High-fidelity transmission of high-frequency burst stimuli from peripheral nerve to thalamic nuclei in children with dystonia

Estefanía Hernandez-Martin, Enrique Arguelles, Yifei Zheng, Ruta Deshpande, Terence D Sanger, Estefanía Hernandez-Martin, Enrique Arguelles, Yifei Zheng, Ruta Deshpande, Terence D Sanger

Abstract

High-frequency peripheral nerve stimulation has emerged as a noninvasive alternative to thalamic deep brain stimulation for some patients with essential tremor. It is not known whether such techniques might be effective for movement disorders in children, nor is the mechanism and transmission of the peripheral stimuli to central brain structures understood. This study was designed to investigate the fidelity of transmission from peripheral nerves to thalamic nuclei in children with dystonia undergoing deep brain stimulation surgery. The ventralis intermediate (VIM) thalamus nuclei showed a robust evoked response to peripheral high-frequency burst stimulation, with a greatest response magnitude to intra-burst frequencies between 50 and 100 Hz, and reliable but smaller responses up to 170 Hz. The earliest response occurred at 12-15 ms following stimulation onset, suggesting rapid high-fidelity transmission between peripheral nerve and thalamic nuclei. A high-bandwidth, low-latency transmission path from peripheral nerve to VIM thalamus is consistent with the importance of rapid and accurate sensory information for the control of coordination and movement via the cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathway. Our results suggest the possibility of non-invasive modulation of thalamic activity in children with dystonia, and therefore the possibility that a subset of children could have beneficial clinical response without the need for invasive deep brain stimulation.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. T.D.S serves as a paid consultant and owns stock in CALA HEALTH Inc., a company that develops and manufactures noninvasive electrical stimulation devices for treatment of movement disorders in adults.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
3D rendering of group based DBS electrodes in the bilateral ventral intermediate nuclei. Axial view from normalized scans into MNI space. The VIM boundaries were defined by the DISTAL atlas. Each pair of DBS electrodes corresponds to a patient and are represented by a different color for each patient. A total of 20 DBS electrodes in 10 dystonic patients are represented through DSI Studio, V3 (http://dsi-studio.labsolver.org).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average thalamic EPs in responses to contralateral single-pulse median nerve stimulation. Note that VIM and VPL EPs have an onset at approximately 11 ms and first peak at 15 ms.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Robust evoked responses are observed in the microelectrodes proximal to the target thalamic nuclei, with a change in the amplitudes as a function of burst frequency. Representative evoked VIM responses are presented for each of the 10 micro-contacts.
Figure 4
Figure 4
EP in response to a single 5-Hz pulse (top row) and 50–170-Hz burst stimulation for a single VIM contact in a single subject. (A) Average traces for the 100-ms stimulation period (negative time values) and the 100-ms EP response used for analysis (positive time values). Stimulation artifacts appear as thick vertical lines. (B) Power spectral density (PSD) calculated from the 100-ms period after the last stimulus pulse. Dotted line indicates stimulation frequency.
Figure 5
Figure 5
EP amplitudes from left (blue) and right (red) VIM as a function of stimulation frequency during stimulation of the contralateral median nerve, for each subject. Horizontal axes indicate stimulation frequency. Vertical axes represent the normalized EP values.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Average EP amplitude as a function of pulse frequency for all subjects. EP amplitude differed significantly between 50 vs. 140 Hz (p < 0.01), 50 vs. 170 Hz (p < 0.001), and 100 vs. 170 Hz (p < 0.001). Error bars indicate standard error.

References

    1. Bending J, Cleeves L. Effect of electrical nerve stimulation on dystonic tremor. Lancet. 1990;336:1385–1386. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)92946-F.
    1. Tinazzi M, et al. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on motor cortex excitability in writer’s cramp: neurophysiological and clinical correlations. Mov. Disord. Off. J. Mov. Disord. Soc. 2006;21:1908–1913. doi: 10.1002/mds.21081.
    1. Sanger T, et al. Pediatric deep brain stimulation using awake recording and stimulation for target selection in an inpatient neuromodulation monitoring unit. Brain Sci. 2018;8:135. doi: 10.3390/brainsci8070135.
    1. Sanger TD, Robison A, Arguelles E, Ferman D, Liker M. Case report: targeting for deep brain stimulation surgery using chronic recording and stimulation in an inpatient neuromodulation monitoring unit, with implantation of electrodes in GPi and Vim in a 7-year-old child with progressive generalized dystonia. J. Child Neurol. 2018;33:776–783. doi: 10.1177/0883073818787741.
    1. Sanger TD. Deep brain stimulation for cerebral palsy: where are we now? Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2020;62(1):28–33. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14295.
    1. Sanger TD, Merzenich MM. Computational model of the role of sensory disorganization in focal task-specific dystonia. J. Neurophysiol. 2000;84:2458–2464. doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.5.2458.
    1. Sanger TD. Toward a definition of childhood dystonia. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2004;16:623–627. doi: 10.1097/01.mop.0000142487.90041.a2.
    1. Benarroch EE. Effects of acetylcholine in the striatum. Neurology. 2012;79:274–281. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31825fe154.
    1. Sanger TD, et al. Definition and classification of negative motor signs in childhood. Pediatrics. 2006;118:2159–2167. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-3016.
    1. Sanger TD. Basic and translational neuroscience of childhood-onset dystonia: A control-theory perspective. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2018;41:41–59. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-080317-061504.
    1. Mink JW. The basal ganglia: focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programs. Prog. Neurobiol. 1996;50:381–425. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0082(96)00042-1.
    1. Nibbeling EAR, et al. Using the shared genetics of dystonia and ataxia to unravel their pathogenesis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2017;75:22–39. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.033.
    1. Lawrenson C, et al. The mystery of the cerebellum: Clues from experimental and clinical observations. Cerebellum & Ataxias. 2018;5:8. doi: 10.1186/s40673-018-0087-9.
    1. Ewert S, et al. Toward defining deep brain stimulation targets in MNI space: A subcortical atlas based on multimodal MRI, histology and structural connectivity. Neuroimage. 2018;170:271–282. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.015.
    1. Klostermann F, Gobbele R, Buchner H, Curio G. Dissociation of human thalamic and cortical SEP gating as revealed by intrathalamic recordings under muscle relaxation. Brain Res. 2002;958:146–151. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(02)03677-6.
    1. Klostermann F, Vesper J, Curio G. Identification of target areas for deep brain stimulation in human basal ganglia substructures based on median nerve sensory evoked potential criteria. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2003;74:1031–1035. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.8.1031.
    1. Shima F, et al. Localization of stereotactic targets by microrecording of thalamic somatosensory evoked potentials. Neurosurgery. 1991;28:223–230. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199102000-00008.
    1. Hernandez-Martin E, Arguelles E, Deshpande R, Sanger TD. Evoked potentials during peripheral stimulation confirm electrode location in thalamic subnuclei in children with secondary dystonia. J. Child Neurol. 2020 doi: 10.1177/0883073820931970.
    1. Katayama Y, Tsubokawa T. Somatosensory evoked potentials from the thalamic sensory relay nucleus (VPL) in humans: Correlations with short latency somatosensory evoked potentials recorded at the scalp. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. Potentials Sect. 1987;68:187–201. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(87)90026-8.
    1. Klostermann F, Funk T, Vesper J, Curio G. Spatiotemporal characteristics of human intrathalamic high-frequency (>400Hz) SEP components. NeuroReport. 1999;10:3627–3631. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199911260-00030.
    1. Fujii S, Kudo K, Ohtsuki T, Oda S. Tapping performance and underlying wrist muscle activity of non-drummers, drummers, and the world’s fastest drummer. Neurosci. Lett. 2009;459:69–73. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.04.055.
    1. Sanger TD, Kukke SN. Abnormalities of tactile sensory function in children with dystonic and diplegic cerebral palsy. J. Child Neurol. 2007;22:289–293. doi: 10.1177/0883073807300530.
    1. Sanger TD, Tarsy D, Pascual-Leone A. Abnormalities of spatial and temporal sensory discrimination in writer’s cramp. Mov. Disord. Off. J. Mov. Disord. Soc. 2001;16:94–99. doi: 10.1002/1531-8257(200101)16:1<94::AID-MDS1020>;2-O.
    1. Galvan A, Devergnas A, Wichmann T. Alterations in neuronal activity in basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits in the parkinsonian state. Front. Neuroanat. 2015;9:5. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2015.00005.
    1. Becker J, et al. The effects of thalamic and posterior subthalamic deep brain stimulation on speech in patients with essential tremor—A prospective, randomized, doubleblind crossover study. Brain Lang. 2020;202:104724. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104724.
    1. Fukushima T, Mayanagi Y, Bouchard G. Thalamic evoked potentials to somatosensory stimulation in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1976;40:481–490. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(76)90078-X.
    1. Morioka T, Shima F, Kato M, Fukui M. Origin and distribution of thalamic somatosensory evoked potentials in humans. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. Potentials Sect. 1989;74:186–193. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90004-7.
    1. Nayak, R. & Banik, R. K. Current innovations in peripheral nerve stimulation. Pain Res. Treat.2018 (2018).
    1. Sanger TD, Delgado MR, Gaebler-Spira D, Hallett M, Mink JW. Classification and definition of disorders causing hypertonia in childhood. Pediatrics. 2003;111:e89–e97. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.1.e89.
    1. Hassler R. Introduction to stereotaxis with an atlas of the human brain. Anat. thalamus. 1959;1:230–290.
    1. Avants BB, Epstein CL, Grossman M, Gee JC. Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain. Med. Image Anal. 2008;12:26–41. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2007.06.004.
    1. Horn A, Kühn AA. Lead-DBS: A toolbox for deep brain stimulation electrode localizations and visualizations. Neuroimage. 2015;107:127–135. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.002.
    1. Husch A, Petersen M, Gemmar P, Goncalves J, Hertel F. PaCER: A fully automated method for electrode trajectory and contact reconstruction in deep brain stimulation. NeuroImage Clin. 2018;17:80–89. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.10.004.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi