Economic evaluation of multidisciplinary rehabilitation after primary total knee arthroplasty based on a randomized controlled trial
Anna-Maija Kauppila, Harri Sintonen, Pasi Aronen, Pasi Ohtonen, Eero Kyllönen, Jari P A Arokoski, Anna-Maija Kauppila, Harri Sintonen, Pasi Aronen, Pasi Ohtonen, Eero Kyllönen, Jari P A Arokoski
Abstract
Objective: To conduct an economic evaluation of a multidisciplinary, biopsychosocial outpatient rehabilitation program implemented 2-4 months after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), compared with conventional orthopedic care.
Methods: After surgery, 86 patients were randomized to a multidisciplinary rehabilitation group (n = 44) or a conventional orthopedic care group (n = 42). Alongside the randomized controlled trial, we estimated the costs of rehabilitation, health care resource use, and community support. Information about resource use was collected by means of a questionnaire together with data from hospital records. The primary outcome (effectiveness) measure was change in self-reported functional capacity and the secondary measure was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained during the 12-month followup. Cost-effectiveness was assessed from between-group differences in costs, change in functional capacity, and QALYs gained.
Results: Both protocols of providing rehabilitation services turned out to be equally effective, but the conventional orthopedic care protocol was unequivocally cost saving: the saving was €1,830 per patient (95% confidence interval -548, 3,623) using the available direct cost data.
Conclusion: Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for unselected osteoarthritis patients in the subacute period of recovery after TKA is not a cost-effective use of health care resources. Similar rehabilitation protocols cannot be recommended for clinical pathways of TKA in the future.
Copyright © 2011 by the American College of Rheumatology.
Source: PubMed