The safety and effectiveness of the LVIS stent system for the treatment of wide-necked cerebral aneurysms: final results of the pivotal US LVIS trial

David Fiorella, Alan Boulos, Aquilla S Turk, Adnan H Siddiqui, Adam S Arthur, Orlando Diaz, Demetrius K Lopes, LVIS investigators, David Fiorella, Alan Boulos, Aquilla S Turk, Adnan H Siddiqui, Adam S Arthur, Orlando Diaz, Demetrius K Lopes, LVIS investigators

Abstract

Introduction: The LVIS stent system (LVIS and LVIS Junior) is a self-expanding, retrievable, microstent system indicated for the treatment of wide-necked cerebral aneurysms (WNAs). The present pivotal study was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this device.

Methods: The US LVIS pivotal trial was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, interventional study conducted at 21 US centers. The study enrolled 153 adults with WNAs of the anterior and posterior circulations. The study was conducted under good clinical practices and included independent adjudication of all adverse events. The primary effectiveness endpoint was defined as successful aneurysm treatment with the LVIS System as evidenced by complete (100%) aneurysm occlusion at 12 months on conventional angiography without retreatment and without significant (≥50%) stenosis of the treated artery at 12 months as determined by an independent core laboratory. The primary safety endpoint was defined as the rate of stroke or death within 30 days, or ipsilateral stroke or neurologic death with 12 months.

Results: One hundred and fifty-three patients enrolled at 21 investigational sites underwent attempted LVIS-assisted coil embolization. The mean age was 58.3±10.5 years and the majority of the participants (110/153, 71.9%) were female. Fifty-seven aneurysms (57/153, 37.3%) arose from the anterior cerebral artery, 43 (43/153, 28.1%) from the internal carotid artery, 17 (17/153, 11.1%) from the middle cerebral artery, 27 (27/153, 17.6%) from the basilar artery, six (6/153,3.9 %) from the PCA, and two from the vertebral artery. A single aneurysm arose from the superior cerebellar artery. The mean aneurysm dome height was 6.0±2.2 mm and mean width 5.5±2.3 mm. Mean neck width was 4.2±1.4 mm. A total of 22 participants presented for re-treatment of a previously ruptured (>30 days prior to treatment) target aneurysm. The primary effectiveness endpoint was observed in 70.6% (108/153) in the intent to treat population (ITT). Of the evaluable participants with follow-up 12-month angiography, 79.1 % (110/139) demonstrated complete occlusion- 92.1% (128/139) in this population demonstrated ≥95% occlusion and 95% demonstrated ≥90% occlusion (132/139). Eight participants (5.2%, 8/153) had at least one primary safety event in the ITT population.

Conclusion: The LVIS stent system allows safe and highly effective coil embolization of WNAs.

Clinical registration number: NCT01793792.

Keywords: LVIS; aneurysm; hemorrhagic stroke.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors have the following potential conflicts with Microvention/Terumo: DF: research support, consulting; AB: speaker’s fees; AST: consulting; AHS: research support, consulting; ASA: research support, consulting; OD: proctor; DKL: research support, consulting.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The LVIS devices: the LVIS devices are self-expanding nickel titanium, single-wire braid, compliant, closed-cell implants that can be deployed and retrieved by a single operator using the delivery system. The LVIS Junior device (A) is available in diameters of 2.5 and 3.5 mm and in unconstrained lengths between 10 and 30 mm. The LVIS device (B) is available in 3.5, 4.5, and 5.5 mm diameters ranging in lengths between 10 and 30 mm.

References

    1. Fargen KM, Velat GJ, Lawson MF, et al. . The stent anchor technique for distal access through a large or giant aneurysm. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:e24 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010276
    1. Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J, et al. . Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003;362:103–10. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13860-3
    1. Birknes JK, Hwang SK, Pandey AS, et al. . Feasibility and limitations of endovascular coil embolization of anterior communicating artery aneurysms: morphological considerations. Neurosurgery 2006;59:43–52. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000219220.25721.B9
    1. Lusseveld E, Brilstra EH, Nijssen PC, et al. . Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping in patients with a ruptured basilar tip aneurysm. J of Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;73:591–3. 10.1136/jnnp.73.5.591
    1. Spetzler RF, McDougall CG, Albuquerque FC, et al. . The barrow ruptured aneurysm trial: 3-year results. J Neurosurg 2013;119:146–57. 10.3171/2013.3.JNS12683
    1. Spetzler RF, McDougall CG, Zabramski JM, et al. . The barrow ruptured aneurysm trial: 6-year results. J Neurosurg 2015;123:609–17. 10.3171/2014.9.JNS141749
    1. Fiorella D, Arthur A, Boulos A, et al. . Final results of the US humanitarian device exemption study of the low-profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) device. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:894–7. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011937
    1. Grossberg JA, Hanel RA, Dabus G, et al. . Treatment of wide-necked aneurysms with the Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS Jr) device: a multicenter experience. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:1098–102. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012687
    1. Iosif C, Piotin M, Saleme S, et al. . Safety and effectiveness of the Low Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS and LVIS Jr) devices in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: results of the TRAIL multicenter observational study. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:675–81. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013375
    1. Santillan A, Boddu S, Schwarz J, et al. . Stent for treatment of intracranial aneurysms with parent vessel diameter of 2.5 mm or less. Interv Neuroradiol 2018:1591019918759307.
    1. Shankar JJS, Quateen A, Weill A, et al. . Canadian registry of LVIS Jr for treatment of intracranial aneurysms (CaRLA). J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:849–53. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012611
    1. Su W, Zhang Y, Chen J, et al. . 225 intracranial aneurysms treated with the Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS) stent: a single-center retrospective study. Neurol Res 2018;40:445–51. 10.1080/01616412.2018.1457608
    1. Zhang X, Zhong J, Gao H, et al. . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the LVIS device: a systematic review. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:553–7. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012403
    1. Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Deshmukh VR, et al. . Usefulness of the Neuroform stent for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: results at initial (3-6-mo) follow-up. Neurosurgery 2005;56:1191–202. discussion 1201-1192 10.1227/
    1. Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Deshmukh VR, et al. . In-stent stenosis as a delayed complication of neuroform stent-supported coil embolization of an incidental carotid terminus aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1764–7.
    1. Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Deshmukh VR, et al. . Endovascular reconstruction with the neuroform stent as monotherapy for the treatment of uncoilable intradural pseudoaneurysms. Neurosurgery 2006;59:291–300. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000223650.11954.6C
    1. Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Han P, et al. . Preliminary experience using the neuroform stent for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2004;54:6–17. discussion 16-17 10.1227/01.NEU.0000097194.35781.EA
    1. Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Woo H, et al. . Neuroform stent assisted aneurysm treatment: evolving treatment strategies, complications and results of long term follow-up. J Neurointerv Surg 2010;2:16–22. 10.1136/jnis.2009.000521
    1. Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Woo H, et al. . Neuroform in-stent stenosis: incidence, natural history, and treatment strategies. Neurosurgery 2006;59:34–42. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000219853.56553.71
    1. Mocco J, Snyder KV, Albuquerque FC, et al. . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Enterprise stent: a multicenter registry. J Neurosurg 2009;110:35–9. 10.3171/2008.7.JNS08322
    1. Heller R, Calnan DR, Lanfranchi M, et al. . Incomplete stent apposition in enterprise stent-mediated coiling of aneurysms: persistence over time and risk of delayed ischemic events. J Neurosurg 2013;118:1014–22. 10.3171/2013.2.JNS121427
    1. Heller RS, Malek AM. Delivery technique plays an important role in determining vessel wall apposition of the Enterprise self-expanding intracranial stent. J Neurointerv Surg 2011;3:340–3. 10.1136/jnis.2010.004499
    1. Heller RS, Malek AM. Parent vessel size and curvature strongly influence risk of incomplete stent apposition in enterprise intracranial aneurysm stent coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1714–20. 10.3174/ajnr.A2584
    1. Dholakia R, Sadasivan C, Fiorella DJ, et al. . Hemodynamics of flow diverters. J Biomech Eng 2017;139:021002–10. 10.1115/1.4034932
    1. Fiorella D, Arthur AS, Chiacchierini R, et al. . How safe and effective are existing treatments for wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms? Literature-based objective performance criteria for safety and effectiveness. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:1197–201. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013223
    1. De Leacy RA, Fargen KM, Mascitelli JR, et al. . Wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery and basilar apex treated by endovascular techniques: a multicentre, core lab adjudicated study evaluating safety and durability of occlusion (BRANCH). J Neurointerv Surg 2018:neurintsurg-2018-013771 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-013771

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi