Validation of a Polish version of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: Do moderate psychometric properties affect its clinical utility?

Adam Wiśniewski, Karolina Filipska, Marlena Puchowska, Katarzyna Piec, Filip Jaskólski, Robert Ślusarz, Adam Wiśniewski, Karolina Filipska, Marlena Puchowska, Katarzyna Piec, Filip Jaskólski, Robert Ślusarz

Abstract

Background: The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a validated tool for assessing the severity of stroke. It has been adapted into several languages; however, a Polish version with large-scale psychometric validation, including repeatability and separate assessments of anterior and posterior stroke, has not been developed. We aimed to adapt and validate a Polish version of the NIHSS (PL-NIHSS) while focusing on the psychometric properties and site of stroke.

Methods: The study included 225 patients with ischemic stroke (102 anterior and 123 posterior circulation stroke). Four NIHSS-certified researchers estimated stroke severity using the most appropriate scales to assess the psychometric properties (including internal consistency, homogeneity, scalability, and discriminatory power of individual items) and ultimately determine the reliability, repeatability, and validity of the PL-NIHSS.

Results: The PL-NIHSS achieved Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.6885, which indicates moderate internal consistency and homogeneity. Slightly more than half of the individual items provided sufficient discriminatory power (r > 0.3). A favorable coefficient of repeatability (0.6267; 95% confidence interval: 0.5737-0.6904), narrow limits of inter-rater agreement, and excellent intraclass correlation coefficients or weighted kappa values (> 0.90), demonstrated high reliability of PL-NIHSS. Highly significant correlations with other tools confirmed the validity and predictive value of the PL-NIHSS. In posterior stroke, the PL-NIHSS achieved the required Cronbach's alpha coefficient (0.71070). Additionally, stroke location did not affect other psychometric features or instrument reliability and validity.

Conclusions: We developed a valid and reliable tool for assessing stroke severity in Polish-speaking participants. Moderate psychometric features were emphasized without limiting its clinical applications.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Pictogram showing modified words, phrases,…
Fig 1. Pictogram showing modified words, phrases, and pictures for better assessment of speech disorders, inattention, and extinction in a Polish-speaking population.
Fig 2. Bland–Altman diagram indicating the repeatability…
Fig 2. Bland–Altman diagram indicating the repeatability of the Polish version of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (PL-NIHSS).
The distribution of plots is based on the mean and difference from the total PL-NIHSS scores obtained by two randomly selected examiners. The limits of agreement occupy the area between the dashed lines. The 95% confidence interval of the regression line is located between the orange bold lines.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Construct (A) and predictive (B, C) validity of the Polish version of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (PL-NIHSS). Significant correlation with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on the first day of stroke. Significant correlations with (B) modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and (C) Barthel index on the 90th day of stroke.

References

    1. Lyden P, Brott T, Tilley B, Welch KM, Mascha EJ, Levine S, et al.. Improved reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale using video training. NINDS TPA Stroke Study Group. Stroke. 1994;25:2220–2226. 10.1161/01.str.25.11.2220
    1. Lyden PD, Lu M, Levine SR, Brott TG, Broderick J, NINDS rtPA Stroke Study Group. A modified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for use in stroke clinical trials: preliminary reliability and validity. Stroke. 2001;32:1310–1317. 10.1161/01.str.32.6.1310
    1. Lyden P, Raman R, Liu L, Grotta J, Broderick J, Olson S, et al.. NIHSS training and certification using a new digital video disk is reliable. Stroke. 2005;36:2446–2449. 10.1161/01.STR.0000185725.42768.92
    1. Heldner MR, Hsieh K, Broeg-Morvay A, Mordasini P, Bühlmann M, Jung S, et al.. Clinical prediction of large vessel occlusion in anterior circulation stroke: mission impossible? J Neurol. 2016;263:1633–1640. 10.1007/s00415-016-8180-6
    1. Kharitonova T, Mikulik R, Roine RO, Soinne L, Ahmed N, Wahlgren N, et al.. Association of early National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale improvement with vessel recanalization and functional outcome after intravenous thrombolysis in ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2011;42:1638–1643. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.606194
    1. Goldstein LB, Samsa GP. Reliability of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Extension to non-neurologists in the context of a clinical trial. Stroke. 1997;28:307–310. d: 10.1161/01.str.28.2.307
    1. Kasner SE, Chalela JA, Luciano JM, Cucchiara BL, Raps EC, McGarvey ML, et al.. Reliability and validity of estimating the NIH stroke scale score from medical records. Stroke. 1999;30:1534–1537. 10.1161/01.str.30.8.1534
    1. Dewey HM, Donnan GA, Freeman EJ, Sharples CM, Macdonell RA, McNeil JJ, et al.. Interrater reliability of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: rating by neurologists and nurses in a community based stroke incidence study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1999;9:323–327. 10.1159/000016006
    1. Berger K, Weltermann B, Kolominsky-Rabas P, Meves S, Heuschmann P, Böhner J, et al.. The reliability of stroke scales. The German version of NIHSS, ESS and Rankin scales. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1999;67:81–93. 10.1055/s-2007-993985
    1. Pezzella FR, Picconi O, De Luca A, Lyden PD, Fiorelli M. Development of the Italian version of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: It-NIHSS. Stroke. 2009;40:2557–2559. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.534495
    1. Hussein HM, Abdel Moneim A, Emara T, Abd-Elhamid YA, Salem HH, Abd-Allah F, et al.. Arabic cross cultural adaptation and validation of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. J Neurol Sci. 2015;357:152–156. 10.1016/j.jns.2015.07.022
    1. Prasad K, Dash D, Kumar A. Validation of the Hindi version of National Institute of Health Stroke Scale. Neurol India. 2012;60:40–44. 10.4103/0028-3886.93587
    1. Domínguez R, Vila JF, Augustovski F, Irazola V, Castillo PR, Rotta Escalante R, et al.. Spanish cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:476–480. 10.4065/81.4.476
    1. Oh MS, Yu KH, Lee JH, Jung S, Ko IS, Shin JH, et al.. Validity and reliability of a korean version of the national institutes of health stroke scale. J Clin Neurol. 2012;8: 177–183. 10.3988/jcn.2012.8.3.177
    1. Cincura C, Pontes-Neto OM, Nevilee IS, Mendes HF, Menezes DF, Mariano DC, et al.. Validation of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index in Brazil: the role of cultural adaptation and structured interviewing. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27:119–122. 10.1159/000177918
    1. Sun TK, Chiu SC, Yeh SH, Chang KC. Assessing reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the stroke scale: scale development. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006;43:457–463. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.07.004
    1. Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, Caplan LR, Connors JJ, Culebras A, et al.. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44:2064–2089. 10.1161/STR.0b013e318296aeca
    1. Gandek B, Ware JE Jr. Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:953–959. 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00086-9
    1. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35: 382–385. 10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
    1. Lyden P. Using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. a cautionary tale. Stroke. 2017;48:513–519. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015434
    1. Nunnaly JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. Mc-Graw-Hill, New York: 1994.
    1. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: Cronbach`s alpha. BMJ. 1997;314:572–572. 10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572
    1. Kline P. An easy guide to factor analysis. Routledge; 2008.
    1. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. Lippincott Williams Wilkins Hagerstow; 2003.
    1. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales–a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University, New York: 2003.
    1. Jurjans K, Noviks I, Volceka D, Zandersone L, Meilerte K, Miglāne E, et al.. The adaption and evaluation of a Latvian version of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. J Int Med Res. 2017;45:1861–1869. 10.1177/0300060516664636
    1. Schneck MJ. Current stroke scales may be partly responsible for worse outcomes in posterior circulation stroke. Stroke. 2018;49:2565–2566. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023201

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi