Auditory training with spectrally shifted speech: implications for cochlear implant patient auditory rehabilitation

Qian-Jie Fu, Geraldine Nogaki, John J Galvin 3rd, Qian-Jie Fu, Geraldine Nogaki, John J Galvin 3rd

Abstract

After implantation, postlingually deafened cochlear implant (CI) patients must adapt to both spectrally reduced and spectrally shifted speech, due to the limited number of electrodes and the limited length of the electrode array. This adaptation generally occurs during the first three to six months of implant use and may continue for many years. To see whether moderate speech training can accelerate this learning process, 16 naïve, normal-hearing listeners were trained with spectrally shifted speech via an eight-channel acoustic simulation of CI speech processing. Baseline vowel and consonant recognition was measured for both spectrally shifted and unshifted speech. Short daily training sessions were conducted over five consecutive days, using four different protocols. For the test-only protocol, no improvement was seen over the five-day period. Similarly, sentence training provided little benefit for vowel recognition. However, after five days of targeted phoneme training, subjects' recognition of spectrally shifted vowels significantly improved in most subjects. This improvement did not generalize to the spectrally unshifted vowel and consonant tokens, suggesting that subjects adapted to the specific spectral shift, rather than to the eight-channel processing in general. Interestingly, significant improvement was also observed for the recognition of spectrally shifted consonants. The largest improvement was observed with targeted vowel contrast training, which did not include any explicit consonant training. These results suggest that targeted phoneme training can accelerate adaptation to spectrally shifted speech. Given these results with normal-hearing listeners, auditory rehabilitation tools that provide targeted phoneme training may be effective in improving the speech recognition performance of adult CI users.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Frequency allocations of analysis and carrier filter bands for eight-channel acoustic simulation of cochlear implant speech processing.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Baseline vowel and consonant recognition measures for unprocessed speech, eight-channel spectrally unshifted speech and eight-channel spectrally shifted speech. Error bars indicate ±1 standard deviation.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean vowel recognition performance of spectrally shifted speech for the four training groups, as a function of training days. Error bars indicate ±1 standard deviation.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean improvement in vowel and consonant recognition after five days of training, for the different training protocols. A Shift in performance for recognition of eight-channel spectrally shifted speech; B shift in performance for recognition of eight-channel spectrally unshifted speech. Error bars indicate ±1 standard deviation.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi