Empagliflozin and Cerebrovascular Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus at High Cardiovascular Risk

Bernard Zinman, Silvio E Inzucchi, John M Lachin, Christoph Wanner, David Fitchett, Sven Kohler, Michaela Mattheus, Hans J Woerle, Uli C Broedl, Odd Erik Johansen, Gregory W Albers, Hans Christoph Diener, EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators (Empagliflozin Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients), Bernard Zinman, Silvio E Inzucchi, John M Lachin, Christoph Wanner, David Fitchett, Sven Kohler, Michaela Mattheus, Hans J Woerle, Uli C Broedl, Odd Erik Johansen, Gregory W Albers, Hans Christoph Diener, EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators (Empagliflozin Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients)

Abstract

Background and purpose: In the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial (Empagliflozin Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients), empagliflozin added to standard of care in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and high cardiovascular risk reduced the risk of 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events, driven by a reduction in cardiovascular mortality, with no significant difference between empagliflozin and placebo in risk of myocardial infarction or stroke. In a modified intent-to-treat analysis, the hazard ratio for stroke was 1.18 (95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.56; P=0.26). We further investigated cerebrovascular events.

Methods: Patients were randomized to empagliflozin 10 mg, empagliflozin 25 mg, or placebo; 7020 patients were treated. Median observation time was 3.1 years.

Results: The numeric difference in stroke between empagliflozin and placebo in the modified intent-to-treat analysis was primarily because of 18 patients in the empagliflozin group with a first event >90 days after last intake of study drug (versus 3 on placebo). In a sensitivity analysis based on events during treatment or ≤90 days after last dose of drug, the hazard ratio for stroke with empagliflozin versus placebo was 1.08 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.45; P=0.60). There were no differences in risk of recurrent, fatal, or disabling strokes, or transient ischemic attack, with empagliflozin versus placebo. Patients with the largest increases in hematocrit or largest decreases in systolic blood pressure did not have an increased risk of stroke.

Conclusions: In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and high cardiovascular risk, there was no significant difference in the risk of cerebrovascular events with empagliflozin versus placebo.

Clinical trial registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01131676.

Keywords: blood pressure; cardiovascular diseases; hematocrit; stroke; type 2 diabetes mellitus.

© 2017 The Authors.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Time to first fatal or nonfatal stroke. A, Modified intent-to-treat analyses in the treated set; events observed from randomization to the end of the study in treated set (patients treated with ≥1 dose of study drug). B, Sensitivity analysis in treated set plus 90 days; events observed during treatment or ≤90 days after a patient’s last intake of trial medication in treated set (patients treated with ≥1 dose of study drug). Cumulative incidence function. Hazard ratios (HR) are based on Cox regression analyses. CI indicates confidence interval.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Time to first stroke, transient ischemic attack, and composite outcomes in modified intent-to-treat analyses. Cox regression analyses. Events from randomization to the end of the study in treated set (patients treated with ≥1 dose of study drug). Analyses were prespecified for time to first fatal or nonfatal stroke, time to first nonfatal stroke, and time to first transient ischemic attack. CI indicates confidence interval; and HR, hazard ratio.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Time to first stroke in subgroups defined by baseline characteristics. Post hoc Cox regression analyses. Events of fatal or nonfatal stroke observed from randomization to end of study in treated set (patients treated with ≥1 dose of study drug). Race: Black and Other not included in Cox regression as P value is for homogeneity of the treatment group difference among subgroups (test for group by covariate interaction) with no adjustment for multiple tests. P=0.054 for age. The size of the oval is proportional to the number of patients in the subgroup. ACE indicates angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; CI, confidence interval; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate (according to Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula); HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; HR, hazard ratio; and SBP, systolic blood pressure. *Plus Australia and New Zealand.

References

    1. Sarwar N, Gao P, Seshasai SR, Gobin R, Kaptoge S, Di Angelantonio E, et al. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet. 2010;375:2215–2222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60484-9.
    1. Callahan A, Amarenco P, Goldstein LB, Sillesen H, Messig M, Samsa GP, et al. SPARCL Investigators. Risk of stroke and cardiovascular events after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack in patients with type 2 diabetes or metabolic syndrome: secondary analysis of the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trial. Arch Neurol. 2011;68:1245–1251. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.146.
    1. Boussageon R, Bejan-Angoulvant T, Saadatian-Elahi M, Lafont S, Bergeonneau C, Kassaï B, et al. Effect of intensive glucose lowering treatment on all cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and microvascular events in type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d4169. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4169.
    1. Green JB, Bethel MA, Armstrong PW, Buse JB, Engel SS, Garg J, et al. TECOS Study Group. Effect of sitagliptin on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:232–242. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1501352.
    1. Scirica BM, Bhatt DL, Braunwald E, Steg PG, Davidson J, Hirshberg B, et al. SAVOR-TIMI 53 Steering Committee and Investigators. Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1317–1326. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1307684.
    1. White WB, Cannon CP, Heller SR, Nissen SE, Bergenstal RM, Bakris GL, et al. EXAMINE Investigators. Alogliptin after acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1327–1335. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1305889.
    1. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1577–1589. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806470.
    1. Wilcox R, Bousser MG, Betteridge DJ, Schernthaner G, Pirags V, Kupfer S, et al. PROactive Investigators. Effects of pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes with or without previous stroke: results from PROactive (Prospective Pioglitazone Clinical Trial in MacroVascular Events 04). Stroke. 2007;38:865–873. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000257974.06317.49.
    1. Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, Eliaschewitz FG, Jódar E, Leiter LA, et al. SUSTAIN-6 Investigators. Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1834–1844. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607141.
    1. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S, et al. EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2117–2128. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504720.
    1. Zinman B, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM, Wanner C, Ferrari R, Fitchett D, et al. Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of a randomized, placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcome trial of empagliflozin (EMPA-REG OUTCOME™). Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014;13:102. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-13-102.
    1. Adams HP, Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke. 1993;24:35–41. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.24.1.35.
    1. Fitchett D, Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Hantel S, Salsali A, et al. EMPA-REG OUTCOME® Trial Investigators. Heart failure outcomes with empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk: results of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME® trial. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:1526–1534. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv728.
    1. Asplund K, Karvanen J, Giampaoli S, Jousilahti P, Niemelä M, Broda G, et al. MORGAM Project. Relative risks for stroke by age, sex, and population based on follow-up of 18 European populations in the MORGAM Project. Stroke. 2009;40:2319–2326. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.547869.
    1. Meschia JF, Bushnell C, Boden-Albala B, Braun LT, Bravata DM, Chaturvedi S, et al. American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology; Council on Hypertension. Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45:3754–3832. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000046.
    1. Hardie K, Hankey GJ, Jamrozik K, Broadhurst RJ, Anderson C. Ten-year risk of first recurrent stroke and disability after first-ever stroke in the Perth Community Stroke Study. Stroke. 2004;35:731–735. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000116183.50167.D9.
    1. O’Donnell MJ, Xavier D, Liu L, Zhang H, Chin SL, Rao-Melacini P, et al. INTERSTROKE Investigators. Risk factors for ischaemic and intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): a case-control study. Lancet. 2010;376:112–123. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60834-3.
    1. Ricci F, Fedorowski A, Radico F, Romanello M, Tatasciore A, Di Nicola M, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality related to orthostatic hypotension: a meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1609–1617. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv093.
    1. Cushman WC, Evans GW, Byington RP, Goff DC, Jr, Grimm RH, Jr, Cutler JA, et al. Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1575–1585. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001286.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi