The place for short-acting opioids: special emphasis on remifentanil

Wolfram Wilhelm, Sascha Kreuer, Wolfram Wilhelm, Sascha Kreuer

Abstract

Pain is among the worst possible experiences for the critically ill. Therefore, nearly all intensive care patients receive some kind of pain relief, and opioids are most frequently administered. Morphine has a number of important adverse effects, including histamine release, pruritus, constipation, and, in particular, accumulation of morphine-6-glucuronide in patients with renal impairment. Hence, it is not an ideal analgesic for use in critically ill patients. Although the synthetic opioids fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil have better profiles, they undergo hepatic metabolism and their continuous infusion also leads to accumulation and prolonged drug effects. Various attempts have been made to limit these adverse effects, including daily interruption of infusion of sedatives and analgesics, intermittent bolus injections rather than continuous infusions, and selection of a ventilatory support pattern that allows more spontaneous ventilation. However, these techniques at best only limit the effects of drug accumulation, but they do not solve the problem. Another type of approach is to use remifentanil in critically ill patients. Remifentanil is metabolized by unspecific blood and tissue esterases and undergoes rapid metabolism, independent of the duration of infusion or any organ insufficiency. There are data indicating that remifentanil can be used for analgesia and sedation in all kinds of adult intensive care unit patients, and that its use will result in rapid and predictable offset of effect. This may permit both a significant reduction in weaning and extubation times, and clear differentiation between over-sedation and brain dysfunction. This article provides an overview of the use of short-acting opioids in the intensive care unit, with special emphasis on remifentanil. It summarizes the currently available study data regarding remifentanil and provides recommendations for clinical use of this agent.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Context-sensitive half-times of remifentanil and the other 4-anilido-piperidine opioids. Remifentanil has a context-sensitive half-time of 3 to 4 minutes, regardless of the duration of infusion, whereas continuous infusion of the other opioids results in accumulation and considerable prolongation of effect, making these opioids intermediate-acting or long-acting agents, depending on the duration of infusion. Figure adapted with permission from Egan TD, Lemmens HJ, Fiset P, Hermann DJ, Muir KT, Stanski DR, Shafer SL: The pharmacokinetics of the new short-acting opioid remifentanil (GI87084B) in healthy adult male volunteers. Anesthesiology 1993, 79:881–892.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Decline of effect site concentrations of different opioids after 24 hours of infusion. The findings are expressed as percentage of the individual maximum effect site concentration. This figure was calculated using Stanpump simulation software (by Shafer S, University of Stanford, CA, USA) for a female individual (age 80 years, height 170 cm, body weight 80 kg) and the following infusion rates: remifentanil 0.15 μg/kg per minute, sufentanil 1 μg/kg per hour, alfentanil 1.5 mg/hour, and fentanyl 0.2 mg/hour.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Extubation times after remifentanil infusion. Shown are extubation times in 46 intensive care unit patients after sedation with a remifentanil infusion (mean duration 9.8 hours, mean dosage 0.14 ± 0.08 μg/kg per minute). Two-thirds of all patients could be extubated within 15 minutes and 87% within 45 minutes after cessation of remifentanil infusion. Figure adapted with permission from: Wilhelm W, Dorscheid E, Schlaich N, Niederprüm, Deller D: The use of remifentanil in critically ill patients. Clinical findings and early experience. Anaesthesist 1999, 48:625–629. © Springer.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Times to offset of opioid effect after down-titration of remifentanil. Shown are times to offset of opioid effect after scheduled down-titrations (SDT) of remifentanil at 8, 24, 48, and 72 hours of infusion in (a) 10 adult intensive care unit patients with normal or mildly impaired renal function and (b) 30 patients with moderate or severe renal impairment with a mean creatinine clearance of 14.7 ml/minute. Offset times were more variable and statistically significantly longer in the renal impairment group (b). However, the time differences between the groups were only in the order of minutes and without clinical importance (about 17 minutes longer [mean] in the renal impairment group after 72 hours of remifentanil infusion). Adapted with permission from Breen and coworkers [30].

References

    1. Novaes MA, Knobel E, Bork AM, Pavao OF, Noqueira-Martins LA, Ferraz MB. Stressors in ICU: Perception of the patient, relatives and healthcare team. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25:1421–1426. doi: 10.1007/s001340051091.
    1. Soliman HM, Melot C, Vincent JL. Sedative and analgesic practice in the intensive care unit: the results of a European survey. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87:186–192. doi: 10.1093/bja/87.2.186.
    1. Mazoit JX, Butscher K, Samii K. Morphine in postoperative patients: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metabolites. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:70–78. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000265557.73688.32.
    1. Jacobi J, Fraser GL, Coursin DB, Riker RR, Fontaine D, Wittbrodt ET, Chalfin DB, Masica MF, Bjerke HS, Coplin WM, Task Force of the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP), American College of Chest Physicians et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:119–141. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200201000-00020.
    1. Martin J, Bäsell K, Bürkle H, Hommel J, Huth G, Kessler P, Kretz FJ, Putensen Ch, Quintel M, Tonner P, et al. Analgesia and sedation in intensive care medicine. S2-Guidelines of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. Anästhesiol Intensivmed. 2005;46(Suppl):1–20.
    1. Klees TM, Sheffels P, Dale O, Kharasch ED. Metabolism of alfentanil by cytochrome P4503A (CYP3A) enzymes. Drug Metab Dispos. 2005;33:303–311. doi: 10.1124/dmd.104.002709.
    1. Kress JP, Pohlman AS, O'Connor MF, Hal JB. Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1471–1477. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005183422002.
    1. Kollef MH, Levy NT, Ahrens TS, Schaiff R, Prentice D, Sherman G. The use of continuous IV sedation is associated with prolongation of mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1998;114:541–548. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.2.541.
    1. Rathgeber J, Schorn B, Falk V, Kazmaier S, Spiegel T, Burchardi H. The influence of controlled mandatory ventilation (CMV), intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) and biphasic intermittent positive airway pressure (BIPAP) on duration of intubation and consumption of analgesics and sedatives. A prospective analysis in 596 patients following adult cardiac surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1997;14:576–582. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.1994.00178.x.
    1. Egan TD, Lemmens HJ, Fiset P, Hermann DJ, Muir KT, Stanski DR, Shafer SL. The pharmacokinetics of the new short-acting opioid remifentanil (GI87084B) in healthy adult male volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:881–892. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199311000-00004.
    1. Glass PSA, Gan TJ, Howell S. A review of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Anesth Analg. 1999;89(Suppl):7–14. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199910001-00003.
    1. Cox EH, Langemeijer MWE, Gubbens-Stibbe JM, Muir KT, Danhof M. The comparative pharmacodynamics of remifentanil and its metabolite, GR9 in a rat electroencephalographic model. Anesthesiology. 0291;90:535–544. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199902000-00030.
    1. Scott LJ, Perry CM. Remifentanil: a review of its use during the induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia. Drugs. 2005;65:1793–1823. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565130-00007.
    1. Hoke JF, Shlugman D, Dershwitz M, Michalowski P, Malthouse-Dufore S, Connors PM, Martel D, Rosow CE, Muir KT, Rubin N, Glass PS. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil in persons with renal failure compared with healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:533–541. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199709000-00012.
    1. Pitsiu M, Wilmer A, Bodenham A, Breen D, Bach V, Bonde J, Kessler P, Albrecht S, Fisher G, Kirkham A. Pharmacokinetics of remifentanil and its major metabolite, remifentanil acid, in ICU patients with renal impairment. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92:493–503. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh086.
    1. Westmoreland CL, Hoke JF, Sebel PS, Hug CC, Muir KT. Pharmacokinetics of remifentanil (GI87084B) and its major metabolite (GI90291) in patients undergoing elective inpatient surgery. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:893–903. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199311000-00005.
    1. Evans TN, Park GR. Remifentanil in the critically ill. Anaesthesia. 1997;52:800–801.
    1. Soltész S, Biedler A, Silomon M, Schöpflin I, Molter GP. Recovery after remifentanil and sufentanil for analgesia and sedation of mechanically ventilated patients after trauma or major surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2001;86:763–768. doi: 10.1093/bja/86.6.763.
    1. Wilhelm W, Dorscheid E, Schlaich N, Niederprüm , Deller D. The use of remifentanil in critically ill patients. Clinical findings and early experience. Anaesthesist. 1999;48:625–629. doi: 10.1007/s001010050762.
    1. Dahaba AA, Grabner T, Rehak PH, List WF, Metzler H. Remifentanil versus morphine analgesia and sedation for mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a randomized double blind study. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:640–646. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200409000-00012.
    1. Müllejans B, López A, Cross MH, Bonome C, Morrison L, Kirkham AJT. Remifentanil versus fentanyl for analgesia based sedation to provide patient comfort in the intensive care unit: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial. Crit Care. 2004;8:R1–R11. doi: 10.1186/cc2398.
    1. Müllejans B, Matthey T, Scholpp J, Schill M. Sedation in the intensive care unit with remifentanil/propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl: a randomised, open-label, pharmacoeconomic trial. Critical Care. 2006;10:R91. doi: 10.1186/cc4939.
    1. Baillard C, Cohen Y, Le Toumelin P, Karoubi P, Hoang P, Ait Kaci F, Cupa M, Fosse JP. Remifentanil-midazolam compared to sufentanil-midazolam for ICU long-term sedation. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2005;24:480–486.
    1. Engelhard K, Reeker W, Kochs E, Werner C. Effect of remifentanil on intracranial pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity in patients with head trauma. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004;48:396–399. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-5172.2004.00348.x.
    1. Leone M, Albanese J, Viviand X, Garnier F, Bourgoin A, Barrau K, Martin C. The effects of remifentanil on endotracheal suctioning-induced increases in intracranial pressure in head-injured patients. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1193–1198. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000132546.79769.91.
    1. Karabinis A, Mandragos K, Stergiopoulos S, Komnos A, Soukup J, Speelberg B, Kirkham AJT. Safety and efficacy of analgesia-based sedation using remifentanil versus standard hypnotic-based regimens in intensive care unit patients with brain injuries: a randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN50308308] Crit Care. 2004;8:R268–R280. doi: 10.1186/cc2896.
    1. Bauer C, Kreuer S, Ketter R, Grundmann U, Wilhelm W. Remifentanil-propofol versus fentanyl-midazolam combinations for intracranial surgery: Influence of anaesthesia technique and intensive sedation on ventilation times and duration of stay in the ICU. Anaesthesist. 2007;56:128–132. doi: 10.1007/s00101-006-1130-4.
    1. Dershwitz M, Hoke JF, Rosow CE, Michalowski P, Connors PM, Muir KT, Dienstag JL. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil in volunteer subjects with severe liver disease. Anesthesiology. 1996;84:812–820. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199604000-00008.
    1. Navapurkar VU, Archer S, Gupta SK, Muir KT, Frazer N, Park GR. Metabolism of remifentanil during liver transplantation. Br J Anaesth. 1998;81:881–886.
    1. Breen D, Wilmer A, Bodenham A, Bach V, Bonde J, Kessler P, Albrecht S, Shaikh S. Offset of pharmacodynamic effects and safety of remifentanil in intensive care unit patients with various degrees of renal impairment. Crit Care. 2004;8:R21–R30. doi: 10.1186/cc2399.
    1. Breen D, Karabinis A, Malbrain M, Morais R, Albrecht S, Jarnvig IL, Parkinson P, Kirkham AJT. Decreased duration of mechanical ventilation when comparing analgesia-based sedation using remifentanil with standard hypnotic-based sedation for up to 10 days in intensive care unit patients: a randomised trial [ISRCTN47583497] Crit Care. 2005;9:R200–R210. doi: 10.1186/cc3495.
    1. Park G, Lane M, Rogers S, Bassett P. A comparison of hypnotic and analgesic based sedation in a general intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth. 2007;98:76–82. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael320.
    1. Wilhelm W, Wrobel M, Kreuer S, Larsen R. Remifentanil: an update. Anaesthetist. 2003;52:473–494.
    1. Bouillon T, Kietzmann D, Port R, Meineke I, Hoeft A. Population pharmacokinetics of piritramide in surgical patients. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:7–15. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199901000-00004.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi