The effect of different vitrification protocols on cell survival in human ovarian tissue: a pilot study

J Marschalek, C Egarter, K Nouri, S Dekan, J Ott, M Frank, D Pietrowski, J Marschalek, C Egarter, K Nouri, S Dekan, J Ott, M Frank, D Pietrowski

Abstract

Background: Vitrification has superseded the slow freezing method for cryopreservation of oocytes, embryos, and sperm, but there are as yet no standard protocols for its use in ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC). Published protocols diverge mainly with regard to the extent of supplementation of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to the vitrification medium, and to the use of an open or closed vitrification system. We investigated the viability of cells after vitrification/warming, using ovarian tissue of transgender patients, by means of Fluorescence Activated Cells Sorting (FACS), and histomorphological analyses using a DMSO-containing (P1) and a DMSO-free protocol (P2) in an open or closed vitrification setting.

Results: Twelve ovarian samples were donated from female-to-male transgender patients: 6 were vitrified according to protocol 1, the other 6 according to protocol 2. The amount of viable cells was 90.1% (P1) and 88.4% (P2) before vitrification. After vitrification and subsequent warming, viable cells were reduced to 82.9% (P1, p = 0.093) and 72.4% (P2, p = 0.019). When comparing the closed and the open systems, the decline in cell viability from pre- to post-vitrification was significant only for the latter (p = 0.037). Histological examination reveals no significant differences with respect to degenerated follicles before or after vitrification.

Conclusion: These results led us to conclude that a protocol containing DMSO results in a higher viability of ovarian cells than a protocol that uses ethylene glycol as cryoprotective agent in vitrification. The use of an open vitrification system led to significant decline in the rate of viable cells.

Trial registration: NCT03649087 , retrospectively registered 28.08.2018.

Keywords: Cell viability; Fertility preservation; Ovarian tissue cryopreservation; Transgender; Vitrification.

Conflict of interest statement

JO received remuneration for lecturing from Lenus Pharma GesmbH outside the submitted work. All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow chart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Representative example image of a Fluorescence Activated Cells Sorting (FACS) analysis of non-vitrified (left) and vitrified (right) ovarian cells after enzymatic digestion. Upper lane: Contour Plot of ovarian cells. Lower lane: Dot Plot of DAPI (4,6 Diamino-2-Phenylindole, Dihydrochloride) stained cells
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A Rate of viable ovarian cells before and after vitrification/warming using the DMSO-containing protocol 1 and the DMSO-free protocol 2. B Rate of viable ovarian cells before and after vitrification/warming using the open and the closed vitrification system. *p < 0.05
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Number of defective follicles with regard to different protocols
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Example of morphologically normal and defective follicles. Example of HE stained ovarian histological tissue sections before (A) and after (B) vitrification showing normal (1) and atretic (2) follicles. Stroma cells (3) and Oocyte nucleus (4) were marked (Magnification 400X)

References

    1. Silber SJ, DeRosa M, Goldsmith S, Fan Y, Castleman L, Melnick J. Cryopreservation and transplantation of ovarian tissue: results from one center in the USA. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(12):2205–2213.
    1. Smith MA, Seibel NL, Altekruse SF, Ries LA, Melbert DL, O'Leary M, et al. Outcomes for children and adolescents with cancer: challenges for the twenty-first century. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(15):2625–2634.
    1. Dolmans MM, Falcone T, Patrizio P. Importance of patient selection to analyze in vitro fertilization outcome with transplanted cryopreserved ovarian tissue. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(2):279–280.
    1. Dolmans MM, von Wolff M, Poirot C, Diaz-Garcia C, Cacciottola L, Boissel N, et al. Transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in a series of 285 women: a review of five leading European centers. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(5):1102–1115.
    1. Elliott GD, Wang S, Fuller BJ. Cryoprotectants: a review of the actions and applications of cryoprotective solutes that modulate cell recovery from ultra-low temperatures. Cryobiology. 2017;76:74–91.
    1. Zhou XH, Zhang D, Shi J, Wu YJ. Comparison of vitrification and conventional slow freezing for cryopreservation of ovarian tissue with respect to the number of intact primordial follicles: a meta-analysis. Medicine. 2016;95(39):e4095.
    1. Suzuki N, Yoshioka N, Takae S, Sugishita Y, Tamura M, Hashimoto S, et al. Successful fertility preservation following ovarian tissue vitrification in patients with primary ovarian insufficiency. Hum Reprod (Oxford, England) 2015;30(3):608–615.
    1. Amorim CA, Curaba M, Van Langendonckt A, Dolmans MM, Donnez J. Vitrification as an alternative means of cryopreserving ovarian tissue. Reprod BioMed Online. 2011;23(2):160–186.
    1. Gook DA, Edgar DH, Stern C. Effect of cooling rate and dehydration regimen on the histological appearance of human ovarian cortex following cryopreservation in 1, 2-propanediol. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(8):2061–2068.
    1. Sheikhi M, Hultenby K, Niklasson B, Lundqvist M, Hovatta O. Clinical grade vitrification of human ovarian tissue: an ultrastructural analysis of follicles and stroma in vitrified tissue. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(3):594–603.
    1. Okamoto N, Nakajima M, Sugishita Y, Suzuki N. Effect of mouse ovarian tissue cryopreservation by vitrification with Rapid-i closed system. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(4):607–613.
    1. Bielanski A, Bergeron H, Lau PC, Devenish J. Microbial contamination of embryos and semen during long term banking in liquid nitrogen. Cryobiology. 2003;46(2):146–152.
    1. Bielanski A, Vajta G. Risk of contamination of germplasm during cryopreservation and cryobanking in IVF units. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(10):2457–2467.
    1. Leonel ECR, Corral A, Risco R, Camboni A, Taboga SR, Kilbride P, et al. Stepped vitrification technique for human ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):20008.
    1. Donfack NJ, Alves KA, Alves BG, Rocha RMP, Bruno JB, Bertolini M, et al. Stroma cell-derived factor 1 and connexins (37 and 43) are preserved after vitrification and in vitro culture of goat ovarian cortex. Theriogenology. 2018;116:83–88.
    1. Fowles J, Banton M, Klapacz J, Shen H. A toxicological review of the ethylene glycol series: commonalities and differences in toxicity and modes of action. Toxicol Lett. 2017;278:66–83.
    1. Galvao J, Davis B, Tilley M, Normando E, Duchen MR, Cordeiro MF. Unexpected low-dose toxicity of the universal solvent DMSO. FASEB J. 2014;28(3):1317–1330.
    1. Santos NC, Figueira-Coelho J, Martins-Silva J, Saldanha C. Multidisciplinary utilization of dimethyl sulfoxide: pharmacological, cellular, and molecular aspects. Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;65(7):1035–1041.
    1. Kokotsaki M, Mairhofer M, Schneeberger C, Marschalek J, Pietrowski D. Impact of vitrification on granulosa cell survival and gene expression. Cryobiology. 2018;85:73–78.
    1. Verheijen M, Lienhard M, Schrooders Y, Clayton O, Nudischer R, Boerno S, et al. DMSO induces drastic changes in human cellular processes and epigenetic landscape in vitro. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):4641.
    1. Amorim CA, David A, Van Langendonckt A, Dolmans MM, Donnez J. Vitrification of human ovarian tissue: effect of different solutions and procedures. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(3):1094–1097.
    1. Sheikhi M, Hultenby K, Niklasson B, Lundqvist M, Hovatta O. Preservation of human ovarian follicles within tissue frozen by vitrification in a xeno-free closed system using only ethylene glycol as a permeating cryoprotectant. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(1):170–7.e1-2.
    1. Schmidt KL, Byskov AG, Nyboe Andersen A, Muller J, Yding Andersen C. Density and distribution of primordial follicles in single pieces of cortex from 21 patients and in individual pieces of cortex from three entire human ovaries. Hum Reprod (Oxford, England) 2003;18(6):1158–1164.
    1. Isachenko V, Lapidus I, Isachenko E, Krivokharchenko A, Kreienberg R, Woriedh M, et al. Human ovarian tissue vitrification versus conventional freezing: morphological, endocrinological, and molecular biological evaluation. Reproduction. 2009;138(2):319–327.
    1. Kupferschmied HU, Kihm U, Bachmann P, Muller KH, Ackermann M. Transmission of IBR/IPV virus in bovine semen: a case report. Theriogenology. 1986;25(3):439–443.
    1. Kleegman SJ. Therapeutic donor insemination. Conn Med. 1967;31(10):705–713.
    1. Englert Y, Lesage B, Van Vooren JP, Liesnard C, Place I, Vannin AS, et al. Medically assisted reproduction in the presence of chronic viral diseases. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10(2):149–162.
    1. Sugishita Y, Taylan E, Kawahara T, Shahmurzada B, Suzuki N, Oktay K. Comparison of open and a novel closed vitrification system with slow freezing for human ovarian tissue cryopreservation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(10):2723–2733.
    1. Terren C, Fransolet M, Ancion M, Nisolle M, Munaut C. Slow freezing versus vitrification of mouse ovaries: from ex vivo analyses to successful pregnancies after auto-transplantation. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):19668.
    1. Cheng PJ, Pastuszak AW, Myers JB, Goodwin IA, Hotaling JM. Fertility concerns of the transgender patient. Transl Androl Urol. 2019;8(3):209–218.
    1. Grynberg M, Fanchin R, Dubost G, Colau JC, Bremont-Weil C, Frydman R, et al. Histology of genital tract and breast tissue after long-term testosterone administration in a female-to-male transsexual population. Reprod BioMed Online. 2010;20(4):553–558.
    1. De Roo C, Lierman S, Tilleman K, Peynshaert K, Braeckmans K, Caanen M, et al. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation in female-to-male transgender people: insights into ovarian histology and physiology after prolonged androgen treatment. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;34(6):557–566.
    1. Marschalek J, Pietrowski D, Dekan S, Marschalek ML, Brandstetter M, Ott J. Markers of vitality in ovaries of transmen after long-term androgen treatment: a prospective cohort study. Mol Med. 2020;26(1):83.
    1. Isachenko V, Todorov P, Isachenko E, Rahimi G, Tchorbanov A, Mihaylova N, et al. Long-time cooling before cryopreservation decreased translocation of phosphatidylserine (Ptd-L-Ser) in human ovarian tissue. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0129108.
    1. Kurus M, Karakaya C, Karalok MH, To G, Johnson J. The control of oocyte survival by intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;761:7–18.
    1. Fransolet M, Henry L, Labied S, Noel A, Nisolle M, Munaut C. In vitro evaluation of the anti-apoptotic drug Z-VAD-FMK on human ovarian granulosa cell lines for further use in ovarian tissue transplantation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(10):1551–1559.
    1. Ott J, van Trotsenburg M, Kaufmann U, Schrogendorfer K, Haslik W, Huber JC, et al. Combined hysterectomy/salpingo-oophorectomy and mastectomy is a safe and valuable procedure for female-to-male transsexuals. J Sex Med. 2010;7(6):2130–2138.
    1. Vanacker J, Camboni A, Dath C, Van Langendonckt A, Dolmans MM, Donnez J, et al. Enzymatic isolation of human primordial and primary ovarian follicles with Liberase DH: protocol for application in a clinical setting. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(2):379–83 e3.
    1. Dolmans MM, Michaux N, Camboni A, Martinez-Madrid B, Van Langendonckt A, Nottola SA, et al. Evaluation of Liberase, a purified enzyme blend, for the isolation of human primordial and primary ovarian follicles. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(2):413–420.
    1. Bastings L, Westphal JR, Beerendonk CC, Bekkers RL, Zusterzeel PL, Hendriks JC, et al. Clinically applied procedures for human ovarian tissue cryopreservation result in different levels of efficacy and efficiency. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(12):1605–1614.
    1. Gougeon A. Dynamics of follicular growth in the human: a model from preliminary results. Hum Reprod (Oxford, England) 1986;1(2):81–87.
    1. Keros V, Xella S, Hultenby K, Pettersson K, Sheikhi M, Volpe A, et al. Vitrification versus controlled-rate freezing in cryopreservation of human ovarian tissue. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(7):1670–1683.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi