Effectiveness of Home Visits in Pregnancy as a Public Health Measure to Improve Birth Outcomes

Kayoko Ichikawa, Takeo Fujiwara, Takeo Nakayama, Kayoko Ichikawa, Takeo Fujiwara, Takeo Nakayama

Abstract

Background: Birth outcomes, such as preterm birth, low birth weight (LBW), and small for gestational age (SGA), are crucial indicators of child development and health.

Purpose: To evaluate whether home visits from public health nurses for high-risk pregnant women prevent adverse birth outcomes.

Methods: In this quasi-experimental cohort study in Kyoto city, Japan, high-risk pregnant women were defined as teenage girls (range 14-19 years old), women with a twin pregnancy, women who registered their pregnancy late, had a physical or mental illness, were of single marital status, non-Japanese women who were not fluent in Japanese, or elderly primiparas. We collected data from all high-risk pregnant women at pregnancy registration interviews held at a public health centers between 1 July 2011 and 30 June 2012, as well as birth outcomes when delivered from the Maternal and Child Health Handbook (N = 964), which is a record of prenatal check-ups, delivery, child development and vaccinations. Of these women, 622 women were selected based on the home-visit program propensity score-matched sample (pair of N = 311) and included in the analysis. Data were analyzed between January and June 2014.

Results: In the propensity score-matched sample, women who received the home-visit program had lower odds of preterm birth (odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39 to 0.98) and showed a 0.55-week difference in gestational age (95% CI: 0.18 to 0.92) compared to the matched controlled sample. Although the program did not prevent LBW and SGA, children born to mothers who received the program showed an increase in birth weight by 107.8 g (95% CI: 27.0 to 188.5).

Conclusion: Home visits by public health nurses for high-risk pregnant women in Japan might be effective in preventing preterm birth, but not SGA.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Participant flowchart.
Fig 1. Participant flowchart.

References

    1. Baron IS, Litman FR, Ahronovich MD, Baker R (2012) Late Preterm Birth: A Review of Medical and Neuropsychological Childhood Outcomes. Neuropsychology Review. 22: 438–450. 10.1007/s11065-012-9210-5
    1. Bhutta AT, Cleves MA, Casey PH, Cradock MM, Anand KJS (2002) Cognitive and behavioral outcomes of school-aged children who were born preterm—A meta-analysis. JAMA. 288: 728–737.
    1. Jongbloed-Pereboom M, Janssen A, Steenbergen B, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG (2012) Motor learning and working memory in children born preterm: A systematic review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 36: 1314–1330. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.02.005
    1. McGowan JE, Alderdice FA, Holmes VA, Johnston L (2011) Early Childhood Development of Late-Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics. 127: 1111–1124. 10.1542/peds.2010-2257
    1. Saigal S, Doyle LW (2008) Preterm birth 3—An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet. 371: 261–269. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60136-1
    1. van Noort-van der Spek IL, Franken M, Weisglas-Kuperus N (2012) Language Functions in Preterm-Born Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 129: 745–754. 10.1542/peds.2011-1728
    1. Strathearn L, Gray PH, O'Callaghan MJ, Wood DO (2001) Childhood neglect and cognitive development in extremely low birth weight infants: A prospective study. Pediatrics. 108: 142–151.
    1. Windham AM, Rosenberg L, Fuddy L, McFarlane E, Sia C, Duggan AK (2004) Risk of mother-reported child abuse in the first 3 years of life. Child Abuse & Neglect. 28: 645–667.
    1. Wu SS, Ma CX, Carter RL, Ariet M, Feaver EA, Resnick MB, et al. (2004) Risk factors for infant maltreatment: a population-based study. Child Abuse & Neglect 28: 1253–1264.
    1. Beck S, Wojdyla D, Say L, Betran AP, Merialdi M, Requejo JH, et al. (2010) The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 88: 31–38. 10.2471/BLT.08.062554
    1. Takimoto H, Yokoyama T, Yoshiike N, Fukuoka H (2005) Increase in low-birth-weight infants in Japan and associated risk factors, 1980–2000. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 31: 314–322.
    1. Yorifuji T, Naruse H, Kashima S, Murakoshi T, Kato T, Inoue S, et al. (2012) Trends of preterm birth and low birth weight in Japan: a one hospital-based study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 12 10.1186/1471-2393-12-162
    1. Hokama T, Binns C (2009) Trends in the prevalence of low birth weight in Okinawa, Japan: a public health perspective. Acta Paediatrica. 98: 242–246. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.01017.x
    1. Health, Labour, and Welfare Statistics (2012) Health, Labour, and Welfare Statistics Association. Journal of Health and Welfare Statistics.
    1. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R (2008) Preterm birth 1—Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 371: 75–84. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4
    1. Hillier SL, Nugent RP, Eschenbach DA, Krohn MA, Gibbs RS, Martin DH, et al. (1995) Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant. New England Journal of Medicine. 333: 1737–1742.
    1. DiFranza JR, Aligne CA, Weitzman M (2004) Prenatal and postnatal environmental tobacco smoke exposure and children's health. Pediatrics. 113: 1007–1015.
    1. Hendler I, Goldenberg RL, Mercer BM, Iams JD, Meis PJ, Moawad AH, et al. (2005) The Preterm Prediction study: Association between maternal body mass index and spontaneous and indicated preterm birth. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 192: 882–886.
    1. Grote NK, Bridge JA, Gavin AR, Melville JL, Iyengar S, Katon WJ, et al. (2010) A Meta-analysis of Depression During Pregnancy and the Risk of Preterm Birth, Low Birth Weight, and Intrauterine Growth Restriction. Archives of General Psychiatry. 67: 1012–1024. 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.111
    1. Hobel CJ, Goldstein A, Barrett ES (2008) Psychosocial stress and pregnancy outcome. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 51: 333–348. 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31816f2709
    1. Hoffman S, Hatch MC (1996) Stress, social support and pregnancy outcome: A reassessment based on recent research. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 10: 380–405.
    1. Xiong X, Buekens P, Fraser WD, Beck J, Offenbacher S (2006) Periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review. BJOG. 113: 135–143.
    1. Thompson JMD, Irgens LM, Rasmussen S, Daltveit AK (2006) Secular trends in socio-economic status and the implications for preterm birth. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 20: 182–187.
    1. Smith LK, Draper ES, Manktelow BN, Dorling JS, Field DJ (2007) Socioeconomic inequalities in very preterm birth rates. Archives of Disease in Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 92: F11–F14.
    1. Brett KM, Strogatz DS, Savitz DA (1997) Employment, job strain, and preterm delivery among women in North Carolina. American Journal of Public Health. 87: 199–204.
    1. Adirim T, Supplee L (2013) Overview of the Federal Home Visiting Program. Pediatrics. 132: S59–S64. 10.1542/peds.2013-1021C
    1. Avellar SA, Supplee LH (2013) Effectiveness of Home Visiting in Improving Child Health and Reducing Child Maltreatment. Pediatrics. 132: S90–S99. 10.1542/peds.2013-1021G
    1. Carabin H, Cowan LD, Beebe LA, Skaggs VJ, Thompson D, Agbangla C (2005) Does participation in a nurse visitation programme reduce the frequency of adverse perinatal outcomes in first-time mothers? Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 19: 194–205.
    1. Kitzman H, Olds DL, Henderson CR, Hanks C, Cole R, Tatelbaum, et al. (1997) Of prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses on pregnancy outcomes, childhood injuries, and repeated childbearing trial—A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 278: 644–652.
    1. Donovan EF, Ammerman RT, Besl J, Atherton H, Khoury JC, Altaye M, et al. (2007) Intensive home visiting is associated with decreased risk of infant death. Pediatrics. 119: 1145–1151.
    1. Olds DL, Henderson CR, Tatelbaum R, Chamberlin R (1986) Improving the delivery of prenatal-care and outcomes of pregnancy–a randomized trial of nurse home visitation. Pediatrics. 77: 16–28.
    1. Peacock S, Konrad S, Watson E, Nickel D, Muhajarine N (2013) Effectiveness of home visiting programs on child outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 13 10.1186/1471-2458-13-17
    1. Roman L, Raffo JE, Zhu Q, Meghea CI (2014) A Statewide Medicaid Enhanced Prenatal Care Program Impact on Birth Outcomes. JAMA Pediatrics. 168: 220–227. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4347
    1. Issel LM, Forrestal SG, Slaughter J, Wiencrot A, Handler A (2011) A Review of Prenatal Home-Visiting Effectiveness for Improving Birth Outcomes. Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing. 40: 157–165.
    1. McNaughton DB (2004) Nurse home visits to maternal-child clients: A review of intervention research. Public Health Nursing. 21: 207–219.
    1. Lee E, Mitchell-Herzfeld SD, Lowenfels AA, Greene R, Dorabawila V, DuMont KA (2009) Reducing Low Birth Weight Through Home Visitation A Randomized Controlled Trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 36: 154–160. 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.09.029
    1. McLaughlin FJ, Altemeier WA, Christensen MJ, Sherrod KB, Dietrich MS, Stern DT (1992) Randomized trial of comprehensive prenatal-care for low-income women: effect on infant birth weight. Pediatrics. 89: 128–132.
    1. Goyal NK, Hall ES, Meinzen-Derr JK, Kahn RS, Short JA, Van Ginkel JB, et al. (2013) Dosage Effect of Prenatal Home Visiting on Pregnancy Outcomes in At-Risk, First-Time Mothers. Pediatrics. 132: S118–S125. 10.1542/peds.2013-1021J
    1. Filene JH, Kaminski JW, Valle LA, Cachat P (2013) Components Associated With Home Visiting Program Outcomes: A Meta-analysis. Pediatrics 132: S100–S109. 10.1542/peds.2013-1021H
    1. Nakamura Y. (2010) Maternal and child health handbook in Japan. Japan Medical Association. 53: 259–265.
    1. Ministry of Health, Lavour, and Welfare (2014) Reports of community health care and health promotion project [chiikihoken, kenkouzousin jigyou houkoku]. Available: . Accessed 6 January 2015.
    1. Hertz-Picciotto I, Din-Dzietham R (1998) Comparisons of infant mortality using a percentile-based method of standardization for birthweight or gestational age. Epidemiology. 9: 61–67.
    1. Cooper BP, Scharff DP, Elliott M, Rotter B (2013) The Impact of SLHS Program on Perinatal Indicators. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 17: 1158–1165. 10.1007/s10995-012-1101-0
    1. Japanese Nursing Association (2014) Midwifery in Japan. Available: . Accessed 6 January 2015.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi