Identification of Patients With Ovarian Cancer Experiencing the Highest Benefit From Bevacizumab in the First-Line Setting on the Basis of Their Tumor-Intrinsic Chemosensitivity (KELIM): The GOG-0218 Validation Study

Benoit You, Christopher Purdy, Larry J Copeland, Elizabeth M Swisher, Michael A Bookman, Gini Fleming, Robert Coleman, Leslie M Randall, Krishnansu S Tewari, Bradley J Monk, Robert S Mannel, Joan L Walker, Fabio Cappuccini, David Cohn, Mahvish Muzaffar, David Mutch, Andrea Wahner-Hendrickson, Lainie Martin, Olivier Colomban, Robert A Burger, Benoit You, Christopher Purdy, Larry J Copeland, Elizabeth M Swisher, Michael A Bookman, Gini Fleming, Robert Coleman, Leslie M Randall, Krishnansu S Tewari, Bradley J Monk, Robert S Mannel, Joan L Walker, Fabio Cappuccini, David Cohn, Mahvish Muzaffar, David Mutch, Andrea Wahner-Hendrickson, Lainie Martin, Olivier Colomban, Robert A Burger

Abstract

Purpose: In patients with high-grade ovarian cancer, predictors of bevacizumab efficacy in first-line setting are needed. In the ICON-7 trial, a poor tumor intrinsic chemosensitivity (defined by unfavorable modeled cancer antigen-125 [CA-125] ELIMination rate constant K [KELIM] score) was a predictive biomarker. Only the patients with high-risk disease (suboptimally resected stage III, or stage IV) exhibiting unfavorable KELIM score < 1.0 had overall survival (OS) benefit from bevacizumab (median: 29.7 v 20.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.78). An external validation study in the GOG-0218 trial was performed.

Methods: In GOG-0218, 1,873 patients were treated with carboplatin-paclitaxel ± concurrent-maintenance bevacizumab/placebo. Patient KELIM values were calculated with CA-125 kinetics during the first 100 chemotherapy days by the Lyon University team. The association between KELIM score (favorable ≥ 1.0, or unfavorable < 1.0) and bevacizumab benefit for progression-free survival (PFS)/OS was independently assessed by NGR-GOG using univariate/multivariate analyses.

Results: KELIM was assessable in 1,662 patients with ≥ 3 CA-125 available values. An unfavorable KELIM score was associated with bevacizumab benefit compared with placebo (PFS: HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.82; OS: HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.03), whereas a favorable KELIM was not (PFS: HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.17; OS: HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.39). The highest benefit was observed in patients with a high-risk disease exhibiting unfavorable KELIM, for PFS (median: 9.1 v 5.6 months; HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.78), and for OS (median: 35.1 v 29.1 months; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.97).

Conclusion: This GOG-0218 trial investigation validates ICON-7 findings about the association between poor tumor chemosensitivity and benefit from concurrent-maintenance bevacizumab, suggesting that bevacizumab may mainly be effective in patients with poorly chemosensitive disease. Bevacizumab may be prioritized in patients with a high-risk and poorly chemosensitive disease to improve their PFS/OS (patient KELIM score calculator available on the Biomarker Kinetics website).

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00262847.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Kaplan-Meier curves of the PFS of patients according to treatment arm (arm 3 with bevacizumab concurrent-maintenance, v arm 1 with placebo) in patients with unfavorable or favorable KELIM (KEL) score, in the whole population. HR, hazard ratio; KELIM, ELIMination rate constant K; mPFS, median PFS (months); PFS, progression-free survival; Ref, reference.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Kaplan-Meier curves of the OS of patients according to treatment arm (arm 3 with bevacizumab concurrent-maintenance, v arm 1 with placebo) in patients with unfavorable or favorable KELIM (KEL) score, in the whole population. HR, hazard ratio; KELIM, ELIMination rate constant K; mPFS, median PFS (months); PFS, progression-free survival; Ref, reference.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Kaplan-Meier curves of the PFS of patients according to treatment arm (arm 3 with bevacizumab concurrent-maintenance, v arm 1 with placebo) in patients with favorable or unfavorable KELIM (KEL) score, in the population of patients with a high-risk disease (stage IV + stage III operated with suboptimal surgery). HR, hazard ratio; KELIM, ELIMination rate constant K; mPFS, median PFS (months); PFS, progression-free survival; Ref, reference.
FIG 4.
FIG 4.
Kaplan-Meier curves of the OS of patients according to treatment arm (arm 3 with bevacizumab concurrent-maintenance, v arm 1 with placebo) in patients with favorable or unfavorable KELIM (KEL) score, in the population of patients with a high-risk disease (stage IV + stage III operated with suboptimal surgery). HR, hazard ratio; KELIM, ELIMination rate constant K; mPFS, median PFS (months); OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; Ref, reference.

References

    1. US Food and Drug Administration: FDA approves bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. 2018.
    1. Burger RA, Brady MF, Bookman MA, et al. : Incorporation of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 365:2473-2483, 2011
    1. Perren TJ, Swart AM, Pfisterer J, et al. : A phase 3 trial of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 365:2484-2496, 2011
    1. Colombo N, Sessa C, Bois AD, et al. : ESMO-ESGO consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: Pathology and molecular biology, early and advanced stages, borderline tumours and recurrent disease. Int J Gynecol Cancer 30:672-705, 2019
    1. Collinson F, Hutchinson M, Craven RA, et al. : Predicting response to bevacizumab in ovarian cancer: A panel of potential biomarkers informing treatment selection. Clin Cancer Res 19:5227-5239, 2013
    1. Tewari KS, Burger RA, Enserro D, et al. : Final overall survival of a randomized trial of bevacizumab for primary treatment of ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 37:2317-2328, 2019
    1. Oza AM, Cook AD, Pfisterer J, et al. : Standard chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer (ICON7): Overall survival results of a phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 16:928-936, 2015
    1. Pujade-Lauraine E, Hilpert F, Weber B, et al. : Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: The AURELIA open-label randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 32:1302-1308, 2014
    1. You B, Freyer G, Gonzalez-Martin A, et al. : The role of the tumor primary chemosensitivity relative to the success of the medical-surgical management in patients with advanced ovarian carcinomas. Cancer Treat Rev 100:102294, 2021
    1. Colomban O, Tod M, Leary A, et al. : Early modeled longitudinal CA-125 kinetics and survival of ovarian cancer patients: A GINECO AGO MRC CTU study. Clin Cancer Res 25:5342-5350, 2019
    1. You B, Colomban O, Heywood M, et al. : The strong prognostic value of KELIM, a model-based parameter from CA 125 kinetics in ovarian cancer: Data from CALYPSO trial (a GINECO-GCIG study). Gynecol Oncol 130:289-294, 2013
    1. Lauby A, Colomban O, Corbaux P, et al. : The increasing prognostic and predictive roles of the tumor primary chemosensitivity assessed by CA-125 elimination rate constant K (KELIM) in ovarian cancer: A narrative review. Cancers (Basel) 14:98, 2021
    1. Dartois C, Brendel K, Comets E, et al. : Overview of model-building strategies in population PK/PD analyses: 2002-2004 literature survey. Br J Clin Pharmacol 64:603-612, 2007
    1. Biomarker Kinetics: Modeled CA-125 KELIM™ in patients with stage III-IV high grade serous ovarian carcinomas treated with first line adjuvant chemotherapy.
    1. Van Wagensveld L, Colomban O, Van der AA MA, et al. : The prognostic value of chemosensitivity, estimated by the modeled CA-125 KELIM, in ovarian cancer patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in the Netherlands. Ann Oncol 31, 2020. (suppl; abstr 847P)
    1. You B, Robelin P, Tod M, et al. : CA-125 ELIMination rate constant K (KELIM) is A marker of chemosensitivity in patients with ovarian cancer: Results from the phase II CHIVA trial. Clin Cancer Res 26:4625-4632, 2020
    1. Heller G, McCormack R, Kheoh T, et al. : Circulating tumor cell number as a response measure of prolonged survival for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A comparison with prostate-specific antigen across five randomized phase III clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 36:572-580, 2018
    1. Beal SL, Boeckmann A, Bauer R, et al. : NONMEM User’s Guides (1989–2009). Ellicott City, MD, Icon, 2009
    1. Jonsson EN, Karlsson MO: Xpose—An S-PLUS based population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model building aid for NONMEM. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 58:51-64, 1999
    1. van Driel WJ, Koole SN, Sikorska K, et al. : Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 378:230-240, 2018
    1. Colomban O, Tod M, Peron J, et al. : Bevacizumab for newly diagnosed ovarian cancers: Best candidates among high-risk disease patients (ICON-7). JNCI Cancer Spectr 4:pkaa026, 2020
    1. You B, Clamp A, Cook A, et al. : Differential benefit from fractionated dose-dense first-line chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) according to KELIM-evaluated tumor primary chemosensitivity: Exploratory analyses of ICON-8 trial. J Clin Oncol 39, 2021. (suppl 15; abstr 5530)
    1. Clamp AR, James EC, McNeish IA, et al. : Weekly dose-dense chemotherapy in first-line epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma treatment (ICON8): Primary progression free survival analysis results from a GCIG phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 394:2084-2095, 2019
    1. Printezi MI, Kilgallen AB, Bond MJG, et al. : Toxicity and efficacy of chronomodulated chemotherapy: A systematic review. Lancet Oncol 23:e129-e143, 2022
    1. Wright AA, Bohlke K, Armstrong DK, et al. : Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer: Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 34:3460-3473, 2016
    1. Tew WP, Lacchetti C, Ellis A, et al. : PARP inhibitors in the management of ovarian cancer: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 38:3468-3493, 2020
    1. Norquist BM, Brady MF, Harrell MI, et al. : Mutations in homologous recombination Genes and outcomes in ovarian carcinoma patients in GOG 218: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Clin Cancer Res 24:777-783, 2018
    1. You B, Sehgal V, Hosmane B, et al. : The CA-125 KELIM as a potential complementary tool for predicting veliparib benefit: An exploratory analysis from the VELIA/GOG-3005 Study. J Clin Oncol [epub ahead of print on July 22, 2022]
    1. Biomarker Kinetics: Modeled CA-125 KELIM™ in patients with stage III-IV high grade serous ovarian carcinomas treated with first line neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi