Uptake and population-level impact of expedited partner therapy (EPT) on Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: the Washington State community-level randomized trial of EPT

Matthew R Golden, Roxanne P Kerani, Mark Stenger, James P Hughes, Mark Aubin, Cheryl Malinski, King K Holmes, Matthew R Golden, Roxanne P Kerani, Mark Stenger, James P Hughes, Mark Aubin, Cheryl Malinski, King K Holmes

Abstract

Background: Expedited partner therapy (EPT), the practice of treating the sex partners of persons with sexually transmitted infections without their medical evaluation, increases partner treatment and decreases gonorrhea and chlamydia reinfection rates. We conducted a stepped-wedge, community-level randomized trial to determine whether a public health intervention promoting EPT could increase its use and decrease chlamydia test positivity and gonorrhea incidence in women.

Methods and findings: The trial randomly assigned local health jurisdictions (LHJs) in Washington State, US, into four study waves. Waves instituted the intervention in randomly assigned order at intervals of 6-8 mo. Of the state's 25 LHJs, 24 were eligible and 23 participated. Heterosexual individuals with gonorrhea or chlamydial infection were eligible for the intervention. The study made free patient-delivered partner therapy (PDPT) available to clinicians, and provided public health partner services based on clinician referral. The main study outcomes were chlamydia test positivity among women ages 14-25 y in 219 sentinel clinics, and incidence of reported gonorrhea in women, both measured at the community level. Receipt of PDPT from clinicians was evaluated among randomly selected patients. 23 and 22 LHJs provided data on gonorrhea and chlamydia outcomes, respectively. The intervention increased the percentage of persons receiving PDPT from clinicians (from 18% to 34%, p < 0.001) and the percentage receiving partner services (from 25% to 45%, p < 0.001). Chlamydia test positivity and gonorrhea incidence in women decreased over the study period, from 8.2% to 6.5% and from 59.6 to 26.4 per 100,000, respectively. After adjusting for temporal trends, the intervention was associated with an approximately 10% reduction in both chlamydia positivity and gonorrhea incidence, though the confidence bounds on these outcomes both crossed one (chlamydia positivity prevalence ratio = 0.89, 95% CI 0.77-1.04, p = 0.15; gonorrhea incidence rate ratio = 0.91, 95% CI .71-1.16, p = 0.45). Study findings were potentially limited by inadequate statistical power, by the institution of some aspects of the study intervention outside of the research randomization sequence, and by the fact that LHJs did not constitute truly isolated sexual networks.

Conclusions: A public health intervention promoting the use of free PDPT substantially increased its use and may have resulted in decreased chlamydial and gonococcal infections at the population level.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01665690.

Conflict of interest statement

Pfizer pharmaceuticals provided free azithromycin used in the study. MRG has received research support from Melinta pharmacueticals and Cempra pharmaceuticals for his participation as an investigator in trials of new drug treatments for gonorrhea. MRG has received a consulting fee from Melinta pharmaceuticals.

Figures

Figure 1. Study flow diagram.
Figure 1. Study flow diagram.
Modified for stepped-wedge design from suggested CONSORT criteria format for cluster randomized trials [47]. +Numbers of tests and cases presented as means with ranges.
Figure 2. Washington State local health jurisdictions…
Figure 2. Washington State local health jurisdictions instituting an expedited partner therapy intervention in four temporally defined waves.
Figure 3. Percentage of persons with gonorrhea…
Figure 3. Percentage of persons with gonorrhea or chlamydial infection who received components of the study intervention in periods before and during the study intervention, by study wave.
Percentage of persons receiving (A) PDPT from their diagnosing clinician, (B) public health partner services, or (C) either PDPT or public health partner services. *The percentage of persons receiving partner services was directly measured and is not an estimate. Consequently, there are no confidence intervals on data for this outcome.
Figure 4. Trends in chlamydia test positivity…
Figure 4. Trends in chlamydia test positivity and gonorrhea incidence for 2007–2010 among women in 23 local health jurisdictions in Washington State.
Chlamydia test positivity and gonorrhea incidence (A) across all waves and (B) by wave. Open symbols and red lines indicate measurement and time before the institution of the study intervention, and solid symbols and black lines represent intervention time periods. Time periods are 3-mo analysis periods occurring prior to initiation of the intervention in each wave.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013) Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2012. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;
    1. Golden MR, Hogben M, Potterat JJ, Handsfield HH (2004) HIV partner notification in the United States: a national survey of program coverage and outcomes. Sex Transm Dis 31: 709–712.
    1. Schillinger JA, Kissinger P, Calvet H, Whittington WL, Ransom RL, et al. (2003) Patient-delivered partner treatment with azithromycin to prevent repeated Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women: a randomized, controlled trial. Sex Transm Dis 30: 49–56.
    1. Golden MR, Whittington WL, Handsfield HH, Hughes JP, Stamm WE, et al. (2005) Effect of expedited treatment of sex partners on recurrent or persistent gonorrhea or chlamydial infection. N Engl J Med 352: 676–685.
    1. Kissinger P, Mohammed H, Richardson-Alston G, Leichliter JS, Taylor SN, et al. (2005) Patient-delivered partner treatment for male urethritis: a randomized, controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis 41: 623–629.
    1. Ferreira A, Young T, Mathews C, Zunza M, Low N (2013) Strategies for partner notification for sexually transmitted infections, including HIV. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10: CD002843 10.1002/14651858.CD002843.pub2
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014) Legal status of expedited partner therapy (EPT). Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;
    1. Hogben M, McCree DH, Golden MR (2005) Patient-delivered partner therapy for sexually transmitted diseases as practiced by U.S. physicians. Sex Transm Dis 32: 101–105.
    1. Guerry SL, Bauer HM, Packel L, Samuel M, Chow J, et al. (2005) Chlamydia screening and management practices of primary care physicians and nurse practitioners in California. J Gen Intern Med 20: 1102–1107.
    1. Rogers ME, Opdyke KM, Blank S, Schillinger JA (2006) Patient-delivered partner treatment and other partner management strategies for sexually transmitted diseases used by New York City healthcare providers. Sex Transm Dis 34: 88–92.
    1. Cramer R, Leichliter JS, Stenger MR, Loosier PS, Slive L, et al. (2013) The legal aspects of expedited partner therapy practice: do state laws and policies really matter? Sex Transm Dis 40: 657–662. 10.1097/01.OLQ.0000431358.18959.d4
    1. Golden MR, Hughes JP, Brewer DD, Holmes KK, Whittington WL, et al. (2007) Evaluation of a population-based program of expedited partner therapy for gonorrhea and chlamydial infection. Sex Transm Dis 34: 598–603.
    1. Yu YY, Frasure-Williams JA, Dunne EF, Bolan G, Markowitz L, et al. (2011) Chlamydia partner services for females in California family planning clinics. Sex Transm Dis 38: 913–918. 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182240366
    1. Stephens SC, Bernstein KT, Katz MH, Philip SS, Klausner JD (2010) The effectiveness of patient-delivered partner therapy and chlamydial and gonococcal reinfection in San Francisco. Sex Transm Dis 37: 525–529. 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181d8920f
    1. Mickiewicz T, Al-Tayyib A, Thrun M, Rietmeijer C (2012) Implementation and effectiveness of an expedited partner therapy program in an urban clinic. Sex Transm Dis 39: 923–929. 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182756f20
    1. Kerns JL, Jones HE, Pressman EJ, Fratarelli LA, Garth J, et al. (2011) Implementation of expedited partner therapy among women with chlamydia infection at an urban family planning clinic. Sex Transm Dis 38: 722–726. 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318214bb83
    1. Hussey MA, Hughes JP (2007) Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials 28: 182–191.
    1. Golden MR, Whittington WL, Handsfield HH, Malinski C, Clark A, et al. (2001) Partner management for gonococcal and chlamydial infection: expansion of public health services to the private sector and expedited sex partner treatment through a partnership with commercial pharmacies. Sex Transm Dis 28: 658–665.
    1. Washington State Department of Health (2005) Washington State provider guidelines for patient delivered therapy. Olympia: Washington State Department of Health;
    1. Satterwhite CL, Grier L, Patzer R, Weinstock H, Howards PP, et al. (2011) Chlamydia positivity trends among women attending family planning clinics: United States, 2004–2008. Sex Transm Dis 38: 989–994. 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318225f7d7
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010) Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2009. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
    1. Fine D, Dicker L, Mosure D, Berman S (2008) Increasing chlamydia positivity in women screened in family planning clinics: do we know why? Sex Transm Dis 35: 47–52.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2009) CDC expert consultation on the effect of antiretroviral therapy on risk of sexual transmission of HIV infection and superinfection. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
    1. Groves RM, Mosher WD, Lepkowski JM, Kirgis NG (2009) Planning and development of the continuous National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat 1: 1–64.
    1. Kissinger P, Schmidt N, Mohammed H, Leichliter JS, Gift TL, et al. (2006) Patient-delivered partner treatment for Trichomonas vaginalis infection: a randomized controlled trial. Sex Transm Dis 33: 445–450.
    1. Cameron ST, Glasier A, Scott G, Young H, Melvin L, et al. (2009) Novel interventions to reduce re-infection in women with chlamydia: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 24: 888–895. 10.1093/humrep/den475
    1. Althaus CL, Turner KM, Mercer CH, Auguste P, Roberts TE, et al. (2014) Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of traditional and new partner notification technologies for curable sexually transmitted infections: observational study, systematic reviews and mathematical modelling. Health Technol Assess 18: 1–100. 10.3310/hta18020
    1. Kretzschmar M, van Duynhoven YT, Severijnen AJ (1996) Modeling prevention strategies for gonorrhea and Chlamydia using stochastic network simulations. Am J Epidemiol 144: 306–317.
    1. Hethcote H, Yorke J, Nold A (1982) Gonorrhea modeling. Math Biosci 58: 93–109.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention (2006) Expedited partner therapy in the management of sexually transmitted diseases: review and guidance.Washington (District of Columbia): US Department of Health and Human Services.
    1. New Mexico Department of Health (2007) New Mexico Department of Health guidelines for expedited partner treatment (EPT) of sexually transmitted diseases. Santa Fe: New Mexico Department of Health.
    1. Minnesota Department of Health (2008) Expedited partner therapy (EPT) for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: guidance for medical providers in Minnesota. Minneapolis: Minnesota Department of Health; 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31815b0158
    1. Bauer HM, Wohlfeiler D, Klausner JD, Guerry S, Gunn RA, et al. (2008) California guidelines for expedited partner therapy for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Sex Transm Dis 35: 314–319. 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31815b0158
    1. New York State Department of Health (2011) Expedited partner therapy guidelines for health care providers in NYS for Chlamydia trachomatis. Albany: New York State Department of Health.
    1. Tennessee Department of Health (2013) Expedited STD management implementation guide. Nashville: Tennessee Department of Health.
    1. Gift TL, Kissinger P, Mohammed H, Leichliter JS, Hogben M, et al. (2011) The cost and cost-effectiveness of expedited partner therapy compared with standard partner referral for the treatment of Chlamydia or gonorrhea. Sex Transm Dis 38: 1067–1073. 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31822e9192
    1. Ng BE, Butler LM, Horvath T, Rutherford GW (2011) Population-based biomedical sexually transmitted infection control interventions for reducing HIV infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011: CD001220 10.1002/14651858.CD001220.pub3
    1. Grosskurth H, Mosha F, Todd J, Mwijarubi E, Klokke A, et al. (1995) Impact of improved treatment of sexually transmitted diseases on HIV infection in rural Tanzania: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 346: 530–536.
    1. Kamali A, Quigley M, Nakiyingi J, Kinsman J, Kengeya-Kayondo J, et al. (2003) Syndromic management of sexually-transmitted infections and behaviour change interventions on transmission of HIV-1 in rural Uganda: a community randomised trial. Lancet 361: 645–652.
    1. Wawer MJ, Sewankambo NK, Serwadda D, Quinn TC, Paxton LA, et al. (1999) Control of sexually transmitted diseases for AIDS prevention in Uganda: a randomised community trial. Rakai Project Study Group. Lancet 353: 525–535.
    1. Garcia PJ, Holmes KK, Carcamo CP, Garnett GP, Hughes JP, et al. (2012) Prevention of sexually transmitted infections in urban communities (Peru PREVEN): a multicomponent community-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379: 1120–1128. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61846-1
    1. van den Broek IV, van Bergen JE, Brouwers EE, Fennema JS, Gotz HM, et al. (2012) Effectiveness of yearly, register based screening for chlamydia in the Netherlands: controlled trial with randomised stepped wedge implementation. BMJ 345: e4316 10.1136/bmj.e4316
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012) Update to CDC’s sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010: oral cephalosporins no longer a recommended treatment for gonococcal infections. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 61: 590–594.
    1. Unemo M, European STI Guidelines Editorial Board (2012) The 2012 European guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults recommends dual antimicrobial therapy. Euro Surveill 17: 20323
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013) Guidance on the use of expedited partner therapy in the treatment of gonorrhea. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;
    1. Golden MR, Barbee LA, Kerani R, Dombrowski JC (2014) Potential deleterious effects of promoting the use of ceftriaxone in the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Sex Transm Dis 41: 619–625. 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000174
    1. Campbell MK, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, CONSORT Group (2005) CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ 328: 702–708.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi