Dose-finding study of ibrutinib and venetoclax in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma

Craig A Portell, Nolan A Wages, Brad S Kahl, Lihua E Budde, Robert W Chen, Jonathon B Cohen, Nikole E Varhegyi, Gina R Petroni, Michael E Williams, Craig A Portell, Nolan A Wages, Brad S Kahl, Lihua E Budde, Robert W Chen, Jonathon B Cohen, Nikole E Varhegyi, Gina R Petroni, Michael E Williams

Abstract

Relapsed Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is often treated with Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi); however, post-BTKi relapse can be challenging. Adding venetoclax (VEN) to ibrutinib (IBR) has shown synergy in preclinical MCL models. Prior MCL studies of the combination show promising efficacy but have conducted limited dose finding. We sought to identify the optimal dosing combination, based on efficacy and toxicity, utilizing a continual reassessment method of 6 combinations of IBR (280 mg, 420 mg, and 560 mg by mouth daily) and VEN (max dose of 200 mg and 400 mg by mouth daily). Eligible participants were not previously exposed to BTKi and not high risk for tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). VEN, initiated first at 100 mg, then at 20 mg by mouth daily after a TLS event, was started prior to adding IBR and ramped-up based on the dose level assigned. Combination treatment continued for six 28-day cycles. Thirty-five participants were enrolled and treated. One TLS event occurred with starting dose of 100 mg VEN; no TLS was seen with 20 mg. The optimal dosing combination was considered to be VEN 200 mg and IBR 420 mg with an overall response rate (ORR) of 93.8% (95% CI: 73.6% to 99.7%) and DLT incidence of 6.2% (95% CI: 0.3% to 26.4%). ORR for all arms was 82.3% (28/34; 95% CI: 65.5% to 93.2%) with a complete response (CR) rate of 42.4% (14/33; 95% CI: 25.5% to 60.8%). A participant was not allocated to IBR 560 mg and VEN 400 mg. ORR benefit was not seen with higher dosing combinations and toxicity was higher; a comparison made within the limitations of small cohorts. Resistance was seen in nearly all arms. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov #NCT02419560.

© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Treatment schema. Participants were initially treated with VEN, starting at 20 mg by mouth daily and increasing to 50 mg by mouth daily and 100 mg by mouth daily over 2 weeks (cycle 0*). Participants must have had at least 2 but no more than 4 days of 20 mg, and 3 but no more than 5 days of 50 mg before moving to 100 mg by mouth daily for 7 days. Ibrutinib (IBR), at the allocated dose, was added to venetoclax (VEN) at 100 mg by mouth daily for an additional 7 days (cycle 1, week 1). Weekly VEN dose titration was continued to the allocated dose as shown.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
PFS and OS. (A) PFS for all participants. (B) PFS for the optimal dose, arm B (IBR 420 mg daily and VEN 200 mg daily). (C) OS for all participants. (D) OS for the optimal dose, arm B (IBR 420 mg daily and VEN 200 mg daily).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
PFS in those finishing study therapy. PFS starts at the end of therapy and compares those that were treated with IBR (red) to those that were not (blue).

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7-30.
    1. Swerdlow SHCE, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, Thiele J. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, Revised 4th Edition. Lyon: IARC; 2017
    1. Al-Hamadani M, Habermann TM, Cerhan JR, Macon WR, Maurer MJ, Go RS. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtype distribution, geodemographic patterns, and survival in the US: A longitudinal analysis of the National Cancer Data Base from 1998 to 2011. Am J Hematol. 2015;90(9):790-795.
    1. Cohen JB, Han X, Jemal A, Ward EM, Flowers CR. Deferred therapy is associated with improved overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma. Cancer. 2016;122(15):2356-2363.
    1. Martin P, Chadburn A, Christos P, et al. . Outcome of deferred initial therapy in mantle-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(8):1209-1213.
    1. Fernàndez V, Salamero O, Espinet B, et al. . Genomic and gene expression profiling defines indolent forms of mantle cell lymphoma. Cancer Res. 2010;70(4):1408-1418.
    1. Clot G, Jares P, Giné E, et al. . A gene signature that distinguishes conventional and leukemic nonnodal mantle cell lymphoma helps predict outcome. Blood. 2018;132(4):413-422.
    1. Geisler CH, Kolstad A, Laurell A, et al. ; Nordic Lymphoma Group . Long-term progression-free survival of mantle cell lymphoma after intensive front-line immunochemotherapy with in vivo-purged stem cell rescue: a nonrandomized phase 2 multicenter study by the Nordic Lymphoma Group. Blood. 2008;112(7):2687-2693.
    1. Eskelund CW, Kolstad A, Jerkeman M, et al. . 15-year follow-up of the Second Nordic Mantle Cell Lymphoma trial (MCL2): prolonged remissions without survival plateau. Br J Haematol. 2016;175(3):410-418.
    1. Hermine O, Hoster E, Walewski J, et al. ; European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network . Addition of high-dose cytarabine to immunochemotherapy before autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients aged 65 years or younger with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL Younger): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial of the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network. Lancet. 2016;388(10044):565-575.
    1. Delarue R, Haioun C, Ribrag V, et al. ; Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes de l’Adulte (GELA) . CHOP and DHAP plus rituximab followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in mantle cell lymphoma: a phase 2 study from the Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes de l’Adulte. Blood. 2013;121(1):48-53.
    1. Le Gouill S, Thieblemont C, Oberic L, et al. ; LYSA Group . Rituximab after Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Mantle-Cell Lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(13):1250-1260.
    1. Wang ML, Blum KA, Martin P, et al. . Long-term follow-up of MCL patients treated with single-agent ibrutinib: updated safety and efficacy results. Blood. 2015;126(6):739-745.
    1. Wang ML, Rule S, Martin P, et al. . Targeting BTK with ibrutinib in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(6):507-516.
    1. Advani RH, Buggy JJ, Sharman JP, et al. . Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib (PCI-32765) has significant activity in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(1):88-94.
    1. Rule S, Dreyling M, Goy A, et al. . Outcomes in 370 patients with mantle cell lymphoma treated with ibrutinib: a pooled analysis from three open-label studies. Br J Haematol. 2017;179(3):430-438.
    1. Martin P, Maddocks K, Leonard JP, et al. . Postibrutinib outcomes in patients with mantle cell lymphoma. Blood. 2016;127(12):1559-1563.
    1. Cheah CY, Chihara D, Romaguera JE, et al. . Patients with mantle cell lymphoma failing ibrutinib are unlikely to respond to salvage chemotherapy and have poor outcomes. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(6):1175-1179.
    1. Jain P, Kanagal-Shamanna R, Zhang S, et al. . Long-term outcomes and mutation profiling of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who discontinued ibrutinib. Br J Haematol. 2018;183(4):578-587.
    1. Woyach JA, Ruppert AS, Guinn D, et al. . BTKC481S-Mediated Resistance to Ibrutinib in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(13):1437-1443.
    1. Woyach JA, Furman RR, Liu T-M, et al. . Resistance mechanisms for the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(24):2286-2294.
    1. Axelrod M, Ou Z, Brett LK, et al. . Combinatorial drug screening identifies synergistic co-targeting of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase and the proteasome in mantle cell lymphoma. Leukemia. 2013;28(2):407-410.
    1. Cervantes-Gomez F, Lamothe B, Woyach JA, et al. . Pharmacological and Protein Profiling Suggests Venetoclax (ABT-199) as Optimal Partner with Ibrutinib in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(16):3705-3715.
    1. Adams CM, Clark-Garvey S, Porcu P, Eischen CM. Targeting the Bcl-2 Family in B Cell Lymphoma. Front Oncol. 2019;8(636):636.
    1. Souers AJ, Leverson JD, Boghaert ER, et al. . ABT-199, a potent and selective BCL-2 inhibitor, achieves antitumor activity while sparing platelets. Nat Med. 2013;19(2):202-208.
    1. Roberts AW, Davids MS, Pagel JM, et al. . Targeting BCL2 with Venetoclax in Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374(4):311-322.
    1. Davids MS, Roberts AW, Seymour JF, et al. . Phase I First-in-Human Study of Venetoclax in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(8):826-833.
    1. Tam CS, Anderson MA, Pott C, et al. . Ibrutinib plus Venetoclax for the Treatment of Mantle-Cell Lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(13):1211-1223.
    1. Le Gouill S, Morschhauser F, Chiron D, et al. . Ibrutinib, obinutuzumab, and venetoclax in relapsed and untreated patients with mantle cell lymphoma: a phase 1/2 trial. Blood. 2021;137(7):877-887.
    1. Davids MS, von Keudell G, Portell CA, et al. . Revised Dose Ramp-Up to Mitigate the Risk of Tumor Lysis Syndrome When Initiating Venetoclax in Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(35):3525-3527.
    1. Wages NA, Portell CA, Williams ME, Conaway MR, Petroni GR. Implementation of a Model-Based Design in a Phase Ib Study of Combined Targeted Agents. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(23):7158-7164.
    1. Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, et al. ; United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute . Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(27):3059-3067.
    1. Wang M, Ramchandren R, Chen R, et al. . Results from the Safety Run-in Period of the SYMPATICO Study Evaluating Ibrutinib in Combination with Venetoclax in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma. Hematol Oncol. 2019;37(s2):333-335.
    1. Tam CS, Ramchandren R, Chen R, et al. . Ibrutinib Plus Venetoclax in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Results From the Safety Run-In Period of the Phase 3 Sympatico Study. Blood. 2020;136(Supplement 1):39-41.
    1. Handunnetti S, Anderson MA, Burbury K, et al. . Three Year Update of the Phase II ABT-199 (Venetoclax) and Ibrutinib in Mantle Cell Lymphoma (AIM) Study. Blood. 2019;134(Supplement_1):756.
    1. Handunnetti SM, Khot A, Anderson MA, et al. . Safety and Efficacy of Ibrutinib in Combination with Venetoclax in Patients with Marginal Zone Lymphoma: Preliminary Results from an Open Label, Phase II Study. Blood. 2019;134(Supplement_1):3999.
    1. Chen LS, Bose P, Cruz ND, et al. . A pilot study of lower doses of ibrutinib in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2018;132(21):2249-2259.
    1. Akhtar OS, Attwood K, Lund I, Hare R, Hernandez-Ilizaliturri FJ, Torka P. Dose reductions in ibrutinib therapy are not associated with inferior outcomes in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Leuk Lymphoma. 2019;60(7):1650-1655.
    1. Agarwal R, Chan Y-C, Tam CS, et al. . Dynamic molecular monitoring reveals that SWI-SNF mutations mediate resistance to ibrutinib plus venetoclax in mantle cell lymphoma. Nat Med. 2018;25(1):119-129.
    1. Jayappa KD, Portell CA, Gordon VL, et al. . Microenvironmental agonists generate de novo phenotypic resistance to combined ibrutinib plus venetoclax in CLL and MCL. Blood Adv. 2017;1(14):933-946.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi