A Gap Analysis Needs Assessment Tool to Drive a Care Delivery and Research Agenda for Integration of Care and Sharing of Best Practices Across a Health System

Sherita Hill Golden, Daniel Hager, Lois J Gould, Nestoras Mathioudakis, Peter J Pronovost, Sherita Hill Golden, Daniel Hager, Lois J Gould, Nestoras Mathioudakis, Peter J Pronovost

Abstract

Background: In a complex health system, it is important to establish a systematic and data-driven approach to identifying needs. The Diabetes Clinical Community (DCC) of Johns Hopkins Medicine's Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality developed a gap analysis tool and process to establish the system's current state of inpatient diabetes care.

Methods: The collectively developed tool assessed the following areas: program infrastructure; protocols, policies, and order sets; patient and health care professional education; and automated data access. For the purposes of this analysis, gaps were defined as those instances in which local resources, infrastructure, or processes demonstrated a variance against the current national evidence base or institutionally defined best practices.

Results: Following the gap analysis, members of the DCC, in collaboration with health system leadership, met to identify priority areas in order to integrate and synergize diabetes care resources and efforts to enhance quality and reduce disparities in care across the system. Key gaps in care identified included lack of standardized glucose management policies, lack of standardized training of health care professionals in inpatient diabetes management, and lack of access to automated data collection and analysis. These results were used to gain resources to support collaborative diabetes health system initiatives and to successfully obtain federal research funding to develop and pilot a pragmatic diabetes educational intervention.

Conclusion: At a health system level, the summary format of this gap analysis tool is an effective method to clearly identify disparities in care to focus efforts and resources to improve care delivery.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest.

All authors report no conflicts of interest.

Copyright © 2016 The Joint Commission. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
The conceptual model for implementing hospitalwide glucose management programs was used to identify priority areas to integrate and synergize diabetes care resources and efforts. Adapted from Munoz M, et al. Implementing and evaluating a multicomponent inpatient diabetes management program: Putting research into practice. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012;38:195–206. FTE, full-time equivalent; OAD, oral antidiabetic drug; BG, blood glucose; LOS, length of stay; DKA, diabetic ketoacidosis.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi