Feasibility and Quit Rates of the Tobacco Status Project: A Facebook Smoking Cessation Intervention for Young Adults

Danielle E Ramo, Johannes Thrul, Kathryn Chavez, Kevin L Delucchi, Judith J Prochaska, Danielle E Ramo, Johannes Thrul, Kathryn Chavez, Kevin L Delucchi, Judith J Prochaska

Abstract

Background: Young adult smokers are a challenging group to engage in smoking cessation interventions. With wide reach and engagement among users, Facebook offers opportunity to engage young people in socially supportive communities for quitting smoking and sustaining abstinence.

Objective: We developed and tested initial efficacy, engagement, and acceptability of the Tobacco Status Project, a smoking cessation intervention for young adults delivered within Facebook.

Methods: The intervention was based on the US Public Health Service Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Transtheoretical Model and enrolled participants into study-run 3-month secret Facebook groups matched on readiness to quit smoking. Cigarette smokers (N=79) aged 18-25, who used Facebook on most days, were recruited via Facebook. All participants received the intervention and were randomized to one of three monetary incentive groups tied to engagement (commenting in groups). Assessments were completed at baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12-months follow-up. Analyses examined retention, smoking outcomes over 12 months (7-day point prevalence abstinence, ≥50% reduction in cigarettes smoked, quit attempts and strategies used, readiness to quit), engagement, and satisfaction with the intervention.

Results: Retention was 82% (65/79) at 6 months and 72% (57/79) at 12 months. From baseline to 12-months follow-up, there was a significant increase in the proportion prepared to quit (10/79, 13%; 36/79, 46%, P<.001). Over a third (28/79, 35%) reduced their cigarette consumption by 50% or greater, and 66% (52/79) made at least one 24-hour quit attempt during the study. In an intent-to-treat analysis, 13% (10/79) self-reported 7-day abstinence (6/79, 8% verified biochemically) at 12-months follow-up. In their quit attempts, 11% (9/79) used a nicotine replacement therapy approved by the Food and Drug Administration, while 18% (14/79) used an electronic nicotine delivery system to quit (eg, electronic cigarette). A majority (48/79, 61%) commented on at least one Facebook post, with more commenting among those with biochemically verified abstinence at 3 months (P=.036) and those randomized to receive a personal monetary incentive (P=.015). Over a third of participants (28/79, 35%) reported reading most or all of the Facebook posts. Highest acceptability ratings of the intervention were for post ease (57/79, 72%) and thinking about what they read (52/79, 66%); 71% (56/79) recommended the program to others. Only 5 participants attended the optional cognitive-behavioral counseling sessions, though their attendance was high (6/7 sessions overall) and the sessions were rated as easy to understand, useful, and helpful (all 90-100% agreed).

Conclusions: A Facebook quit smoking intervention is attractive and feasible to deliver, and early efficacy data are encouraging. However, the 1.5-fold greater use of electronic cigarettes over nicotine replacement products for quitting is concerning.

Keywords: Facebook; smoking cessation; social media; young adults.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow chart through a Facebook smoking cessation intervention. Those assessed for eligibility who were not counted as “excluded” left the survey too early to determine why they were ineligible (participants were randomized to incentive groups as follows: 24% Personal; 28% Altruistic; 48% None).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Reported and biochemically verified 7-day point prevalence abstinence by time in a Facebook smoking cessation intervention among young adults in an intent-to-treat (missing=smoking) and complete case (missing=missing) analysis (N=79). Follow-up rates are 76% at 3 months, 82% at 6 months, and 72% at 12 months. Verified abstinence includes only those who returned biochemical verification of abstinence at each follow-up assessment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proportion of respondents reporting they “agree” or “strongly agree” with statements about their Facebook group for a Facebook smoking cessation intervention (N=62).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Proportion of “agree” or “strongly agree” reports about 7 cognitive-behavioral counseling sessions for a Facebook smoking cessation intervention (22 session reports).

References

    1. Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration . Results from the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services; 2013. Table 224B - Cigarette Use in Lifetime, Past Year, Past Month among Persons Aged 18 to 25, by Demographic Characteristics: Percentages.
    1. Curry S, Sporer AK, Pugach O, Campbell RT, Emery S. Use of tobacco cessation treatments among young adult smokers: 2005 National Health Interview Survey. Am J Public Health. 2007 Aug;97(8):1464–1469. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.103788.
    1. Bost ML. A descriptive study of barriers to enrollment in a collegiate Health Assessment Program. J Community Health Nurs. 2005;22(1):15–22. doi: 10.1207/s15327655jchn2201_2.
    1. Davies J, McCrae BP, Frank J, Dochnahl A, Pickering T, Harrison B, Zakrzewski M, Wilson K. Identifying male college students' perceived health needs, barriers to seeking help, and recommendations to help men adopt healthier lifestyles. J Am Coll Health. 2000 May;48(6):259–267. doi: 10.1080/07448480009596267.
    1. Cohen S, Lemay EP. Why would social networks be linked to affect and health practices? Health Psychol. 2007 Jul;26(4):410–417. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.4.410.
    1. Huang GC, Unger JB, Soto D, Fujimoto K, Pentz MA, Jordan-Marsh M, Valente TW. Peer influences: the impact of online and offline friendship networks on adolescent smoking and alcohol use. J Adolesc Health. 2014 May;54(5):508–514. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.07.001.
    1. Burri M, Baujard V, Etter J. A qualitative analysis of an internet discussion forum for recent ex-smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Dec;8 Suppl 1:S13–19.
    1. van MT, Voci S, Lee S, Fournier R, Selby P. Superusers in social networks for smoking cessation: analysis of demographic characteristics and posting behavior from the Canadian Cancer Society's smokers' helpline online and . J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(3):e66. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1854.
    1. Alexa Top sites in United States. 2015. [2015-08-10]. .
    1. statistica. 2015. [2015-10-07]. Number of Facebook users in the United States as of January 2015, by age group (in millions)
    1. Duggan M. Social Media Update. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2015. [2015-09-16]. .
    1. Bull SS, Levine DK, Black SR, Schmiege SJ, Santelli J. Social media-delivered sexual health intervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Nov;43(5):467–474. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.022.
    1. Patrick K, Marshall SJ, Davila EP, Kolodziejczyk JK, Fowler JH, Calfas KJ, Huang JS, Rock CL, Griswold WG, Gupta A, Merchant G, Norman GJ, Raab F, Donohue MC, Fogg BJ, Robinson TN. Design and implementation of a randomized controlled social and mobile weight loss trial for young adults (project SMART) Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Jan;37(1):10–18. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.11.001.
    1. Young SD. Social media technologies for HIV prevention study retention among minority men who have sex with men (MSM) AIDS Behav. 2014 Sep;18(9):1625–1629. doi: 10.1007/s10461-013-0604-z.
    1. Kernot J, Olds T, Lewis LK, Maher C. Effectiveness of a facebook-delivered physical activity intervention for post-partum women: a randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:518. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-518.
    1. Cavallo DN, Tate DF, Ries AV, Brown JD, DeVellis RF, Ammerman AS. A social media-based physical activity intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Nov;43(5):527–532. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.019.
    1. Napolitano MA, Hayes S, Bennett GG, Ives AK, Foster GD. Using Facebook and text messaging to deliver a weight loss program to college students. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2013 Jan;21(1):25–31. doi: 10.1002/oby.20232.
    1. Pedrana A, Hellard M, Gold J, Ata N, Chang S, Howard S, Asselin J, Ilic O, Batrouney C, Stoove M. Queer as F**k: reaching and engaging gay men in sexual health promotion through social networking sites. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(2):e25. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2334.
    1. Williams G, Hamm MP, Shulhan J, Vandermeer B, Hartling L. Social media interventions for diet and exercise behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open. 2014;4(2):e003926. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003926.
    1. Jones K, Baldwin KA, Lewis PR. The potential influence of a social media intervention on risky sexual behavior and Chlamydia incidence. J Community Health Nurs. 2012;29(2):106–120. doi: 10.1080/07370016.2012.670579.
    1. Valle CG, Tate DF, Mayer DK, Allicock M, Cai J. Exploring Mediators of Physical Activity in Young Adult Cancer Survivors: Evidence from a Randomized Trial of a Facebook-Based Physical Activity Intervention. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2015 Mar 1;4(1):26–33. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2014.0034.
    1. Baskerville NB, Azagba S, Norman C, McKeown K, Brown KS. Effect of a Digital Social Media Campaign on Young Adult Smoking Cessation. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Jun 4;:-. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv119.
    1. Ramo DE, Liu H, Prochaska JJ. A mixed-methods study of young adults' receptivity to using Facebook for smoking cessation: if you build it, will they come? Am J Health Promot. 2015;29(4):e126–135. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130326-QUAL-128.
    1. Danaher BG, Seeley JR. Methodological issues in research on web-based behavioral interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2009 Aug;38(1):28–39. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9129-0.
    1. Kohl LFM, Crutzen R, de Vries NK. Online prevention aimed at lifestyle behaviors: a systematic review of reviews. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(7):e146. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2665.
    1. Caldwell PHY, Hamilton S, Tan A, Craig JC. Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomised controlled trials: systematic review. PLoS Med. 2010;7(11):e1000368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000368.
    1. Benishek LA, Dugosh KL, Kirby KC, Matejkowski J, Clements NT, Seymour BL, Festinger DS. Prize-based contingency management for the treatment of substance abusers: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 2014 Sep;109(9):1426–1436. doi: 10.1111/add.12589.
    1. Meier S. Economics and psychology: a promising new cross-disciplinary field. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2007. A Survey on Ecomonic Theories and Field Evidence on Pro-social Behavior; pp. 51–88.
    1. Centers for Disease ControlPrevention (CDC) Vital signs: current cigarette smoking among adults aged >or=18 years --- United States, 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Sep 10;59(35):1135–1140.
    1. Ramo DE, Rodriguez TMS, Chavez K, Sommer MJ, Prochaska JJ. Facebook Recruitment of Young Adult Smokers for a Cessation Trial: Methods, Metrics, and Lessons Learned. Internet Interv. 2014 Apr;1(2):58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2014.05.001.
    1. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983 Jun;51(3):390–395.
    1. DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO, Fairhurst SK, Velicer WF, Velasquez MM, Rossi JS. The process of smoking cessation: an analysis of precontemplation, contemplation, and preparation stages of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Apr;59(2):295–304.
    1. Center F. What are the privacy options for groups? 2015. [2015-12-18]. H .
    1. Clinical Practice Guideline Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence 2008 Update Panel‚ Liaisons‚Staff A clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. A U.S. Public Health Service report. Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2):158–176. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.009.
    1. Carpenter MJ, Hughes JR, Solomon LJ, Callas PW. Both smoking reduction with nicotine replacement therapy and motivational advice increase future cessation among smokers unmotivated to quit. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Jun;72(3):371–381. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.3.371.
    1. Carpenter MJ, Hughes JR, Keely JP. Effect of smoking reduction on later cessation: a pilot experimental study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003 Apr;5(2):155–162.
    1. Chan SC, Lam TH, Salili F, Leung GM, Wong DCN, Botelho RJ, Lo SL, Lau YL. A randomized controlled trial of an individualized motivational intervention on smoking cessation for parents of sick children: a pilot study. Appl Nurs Res. 2005 Aug;18(3):178–181. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2005.01.002.
    1. Butler C, Rollnick S, Cohen D, Bachmann M, Russell I, Stott N. Motivational consulting versus brief advice for smokers in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49:611–616.
    1. Curry SJ, Ludman EJ, Graham E, Stout J, Grothaus L, Lozano P. Pediatric-based smoking cessation intervention for low-income women: a randomized trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Mar;157(3):295–302.
    1. Brown R, Ramsey S E, Strong D R, Myers M G, Kahler C W, Lejuez C W, Niaura R, Pallonen U E, Kazura A N, Goldstein M G, Abrams D B. Effects of motivational interviewing on smoking cessation in adolescents with psychiatric disorders. Tob Control. 2003 Dec;12 Suppl 4:IV3–10.
    1. Steinberg ML, Ziedonis DM, Krejci JA, Brandon TH. Motivational interviewing with personalized feedback: a brief intervention for motivating smokers with schizophrenia to seek treatment for tobacco dependence. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Aug;72(4):723–728. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.4.723.
    1. Pro-Change Behavior Systems . A Guide for Smoking Cessation. South Kingstown, RI: Pro-Change Behavior Systems; 2009. [2015-12-22]. .
    1. Hettema JE, Hendricks PS. Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation: a meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Dec;78(6):868–884. doi: 10.1037/a0021498.
    1. Hall Sharon M, Tsoh Janice Y, Prochaska Judith J, Eisendrath Stuart, Rossi Joseph S, Redding Colleen A, Rosen Amy B, Meisner Marc, Humfleet Gary L, Gorecki Julie A. Treatment for cigarette smoking among depressed mental health outpatients: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Public Health. 2006 Oct;96(10):1808–1814. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.080382.
    1. Thrul J, Stemmler M, Bühler A, Goecke M. The role of participants' self-selected future smoking goals in adolescent smoking cessation interventions. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Aug 1;141:118–123. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.05.016.
    1. Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Center (TTURC) Tobacco Dependence. Baker TB, Piper ME, McCarthy DE, Bolt DM, Smith SS, Kim S, Colby S, Conti D, Giovino GA, Hatsukami D, Hyland A, Krishnan-Sarin S, Niaura R, Perkins KA, Toll BA. Time to first cigarette in the morning as an index of ability to quit smoking: implications for nicotine dependence. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007 Nov;9 Suppl 4:S555–570. doi: 10.1080/14622200701673480.
    1. Hughes JR, Keely JP, Niaura RS, Ossip-Klein DJ, Richmond RL, Swan GE. Measures of abstinence in clinical trials: issues and recommendations. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003 Feb;5(1):13–25.
    1. Andreoni J, Miller J. Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Consistency of Preferences for Altruism. Econometrica. 2002 Mar;70(2):737–753. doi: 10.1111/1468-0262.00302.
    1. Ben-Ner A, Kramer A, Levy O. Economic and hypothetical dictator game experiments: Incentive effects at the individual level. J Socio-Econ. 2008 Oct;37(5):1775–1784. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2007.11.004.
    1. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Redding C, Rossi JS, Goldstein M, DePue J, Greene GW, Rossi SR, Sun X, Fava JL, Laforge R, Rakowski W, Plummer BA. Stage-based expert systems to guide a population of primary care patients to quit smoking, eat healthier, prevent skin cancer, and receive regular mammograms. Prev Med. 2005 Aug;41(2):406–416. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.050.
    1. Crisp DA, Griffiths KM. Participating in online mental health interventions: who is most likely to sign up and why? Depress Res Treat. 2014;2014:790457. doi: 10.1155/2014/790457.
    1. Backinger CL, Michaels CN, Jefferson AM, Fagan P, Hurd AL, Grana R. Factors associated with recruitment and retention of youth into smoking cessation intervention studies--a review of the literature. Health Educ Res. 2008 Apr;23(2):359–368. doi: 10.1093/her/cym053.
    1. Hughes JR, Solomon LJ, Naud S, Fingar JR, Helzer JE, Callas PW. Natural history of attempts to stop smoking. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Sep;16(9):1190–1198. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu052.
    1. Solberg LI, Asche SE, Boyle R, McCarty MC, Thoele MJ. Smoking and cessation behaviors among young adults of various educational backgrounds. Am J Public Health. 2007 Aug;97(8):1421–1426. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.098491.
    1. Myers MG, MacPherson L. Smoking cessation efforts among substance abusing adolescents. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004 Feb 7;73(2):209–213.
    1. Grana R, Benowitz N, Glantz SA. E-cigarettes: a scientific review. Circulation. 2014 May 13;129(19):1972–1986. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.007667.
    1. Hajek P, Foulds J, Le HJ, Sweanor D, Yach D. Should e-cigarettes be regulated as a medicinal device? Lancet Respir Med. 2013 Aug;1(6):429–431. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70124-3.
    1. Choi K, Fabian L, Mottey N, Corbett A, Forster J. Young adults' favorable perceptions of snus, dissolvable tobacco products, and electronic cigarettes: findings from a focus group study. Am J Public Health. 2012 Nov;102(11):2088–2093. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300525.
    1. Grana RA, Ling PM. "Smoking revolution": a content analysis of electronic cigarette retail websites. Am J Prev Med. 2014 Apr;46(4):395–403. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.12.010.
    1. Stanton A, Grimshaw G. Tobacco cessation interventions for young people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;8:CD003289. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003289.pub5.
    1. Danaher BG, Severson HH, Andrews JA, Tyler MS, Lichtenstein E, Woolley TG, Seeley JR. Randomized controlled trial of MyLastDip: a Web-based smokeless tobacco cessation program for chewers ages 14-25. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Sep;15(9):1502–1510. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt006.
    1. Pechmann C, Pan L, Delucchi K, Lakon CM, Prochaska JJ. Development of a Twitter-based intervention for smoking cessation that encourages high-quality social media interactions via automessages. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(2):e50. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3772.
    1. Nash CM, Vickerman KA, Kellogg ES, Zbikowski SM. Utilization of a Web-based vs integrated phone/Web cessation program among 140,000 tobacco users: an evaluation across 10 free state quitlines. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(2):e36. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3658.
    1. Pew Internet & American Life Project Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project. 2015. [2015-11-03]. Facebook Demographics
    1. Bull SS, Breslin LT, Wright EE, Black SR, Levine D, Santelli JS. Case study: An ethics case study of HIV prevention research on Facebook: the Just/Us study. J Pediatr Psychol. 2011;36(10):1082–1092. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsq126.

Source: PubMed

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

3
Sottoscrivi