Pilot test of an online training module on near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring for the randomised clinical trial SafeBoosC-III

Mathias Lühr Hansen, Marie Isabel Rasmussen, Snorre Rubin, Adelina Pellicer, Guoqiang Cheng, Xin Xu, Yin Zhaoqing, Vibeke Zoffmann, Gorm Greisen, Mathias Lühr Hansen, Marie Isabel Rasmussen, Snorre Rubin, Adelina Pellicer, Guoqiang Cheng, Xin Xu, Yin Zhaoqing, Vibeke Zoffmann, Gorm Greisen

Abstract

Background: SafeBoosC-III is an international randomised clinical trial to evaluate the effect of treatment of extremely preterm infants during the first 3 days of life based on cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) monitoring versus treatment and monitoring as usual. To ensure high quality of the trial intervention as well as of patient care, we have developed a multilingual web-based training program to train relevant staff and test their competence. As we enter an under-explored area of e-learning, we have conducted a pilot study on the first of the five modules comprising the web-based training program to test the feasibility of developing such a program for an international trial with limited resources.

Methods: The module in this study focuses on the principles and practice of NIRS monitoring. The pedagogical idea was to integrate training and certification. One-hundred doctors and nurses from five Neonatal Intensive Care Units across China, Spain and Denmark were invited to participate in the pilot study. Upon completion of the NIRS module, participants were invited to evaluate their experience by completing an online survey. Data from closed-ended questions were analysed using descriptive statistics while data from open-ended questions underwent thematic analysis.

Results: In total, 81 of 100 invited staff members entered the training module and completed the online survey. The median time and the number of questions to pass the module was 15 minutes and seven questions, respectively. Most staff found the academic level of the learning material and quiz appropriate (85% and 93% of all staff members, respectively), as well as agreeing that the module was relevant to prepare them to 'use the NIRS device' (90%). Thematic analysis revealed issues such as a discrepancy between learning material and quiz questions, lack of clarity, and technical issues.

Conclusion: We provide evidence of the feasibility of developing a multilingual web-based training program for an international trial, despite challenges such as low budget, language barriers and possibly differences in the clinical training of staff. Exploring the integration of training and certification for international trials, the positive results of this study motivate further developments.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT03770741. Registered 10 December 2018.

Keywords: E-learning; Extremely preterm; NIRS; Near-infrared spectroscopy; Online training; RCT; Randomised clinical trial; Randomized clinical trial; SafeBoosC; Web-based training.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
On the opening page, the participant will see a short introduction text and the possibility to 1) open the introduction material (‘here’ in blue text) or 2) go to the quiz (in the middle of the lower blue bar)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Example of a question from the NIRS module. a The case-text describing the clinical setting and the five answer possibilities; options two and three have been chosen. b Explanations to answers are presented; option two was correct, while option 3 was wrong. This means that the question is not passed and the participant will be presented with another question on the same learning objective and have to answer that correctly before completing the quiz
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Inferred themes and sub-themes

References

    1. Garattini S, Jakobsen JC, Wetterslev J, Bertelé V, Banzi R, Rath A, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice: Overview of threats to the validity of evidence and how to minimise them. Eur J Intern Med. 2016;32:13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.03.020.
    1. Nardini C. The ethics of clinical trials. Ecancermedicalscience. 2014;8:1–9.
    1. CHMP Guideline for good clinical practice E6(R2) by the International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Eur Med Agency. 2016;6:1–70.
    1. Walker R, Morris DW, Greer TL, Trivedi MH. Research staff training in a multisite randomized clinical trial: Methods and recommendations from the stimulant reduction intervention using dosed exercise (STRIDE) trial. Addict Res Theory. 2014;22:407–415. doi: 10.3109/16066359.2013.868446.
    1. Targum SD. Evaluating rater competency for CNS clinical trials. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006;26:308–310. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000219049.33008.b7.
    1. Mulsant BH, Kastango KB, Rosen J, Stone RA, Mazumdar S, Pollock BG. Interrater reliability in clinical trials of depressive disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:1598–1600. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.9.1598.
    1. Clark RC, Mayer RE. E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedialearning. 3. San Francisco: Wiley; 2011.
    1. Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med. 2006;81:207–212. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200603000-00002.
    1. Palmer RC, Samson R, Triantis M, Mullan ID. Development and evaluation of a web-based breast cancer cultural competency course for primary healthcare providers. BMC Med Educ. 2011;11:59. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-59.
    1. Brown M, Bullock A. Evaluating PLATO: postgraduate teaching and learning online. Clin Teach. 2014;11:10–14. doi: 10.1111/tct.12052.
    1. Antonoff MB, Verrier ED, Allen MS, Aloia L, Baker C, Fann JI, et al. Impact of Moodle-based online curriculum on thoracic surgery in-training examination scores. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:1381–1386. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.03.100.
    1. Thukral A, Sasi A, Chawla D, Datta P, Wahid S, Rao S, et al. Online Neonatal Training and Orientation Programme in India (ONTOP-IN)--the way forward for distance education in developing countries. J Trop Pediatr. 2012;58:486–490. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fms029.
    1. Pelayo-Alvarez M, Perez-Hoyos S, Agra-Varela Y. Clinical effectiveness of online training in palliative care of primary care physicians. J Palliat Med. 2013;16:1188–1196. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0005.
    1. Oliveira AC, Mattos S, Coimbra M. Development and assessment of an e-learning course on pediatric cardiology basics. JMIR Med Educ. 2017;3:e10. doi: 10.2196/mededu.5434.
    1. Frehywot S, Vovides Y, Talib Z, Mikhail N, Ross H, Wohltjen H, et al. E-learning in medical education in resource constrained low- and middle-income countries. Hum Resour Health. 2013;11:4. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-11-4.
    1. Vaona A, Banzi R, Kwag KH, Rigon G, Cereda D, Pecoraro V, et al. E-learning for health professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5:12.
    1. Cook DE, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Internet-based learning in the health professions. JAMA. 2014;300:1181–1196. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.10.1181.
    1. Cook DA. Web-based learning: pros, cons and controversies. Clin Med (Northfield Il) 2007;7:37–42. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.7-1-37.
    1. Benjamin SE, Tate DF, Bangdiwala SI, Neelon BH, Ammerman AS, Dodds JM, et al. Preparing child care health consultants to address childhood overweight: A randomized controlled trial comparing web to in-person training. Matern Child Health J. 2008;12:662–669. doi: 10.1007/s10995-007-0277-1.
    1. Ford I, Norrie J. Pragmatic trials. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:454–463. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1510059.
    1. Bloom BS, Krathwohl DR, Masia BS. Taxonomy of educational objectives. the classification of educational goals : Cognitive domain handbook 1. New York: Longman; 1984.
    1. Wojcikowski K, Kirk L. Immediate detailed feedback to test-enhanced learning: An effective online educational tool. Med Teach. 2013;35:915–919. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.826793.
    1. Reis LO, Ikari O, Taha-Neto KA, Gugliotta A, Denardi F. Delivery of a urology online course using moodle versus didactic lectures methods. Int J Med Inform. 2015;84:149–154. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.11.001.
    1. Hyttel-Sørensen S, Pellicer A, Alderliesten T, Austin T, Van Bel F, Benders M, et al. Cerebral near infrared spectroscopy oximetry in extremely preterm infants: phase II randomised clinical trial. BMJ. 2015;350:1–11. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7635.
    1. Greisen G, Andresen B, Plomgaard AM, Hyttel-Sørensen S. Cerebral oximetry in preterm infants: an agenda for research with a clear clinical goal. Neurophotonics. 2016;3:31407. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.3.3.031407.
    1. Hyttel-Sorensen S, Kleiser S, Wolf M, Greisen G. Calibration of a prototype NIRS oximeter against two commercial devices on a blood-lipid phantom. Biomed Opt Express. 2013;4:1662–1672. doi: 10.1364/BOE.4.001662.
    1. Hyttel-Sørensen S, Greisen G, Als-Nielsen B, Gluud C. Cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring for prevention of brain injury in very preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;9:CD011506.
    1. Hyttel-Sorensen S, Hessel TW, la Cour A, Greisen G. A comparison between two NIRS oximeters (INVOS, OxyPrem) using measurement on the arm of adults and head of infants after caesarean section. Biomed Opt Express. 2014;5:3671. doi: 10.1364/BOE.5.003671.
    1. Wang Y-S. Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Inf Manag. 2003;41:75–86. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00028-4.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
    1. Pellicer A, Greisen G, Benders M, Claris O, Dempsey E, Fumagally M, et al. The SafeBoosC phase II randomised clinical trial: A treatment guideline for targeted near-infrared-derived cerebral tissue oxygenation versus standard treatment in extremely preterm infants. Neonatology. 2013;104:171–178. doi: 10.1159/000351346.
    1. Plomgaard AM, Hagmann C, Alderliesten T, Austin T, Van Bel F, Claris O, et al. Brain injury in the international multicenter randomized SafeBoosC phase II feasibility trial: Cranial ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging assessments. Pediatr Res. 2016;79:466–472. doi: 10.1038/pr.2015.239.
    1. Riera J, Hyttel-Sorensen S, Bravo MC, Cabañas F, López-Ortego P, Sanchez L, et al. The SafeBoosC phase II clinical trial: an analysis of the interventions related with the oximeter readings. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016;101:F333–F338. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308829.
    1. Rothwell PM. External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?”. Lancet. 2005;365:82–93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17670-8.
    1. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–357. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi