The relationship between birth intervals and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in six low and lower-middle income countries

Melissa Bauserman, Kayla Nowak, Tracy L Nolen, Jackie Patterson, Adrien Lokangaka, Antoinette Tshefu, Archana B Patel, Patricia L Hibberd, Ana L Garces, Lester Figueroa, Nancy F Krebs, Fabian Esamai, Edward A Liechty, Waldemar A Carlo, Elwyn Chomba, Musaku Mwenechanya, Shivaprasad S Goudar, Umesh Ramadurg, Richard J Derman, Sarah Saleem, Saleem Jessani, Marion Koso-Thomas, Elizabeth M McClure, Robert L Goldenberg, Carl Bose, Melissa Bauserman, Kayla Nowak, Tracy L Nolen, Jackie Patterson, Adrien Lokangaka, Antoinette Tshefu, Archana B Patel, Patricia L Hibberd, Ana L Garces, Lester Figueroa, Nancy F Krebs, Fabian Esamai, Edward A Liechty, Waldemar A Carlo, Elwyn Chomba, Musaku Mwenechanya, Shivaprasad S Goudar, Umesh Ramadurg, Richard J Derman, Sarah Saleem, Saleem Jessani, Marion Koso-Thomas, Elizabeth M McClure, Robert L Goldenberg, Carl Bose

Abstract

Background: Due to high fertility rates in some low and lower-middle income countries, the interval between pregnancies can be short, which may lead to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Methods: We analyzed data from women enrolled in the NICHD Global Network Maternal Newborn Health Registry (MNHR) from 2013 through 2018. We report maternal characteristics and outcomes in relationship to the inter-delivery interval (IDI, time from previous delivery [live or stillborn] to the delivery of the index birth), by category of 6-17 months (short), 18-36 months (reference), 37-60 months, and 61-180 months (long). We used non-parametric tests for maternal characteristics, and multivariable logistic regression models for outcomes, controlling for differences in baseline characteristics.

Results: We evaluated 181,782 women from sites in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Zambia, Kenya, Guatemala, India, and Pakistan. Women with short IDI varied by site, from 3% in the Zambia site to 20% in the Pakistan site. Relative to a 18-36 month IDI, women with short IDI had increased risk of neonatal death (RR = 1.89 [1.74, 2.05]), stillbirth (RR = 1.70 [1.56, 1.86]), low birth weight (RR = 1.38 [1.32, 1.44]), and very low birth weight (RR = 2.35 [2.10, 2.62]). Relative to a 18-36 month IDI, women with IDI of 37-60 months had an increased risk of maternal death (RR 1.40 [1.05, 1.88]), stillbirth (RR 1.14 [1.08, 1.22]), and very low birth weight (RR 1.10 [1.01, 1.21]). Relative to a 18-36 month IDI, women with long IDI had increased risk of maternal death (RR 1.54 [1.10, 2.16]), neonatal death (RR = 1.25 [1.14, 1.38]), stillbirth (RR = 1.50 [1.38, 1.62]), low birth weight (RR = 1.22 [1.17, 1.27]), and very low birth weight (RR = 1.47 [1.32,1.64]). Short and long IDIs were also associated with increased risk of obstructed labor, hemorrhage, hypertensive disorders, fetal malposition, infection, hospitalization, preterm delivery, and neonatal hospitalization.

Conclusions: IDI varies by site. When compared to 18-36 month IDI, women with both short IDI and long IDI had increased risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Trial registration: The MNHR is registered at NCT01073475 .

Keywords: Birth intervals; Developing countries; Global network; Low birthweight; Maternal mortality; Neonatal mortality.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Adjusted Relative Risk for Maternal Mortality

Fig. 2

Adjusted Relative Risk for Neonatal…

Fig. 2

Adjusted Relative Risk for Neonatal Mortality

Fig. 2
Adjusted Relative Risk for Neonatal Mortality

Fig. 3

Adjusted Relative Risk for Stillbirth…

Fig. 3

Adjusted Relative Risk for Stillbirth by IDI Categories (months)

Fig. 3
Adjusted Relative Risk for Stillbirth by IDI Categories (months)

Fig. 4

Adjusted Relative Risk for Low…

Fig. 4

Adjusted Relative Risk for Low Birth Weight by IDI Categories (months)

Fig. 4
Adjusted Relative Risk for Low Birth Weight by IDI Categories (months)
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Fertility rate, total (births per woman) [https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/sp.dyn.tfrt.in], Accessed 12, June 2019.
    1. Dewey KG, Cohen RJ. Does birth spacing affect maternal or child nutritional status? A systematic literature review. Matern Child Nutr. 2007;3:151–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2007.00092.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rutstein SO. Effects of preceding birth intervals on neonatal, infant and under-five years mortality and nutritional status in developing countries: evidence from the demographic and health surveys. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;89(Suppl 1):S7–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.11.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006;295:1809–1823. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.15.1809. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Effects of birth spacing on maternal health: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:297–308. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.055. - DOI - PubMed
Show all 23 references
MeSH terms
Associated data
Related information
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Adjusted Relative Risk for Neonatal Mortality

Fig. 3

Adjusted Relative Risk for Stillbirth…

Fig. 3

Adjusted Relative Risk for Stillbirth by IDI Categories (months)

Fig. 3
Adjusted Relative Risk for Stillbirth by IDI Categories (months)

Fig. 4

Adjusted Relative Risk for Low…

Fig. 4

Adjusted Relative Risk for Low Birth Weight by IDI Categories (months)

Fig. 4
Adjusted Relative Risk for Low Birth Weight by IDI Categories (months)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Adjusted Relative Risk for Stillbirth by IDI Categories (months)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Adjusted Relative Risk for Low Birth Weight by IDI Categories (months)

References

    1. Fertility rate, total (births per woman) [], Accessed 12, June 2019.
    1. Dewey KG, Cohen RJ. Does birth spacing affect maternal or child nutritional status? A systematic literature review. Matern Child Nutr. 2007;3:151–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2007.00092.x.
    1. Rutstein SO. Effects of preceding birth intervals on neonatal, infant and under-five years mortality and nutritional status in developing countries: evidence from the demographic and health surveys. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;89(Suppl 1):S7–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.11.012.
    1. Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006;295:1809–1823. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.15.1809.
    1. Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Effects of birth spacing on maternal health: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:297–308. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.055.
    1. Zhu BP, Rolfs RT, Nangle BE, Horan JM. Effect of the interval between pregnancies on perinatal outcomes. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:589–594. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199902253400801.
    1. DaVanzo J, Hale L, Razzaque A, Rahman M. Effects of interpregnancy interval and outcome of the preceding pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes in Matlab, Bangladesh. BJOG. 2007;114:1079–1087. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01338.x.
    1. Arafa MA, Alkhouly A, Youssef ME. Influence of inter-pregnancy interval on preterm delivery. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2004;18:248–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2004.00564.x.
    1. Yee LM, Truong YN, Caughey AB, Cheng YW. The association between interdelivery interval and adverse perinatal outcomes in a diverse US population. J Perinatol. 2016;36:593–597. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.54.
    1. WHO . Report of a WHO Technical Consultation on Birth Spacing. (Department of Making Pregnancy Safer DoRHaR ed) Geneva: WHO; 2007.
    1. Lee AC, Panchal P, Folger L, Whelan H, Whelan R, Rosner B, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of neonatal assessment for gestational age determination: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2017;140:1–26.
    1. Bose CL, Bauserman M, Goldenberg RL, Goudar SS, McClure EM, Pasha O, et al. The Global Network Maternal Newborn Health Registry: a multi-national, community-based registry of pregnancy outcomes. Reprod Health. 2015;12(Suppl 2):S1. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-12-S2-S1.
    1. Goudar SS, Carlo WA, McClure EM, Pasha O, Patel A, Esamai F, et al. The maternal and newborn health registry study of the global network for Women's and Children's Health Research. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;118:190–193. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.04.022.
    1. Goudar SS, Stolka KB, Koso-Thomas M, Honnungar NV, Mastiholi SC, Ramadurg UY, et al. Data quality monitoring and performance metrics of a prospective, population-based observational study of maternal and newborn health in low resource settings. Reprod Health. 2015;12(Suppl 2):S2. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-12-S2-S2.
    1. Conde-Agudelo A, Belizan JM. Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with interpregnancy interval: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2000;321:1255–1259. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7271.1255.
    1. Conde-Agudelo A, Belizan JM, Norton MH, Rosas-Bermudez A. Effect of the interpregnancy interval on perinatal outcomes in Latin America. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:359–366. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000171118.79529.a3.
    1. Mahande MJ, Obure J. Effect of interpregnancy interval on adverse pregnancy outcomes in northern Tanzania: a registry-based retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:140. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0929-5.
    1. Fotso JC, Cleland J, Mberu B, Mutua M, Elungata P. Birth spacing and child mortality: an analysis of prospective data from the Nairobi urban health and demographic surveillance system. J Biosoc Sci. 2013;45:779–798. doi: 10.1017/S0021932012000570.
    1. Mol BWJ, Roberts CT, Thangaratinam S, Magee LA, de Groot CJM, Hofmeyr GJ. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2016;387:999–1011. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00070-7.
    1. Hutcheon JA, Moskosky S, Ananth CV, Basso O, Briss PA, Ferre CD, et al. Good practices for the design, analysis, and interpretation of observational studies on birth spacing and perinatal health outcomes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019;33:O15–O24.
    1. McGuire C, Stephenson R. Community factors influencing birth spacing among married women in Uganda and Zimbabwe. Afr J Reprod Health. 2015;19:14–24.
    1. Class QA, Rickert ME, Oberg AS, Sujan AC, Almqvist C, Larsson H, et al. Within-family analysis of Interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:1304–1311. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002358.
    1. Baqui AH, Ahmed S, Begum N, Khanam R, Mohan D, Harrison M, et al. Impact of integrating a postpartum family planning program into a community-based maternal and newborn health program on birth spacing and preterm birth in rural Bangladesh. J Glob Health. 2018;8:020406. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.020406.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi