Intra-abdominal hypertension in cardiac surgery patients: a multicenter observational sub-study of the Accuryn registry

Ashish K Khanna, Steven Minear, Andrea Kurz, Vanessa Moll, Kelly Stanton, Leina Essakalli, Amit Prabhakar, Predict AKI Group, Lynnette C Harris, Nia Sweatt, Kelsey Flores, Brandon Reeves, Bruce Cusson, Lillian Nosow, Jessica Fanelli, Lauren Sands, Jacob Fowler, Easton Howard, Samuel Robinson, Anthony Wachnik, Madeline Fram, Rohesh Fernando, Chandrika Garner, Bryan Marchant, Benjamin Morris, Amit Saha, Katherine Egan, Bev Ann Blackwell, Ashish K Khanna, Steven Minear, Andrea Kurz, Vanessa Moll, Kelly Stanton, Leina Essakalli, Amit Prabhakar, Predict AKI Group, Lynnette C Harris, Nia Sweatt, Kelsey Flores, Brandon Reeves, Bruce Cusson, Lillian Nosow, Jessica Fanelli, Lauren Sands, Jacob Fowler, Easton Howard, Samuel Robinson, Anthony Wachnik, Madeline Fram, Rohesh Fernando, Chandrika Garner, Bryan Marchant, Benjamin Morris, Amit Saha, Katherine Egan, Bev Ann Blackwell

Abstract

Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is frequently present in the critically ill and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Conventionally, intermittent 'spot-check' manual measurements of bladder pressure in those perceived as high risk are used as surrogates for intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). True patterns of IAH remain unknown. We explored the incidence of IAH in cardiac surgery patients and describe the intra-and postoperative course of IAP using a novel, high frequency, automated bladder pressure measurement system. Sub-analysis of a prospective, multicenter, observational study (NCT04669548) conducted in three large academic medical centers. Continuous urinary output (CUO) and IAP measurements were observed using the Accuryn Monitoring System (Potrero Medical, Hayward, CA). Data collected included demographics, hemodynamic support, and high-frequency IAP and CUO. One Hundred Thirty-Seven cardiac surgery patients were analyzed intraoperatively and followed 48 h postoperatively in the intensive care unit. Median age was 66.4 [58.3, 72.0] years, and 61% were men. Median Foley catheter dwell time was 56.0 [46.8, 77.5] hours, and median baseline IAP was 6.3 [4.0, 8.1] mmHg. 93% (128/137) of patients were in IAH grade I, 82% (113/137) in grade II, 39% (53/137) in grade III, and 5% (7/137) in grade IV for at least 12 cumulative hours. For maximum consecutive duration of IAH, 84% (115/137) of patients spent at least 12 h in grade I, 62% (85/137) in grade II, 18% (25/137) in grade III, and 2% (3/137) in grade IV IAH. During the first 48 h after cardiac surgery, IAH is common and persistent. Improved and automated monitoring of IAP will increase the detection of IAH-which normally would remain undetected using traditional intermittent monitoring methods.

Keywords: Abdominal compartment syndrome; Cardiac surgery; Intra-abdominal hypertension; IAH; Intra-abdominal pressure; IAP; Perioperative; Real-time monitoring.

Conflict of interest statement

SM and AP declare no support from any organization for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. AKK is a paid consultant for and chairs the steering committee for the Predict AKI group for Potrero Medical and also consults for Edwards Lifesciences, Philips North America, GE Healthcare, Hill-Rom, and Caretaker Medical. His institution has grant funding from Caretaker Medical for ongoing investigations on portable hemodynamic monitoring. AKK is on the executive advisory board for Medtronic and Retia Medical. AKK receives support from the Wake Forest CTSI via NIH/NCATS KL2 for a trial of continuous portable hemodynamic and saturation monitoring on hospital wards. AK is a member of the steering committee for the Predict AKI group for Potrero Medical. VM serves as Chief Medical Officer, KS as Vice President of Data Science, and LE is a data scientist for Potrero Medical, Hayward, CA, USA and are salaried employees. We acknowledge that Vanessa Moll, Kelly Stanton, and Leina Essakalli are employees of Potrero Medical. However, data analysis, as well as manuscript preparation, were led by authors who actively enrolled study patients. Furthermore, while the study was funded by Potrero Medical, this descriptive manuscript is not testing any hypothesis and there is no intervention involved that could potentially be influenced by bias. Dr. Khanna is a paid consultant for the steering committee of the registry; however, he did not directly consent or enroll any patients. Rather this was done at his site by members of his research staff.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Intra-abdominal pressure and urinary output intra-operatively and for the first 48 postoperative hours. The red line represents surgery end. IAP intra-abdominal pressure; UO urinary output; IQR interquartile range; mmHg millimeter Hydrargyrum (Mercury); ml/kg/h milliliter/kilogram/hour
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Histogram of median intra-abdominal pressure from surgery end to 24 h postoperatively. The median IAP within the first 24 postoperative hours was 15.9 [13.6, 18.7] mmHg. IAP intra-abdominal pressure; mmHg millimeter Hydrargyrum (Mercury)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Histogram of median intra-abdominal pressure duration within the time period from 24 to 48 postoperative hours. The median IAP within this time frame was 16.6 [14.5, 19.1] mmHg. IAP intra-abdominal pressure; mmHg millimeter Hydrargyrum (Mercury)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Course of median IAP 6 h before and after extubation. Red line represents time of extubation. Median IAP within the 6 h’ time frame before extubation is 10.2 [7.7, 13.6] and 17.2 [14.1, 20.7] after extubation
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Differences in IAP by CVICU site. Median [IQR] for CCF 15.4 [12.5, 16.5], Emory 17.8 [16.0, 19.4], Wake Forest 16.7 [14.3, 19.5]. CCF, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Emory University Hospital Midtown and Wake Forest Hospital. CVICU, cardiovascular intensive care unit
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Differences in IAP by body mass index (BMI) within the first 24 postoperative hours. Median [IQR] for different BMIs are reflected as follows: Underweight: 12.5 [12.5, 12.5], healthy weight: 15.7 [11.9, 18.7], overweight: 16.3 [14.3, 18.9], obesity class 1: 18.1 [15.0, 19.9], obesity class 2: 16.8 [16.0, 18.8], obesity class 3: 16.2 [15.2, 20.1]. Underweight = BMI of 

References

    1. Reintam Blaser A, Regli A, De Keulenaer B, Kimball EJ, Starkopf L, Davis WA, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients—a prospective multicenter study (IROI study) Crit Care Med. 2019;47:535–542. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003623.
    1. Kim IB, Prowle J, Baldwin I, Bellomo R. Incidence, risk factors and outcome associations of intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012;40:79–89. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1204000107.
    1. Murphy PB, Parry NG, Sela N, Leslie K, Vogt K, Ball I. Intra-abdominal hypertension is more common than previously thought: a prospective study in a mixed medical-surgical ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:958–964. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003122.
    1. Iyer D, Rastogi P, Åneman A, D’Amours S. Early screening to identify patients at risk of developing intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58:1267–1275. doi: 10.1111/aas.12409.
    1. Malbrain MLNG, Chiumello D, Pelosi P, Bihari D, Innes R, Ranieri VM, et al. Incidence and prognosis of intraabdominal hypertension in a mixed population of critically ill patients: a multiple-center epidemiological study. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:315–322. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000153408.09806.1b.
    1. Malbrain M, Chiumello D, Cesana BM, Blaser AR, Starkopf J, Sugrue M, et al. A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis on intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients: the wake-up project. World initiative on Abdominal Hypertension Epidemiology, a Unifying Project (WAKE-Up!) Minerva Anestesiol. 2014;80:293–306.
    1. Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, De Waele J, Jaeschke R, Malbrain ML, De Keulenaer B, et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:1190–1206. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2906-z.
    1. Khanna AK, Shaw AD, Stapelfeldt WH, Boero IJ, Chen Q, Stevens M, et al. Postoperative hypotension and adverse clinical outcomes in patients without intraoperative hypotension, after noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2021;132:1410–1420. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005374.
    1. Smischney NJ, Shaw AD, Stapelfeldt WH, Boero IJ, Chen Q, Stevens M, et al. Postoperative hypotension in patients discharged to the intensive care unit after non-cardiac surgery is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Crit Care. 2020;24:682. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03412-5.
    1. Gregory A, Stapelfeldt WH, Khanna AK, Smischney NJ, Boero IJ, Chen Q, et al. Intraoperative hypotension is associated with adverse clinical outcomes after noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2021;132:1654–1665. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005250.
    1. Mohmand H, Goldfarb S. Renal dysfunction associated with intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22:615–621. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010121222.
    1. Dalfino L, Tullo L, Donadio I, Malcangi V, Brienza N. Intra-abdominal hypertensionand acute renal failurein critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:707–713. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0969-4.
    1. Kopitkó C, Medve L, Gondos T. The value of combined hemodynamic, respiratory and intra-abdominal pressure monitoring in predicting acute kidney injury after major intraabdominal surgeries. Ren Fail. 2019;41:150–158. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2019.1587467.
    1. Mullens W, Abrahams Z, Skouri HN, Francis GS, Taylor DO, Starling RC, et al. Elevated intra-abdominal pressure in acute decompensated heart failure: a potential contributor to worsening renal function? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:300–306. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.043.
    1. Holodinsky JK, Roberts DJ, Ball CG, Blaser AR, Starkopf J, Zygun DA, et al. Risk factors for intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome among adult intensive care unit patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2013;17:R249. doi: 10.1186/cc13075.
    1. Malbrain MLNG, Peeters Y, Wise R. The neglected role of abdominal compliance in organ-organ interactions. Crit Care. 2016;20:67. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1220-x.
    1. Kirkpatrick AW, De Waele JJ, De Laet I, De Keulenaer BL, D’Amours S, Björck M, et al. WSACS—the abdominal compartment society. A society dedicated to the study of the physiology and pathophysiology of the abdominal compartment and its interactions with all organ systems. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015;47:191–194. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2015.0024.
    1. Malbrain MLNG. Different techniques to measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP): time for a critical re-appraisal. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:357–371. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2107-2.
    1. Balogh Z, De Waele JJ, Malbrain MLNG. Continuous intra-abdominal pressure monitoring. Acta Clin Belg. 2007;62(Suppl 1):26–32. doi: 10.1179/acb.2007.62.s1.005.
    1. Kramer GC, Luxon E, Wolf J, Burnett DR, Nanduri D, Friedman BC. Inaccuracy of urine output measurements due to urinary retention in catheterized patients in the burn ICU. J Burn Care Res. 2017;38:e409–e417. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000405.
    1. Prabhakar A, Stanton K, Burnett D, Egan K, Keeling B, Moll V. 1130: combining urine output and intra-abdominal pressures predict acute kidney injury early. Crit Care Med. 2021;49:567–567. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000730408.55242.7c.
    1. Dalfino L, Sicolo A, Paparella D, Mongelli M, Rubino G, Brienza N. Intra-abdominal hypertension in cardiac surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013;17:644–651. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt272.
    1. Iyer D, D’Amours S, Aneman A. Intra-abdominal hypertension in postoperative cardiac surgery patients. Crit Care Resusc. 2014;16:214–219.
    1. Mazzeffi MA, Stafford P, Wallace K, Bernstein W, Deshpande S, Odonkor P, et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension and postoperative kidney dysfunction in cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30:1571–1577. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.05.028.
    1. Czajkowski M, Dabrowski W. Changes in intra-abdominal pressure during CABG with normovolemic hemodilution. Med Sci Monit. 2006;12:CR487–CR492.
    1. Dabrowski W. Changes in intra-abdominal pressure and central venous and brain venous blood pressure in patients during extracorporeal circulation. Med Sci Monit. 2007;13:CR548–CR554.
    1. Dabrowski W, Rzecki Z. Intra-abdominal and abdominal perfusion pressure in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Acta Clin Belg. 2009;64:216–224. doi: 10.1179/acb.2009.038.
    1. Dabrowski W, Wacinski P, Visconti J. Abdominal perfusion pressure and coronary arterial perfusion pressure in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2009;14:e84–e88.
    1. Richer-Séguin É, Ayoub C, Lebon J-S, Cogan J, Jarry S, Lamarche Y, et al. Intra-abdominal pressure during and after cardiac surgery: a single-centre prospective cohort study. Can J Anaesth. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-02141-9.
    1. CDC. Defining Adult Overweight & Obesity. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2021 [cited 2022 Mar 28]. Available from:
    1. Harris CR, Millman KJ, van der Walt SJ, Gommers R, Virtanen P, Cournapeau D, et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature. 2020;585:357–362. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2.
    1. Hunter JD. Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput Sci Eng. 2007;9:90–95. doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55.
    1. McKinney W. Data structures for statistical computing in Python. Proceedings of the 9th Python in science conference. SciPy; 2010 [cited 2021 Oct 4]. Available from:
    1. Gansner ER, Koutsofios E, North SC, Vo K-P. A technique for drawing directed graphs. IEEE Trans Softw Eng. 1993;19:214–230. doi: 10.1109/32.221135.
    1. Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE, Haberland M, Reddy T, Cournapeau D, et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat Methods. 2020;17:261–272. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2.
    1. Brown, Amy, Wilson, Greg. The architecture of open source applications structure, scale, and a few more fearless hacks. Volume II. [S.l.]: Brown & Wilson; 2012. Available from: . Accessed 28 Mar 2022.
    1. Kılıç B, Yapıcı N, Yapıcı F, Kavaklı AS, Kudsioğlu T, Kılıç A, et al. Factors associated with increased intra-abdominal pressure in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2020;28:134–142. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2020.18662.
    1. Al-Abassi AA, Al Saadi AS, Ahmed F. Is intra-bladder pressure measurement a reliable indicator for raised intra-abdominal pressure? A prospective comparative study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018;18:69. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0539-z.
    1. Kellum JA, Lameire N, KDIGO AKI Guideline Work Group Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1) Crit Care. 2013;17:204. doi: 10.1186/cc11454.
    1. Villa G, Samoni S, De Rosa S, Ronco C. The pathophysiological hypothesis of kidney damage during intra-abdominal hypertension. Front Physiol. 2016;7:55. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00055.
    1. De Laet IE, Malbrain MLNG, De Waele JJ. A clinician’s guide to management of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2020;24:97. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2782-1.
    1. Sun J, Sun H, Sun Z, Yang X, Zhou S, Wei J. Intra-abdominal hypertension and increased acute kidney injury risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Med Res. 2021;49:3000605211016627. doi: 10.1177/03000605211016627.
    1. Regli A, Blaser AR, De Keulenaer B, Starkopf J, Kimball E, Malbrain MLNG, et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension and hypoxic respiratory failure together predict adverse outcome—a sub-analysis of a prospective cohort. J Crit Care. 2021;64:165–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.04.009.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi