Phase II evaluation of sunitinib in the treatment of recurrent or refractory high-grade glioma or ependymoma in children: a children's Oncology Group Study ACNS1021

Cynthia Wetmore, Vinay M Daryani, Catherine A Billups, James M Boyett, Sarah Leary, Rachel Tanos, Kelly C Goldsmith, Clinton F Stewart, Susan M Blaney, Amar Gajjar, Cynthia Wetmore, Vinay M Daryani, Catherine A Billups, James M Boyett, Sarah Leary, Rachel Tanos, Kelly C Goldsmith, Clinton F Stewart, Susan M Blaney, Amar Gajjar

Abstract

Sunitinib malate is a small multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) and stem cell factor receptor (KIT), which are highly expressed by some high-grade brain tumors. We conducted a phase II study to estimate the efficacy and further characterize the pharmacokinetics of sunitinib in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory high-grade glioma (Stratum A) or ependymoma (Stratum B). This was a prospective, multicenter Phase II trial conducted through the Children's Oncology Group (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01462695). Sunitinib, 15 mg/m2, was orally administered once daily for 4 weeks every 6 weeks. The safety and tolerability of sunitinib, an estimate of progression-free survival (PFS), analyses of sunitinib pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics modulation of plasma VEGF and VEGFR2 were also assessed. Thirty eligible patients (17 patients on Stratum A, 13 patients on Stratum B) were enrolled and 29 patients were evaluable for response. Sunitinib was reasonably well tolerated in children with recurrent ependymoma or high-grade glioma. Most adverse events were of mild-to-moderate severity and manageable with supportive treatment. While there was a statistically significant modulation of plasma VEGFR2 with sunitinib exposure, there were no sustained tumor responses. Both strata were closed at time of planned interim analysis as there was not sufficient efficacy associated with sunitinib in children with recurrent brain tumors. Sunitinib was well tolerated in children and young adults with recurrent high-grade glioma or ependymoma but had no single agent objective antitumor activity in these patients.

Keywords: Ependymoma; Pediatric; recurrent brain tumor; tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

© 2016 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Progression free (A) and Overall (B) survival.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Sunitinib plasma concentration‐time profile; (o) represents observed concentrations and best fit line from the average parameter estimates of five patients on Cycle 1 Day 1. (B) SU012662 plasma concentration‐time profile; (o) represents observed concentrations and the line represents the average parameter estimates of 5 patients on Cycle 1 Day 1.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Quantification of plasma VEGF (A) and soluble VEGFR2 (B) in patient plasma prior to sunitinib (Day 1), and 14 and 28 days of continuous sunitinib therapy.

References

    1. Gajjar, A. , Pfister S. M., Taylor M. D., and Gilbertson R. J.. 2014. Molecular insights into pediatric brain tumors have the potential to transform therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 20:5630–5640.
    1. Paugh, B. S. , Qu C., Jones C., Liu Z., Adamowicz‐Brice M., Zhang J., et al. 2010. Integrated molecular genetic profiling of pediatric high‐grade gliomas reveals key differences with the adult disease. J. Clin. Oncol. 28:3061–3068.
    1. Puputti, M. , Tynninen O., Pernila P., Salmi M., Jalkanen S., Paetau A., et al. 2010. Expression of KIT receptor tyrosine kinase in endothelial cells of juvenile brain tumors. Brain Pathol. 20:763–770.
    1. Carmeliet, P. 2005. Angiogenesis in life, disease and medicine. Nature 438:932–936.
    1. Faivre, S. , Demetri G., Sargent W., and Raymond E.. 2007. Molecular basis for sunitinib efficacy and future clinical development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 6:734–745.
    1. DuBois, S. G. , Shusterman S., Reid J. M., Ingle A. M., Ahern C. H., Baruchel S., et al. 2012. Tolerability and pharmacokinetic profile of a sunitinib powder formulation in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors: a Children's Oncology Group study. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 69:1021–1027.
    1. Demetri, G. D. , Heinrich M. C., Fletcher J. A., Fletcher C. D., Van den Abbeele A. D., Corless C. L., et al. 2009. Molecular target modulation, imaging, and clinical evaluation of gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients treated with sunitinib malate after imatinib failure. Clin. Cancer Res. 15:5902–5909.
    1. Stacchiotti, S. , Tamborini E., Marrari A., Brich S., Rota S. A., Orsenigo M., et al. 2009. Response to sunitinib malate in advanced alveolar soft part sarcoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 15:1096–1104.
    1. Koutras, A. K. , Krikelis D., Alexandrou N., Starakis I., and Kalofonos H. P.. 2007. Brain metastasis in renal cell cancer responding to sunitinib. Anticancer Res. 27(6C):4255–4257.
    1. Norden‐Zfoni, A. , Desai J., Manola J., Beaudry P., Force J., Maki R., et al. 2007. Blood‐based biomarkers of SU11248 activity and clinical outcome in patients with metastatic imatinib‐resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Clin. Cancer Res. 13:2643–2650.
    1. MacDonald, T. J. , Vezina G., Stewart C. F., Turner D., Pierson C. R., Chen L., et al. 2013. Phase II study of cilengitide in the treatment of refractory or relapsed high‐grade gliomas in children: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Neuro. Oncol. 15:1438–1444.
    1. Bello, C. L. , Sherman L., Zhou J., Verkh L., Smeraglia J., Mount J., et al. 2006. Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of sunitinib malate (SU11248), a multi‐targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor: results from a phase I study in healthy subjects. Anticancer Drugs 17:353–358.
    1. D'Argenio, D. Z. , Schumitzky A., and Wang X.. 2009. ADAPT 5 User's Guide: pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Systems Analysis Software. Biomedical Simulations Resource, Los Angeles.
    1. Dubois, S. G. , Shusterman S., Ingle A. M., Ahern C. H., Reid J. M., Wu B., et al. 2011. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of sunitinib in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors: a children's oncology group study. Clin. Cancer Res. 17:5113–5122.
    1. Schmidinger, M. , Zielinski C. C., Vogl U. M., Bojic A., Bojic M., Schukro C., et al. 2008. Cardiac toxicity of sunitinib and sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 26:5204–5212.
    1. Houk, B. E. , Bello C. L., Kang D., and Amantea M.. 2009. A population pharmacokinetic meta‐analysis of sunitinib malate (SU11248) and its primary metabolite (SU12662) in healthy volunteers and oncology patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 15:2497–2506.
    1. Mendel, D. B. , Laird A. D., Xin X., Louie S. G., Christensen J. G., Li G., et al. 2003. In vivo antitumor activity of SU11248, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet‐derived growth factor receptors: determination of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship. Clin. Cancer Res. 9:327–337.
    1. El Kaffas, A. , Giles A., and Czarnota G. J.. 2013. Dose‐dependent response of tumor vasculature to radiation therapy in combination with Sunitinib depicted by three‐dimensional high‐frequency power Doppler ultrasound. Angiogenesis 16:443–454.
    1. Yoon, S. S. , Stangenberg L., Lee Y. J., Rothrock C., Dreyfuss J. M., Baek K. H., et al. 2009. Efficacy of sunitinib and radiotherapy in genetically engineered mouse model of soft‐tissue sarcoma. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 74:1207–1216.
    1. D'Amico, R. , Lei L., Kennedy B. C., Sisti J., Ebiana V., Crisman C., et al. 2012. The addition of Sunitinib to radiation delays tumor growth in a murine model of glioblastoma. Neurol. Res. 34:252–261.
    1. Wuthrick, E. J. , Kamrava M., Curran W. J. Jr, Werner‐Wasik M., Camphausen K. A., Hyslop T., et al. 2011. A phase 1b trial of the combination of the antiangiogenic agent sunitinib and radiation therapy for patients with primary and metastatic central nervous system malignancies. Cancer 117:5548–5559.
    1. Norden, A. D. , Schiff D., Ahluwalia M. S., Lesser G. J., Nayak L., Lee E. Q., et al. 2015. Phase II trial of triple tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor nintedanib in recurrent high‐grade gliomas. J. Neurooncol. 121;297–307.
    1. Kreisl, T. N. , McNeill K. A., Sul J., Iwamoto F. M., Shih J., and Fine H. A.. 2012. A phase I/II trial of vandetanib for patients with recurrent malignant glioma. Neuro. Oncol. 14:1519–1526.
    1. Iwamoto, F. M. , Lamborn K. R., Robins H. I., Mehta M. P., Chang S. M., Butowski N. A., et al. 2010. Phase II trial of pazopanib (GW786034), an oral multi‐targeted angiogenesis inhibitor, for adults with recurrent glioblastoma (North American Brain Tumor Consortium Study 06‐02). Neuro. Oncol. 12:855–861.
    1. Pan, E. , Yu D., Yue B., Potthast L., Chowdhary S., P. Smith , et al. 2012. A prospective phase II single‐institution trial of sunitinib for recurrent malignant glioma. J. Neurooncol. 110:111–118.
    1. Neyns, B. , Sadones J., Chaskis C., Dujardin M., Everaert H., Lv S., et al. 2011. Phase II study of sunitinib malate in patients with recurrent high‐grade glioma. J. Neurooncol. 103:491–501.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi