Early oral stepdown antibiotic therapy versus continuing intravenous therapy for uncomplicated Gram-negative bacteraemia (the INVEST trial): study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled, open-label, phase III, non-inferiority trial

I Russel Lee, Steven Y C Tong, Joshua S Davis, David L Paterson, Sharifah F Syed-Omar, Kwong Ran Peck, Doo Ryeon Chung, Graham S Cooke, Eshele Anak Libau, Siti-Nabilah B A Rahman, Mihir P Gandhi, Luming Shi, Shuwei Zheng, Jenna Chaung, Seow Yen Tan, Shirin Kalimuddin, Sophia Archuleta, David C Lye, I Russel Lee, Steven Y C Tong, Joshua S Davis, David L Paterson, Sharifah F Syed-Omar, Kwong Ran Peck, Doo Ryeon Chung, Graham S Cooke, Eshele Anak Libau, Siti-Nabilah B A Rahman, Mihir P Gandhi, Luming Shi, Shuwei Zheng, Jenna Chaung, Seow Yen Tan, Shirin Kalimuddin, Sophia Archuleta, David C Lye

Abstract

Background: The incidence of Gram-negative bacteraemia is rising globally and remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The majority of patients with Gram-negative bacteraemia initially receive intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy. However, it remains unclear whether patients can step down to oral antibiotics after appropriate clinical response has been observed without compromising outcomes. Compared with IV therapy, oral therapy eliminates the risk of catheter-associated adverse events, enhances patient quality of life and reduces healthcare costs. As current management of Gram-negative bacteraemia entails a duration of IV therapy with limited evidence to guide oral conversion, we aim to evaluate the clinical efficacy and economic impact of early stepdown to oral antibiotics.

Methods: This is an international, multicentre, randomised controlled, open-label, phase III, non-inferiority trial. To be eligible, adult participants must be clinically stable / non-critically ill inpatients with uncomplicated Gram-negative bacteraemia. Randomisation to the intervention or standard arms will be performed with 1:1 allocation ratio. Participants randomised to the intervention arm (within 72 h from index blood culture collection) will be immediately switched to an oral fluoroquinolone or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Participants randomised to the standard arm will continue to receive IV therapy for at least 24 h post-randomisation before clinical re-assessment and decision-making by the treating doctor. The recommended treatment duration is 7 days of active antibiotics (including empiric therapy), although treatment regimen may be longer than 7 days if clinically indicated. Primary outcome is 30-day all-cause mortality, and the key secondary outcome is health economic evaluation, including estimation of total healthcare cost as well as assessment of patient quality of life and number of quality-adjusted life years saved. Assuming a 30-day mortality of 8% in the standard and intervention arms, with 6% non-inferiority margin, the target sample size is 720 participants which provides 80% power with a one-sided 0.025 α-level after adjustment for 5% drop-out.

Discussion: A finding of non-inferiority in efficacy of oral fluoroquinolones or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus IV standard of care antibiotics may hypothetically translate to wider adoption of a more cost-effective treatment strategy with better quality of life outcomes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05199324 . Registered 20 January 2022.

Keywords: Antibiotics; Early oral stepdown therapy; Gram-negative bacteraemia; Health economic evaluation; Oral fluoroquinolones; Oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; Quality of life.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

References

    1. de Kraker MEA, Jarlier V, Monen JCM, Heuer OE, van de Sande N, Grundmann H. The changing epidemiology of bacteraemias in Europe: trends from the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19:860–868. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12028.
    1. Laupland KB. Incidence of bloodstream infection: a review of population-based studies. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19:492–500. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12144.
    1. Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, Craven DE, Flynn P, O’Grady NP, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:1–45. doi: 10.1086/599376.
    1. Rieger KL, Bosso JA, MacVane SH, Temple Z, Wahlquist A, Bohm N. Intravenous-only or intravenous transitioned to oral antimicrobials for enterobacteriaceae-associated bacteremic urinary tract infection. Pharmacotherapy. 2017;37:1479–1483. doi: 10.1002/phar.2024.
    1. Talan DA, Stamm WE, Hooton TM, Moran GJ, Burke T, Iravani A, et al. Comparison of ciprofloxacin (7 days) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (14 days) for acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis in women: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2000;283:1583. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.12.1583.
    1. Talan DA, Klimberg IW, Nicolle LE, Song J, Kowalsky SF, Church DA. Once daily, extended release ciprofloxacin for complicated urinary tract infections and acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis. J Urol. 2004;171:734–739. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000106191.11936.64.
    1. Tamma PD, Conley AT, Cosgrove SE, Harris AD, Lautenbach E, Amoah J, et al. Association of 30-day mortality with oral step-down vs continued intravenous therapy in patients hospitalized with Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179:316–23.
    1. Keller SC, Dzintars K, Gorski LA, Williams D, Cosgrove SE. Antimicrobial agents and catheter complications in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy. Pharmacotherapy. 2018;38:476–481. doi: 10.1002/phar.2099.
    1. Keller SC, Williams D, Gavgani M, Hirsch D, Adamovich J, Hohl D, et al. Rates of and risk factors for adverse drug events in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:11–19. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix733.
    1. Lau BD, Pinto BL, Thiemann DR, Lehmann CU. Budget impact analysis of conversion from intravenous to oral medication when clinically eligible for oral intake. Clin Ther. 2011;33:1792–1796. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.09.030.
    1. Béïque L, Zvonar R. Addressing concerns about changing the route of antimicrobial administration from intravenous to oral in adult inpatients. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2015;68:318–326.
    1. Chui D, Cheng L, Tejani AM. Clinical equivalency of ciprofloxacin 750 mg enterally and 400 mg intravenously for patients receiving enteral feeding: systematic review. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2009;62:127–134.
    1. Sutton JD, Sayood S, Spivak ES. Top questions in uncomplicated, non-Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Open Forum. Infect Dis Ther. 2018;5:ofy087.
    1. Tandan M, Cormican M, Vellinga A. Adverse events of fluoroquinolones vs. other antimicrobials prescribed in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018;52:529–540. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.04.014.
    1. Ho JM-W, Juurlink DN. Considerations when prescribing trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Can Med Assoc J. 2011;183:1851–1858. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.111152.
    1. Kutob LF, Justo JA, Bookstaver PB, Kohn J, Albrecht H, Al-Hasan MN. Effectiveness of oral antibiotics for definitive therapy of Gram-negative bloodstream infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016;48:498–503. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.07.013.
    1. Mercuro NJ, Stogsdill P, Wungwattana M. Retrospective analysis comparing oral stepdown therapy for enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections: fluoroquinolones versus β-lactams. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018;51:687–692. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.12.007.
    1. Mogle BT, Beccari MV, Steele JM, Fazili T, Kufel WD. Clinical considerations for oral beta-lactams as step-down therapy for Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2019;20:903–907. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1594774.
    1. Punjabi C, Tien V, Meng L, Deresinski S, Holubar M. Oral fluoroquinolone or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole vs. ß-lactams as step-down therapy for Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Forum Infect Dis Ther. 2019;6:ofz364. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz364.
    1. Yahav D, Franceschini E, Koppel F, Turjeman A, Babich T, Bitterman R, et al. Seven versus fourteen days of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated gram-negative bacteremia: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;69:1091–1098. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy1054.
    1. MacNeal W, Frisbee F. One hundred patients with Staphyloccocus septicemia receiving bacteriophage service. Am J Med Sci. 1936;191:179–189. doi: 10.1097/00000441-193602000-00004.
    1. Mendell T. Staphylococcic septicemia—a review of thirty-five cases, with six recoveries, twenty-nine deaths and sixteen autopsies. Arch Intern Med. 1939;63:1068–1083. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1939.00180230053004.
    1. Chotiprasitsakul D, Han JH, Cosgrove SE, Harris AD, Lautenbach E, Conley AT, et al. Comparing the outcomes of adults with Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia receiving short-course versus prolonged-course antibiotic therapy in a multicenter, propensity score-matched cohort. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:172–177. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix767.
    1. von Dach E, Albrich WC, Brunel A-S, Prendki V, Cuvelier C, Flury D, et al. Effect of C-reactive protein–guided antibiotic treatment duration, 7-day treatment, or 14-day treatment on 30-day clinical failure rate in patients with uncomplicated gram-negative bacteremia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;323:2160. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6348.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi