Retrospective comparison of pregnancy outcomes of fresh and frozen-warmed single blastocyst transfer: a 5-year single-center experience
Federico Cirillo, Leonora Grilli, Camilla Ronchetti, Ilaria Paladino, Emanuela Morenghi, Andrea Busnelli, Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti, Federico Cirillo, Leonora Grilli, Camilla Ronchetti, Ilaria Paladino, Emanuela Morenghi, Andrea Busnelli, Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti
Abstract
Purpose: To assess whether live birth rates (LBR) and maternal/neonatal complications differed following single fresh and frozen-warmed blastocyst transfer.
Methods: The present retrospective observational study analyzed 4,613 single embryo transfers (SET) (646 fresh and 3,967 frozen) from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018. Fresh embryo transfer at blastocyst stage was considered according to the age of the patient and her prognosis. In case of the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, premature progesterone rise, non-optimal endometrial growth, or supernumerary embryos, cryopreservation with subsequent frozen embryo transfer (FET) was indicated.
Results: No differences in LBR were recorded. Fresh embryo transfers yielded an increase both in neonatal complications OR 2.15 (95% CI 1.20-3.86, p 0.010), with a higher prevalence of singletons weighting below the 5th percentile (p 0.013) and of intrauterine growth retardation (p 0.015), as well as maternal complications, with a higher placenta previa occurrence OR 3.58 (95% CI 1.54-8.28, p 0.003), compared to FET.
Conclusion: LBR appears not to be affected by the transfer procedure preferred. Fresh embryo transfer is associated with higher risk of neonatal complications (specifically a higher prevalence of singletons weighting below the 5th percentile and of intrauterine growth retardation) and placenta previa. Reflecting on the increased practice of ART procedures, it is imperative to understand whether a transfer procedure yields less complications than the other and if it is time to switch to a "freeze-all" procedure as standard practice.
Trial registration: Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT04310761. Date of registration: March 17, 2020, retrospectively registered.
Keywords: Blastocyst; Fresh ET; Frozen-warmed ET; Pregnancy outcomes; SET.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Source: PubMed