardi A, Rizzo M, Maines F, et al. . Optimisation and validation of a remote monitoring system (Onco-TreC) for home-based management of oral anticancer therapies: an Italian multicentre feasibility study. BMJ Open 2017;7:e014617. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014617
    1. Brooke J. SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, eds. Usability evaluation in industry. London: Taylor & Francis, 1996: 189–94.
    1. Medeiros KS, Queiroz JF, Monteiro MN, et al. . Impact of mobile applications on adherence to cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. BMJ Open 2019;9:e027246. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027246

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi