Photoantimicrobials-are we afraid of the light?

Abstract

Although conventional antimicrobial drugs have been viewed as miraculous cure-alls for the past 80 years, increasing antimicrobial drug resistance requires a major and rapid intervention. However, the development of novel but still conventional systemic antimicrobial agents, having only a single mode or site of action, will not alleviate the situation because it is probably only a matter of time until any such agents will also become ineffective. To continue to produce new agents based on this notion is unacceptable, and there is an increasing need for alternative approaches to the problem. By contrast, light-activated molecules called photoantimicrobials act locally via the in-situ production of highly reactive oxygen species, which simultaneously attack various biomolecular sites in the pathogenic target and therefore offer both multiple and variable sites of action. This non-specificity at the target circumvents conventional mechanisms of resistance and inhibits the development of resistance to the agents themselves. Photoantimicrobial therapy is safe and easy to implement and, unlike conventional agents, the activity spectrum of photoantimicrobials covers bacteria, fungi, viruses, and protozoa. However, clinical trials of these new, truly broad-spectrum, and minimally toxic agents have been few, and the funding for research and development is almost non-existent. Photoantimicrobials constitute one of the few ways forward through the morass of drug-resistant infectious disease and should be fully explored. In this Personal View, we raise awareness of the novel photoantimicrobial technologies that offer a viable alternative to conventional drugs in many relevant application fields, and could thus slow the pace of resistance development.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests.

Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1

Timeline for conventional and photoantimicrobial discovery RLP068=tetracationic Zn(II) phthalocyanine chloride. XF73=positively charged porphyrin. PEI-ce6=polyethyleneimine chlorin(e6) conjugate. SAPYR=perinapthenone derivative. SACUR=curcumin derivative. HpD-Photogem=haematoporphyrin derivative. FLASH=cationic riboflavin derivative. ALA-PPIX=5-aminolevulinic acid-induced protoporphyrin IX. PPA904=tetrabutyl derivative of methylene blue.

Figure 2

Mechanism of photoantimicrobial action The generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) can follow two alternative pathways after light activation by a given photosensitiser (PS). The PS can absorb a photon in the ground state, forming the excited singlet state. This state can undergo intersystem crossing to a longer-lived triplet state that might interact with oxygen by two mechanisms: in type 1, the generation of O2·−, ·OH, and H2O2 by electron transfer from the excited PS; in type 2, the triplet state of the PS can directly undergo energy exchange with triplet ground state oxygen, leading to the formation of excited 1O2. The generated ROS rapidly react with their environment depending on the localisation of the excited PS—eg, microorganism cell walls, lipid membranes, peptides, and nucleic acids. The PS returns to its initial state after this cycle, ready to absorb a new photon and generate additional ROS. O2·−=superoxide anions. ·OH=hydroxyl radical. H2O2=hydrogen peroxide. 1O2=singlet oxygen. e−=electron.