Pharmacokinetic Equivalence of the High Dose Strength Fixed-Dose Combination Tablet of Gemigliptin/Metformin Sustained Release (SR) and Individual Component Gemigliptin and Metformin XR Tablets in Healthy Subjects

Yong-Soon Cho, Shi Hyang Lee, Hyeong-Seok Lim, Kyun-Seop Bae, Yong-Soon Cho, Shi Hyang Lee, Hyeong-Seok Lim, Kyun-Seop Bae

Abstract

Background: In type 2 diabetes mellitus therapy, fixed-dose combination (FDC) can offer not only benefits in glucose control via the combined use of agents, but also increase patient compliance. The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic equivalence of the high dose of the FDC tablet (gemigliptin/metformin sustained release [SR] 50/1,000 mg) and a corresponding co-administered dose of individual tablets.

Methods: This study was randomized, open-label, single dose, two treatments, two-period, crossover study, which included 24 healthy subjects. Subjects received the FDC or individual tablets of gemigliptin (50 mg) and metformin XR (1,000 mg) in each period. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) of the FDC tablet and co-administration of individual tablet for both gemigliptin and metformin were calculated.

Results: The GMRs (FDC tablets/co-administration; 90% CIs) for Cmax and AUClast of gemigliptin were 1.079 (0.986-1.180) and 1.047 (1.014-1.080), respectively. For metformin, the GMRs for Cmax, and AUClast were 1.038 (0.995-1.083) and 1.041 (0.997-1.088), respectively. The 90% CIs for GMRs of Cmax and AUClast for gemigliptin and metformin fell entirely within bounds of 0.800-1.250. Both administration of FDC tablet and co-administration of individual tablets were well tolerated.

Conclusion: FDC tablet exhibited pharmacokinetic equivalence and comparable safety and tolerability to co-administration of corresponding doses of gemigliptin and metformin XR as individual tablets. Trial registry at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02056600.

Keywords: FDC; Gemigliptin/Metformin-SR; Pharmacokinetic Equivalence; Pharmacokinetics.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1. Mean plasma concentration-time profile of…
Fig. 1. Mean plasma concentration-time profile of gemigliptin and metformin following administration of a single dose of FDC tablet (gemigliptin/metformin SR 50/1,000 mg) and co-administration of gemigliptin 50 mg+metformin XR 1,000 mg. Plasma concentrations of gemigliptin are plotted on a (A) linear or (B) log scale and those of metformin are plotted on a (C) linear or (D) log scale. The error bars indicate standard deviations.
FDC = fixed-dose combination, SR = sustained release.
Fig. 2. Systemic exposure comparison between FDC…
Fig. 2. Systemic exposure comparison between FDC tablet and co-administration of separate tablets. Cmax values (A) and AUClast values (B) of gemigliptin and Cmax values (C) and AUClast values (D) of metformin are presented as gray points and box-and-whisker plots. Each box shows the 25th, 50th (median) and 75th percentiles of individual values.
FDC = fixed-dose combination, Cmax = maximum plasma concentration, AUClast = area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration.

References

    1. DeFronzo RA. Lilly lecture 1987. The triumvirate: beta-cell, muscle, liver. A collusion responsible for NIDDM. Diabetes. 1988;37(6):667–687.
    1. Turner RC, Cull CA, Frighi V, Holman RR. Glycemic control with diet, sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: progressive requirement for multiple therapies (UKPDS 49). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. JAMA. 1999;281(21):2005–2012.
    1. Russell S. Incretin-based therapies for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a review of direct comparisons of efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction. Int J Clin Pharm. 2013;35(2):159–172.
    1. Deacon CF. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a comparative review. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011;13(1):7–18.
    1. Kirby M, Yu DM, O'Connor S, Gorrell MD. Inhibitor selectivity in the clinical application of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibition. Clin Sci (Lond) 2009;118(1):31–41.
    1. Drucker DJ, Nauck MA. The incretin system: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2006;368(9548):1696–1705.
    1. Nauck MA, Niedereichholz U, Ettler R, Holst JJ, Orskov C, Ritzel R, et al. Glucagon-like peptide 1 inhibition of gastric emptying outweighs its insulinotropic effects in healthy humans. Am J Physiol. 1997;273(5 Pt 1):E981–E988.
    1. Willms B, Werner J, Holst JJ, Orskov C, Creutzfeldt W, Nauck MA. Gastric emptying, glucose responses, and insulin secretion after a liquid test meal: effects of exogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-(7-36) amide in type 2 (noninsulin-dependent) diabetic patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(1):327–332.
    1. Seino Y, Fukushima M, Yabe D. GIP and GLP-1, the two incretin hormones: similarities and differences. J Diabetes Investig. 2010;1(1-2):8–23.
    1. Yang SJ, Min KW, Gupta SK, Park JY, Shivane VK, Pitale SU, et al. A multicentre, multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemigliptin (LC15-0444) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15(5):410–416.
    1. Lim KS, Kim JR, Choi YJ, Shin KH, Kim KP, Hong JH, et al. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of the dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor LC15-0444 in healthy Korean men: a dose-block-randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending single-dose, Phase I study. Clin Ther. 2008;30(10):1817–1830.
    1. Kim N, Patrick L, Mair S, Stevens L, Ford G, Birks V, et al. Absorption, metabolism and excretion of [14C]gemigliptin, a novel dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, in humans. Xenobiotica. 2014;44(6):522–530.
    1. Rhee EJ, Lee WY, Yoon KH, Yoo SJ, Lee IK, Baik SH, et al. A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase II trial evaluating the optimal dose, efficacy and safety of LC 15-0444 in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2010;12(12):1113–1119.
    1. Rhee EJ, Lee WY, Min KW, Shivane VK, Sosale AR, Jang HC, et al. Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor gemigliptin compared with sitagliptin added to ongoing metformin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin alone. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15(6):523–530.
    1. Shin D, Cho YM, Lee S, Lim KS, Kim JA, Ahn JY, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between gemigliptin and metformin in healthy subjects. Clin Drug Investig. 2014;34(6):383–393.
    1. Park SI, Lee H, Oh J, Lim KS, Jang IJ, Kim JA, et al. A fixed-dose combination tablet of gemigliptin and metformin sustained release has comparable pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and tolerability profiles to separate tablets in healthy subjects. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015;9:729–736.
    1. ICH Harmonised Guideline. Integrated addendum to ICH E6 (R1): guideline for good clinical practice E6 (R2). Current Step. 2015.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi