Assessing the health effects associated with occupational radiation exposure in Korean radiation workers: protocol for a prospective cohort study

Songwon Seo, Wan Young Lim, Dal Nim Lee, Jung Un Kim, Eun Shil Cha, Ye Jin Bang, Won Jin Lee, Sunhoo Park, Young Woo Jin, Songwon Seo, Wan Young Lim, Dal Nim Lee, Jung Un Kim, Eun Shil Cha, Ye Jin Bang, Won Jin Lee, Sunhoo Park, Young Woo Jin

Abstract

Introduction: The cancer risk of radiation exposure in the moderate-to-high dose range has been well established. However, the risk remains unclear at low-dose ranges with protracted low-dose rate exposure, which is typical of occupational exposure. Several epidemiological studies of Korean radiation workers have been conducted, but the data were analysed retrospectively in most cases. Moreover, groups with relatively high exposure, such as industrial radiographers, have been neglected. Therefore, we have launched a prospective cohort study of all Korean radiation workers to assess the health effects associated with occupational radiation exposure.

Methods and analysis: Approximately 42 000 Korean radiation workers registered with the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission from 2016 to 2017 are the initial target population of this study. Cohort participants are to be enrolled through a nationwide self-administered questionnaire survey between 24 May 2016 and 30 June 2017. As of 31 March 2017, 22 982 workers are enrolled in the study corresponding to a response rate of 75%. This enrolment will be continued at 5-year intervals to update information on existing study participants and recruit newly hired workers. Survey data will be linked with the national dose registry, the national cancer registry, the national vital statistics registry and national health insurance data via personal identification numbers. Age-specific and sex-specific standardised incidence and mortality ratios will be calculated for overall comparisons of cancer risk. For dose-response assessment, excess relative risk (per Gy) and excess absolute risk (per Gy) will be estimated with adjustments for birth year and potential confounders, such as lifestyle factors and socioeconomic status.

Ethics and dissemination: This study has received ethical approval from the institutional review board of the Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences (IRB No. K-1603-002-034). All participants provided written informed consent prior to enrolment. The findings of the study will be disseminated through scientific peer-reviewed journals and be provided to the public, including radiation workers, via the study website (http://www.rhs.kr/) and onsite radiation safety education.

Keywords: epidemiology; public health.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of Korean radiation workers and effective doses (mSv) according to occupation. NDT, non-destructive testing; NPP, nuclear power plant.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study design. EAR, excess absolute risk; ERR, excess relative risk; NSSC, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission.

References

    1. Cardis E, Vrijheid M, Blettner M, et al. . The 15-country collaborative study of cancer risk among radiation workers in the nuclear industry: estimates of radiation-related cancer risks. Radiat Res 2007;167:396–416. 10.1667/RR0553.1
    1. Seong KM, Seo S, Lee D, et al. . Is the linear no-threshold dose-response paradigm still necessary for the assessment of health effects of low dose radiation? J Korean Med Sci 2016;31:S10–23. 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.S1.S10
    1. Muirhead CR, O’Hagan JA, Haylock RG, et al. . Mortality and cancer incidence following occupational radiation exposure: third analysis of the national registry for radiation workers. Br J Cancer 2009;100:206–12. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604825
    1. Gilbert ES, Koshurnikova NA, Sokolnikov ME, et al. . Lung cancer in mayak workers. Radiat Res 2004;162:505–16. 10.1667/RR3259
    1. Hunter N, Kuznetsova IS, Labutina EV, et al. . Solid cancer incidence other than lung, liver and bone in Mayak workers: 1948-2004. Br J Cancer 2013;109:1989–96. 10.1038/bjc.2013.543
    1. Shilnikova NS, Preston DL, Ron E, et al. . Cancer mortality risk among workers at the Mayak nuclear complex. Radiat Res 2003;159:787–98.doi:10.1667/0033-7587(2003)159[0787:CMRAWA];2
    1. Rajaraman P, Doody MM, Yu CL, et al. . Incidence and mortality risks for circulatory diseases in US radiologic technologists who worked with fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures, 1994-2008. Occup Environ Med 2016;73:21–7. 10.1136/oemed-2015-102888
    1. Preston DL, Kitahara CM, Freedman DM, et al. . Breast cancer risk and protracted low-to-moderate dose occupational radiation exposure in the US Radiologic Technologists Cohort, 1983-2008. Br J Cancer 2016;115:1105–12. 10.1038/bjc.2016.292
    1. Matanoski GM, Tonascia JA, Correa-Villaseñor A, et al. . Cancer risks and low-level radiation in U.S. shipyard workers. J Radiat Res 2008;49:83–91. 10.1269/jrr.06082
    1. Richardson DB, Wing S. Leukemia mortality among workers at the savannah river site. Am J Epidemiol 2007;166:1015–22. 10.1093/aje/kwm176
    1. Schubauer-Berigan MK, Daniels RD, Bertke SJ, et al. . Cancer Mortality through 2005 among a pooled cohort of U.S. nuclear workers exposed to external lonizing radiation. Radiat Res 2015;183:620–31. 10.1667/RR13988.1
    1. Zablotska LB, Lane RS, Thompson PA. A reanalysis of cancer mortality in Canadian nuclear workers (1956-1994) based on revised exposure and cohort data. Br J Cancer 2014;110:214–23. 10.1038/bjc.2013.592
    1. Metz-Flamant C, Laurent O, Samson E, et al. . Mortality associated with chronic external radiation exposure in the French combined cohort of nuclear workers. Occup Environ Med 2013;70:630–8. 10.1136/oemed-2012-101149
    1. Richardson DB, Cardis E, Daniels RD, et al. . Risk of cancer from occupational exposure to ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study of workers in france, the united kingdom, and the united states (INWORKS). BMJ 2015;351:h5359 10.1136/bmj.h5359
    1. Leuraud K, Richardson DB, Cardis E, et al. . Ionising radiation and risk of death from leukaemia and lymphoma in radiation-monitored workers (INWORKS): an international cohort study. Lancet Haematol 2015;2:e276–e281. 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00094-0
    1. Lee WJ, Ha M, Hwang SS, et al. . The radiologic technologists’ health study in South Korea: study design and baseline results. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2015;88:759–68. 10.1007/s00420-014-1002-1
    1. Lee J, Cha ES, Jeong M, et al. . A national survey of occupational radiation exposure among diagnostic radiologic technologists in South Korea. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2015;167:525–31. 10.1093/rpd/ncu330
    1. Choi KH, Ha M, Lee WJ, et al. . Cancer risk in diagnostic radiation workers in Korea from 1996 to 2002. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2013;10:314–27. 10.3390/ijerph10010314
    1. Jeong M, Jin YW, Yang KH, et al. . Radiation exposure and cancer incidence in a cohort of nuclear power industry workers in the Republic of Korea, 1992-2005. Radiat Environ Biophys 2010;49:47–55. 10.1007/s00411-009-0247-7
    1. Ahn YS, Park RM, Koh DH. Cancer admission and mortality in workers exposed to ionizing radiation in Korea. J Occup Environ Med 2008;50:791–803. 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318167751d
    1. Nuclear safety and security commission, korea institute of nuclear safety, korea institute of nuclear nonproliferation and control. 2015 Nuclear Safety Yearbook, 2016.
    1. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency. Annual reports of occupational disease (2000–2015). (accessed 20 Jun 2017).
    1. Jin YW, Jeong M, Moon K, et al. . Ionizing radiation-induced diseases in korea. J Korean Med Sci 2010;25:S70–6. 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.S.S70
    1. The U.S. radiologic technologists study. Division of cancer epidemiology & genetics. (accessed 20 Jun 2017).
    1. Radiation and health study among radiation workers in Korea. (accessed20 Jun 2017).
    1. Personal Information Protection Act. Articles 15 to 22 Section 1, 2014.
    1. Lee W-H, Kim S-C, Ahn S-M. Comparison on the dosimetry of TLD and OSLD Used in nuclear medicine. J Korea Contents Assoc 2012;12:329–34. 10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.12.329
    1. Choi SY, Kim TH, Chung CK, et al. . Analysis of radiation workers' dose records in the Korean National Dose Registry. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2001;95:143–8. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006534
    1. Choi Y, Kim J, Lee JJ, et al. . Reconstruction of radiation dose received by diagnostic radiologic technologists in korea. J Prev Med Public Health 2016;49:288–300. 10.3961/jpmph.16.064
    1. Taulbee TD, McCartney KA, Traub R, et al. . Implementation of ICRP 116 dose conversion coefficients for reconstructing organ dose in a radiation compensation program. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2017;173:131–7. 10.1093/rpd/ncw305
    1. Bouville A, Toohey RE, Boice JD, et al. . Dose reconstruction for the million worker study: status and guidelines. Health Phys 2015;108:206–20. 10.1097/HP.0000000000000231
    1. Simon SL, Preston DL, Linet MS, et al. . Radiation organ doses received in a nationwide cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists: methods and findings. Radiat Res 2014;182:507–28. 10.1667/RR13542.1
    1. Cheol Seong S, Kim YY, Khang YH, et al. . Data Resource Profile: the national health information database of the national health insurance service in south korea. Int J Epidemiol 2016:dyw253 10.1093/ije/dyw253
    1. National Health Insurance Sharing Service in Korea. Details of DB and cost. (accessed 20 Jun 2017).
    1. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420–8. 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
    1. Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB. Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:423–9. 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90018-V
    1. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:37–46. 10.1177/001316446002000104
    1. Furukawa K, Misumi M, Cologne JB, et al. . A bayesian semiparametric model for radiation dose-response estimation. Risk Anal 2016;36:1211–23. 10.1111/risa.12513
    1. Jeong JH, Lee JK, Kwon JW, et al. . Occupational radiaiton exposure in Korea: 2002. J Korean Assoc Radiat Protect 2005;30:175–83.
    1. Boice JD, Mandel JS, Doody MM, et al. . A health survey of radiologic technologists. Cancer 1992;69:586–98. 10.1002/1097-0142(19920115)69:2<586::AID-CNCR2820690251>;2-3
    1. Lim YK, Kim JR, Hwang KH, et al. . Investigation of nuclear development at the early stage in Korea: KAERI, 2009. (No. KAERI/CM–1022/2007).
    1. McKeown-Eyssen GE, Thomas DC. Sample size determination in case-control studies: the influence of the distribution of exposure. J Chronic Dis 1985;38:559–68. 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90044-X
    1. White E, Kushi LH, Pepe MS. The effect of exposure variance and exposure measurement error on study sample size: implications for the design of epidemiologic studies. J Clin Epidemiol 1994;47:873–80. 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90190-2
    1. Pernot E, Hall J, Baatout S, et al. . Ionizing radiation biomarkers for potential use in epidemiological studies. Mutat Res 2012;751:258–86. 10.1016/j.mrrev.2012.05.003

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi