Harnessing Peer Support in an Online Intervention for Older Adults with Depression

Kathryn N Tomasino, Emily G Lattie, Joyce Ho, Hannah L Palac, Susan M Kaiser, David C Mohr, Kathryn N Tomasino, Emily G Lattie, Joyce Ho, Hannah L Palac, Susan M Kaiser, David C Mohr

Abstract

Objective: This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of two methods of delivering a cognitive behaviorally informed Internet intervention for depression for adults 65 years and older.

Methods: Forty-seven participants were enrolled and assigned to receive one of two versions of the Internet intervention, either delivered individually (III) or with peer support (II+PS), or to a wait list control group (WLC). Primary outcomes included change in depressive symptoms from baseline to post-intervention (week 8), site use, self-reported usability, and coach time. Secondary outcomes included measures of social support and isolation and anxiety.

Results: Follow-up data were provided by 85.1% (40 of 47) of enrolled participants. There were significant differences in depression change across groups (F(2,37) = 3.81, p = 0.03). Greater reductions in depressive symptoms were found for the III (p = 0.02) and II+PS (p = 0.03) compared with WLC, and significantly less coach time was required in the II+PS (p = 0.003).

Conclusions: These results highlight the potential of cognitive-behaviorally informed Internet interventions for older adults with depression, and indicate that peer-supported programs are both acceptable and equivalent to individually delivered Internet interventions. Including peer support may be a viable and potentially more cost-effective option for disseminating online treatments for depression for older adults.

Keywords: Depression; internet interventions; online; peer support; technology.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: No disclosures to report.

Copyright © 2017 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow through the study.

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi