Effect of postextubation noninvasive ventilation with active humidification vs high-flow nasal cannula on reintubation in patients at very high risk for extubation failure: a randomized trial

Gonzalo Hernández, Irene Paredes, Francisco Moran, Marcos Buj, Laura Colinas, María Luisa Rodríguez, Alfonso Velasco, Patricia Rodríguez, María José Pérez-Pedrero, Fernando Suarez-Sipmann, Alfonso Canabal, Rafael Cuena, Lluis Blanch, Oriol Roca, Gonzalo Hernández, Irene Paredes, Francisco Moran, Marcos Buj, Laura Colinas, María Luisa Rodríguez, Alfonso Velasco, Patricia Rodríguez, María José Pérez-Pedrero, Fernando Suarez-Sipmann, Alfonso Canabal, Rafael Cuena, Lluis Blanch, Oriol Roca

Abstract

Purpose: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy was noninferior to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for preventing reintubation in a heterogeneous population at high-risk for extubation failure. However, outcomes might differ in certain subgroups of patients. Thus, we aimed to determine whether NIV with active humidification is superior to HFNC in preventing reintubation in patients with ≥ 4 risk factors (very high risk for extubation failure).

Methods: Randomized controlled trial in two intensive care units in Spain (June 2020‒June 2021). Patients ready for planned extubation with ≥ 4 of the following risk factors for reintubation were included: age > 65 years, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score > 12 on extubation day, body mass index > 30, inadequate secretions management, difficult or prolonged weaning, ≥ 2 comorbidities, acute heart failure indicating mechanical ventilation, moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, airway patency problems, prolonged mechanical ventilation, or hypercapnia on finishing the spontaneous breathing trial. Patients were randomized to undergo NIV with active humidification or HFNC for 48 h after extubation. The primary outcome was reintubation rate within 7 days after extubation. Secondary outcomes included postextubation respiratory failure, respiratory infection, sepsis, multiorgan failure, length of stay, mortality, adverse events, and time to reintubation.

Results: Of 182 patients (mean age, 60 [standard deviation (SD), 15] years; 117 [64%] men), 92 received NIV and 90 HFNC. Reintubation was required in 21 (23.3%) patients receiving NIV vs 35 (38.8%) of those receiving HFNC (difference -15.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -28.3 to -1%). Hospital length of stay was lower in those patients treated with NIV (20 [12‒36.7] days vs 26.5 [15‒45] days, difference 6.5 [95%CI 0.5-21.1]). No additional differences in the other secondary outcomes were observed.

Conclusions: Among adult critically ill patients at very high-risk for extubation failure, NIV with active humidification was superior to HFNC for preventing reintubation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04125342.

Keywords: Active humidification; High-flow nasal cannula; Noninvasive ventilation; Outcome; Reintubation; Weaning.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. GH reported travel expenses and personal fees from Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd. OR reported a research grant from Hamilton Medical AG, speaker fees from Hamilton Medical AG, Fisher&Paykel Healthcare Ltd, Aerogen Ltd and Ambu, and non-financial research support from Timpel; all outside the submitted work.

© 2022. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of participants in a study comparing postextubation noninvasive ventilation with active humidification vs high-flow oxygen therapy for preventing reintubation in very high-risk patients. MV mechanical ventilation; SBT spontaneous breathing trial; NIV noninvasive ventilation with active humidification; HFNC high-flow nasal cannula
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan–Meier analysis of time from extubation to reintubation

References

    1. Ouellette DR, Patel S, Girard TD, et al. Liberation from mechanical ventilation in critically ill adults: an official American College of Chest Physicians/American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline. Chest. 2017;151(1):166–180. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.036.
    1. Rochberg B, Brochard L, Elliott MW, et al. Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J. 2017;50(2):1602426. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02426-2016.
    1. Rochwerg B, Einav S, Chaudhuri D, et al. The role for high flow nasal cannula as a respiratory support strategy in adults: a clinical practice guideline. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(12):2226–2237. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06312-y.
    1. Thille AW, Muller G, Gacouin A, et al. Effect of postextubation high-flow nasal oxygen with noninvasive ventilation vs high-flow nasal oxygen alone on reintubation among patients at high risk of extubation failure: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;322(15):1465–1475. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.14901.
    1. Nava S, Gregoretti C, Fanfulla F, et al. Noninvasive ventilation to prevent respiratory failure after extubation in high-risk patients. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:2465–2470. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000186416.44752.72.
    1. Ferrer M, Valencia M, Nicolas JM, et al. Early noninvasive ventilation averts extubation failure in patients at risk: a randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173:164–170. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200505-718OC.
    1. Hernandez G, Vaquero C, Colinas L, et al. Effect of postextubation high-flow nasal cannula vs noninvasive ventilation on reintubation and postextubation respiratory failure in high-risk patients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316(15):1565–1574. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.14194.
    1. Vallverdu I, Calaf N, Subirana M, Net A, et al. Clinical characteristics, respiratory functional parameters, and outcome of a two-hour T-piece trial in patients weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Care Med. 1998;158(6):1855–1862. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.6.9712135.
    1. El Solh AA, Aquilina A, Pineda L, Dhanvantri V, Grant B, Bouquin P. Noninvasive ventilation for prevention of post-extubation respiratory failure in obese patients. Eur Respir J. 2006;28(3):588–595. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00150705.
    1. Ferrer M, Sellarés J, Valencia M, et al. Non-invasive ventilation after extubation in hypercapnic patients with chronic respiratory disorders: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9695):1082–1088. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61038-2.
    1. Canet J, Gallart L, Gomar C, et al. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population-based surgical cohort. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:1338–1350. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fc6e0a.
    1. Thille AW, Coudroy R, Nay MA, et al. Beneficial effects of non-invasive ventilation after extubation in obese or overweight patients: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 doi: 10.1164/rccm.202106-1452OC.
    1. Stéphan F, Barrucand B, Petit P, et al. High-flow oxygen vs noninvasive positive airway pressure in hypoxemic patients after cardiothoracic surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2015;313(23):2331–2339. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.5213.
    1. Restrepo RD, Walsh BK. AARC clinical practice guideline: humidification during invasive and noninvasive mechanical ventilation: 2012. Respir Care. 2012;57(5):782–788. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01766.
    1. Hernández G, Vaquero C, Ortiz R, et al. Benefit with preventive noninvasive ventilation in subgroups of patients at high-risk for reintubation: a post hoc analysis. J Intensive Care. 2022;10:43. doi: 10.1186/s40560-022-00635-2.
    1. Thille AW, Harrois A, Schortgen F, Brun-Buisson C, Brochard L. Outcomes of extubation failure in medical intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(12):2612–2618. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182282a5a.
    1. Boles JM, Bion J, Connors A, et al. Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J. 2007;29(5):1033–1056. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00010206.
    1. Subira C, Hernandez G, Vazquez A, et al. Effect of pressure support vs T-piece ventilation strategies during spontaneous breathing trial son successful extubation among patients receiving mechanical ventilation. JAMA. 2019;321(22):2175–2182. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.7234.
    1. Ouellette DR, Patel S, Girard TD, et al. Liberation from mechanical ventilation in critically ill adults: an official American college of chest physicians/American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Inspiratory pressure augmentation during spontaneous breathing trials, protocols minimizing sedation, and noninvasive ventilation immediately after extubation. Chest. 2017;151(1):166–180. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.036.
    1. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat. 1979;6:65–70.
    1. Lellouche F, Maggiore SM, Lyazidi A, et al. Water content of delivered gases during non-invasive ventilation in healthy subjects. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(6):987–995. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1455-y.
    1. Lellouche F, L’Her E, Abroug F, Deye N, et al. Impact of the humidification device on intubation rate during noninvasive ventilation with ICU ventilators: results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(2):211–219. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3145-z.
    1. Alqahtani JS, Worsley P, Voegeli D. Effect of humidified noninvasive ventilation on the development of facial skin breakdown. Respir Care. 2018;63(9):1102–1110. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06087.
    1. Pun BT, Badenes R, Heras de la Calle G, Orun OM, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for delirium in critically ill patients with COVID-19 (COVID-D): a multicentre cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9(3):239–250. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30552-X.
    1. Esteban A, Frutos-Vivar F, Ferguson ND, et al. Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation for respiratory failure after extubation. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(24):2452–2460. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032736.
    1. Casey JD, Vaughan EM, Lloyd BD, et al. Protocolized postextubation respiratory support to prevent reintubation: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 doi: 10.1164/rccm.202009-3561OC.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi