Lapatinib plus capecitabine in women with HER-2-positive advanced breast cancer: final survival analysis of a phase III randomized trial

David Cameron, Michelle Casey, Cristina Oliva, Beth Newstat, Bradley Imwalle, Charles E Geyer, David Cameron, Michelle Casey, Cristina Oliva, Beth Newstat, Bradley Imwalle, Charles E Geyer

Abstract

Objectives: A planned interim analysis of study EGF100151 prompted early termination of enrollment based on a longer time to progression with lapatinib and capecitabine than with capecitabine alone in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2(+) previously treated advanced breast cancer or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Here, we report final analyses of overall survival.

Patients and methods: Women with HER-2(+) MBC who progressed after regimens that included, but were not limited to, anthracyclines, taxanes, and trastuzumab, were randomized to lapatinib (1,250 mg/day) plus capecitabine (2,000 mg/m(2)) or capecitabine monotherapy (2,500 mg/m(2)) on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle.

Results: At enrollment termination, 399 patients were randomized, and nine were being screened and were offered combination treatment. In total, 207 and 201 patients were enrolled to combination therapy and monotherapy, respectively. Thirty-six patients receiving monotherapy crossed over to combination therapy following enrollment termination. The median overall survival times were 75.0 weeks for the combination arm and 64.7 weeks for the monotherapy arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-1.08; p = .210). A Cox regression analysis considering crossover as a time-dependent covariate suggested a 20% lower risk for death for patients treated with combination therapy (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64-0.99; p = .043). The low incidence of serious adverse events was consistent with previously reported rates.

Conclusions: Although premature enrollment termination and subsequent crossover resulted in insufficient power to detect differences in overall survival, exploratory analyses demonstrate a trend toward a survival advantage with lapatinib plus capecitabine. These data continue to support the efficacy of lapatinib in patients with HER-2(+) MBC.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: David Cameron: Consultant/advisory role: GlaxoSmithKline, Roche; Michelle Casey: Employment/leadership position: GlaxoSmithKline; Ownership interest: GlaxoSmithKline; Cristina Oliva: Employment/leadership position: Takeda, GlaxoSmithKline; Ownership interest: GlaxoSmithKline; Beth Newstat: Employment/leadership position: GlaxoSmithKline; Ownership interest: GlaxoSmithKline; Bradley Imwalle: None; Charles E. Geyer: None.

The content of this article has been reviewed by independent peer reviewers to ensure that it is balanced, objective, and free from commercial bias. No financial relationships relevant to the content of this article have been disclosed by the independent peer reviewers.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival (OS). (A): Intention-to-treat population. (B): OS curve adjusted for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score, number of metastatic sites, and liver metastases.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival including and excluding the crossover.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for OS analyses. Abbreviations: Adj, adjusted; OS, overall survival; w/, with; w/o, without.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Kaplan–Meier estimates of time to progression in patients receiving: one prior metastatic trastuzumab-based regimen (A) or more than one prior metastatic trastuzumab-based regimen (B).

References

    1. Moy B, Goss PE. Lapatinib: Current status and future directions in breast cancer. The Oncologist. 2006;11:1047–1057.
    1. Joensuu H, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P-L, Bono P, et al. FinHer Study Investigators. Adjuvant docetaxel or vinorelbine with or without trastuzumab for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:809–820.
    1. Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Procter M, Leyland-Jones B, et al. Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) Trial Study Team. Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1659–1672.
    1. Romond EH, Perez EA, Bryant J, et al. Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1673–1684.
    1. Slamon D, Eiermann W, Robert N, et al. BCIRG 006 Investigators. Phase III randomized trial comparing doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (AC→T) with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel and trastuzumab (AC→TH) with docetaxel, carboplatin and trastuzumab (TCH) in HER2 positive early breast cancer patients: BCIRG 006 study [abstract 1] Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;94(suppl 1):S5.
    1. Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, et al. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:783–792.
    1. Nahta R, Esteva FJ. HER2 therapy: Molecular mechanisms of trastuzumab resistance. Breast Cancer Res. 2006;8:215–222.
    1. Rusnak DW, Lackey K, Affleck K, et al. The effects of the novel, reversible epidermal growth factor receptor/ErbB-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, GW2016, on the growth of human normal and tumor-derived cell lines in vitro and in vivo. Mol Cancer Ther. 2001;1:85–94.
    1. Geyer CE, Forster J, Lindquist D, et al. Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2733–2743.
    1. Cameron D, Casey M, Press M, et al. A phase III randomized comparison of lapatinib plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in women with advanced breast cancer that has progressed on trastuzumab: Updated efficacy and biomarker analyses. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;112:533–543.
    1. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–216.
    1. Henderson IC, Patek AJ. The relationship between prognostic and predictive factors in the management of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1998;52:261–288.
    1. Di Leo A, Gomez HL, Aziz Z, et al. Phase III, double-blind, randomized study comparing lapatinib plus paclitaxel with placebo plus paclitaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5544–5552.
    1. Johnston S, Pippen J, Jr, Pivot X, et al. Lapatinib combined with letrozole versus letrozole and placebo as first-line therapy for postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5538–5546.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi