Replicating an effective VA program to train and support family caregivers: a hybrid type III effectiveness-implementation design

N A Boucher, L L Zullig, M Shepherd-Banigan, K P Decosimo, J Dadolf, A Choate, E P Mahanna, N R Sperber, V Wang, K A Allen, S N Hastings, C H Van Houtven, N A Boucher, L L Zullig, M Shepherd-Banigan, K P Decosimo, J Dadolf, A Choate, E P Mahanna, N R Sperber, V Wang, K A Allen, S N Hastings, C H Van Houtven

Abstract

Background: Caring for a growing aging population using existing long-term care resources while simultaneously supporting and educating family caregivers, is a public health challenge. We describe the application of the Replicating Effective Programs (REP) framework, developed by the Centers for Disease Control Prevention and used in public health program implementation, to scale up an evidence-based family caregiver training intervention in the Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system.

Methods: From 2018 to 2020, clinicians at eight VA medical centers received REP-guided implementation including facilitation, technical assistance, and implementation tools to deliver the training program. The project team used the REP framework to develop activities across four distinct phases - (1) pre-conditions, (2) pre-implementation, (3) implementation, and (4) maintenance and evolution - and systematically tracked implementation facilitators, barriers, and adaptations.

Results: Within the REP framework, results describe how each medical center adapted implementation approaches to fit local needs. We highlight examples of how sites balanced adaptations and intervention fidelity.

Conclusions: The REP framework shows promise for national expansion of the caregiver training intervention, including to non-VA systems of care, because it allows sites to adapt while maintaining intervention fidelity.

Trial registration: NCT03474380 . Date registered: March 22, 2018.

Keywords: Aging; Caregiving; Health services research; Implementation research; Long term care.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participating Sites

References

    1. Berg KM, Fortinsky RH, Robison J. Family caregivers needed-no training provided. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(6):835–836.
    1. Stevens LF, Pickett TC, Wilder Schaaf KP, Taylor BC, Gravely A, Van Houtven C, et al. The relationship between training and mental health among caregivers of individuals with polytrauma. Behav Neurol. 2015;2015:185941.
    1. Chari AV, Engberg J, Ray KN, Mehrotra A. The opportunity costs of informal elder-care in the United States: new estimates from the American time use survey. Health Serv Res. 2015;50(3):871–882.
    1. Van Houtven CH, Coe NB, Skira MM. The effect of informal care on work and wages. J Health Econ. 2013;32(1):240–252.
    1. Chiao CY, Wu HS, Hsiao CY. Caregiver burden for informal caregivers of patients with dementia: a systematic review. Int Nurs Rev. 2015;62(3):340–350.
    1. Adelman RD, Tmanova LL, Delgado D, Dion S, Lachs MS. Caregiver burden: a clinical review. JAMA. 2014;311(10):1052–1060.
    1. Coe NB, Van Houtven CH. Caring for mom and neglecting yourself? The health effects of caring for an elderly parent. Health Econ. 2009;18(9):991–1010.
    1. Hughes R. Patient safety and quality: an evidence-based handbook for nurses. Vol 3. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008.
    1. National Academies of Sciences. Families caring for an aging America, recommendations brief. National Academies of Sciences. 2016. . Accessed 30 Mar 2020.
    1. Mittelman MS, Haley WE, Clay OJ, Roth DL. Improving caregiver well-being delays nursing home placement of patients with Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2006;67(9):1592–1599.
    1. Wray LO, Shulan MD, Toseland RW, Freeman KE, Vásquez BE, Gao J. The effect of telephone support groups on costs of care for veterans with dementia. Gerontologist. 2010;50(5):623–631.
    1. Edes T, Kinosian B, Vuckovic NH, Nichols LO, Becker MM, Hossain M. Better access, quality, and cost for clinically complex veterans with home-based primary care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(10):1954–1961.
    1. Sperber NR, Boucher NA, Delgado R, Shepherd-Banigan M, McKenna K, Moore M, et al. Including family caregivers in seriously ill veterans' care: a mixed-methods study. Health Aff (Millwood) 2019;38(6):957–963.
    1. Qualls SH. Caregiving families within the long-term services and support system for older adults. Am Psychol. 2016;71(4):283.
    1. National Alliance for Caregiving and AARP. Caregiving in the U.S. 2020. National Alliance for Caregiving. . Accessed 3 Dec 2020.
    1. Ramchand R, Tanielian T, Fisher MP, Vaughan CA, Trail TE, Epley C, et al. Key facts and statistics from the RAND Military Caregivers Study, 2014. RAND Corporation 2014. . Accessed 30 Mar 2020.
    1. National Alliance for Caregiving and United Health Foundation. Caregivers of veterans: serving on the home front, 2010. National Alliance for Caregiving 2010. . Accessed 19 May 2020.
    1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) Families caring for an aging America. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2016.
    1. Gitlin LN, Marx K, Stanley IH, Hodgson N. Translating evidence-based dementia caregiving interventions into practice: state-of-the-science and next steps. Gerontologist. 2015;55(2):210–226.
    1. Bruening R, Sperber N, Miller K, Andrews S, Steinhauser K, Wieland GD, et al. Connecting caregivers to support: lessons learned from the VA caregiver support program. J Appl Gerontol. 2020;39(4):368–376.
    1. Nichols LO, Martindale-Adams J, Burns R, Zuber J, Graney MJ. REACH VA: moving from translation to system implementation. Gerontologist. 2016;56(1):135–144.
    1. Van Houtven CH, Smith VA, Lindquist JH, Chapman JG, Hendrix C, Hastings SN, et al. Family caregiver skills training to improve experiences of care: a randomized clinical trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(10):2114–2122.
    1. Van Houtven CH, Oddone EZ, Hastings SN, Hendrix C, Olsen M, Neelon B, et al. Helping invested families improve Veterans' experiences study (HI-FIVES): study design and methodology. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014;38(2):260–269.
    1. Wang V, Allen K, Van Houtven CH, Coffman C, Sperber N, Mahanna EP, et al. Supporting teams to optimize function and independence in veterans: a multi-study program and mixed methods protocol. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):58.
    1. Braganza MZ, Kilbourne AM. The Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) impact framework: measuring the real-world impact of implementation science [published online ahead of print, 2020 Sep 1]. J Gen Intern Med. 2020. 10.1007/s11606-020-06143-z.
    1. Neumann M, Sogolow E. Replicating effective programs: HIV/AIDS prevention technology transfer. AIDS Educ Prev. 2000;12(5 Suppl):35–48.
    1. Kilbourne AM, Neumann MS, Pincus HA, Bauer MS, Stall R. Implementing evidence-based interventions in health care: application of the replicating effective programs framework. Implement Sci. 2007;2:42.
    1. Kind AJ, Brenny-Fitzpatrick M, Leahy-Gross K, Mirr J, Chapman E, Frey B, et al. Harnessing protocolized adaptation in dissemination: successful implementation and sustainment of the veterans affairs coordinated-transitional care program in a non-veterans affairs hospital. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(2):409–416.
    1. Huynh AK, Hamilton AB, Farmer MM, Bean-Mayberry B, Wiltsey Stirman S, Moin T, et al. A pragmatic approach to guide implementation evaluation research: strategy mapping for complex interventions. Front Public Health. 2018;6:134.
    1. Thomas DR. Feedback from research participants: are member checks useful in qualitative research? Qual Res Psychol. 2017;14(1):23–41.
    1. Shepherd-Banigan M, Kaufman BG, Decosimo K, Dadolf J, Boucher NA, Mahanna EP, et al. Adaptation and implementation of a family caregiver skills training program: from single site RCT to multisite pragmatic intervention. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2020;52(1):23–33.
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The patient health Questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener. Med Care. 2003;41(11):1284–1292.
    1. Bédard M, Molloy DW, Squire L, Dubois S, Lever JA, O'Donnell M. The Zarit burden interview: a new short version and screening version. Gerontologist. 2001;41(5):652–657.
    1. Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the expert recommendations for implementing change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015;10:21.
    1. Lavori PW, Dawson R. Adaptive treatment strategies in chronic disease. Annu Rev Med. 2008;59:443–453.
    1. Kilbourne AM, Smith SN, Choi SY, Koschmann E, Liebrecht C, Rusch A, et al. Adaptive school-based implementation of CBT (ASIC): clustered-smart for building an optimized adaptive implementation intervention to improve uptake of mental health interventions in schools. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):119.
    1. Burton AM, Sautter JM, Tulsky JA, Lindquist JH, Hays JC, Olsen MK, et al. Burden and well-being among a diverse sample of cancer, congestive heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2012;44(3):410–420.
    1. Sautter JM, Tulsky JA, Johnson KS, Olsen MK, Burton-Chase AM, Lindquist JH, et al. Caregiver experience during advanced chronic illness and last year of life. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(6):1082–1090.
    1. Van Houtven CH, Oddone EZ, Weinberger M. Informal and formal care infrastructure and perceived need for caregiver training for frail US veterans referred to home and community-based services. Chronic illness. 2010;6(1):57–66.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi