Mortality and host response aberrations associated with transient and persistent acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with sepsis: a prospective cohort study

Fabrice Uhel, Hessel Peters-Sengers, Fahimeh Falahi, Brendon P Scicluna, Lonneke A van Vught, Marc J Bonten, Olaf L Cremer, Marcus J Schultz, Tom van der Poll, MARS consortium, Fabrice Uhel, Hessel Peters-Sengers, Fahimeh Falahi, Brendon P Scicluna, Lonneke A van Vught, Marc J Bonten, Olaf L Cremer, Marcus J Schultz, Tom van der Poll, MARS consortium

Abstract

Purpose: Sepsis is the most frequent cause of acute kidney injury (AKI). The "Acute Disease Quality Initiative Workgroup" recently proposed new definitions for AKI, classifying it as transient or persistent. We investigated the incidence, mortality, and host response aberrations associated with transient and persistent AKI in sepsis patients.

Methods: A total of 1545 patients admitted with sepsis to 2 intensive care units in the Netherlands were stratified according to the presence (defined by any urine or creatinine RIFLE criterion within the first 48 h) and evolution of AKI (with persistent defined as remaining > 48 h). We determined 30-day mortality by logistic regression adjusting for confounding variables and analyzed 16 plasma biomarkers reflecting pathways involved in sepsis pathogenesis (n = 866) and blood leukocyte transcriptomes (n = 392).

Results: AKI occurred in 37.7% of patients, of which 18.4% was transient and 81.6% persistent. On admission, patients with persistent AKI had higher disease severity scores and more frequently had severe (injury or failure) RIFLE AKI stages than transient AKI patients. Persistent AKI, but not transient AKI, was associated with increased mortality by day 30 and up to 1 year. Persistent AKI was associated with enhanced and sustained inflammatory and procoagulant responses during the first 4 days, and a more severe loss of vascular integrity compared with transient AKI. Baseline blood gene expression showed minimal differences with respect to the presence or evolution of AKI.

Conclusion: Persistent AKI is independently associated with sepsis mortality, as well as with sustained inflammatory and procoagulant responses, and loss of vascular integrity as compared with transient AKI.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01905033.

Keywords: Acute kidney injury; Host response; Intensive care unit; Mortality; Sepsis.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors disclose that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Evolution of acute kidney injury in patients with sepsis. a Chord diagrams depicting the relationship between the severity of AKI upon ICU-admission and the subsequent presence and evolution of AKI over the first 48 hours. The bottom part of the diagram represents patients ranked by initial RIFLE score calculated upon ICU admission, and the top part represents the same patients ranked according to the presence and evolution of AKI over the first 48 h (no AKI, transient or persistent AKI). Ribbons show for every patient the connection between the initial RIFLE score and the subsequent evolution of AKI. The first diagram (a) represents all patients combined. The diagrams below (be), highlight each individual RIFLE severity score separately. Admission RIFLE score was “none” for all (n = 968) patients without AKI. Of patients with transient AKI, 13 (12.3%), 60 (56.6), 24 (22.6), and 9 (8.5%) had an admission RIFLE score of “none,” “at risk,” “injury,” or “failure,” respectively. Of patients who developed persistent AKI, 39 (8.3%), 110 (23.4%), 147 (31.2%), and 175 (37.2%) had an admission RIFLE score of “none”, “at risk”, “injury”, or “failure”, respectively. f Plasma creatinine over time stratified according to the evolution of AKI after admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Data are presented as mean and standard error of the mean. Numbers below axes indicate the number of patients still present in the ICU for each group. Note: mean creatinine levels showed small increases at day 8 and day 20 in the transient AKI group due to the occurrence of ICU-acquired AKI in 4 patients in whom renal function initially recovered after the initial episode of AKI
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Host response biomarkers in patients with sepsis during the first 4 days of ICU stay stratified according to the evolution of acute kidney injury after admission. Biological parameters are classified as a inflammatory responses, b endothelial cell activation, and c coagulation activation biomarkers. Data are presented as box and whiskers, as specified by Tukey. Dotted lines represent median values obtained in 27 healthy age-matched healthy subjects. Overall P values were derived from the linear mixed model in which the group, or the interaction of time x group (i.e. the trajectory) were defined as fixed effects, and patient-specific intercept and slopes were defined as random effects. Comparisons between groups at specific days were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn's post hoc tests of multiple comparisons using rank sums. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001, ****P < .0001. AKI, acute kidney injury; ANG, angiopoietin; aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; IL, interleukin; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; PT, prothrombin time; sE-Selectin, soluble E-selectin; sICAM, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Leukocyte genomic responses upon admission in sepsis patients without, transient, or persistent acute kidney injury. a Volcano plots illustrating the differences in leukocyte genomic responses (integrating log2 fold changes and multiple-test adjusted probabilities) between sepsis patients without acute kidney injury (AKI) on admission and healthy subjects (left), between patients with transient AKI and healthy subjects (center), and between patients with persistent AKI and healthy subjects (right). Considering adjusted P < .05, 9037, 8303 and 9467 genes were identified as differentially expressed in patients without AKI, patients with transient AKI and patients with persistent AKI on admission vs healthy subjects, respectively. Blue dots represent significantly underexpressed genes (adjusted P < .05, fold expression < −1.5), whereas red dots represent significantly overexpressed genes (adjusted P < .05, fold expression > 1.5) in patients relative to healthy controls. Horizontal dotted line indicates multiple-test adjusted Benjamini–Hochberg (BH) P < .05 threshold. Within plots, pie charts show the extent of gene expression changes: Blue slices show significantly underexpressed genes (adjusted P < .05 and expression more than 1.5-times decreased compared with healthy controls), red slices show significantly overexpressed genes (adjusted P < .05 and expression more than 1.5-time increased compared with healthy controls), and grey slices show significantly different gene expression (adjusted P < .05 and expression less than 1.5-time increased or decreased compared with healthy controls). b Venn–Euler representation of differentially expressed genes on admission in sepsis patients without, transient or persistent AKI vs healthy subjects (adjusted P < .05). Red arrows denote overexpressed genes; blue arrows denote underexpressed genes. c Dot plot depicting the common response (log2 fold changes) of patients without, transient, or persistent AKI as compared with healthy subjects. Rho, Spearman’s correlation coefficient. d Volcano plot illustrating the differences in leukocyte genomic responses on admission between patients with transient AKI relative to patients without AKI (left), between patients with persistent AKI relative to patients without AKI (center), and between patients with persistent AKI relative to patients with transient AKI (right). Considering adjusted P < .05, no gene was differentially expressed in patients with transient AKI versus no AKI and in patients with persistent AKI vs transient AKI, and 2466 genes were differentially expressed between patients with persistent AKI vs patients without AKI. Within plots, pie charts show the extent of gene expression changes compared to the control group

References

    1. Hoste EAJ, Kellum JA, Selby NM, et al. Global epidemiology and outcomes of acute kidney injury. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018;14:607–625. doi: 10.1038/s41581-018-0052-0.
    1. Hoste EAJ, Bagshaw SM, Bellomo R, et al. Epidemiology of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: the multinational AKI-EPI study. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:1411–1423. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3934-7.
    1. Gammelager H, Christiansen CF, Johansen MB, et al. Three-year risk of cardiovascular disease among intensive care patients with acute kidney injury: a population-based cohort study. Crit Care. 2014;18:492. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0492-2.
    1. Rimes-Stigare C, Frumento P, Bottai M, et al. Evolution of chronic renal impairment and long-term mortality after de novo acute kidney injury in the critically ill; a Swedish multi-centre cohort study. Crit Care. 2015;19:221. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0920-y.
    1. Uchino S, Kellum JA, Bellomo R, et al. Acute renal failure in critically ill patients: a multinational, multicenter study. JAMA. 2005;294:813–818. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.7.813.
    1. Bagshaw SM, Uchino S, Bellomo R, et al. Septic acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: clinical characteristics and outcomes. CJASN. 2007;2:431–439. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03681106.
    1. Peters E, Antonelli M, Wittebole X, et al. A worldwide multicentre evaluation of the influence of deterioration or improvement of acute kidney injury on clinical outcome in critically ill patients with and without sepsis at ICU admission: results from The Intensive Care Over Nations audit. Crit Care. 2018;22:188. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2112-z.
    1. Bellomo R, Kellum JA, Ronco C, et al. Acute kidney injury in sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:816–828. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4755-7.
    1. Zarbock A, Kellum JA, Schmidt C, et al. Effect of early vs delayed initiation of renal replacement therapy on mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: the ELAIN randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315:2190. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5828.
    1. Gaudry S, Hajage D, Schortgen F, et al. Timing of renal support and outcome of septic shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome. a Post Hoc analysis of the AKIKI randomized clinical trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198:58–66. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201706-1255OC.
    1. Joannidis M, Metnitz B, Bauer P, et al. Acute kidney injury in critically ill patients classified by AKIN versus RIFLE using the SAPS 3 database. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:1692–1702. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1530-4.
    1. Kellum JA, Chawla LS, Keener C, et al. The effects of alternative resuscitation strategies on acute kidney injury in patients with septic shock. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193:281–287. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201505-0995OC.
    1. Forni LG, Darmon M, Ostermann M, et al. Renal recovery after acute kidney injury. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:855–866. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4809-x.
    1. Chawla LS, Bellomo R, Bihorac A, et al. Acute kidney disease and renal recovery: consensus report of the Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) 16 Workgroup. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017;13:241–257. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2017.2.
    1. Langenberg C, Wan L, Egi M, et al. Renal blood flow in experimental septic acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 2006;69:1996–2002. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000440.
    1. Legrand M, Dupuis C, Simon C, et al. Association between systemic hemodynamics and septic acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a retrospective observational study. Crit Care. 2013;17:R278. doi: 10.1186/cc13133.
    1. Langenberg C, Gobe G, Hood S, et al. Renal histopathology during experimental septic acute kidney injury and recovery. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:e58–e67. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a639da.
    1. Maiden MJ, Otto S, Brealey JK, et al. Structure and function of the kidney in septic shock. a prospective controlled experimental study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194:692–700. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201511-2285OC.
    1. Langenberg C, Bagshaw SM, May CN, Bellomo R. The histopathology of septic acute kidney injury: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2008;12:R38. doi: 10.1186/cc6823.
    1. Lerolle N, Nochy D, Guérot E, et al. Histopathology of septic shock induced acute kidney injury: apoptosis and leukocytic infiltration. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:471–478. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1723-x.
    1. Takasu O, Gaut JP, Watanabe E, et al. Mechanisms of cardiac and renal dysfunction in patients dying of sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:509–517. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201211-1983OC.
    1. Aslan A, van den Heuvel MC, Stegeman CA, et al. Kidney histopathology in lethal human sepsis. Crit Care. 2018;22:359. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2287-3.
    1. Parikh CR, Coca SG. Acute kidney injury: defining prerenal azotemia in clinical practice and research. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010;6:641–642. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2010.128.
    1. Chawla LS, Seneff MG, Nelson DR, et al. Elevated plasma concentrations of IL-6 and elevated APACHE II score predict acute kidney injury in patients with severe sepsis. CJASN. 2007;2:22–30. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02510706.
    1. Lankadeva YR, Kosaka J, Evans RG, et al. Intrarenal and urinary oxygenation during norepinephrine resuscitation in ovine septic acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2016;90:100–108. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.02.017.
    1. Gomez H, Ince C, De Backer D, et al. A unified theory of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury. Shock. 2014;41:3–11. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000052.
    1. (2020) Proceedings of Réanimation 2020, the French Intensive Care Society International Congress. Ann Intensive Care 10:16. 10.1186/s13613-020-0623-7
    1. Klein Klouwenberg PMC, Ong DSY, Bos LDJ, et al. Interobserver agreement of centers for disease control and prevention criteria for classifying infections in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:2373–2378. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182923712.
    1. van Vught LA, Klein Klouwenberg PMC, Spitoni C, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and attributable mortality of secondary infections in the intensive care unit after admission for sepsis. JAMA. 2016;315:1469. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2691.
    1. Scicluna BP, Klein Klouwenberg PMC, van Vught LA, et al. A molecular biomarker to diagnose community-acquired pneumonia on intensive care unit admission. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192:826–835. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201502-0355OC.
    1. Scicluna BP, Wiewel MA, van Vught LA, et al. Molecular biomarker to assist in diagnosing abdominal sepsis upon ICU admission. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197:1070–1073. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201707-1339LE.
    1. Meijer MT, Uhel F, Cremer OL, et al. Tenascin C plasma levels in critically ill patients with or without sepsis: a multicentre observational study. Shock. 2019 doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001481.
    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315:801. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
    1. Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, et al. Acute renal failure – definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the second international consensus conference of the acute dialysis quality initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care. 2004;8:R204–9. doi: 10.1186/cc2872.
    1. KDIGO AKI Work Group KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2:1–141. doi: 10.1038/kisup.2012.7.
    1. Zeng X, McMahon GM, Brunelli SM, et al. Incidence, outcomes, and comparisons across definitions of AKI in hospitalized individuals. CJASN. 2014;9:12–20. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02730313.
    1. Bagshaw SM, Uchino S, Cruz D, et al. A comparison of observed versus estimated baseline creatinine for determination of RIFLE class in patients with acute kidney injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24:2739–2744. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp159.
    1. Nejat M, Pickering JW, Walker RJ, Endre ZH. Rapid detection of acute kidney injury by plasma cystatin C in the intensive care unit. Nephrol Dial Transp. 2010;25:3283–3289. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq176.
    1. Bagshaw SM, Bennett M, Haase M, et al. Plasma and urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in septic versus non-septic acute kidney injury in critical illness. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:452–461. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1724-9.
    1. Klein SJ, Brandtner AK, Lehner GF, et al. Biomarkers for prediction of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44:323–336. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5126-8.
    1. Pierrakos C, Vincent J-L. Sepsis biomarkers: a review. Crit Care. 2010;14:R15. doi: 10.1186/cc8872.
    1. Hotchkiss RS, Moldawer LL, Opal SM, et al. Sepsis and septic shock. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16045. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.45.
    1. Claushuis TAM, van Vught LA, Scicluna BP, et al. Thrombocytopenia is associated with a dysregulated host response in critically ill sepsis patients. Blood. 2016;127:3062–3072. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-11-680744.
    1. van der Poll T, van de Veerdonk FL, Scicluna BP, Netea MG. The immunopathology of sepsis and potential therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17:407–420. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.36.
    1. See EJ, Jayasinghe K, Glassford N, et al. Long-term risk of adverse outcomes after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies using consensus definitions of exposure. Kidney Int. 2018;95:160–72. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.08.036.
    1. Chua H-R, Wong W-K, Ong VH, et al. Extended mortality and chronic kidney disease after septic acute kidney injury. J Intensive Care Med. 2018;11:088506661876461–9. doi: 10.1177/0885066618764617.
    1. Truche AS, Ragey SP, Souweine B, et al. ICU survival and need of renal replacement therapy with respect to AKI duration in critically ill patients. Ann Intensive Care. 2018;8:127. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0467-6.
    1. Sood MM, Shafer LA, Ho J, et al. Early reversible acute kidney injury is associated with improved survival in septic shock. J Crit Care. 2014;29:711–717. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.04.003.
    1. Perinel S, Vincent F, Lautrette A, et al. Transient and persistent acute kidney injury and the risk of hospital mortality in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2015;43:e269–e275. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001077.
    1. Kellum JA, Sileanu FE, Bihorac A, et al. Recovery after acute kidney injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195:784–791. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0799OC.
    1. Hoste E, Bihorac A, Al-Khafaji A, et al. Identification and validation of biomarkers of persistent acute kidney injury: the RUBY study. Intensive Care Med. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05919-0.
    1. Mariano F, Cantaluppi V, Stella M, et al. Circulating plasma factors induce tubular and glomerular alterations in septic burns patients. Crit Care. 2008;12:R42. doi: 10.1186/cc6848.
    1. Luo C, Luo F, Zhang L, et al. Knockout of interleukin-17A protects against sepsis-associated acute kidney injury. Ann Intensive Care. 2016;6:56. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0157-1.
    1. Cunningham PN, Dyanov HM, Park P, et al. Acute renal failure in endotoxemia is caused by TNF acting directly on tnf receptor-1 in kidney. J Immunol. 2002;168:5817–5823. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.11.5817.
    1. Knotek M, Rogachev B, Wang W, et al. Endotoxemic renal failure in mice: Role of tumor necrosis factor independent of inducible nitric oxide synthase. Kidney Int. 2001;59:2243–2249. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00740.x.
    1. Lelubre C, Vincent J-L. Mechanisms and treatment of organ failure in sepsis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018;14:417–27. doi: 10.1038/s41581-018-0005-7.
    1. Kellum JA, Sileanu FE, Murugan R, et al. Classifying AKI by urine output versus serum creatinine level. JASN. 2015;26:2231–2238. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014070724.
    1. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:580–637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af.
    1. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:304–377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi