Empagliflozin for Patients With Presumed Resistant Hypertension: A Post Hoc Analysis of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial

João Pedro Ferreira, David Fitchett, Anne Pernille Ofstad, Bettina Johanna Kraus, Christoph Wanner, Isabella Zwiener, Bernard Zinman, Sabine Lauer, Jyothis T George, Patrick Rossignol, Faiez Zannad, João Pedro Ferreira, David Fitchett, Anne Pernille Ofstad, Bettina Johanna Kraus, Christoph Wanner, Isabella Zwiener, Bernard Zinman, Sabine Lauer, Jyothis T George, Patrick Rossignol, Faiez Zannad

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and resistant hypertension often coexist, greatly increasing risk of target-organ damage and death. We explored the effects of empagliflozin in patients with and without presumed resistant hypertension (prHT) in a post hoc analysis of EMPA-REG OUTCOME (NCT01131676).

Methods: Overall, 7,020 patients received empagliflozin 10, 25 mg, or placebo with median follow-up of 3.1 years. We defined baseline prHT as ≥3 classes of antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic and uncontrolled blood pressure (BP; systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg) or ≥4 classes of antihypertensive, including a diuretic, and controlled BP. We explored the effect of empagliflozin on cardiovascular (CV) death, heart failure (HF) hospitalization, 3-point major adverse cardiac events, all-cause death, and incident/worsening nephropathy by Cox regression and BP over time by a mixed-repeated-measures-model analysis.

Results: 1,579 (22.5%) patients had prHT. The mean difference in change in SBP from baseline to week 12 vs. placebo was -4.5 (95% confidence interval, -5.9 to -3.1) mm Hg (P < 0.001) in prHT and -3.7 (-4.5, -2.9) mm Hg (P < 0.001) in patients without prHT. SBP was more frequently controlled (<130/80 mm Hg) with empagliflozin than with placebo. Patients with prHT had 1.5- to 2-fold greater risk of HF hospitalization, incident/worsening nephropathy, and CV death compared with those without prHT. Empagliflozin improved all outcomes in patients with and without prHT (interaction P > 0.1 for all outcomes).

Conclusions: Empagliflozin induced a clinically relevant reduction in SBP and consistently improved all outcomes regardless of prHT status. Due to these dual effects, empagliflozin should be considered for patients with hypertension and T2D.

Keywords: blood pressure; empagliflozin; hypertension; resistant hypertension; type 2 diabetes.

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Change from baseline in systolic blood pressure over time in patients (a) with presumed resistant hypertension and (b) no presumed resistant hypertension at baseline including all data up until individual trial termination: mixed effect repeated measurement model results. *MMRM model on the overall population including subject as random effect and, among others, treatment, visit, and presumed resistant hypertension at baseline as well as their corresponding 2- and 3-way interactions as fixed effects (for details on other fixed effects and linear covariates, see Statistical analysis section). Abbreviations: MMRM, mixed effect model repeat measurement; rHT, resistant hypertension.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Proportion of patients (a) with presumed resistant hypertension and (b) without presumed resistant hypertension who achieved systolic blood pressure <130 mm Hg during the trial in empagliflozin and placebo groups.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Treatment effects of empagliflozin vs. placebo on outcomes in patients with or without presumed resistant hypertension. *Based on a Cox regression model with terms for age sex, baseline BMI category, baseline HbA1c category, baseline eGFR category, geographical region, treatment, presumed resistant hypertension, and treatment by presumed resistant hypertension interaction. †Excludes fatal stroke. Abbreviations: 3P-MACE, 3-point major adverse cardiac event; BMI, baseline body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CV, cardiovascular; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; HHF, heart failure hospitalization; rHT, resistant hypertension.

References

    1. American Diabetes Association. 9. Cardiovascular disease and risk management: standards of medical care in diabetes—2018. Diabetes Care 2018; 41:S86–S104.
    1. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE. Jr, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, DePalma SM, Gidding S, Jamerson KA, Jones DW, MacLaughlin EJ, Muntner P, Ovbiagele B, Smith SC Jr, Spencer CC, Stafford RS, Taler SJ, Thomas RJ, Williams KA Sr, Williamson JD, Wright JT Jr. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 2018; 138:e484–e594.
    1. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, Clement DL, Coca A, de Simone G, Dominiczak A, Kahan T, Mahfoud F, Redon J, Ruilope L, Zanchetti A, Kerins M, Kjeldsen SE, Kreutz R, Laurent S, Lip GYH, McManus R, Narkiewicz K, Ruschitzka F, Schmieder RE, Shlyakhto E, Tsioufis C, Aboyans V, Desormais I; Authors/Task Force Members 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens 2018; 36:1953–2041.
    1. Viazzi F, Piscitelli P, Ceriello A, Fioretto P, Giorda C, Guida P, Russo G, De Cosmo S, Pontremoli R. Resistant hypertension, time-updated blood pressure values and renal outcome in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Heart Assoc, published online September 22 2017; 6:pii: e006745. doi:10.1161/JAHA.117.006745.
    1. Carey RM, Calhoun DA, Bakris GL, Brook RD, Daugherty SL, Dennison-Himmelfarb CR, Egan BM, Flack JM, Gidding SS, Judd E, Lackland DT, Laffer CL, Newton-Cheh C, Smith SM, Taler SJ, Textor SC, Turan TN, White WB. Resistant hypertension: detection, evaluation, and management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex.: 1979) 2018; 72:e53–e90.
    1. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE Jr, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, DePalma SM, Gidding S, Jamerson KA, Jones DW, MacLaughlin EJ, Muntner P, Ovbiagele B, Smith SC Jr, Spencer CC, Stafford RS, Taler SJ, Thomas RJ, Williams KA Sr, Williamson JD, Wright JT Jr. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 2018; 138:e426–e483.
    1. Daugherty SL, Powers JD, Magid DJ, Tavel HM, Masoudi FA, Margolis KL, O’Connor PJ, Selby JV, Ho PM. Incidence and prognosis of resistant hypertension in hypertensive patients. Circulation 2012; 125:1635–1642.
    1. Mondesir FL, Brown TM, Muntner P, Durant RW, Carson AP, Safford MM, Levitan EB. Diabetes, diabetes severity, and coronary heart disease risk equivalence: REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS). Am Heart J 2016; 181:43–51.
    1. Rimoldi SF, Messerli FH, Bangalore S, Scherrer U. Resistant hypertension: what the cardiologist needs to know. Eur Heart J 2015; 36:2686–2695.
    1. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S, Mattheus M, Devins T, Johansen OE, Woerle HJ, Broedl UC, Inzucchi SE. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2117–2128.
    1. Azizi M, Rossignol P, Hulot JS. Emerging drug classes and their potential use in hypertension. Hypertension 2019;74:1075–1083.
    1. Tikkanen I, Narko K, Zeller C, Green A, Salsali A, Broedl UC, Woerle HJ; EMPA-REG BP Investigators Empagliflozin reduces blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Diabetes Care 2015; 38:420–428.
    1. Mancia G, Cannon CP, Tikkanen I, Zeller C, Ley L, Woerle HJ, Broedl UC, Johansen OE. Impact of empagliflozin on blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension by background antihypertensive medication. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex.: 1979) 2016; 68:1355–1364.
    1. Cherney DZ, Perkins BA, Soleymanlou N, Har R, Fagan N, Johansen OE, Woerle HJ, von Eynatten M, Broedl UC. The effect of empagliflozin on arterial stiffness and heart rate variability in subjects with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2014; 13:28.
    1. Chilton R, Tikkanen I, Cannon CP, Crowe S, Woerle HJ, Broedl UC, Johansen OE. Effects of empagliflozin on blood pressure and markers of arterial stiffness and vascular resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2015; 17:1180–1193.
    1. Inzucchi SE, Zinman B, Fitchett D, Wanner C, Ferrannini E, Schumacher M, Schmoor C, Ohneberg K, Johansen OE, George JT, Hantel S, Bluhmki E, Lachin JM. How does empagliflozin reduce cardiovascular mortality? Insights from a mediation analysis of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial. Diabetes Care 2018; 41:356–363.
    1. Bayliss G, Weinrauch LA, D’Elia JA. Resistant hypertension in diabetes mellitus. Curr Diab Rep 2014; 14:516.
    1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT Jr, Roccella EJ; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure ; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003; 289:2560–2572.
    1. Cushman WC, Evans GW, Byington RP, Goff DC Jr, Grimm RH Jr, Cutler JA, Simons-Morton DG, Basile JN, Corson MA, Probstfield JL, Katz L, Peterson KA, Friedewald WT, Buse JB, Bigger JT, Gerstein HC, Ismail-Beigi F. Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:1575–1585.
    1. Xie X, Atkins E, Lv J, Bennett A, Neal B, Ninomiya T, Woodward M, MacMahon S, Turnbull F, Hillis GS, Chalmers J, Mant J, Salam A, Rahimi K, Perkovic V, Rodgers A. Effects of intensive blood pressure lowering on cardiovascular and renal outcomes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2016; 387:435–443.
    1. Aggarwal R, Steinkamp J, Chiu N, Petrie B, Mirzan H. Intensive blood pressure targets for diabetic and other high-risk populations: a pooled individual patient data analysis. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex.: 1979) 2018; 71:833–839.
    1. Wright JT Jr, Williamson JD, Whelton PK, Snyder JK, Sink KM, Rocco MV, Reboussin DM, Rahman M, Oparil S, Lewis CE, Kimmel PL, Johnson KC, Goff DC Jr, Fine LJ, Cutler JA, Cushman WC, Cheung AK, Ambrosius WT. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med 2015; 373:2103–2116.
    1. Williams B, MacDonald TM, Morant S, Webb DJ, Sever P, McInnes G, Ford I, Cruickshank JK, Caulfield MJ, Salsbury J, Mackenzie I, Padmanabhan S, Brown MJ; British Hypertension Society’s PATHWAY Studies Group Spironolactone versus placebo, bisoprolol, and doxazosin to determine the optimal treatment for drug-resistant hypertension (PATHWAY-2): a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial. Lancet 2015; 386:2059–2068.
    1. Moore MN, Atkins ER, Salam A, Callisaya ML, Hare JL, Marwick TH, Nelson MR, Wright L, Sharman JE, Rodgers A. Regression to the mean of repeated ambulatory blood pressure monitoring five studies. J Hypertens 2019; 37:24–29.
    1. Rossignol P, Claggett BL, Liu J, Vardeny O, Pitt B, Zannad F, Solomon S. Spironolactone and resistant hypertension in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Am J Hypertens 2018; 31:407–414.
    1. Agarwal R, Rossignol P, Romero A, Garza D, Mayo MR, Warren S, Ma J, White WB, Williams B. Patiromer versus placebo to enable spironolactone use in patients with resistant hypertension and chronic kidney disease (AMBER): a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2019; 394:1540–1550.
    1. Weber MA, Mansfield TA, Alessi F, Iqbal N, Parikh S, Ptaszynska A. Effects of dapagliflozin on blood pressure in hypertensive diabetic patients on renin-angiotensin system blockade. Blood Press 2016; 25:93–103.
    1. Weir MR, Januszewicz A, Gilbert RE, Vijapurkar U, Kline I, Fung A, Meininger G. Effect of canagliflozin on blood pressure and adverse events related to osmotic diuresis and reduced intravascular volume in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2014; 16:875–882.
    1. Wanner C, Lachin JM, Inzucchi SE, Fitchett D, Mattheus M, George J, Woerle HJ, Broedl UC, von Eynatten M, Zinman B; EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators Empagliflozin and clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, established cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease. Circulation 2018; 137:119–129.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi