Long-Term Risk Factors for Intracranial In-Stent Restenosis From a Multicenter Trial of Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis Registry in China

Xu Guo, Ning Ma, Feng Gao, Da-Peng Mo, Gang Luo, Zhong-Rong Miao, Xu Guo, Ning Ma, Feng Gao, Da-Peng Mo, Gang Luo, Zhong-Rong Miao

Abstract

Background: For patients with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis (sICAS), endovascular treatment has been shown to be feasible and safe in recent studies. However, in-stent restenosis (ISR) risks the recurrence of ischemic stroke. We attempt to elucidate the risk factors for ISR. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 97 patients with sICAS from a prospective registry trial that included 20 centers from September 2013 to January 2015. Cases were classified into the ISR≥ 50% group or the ISR < 50% group. The baseline characteristics and long-term follow-up were compared between the two groups. Binary logistic regression analyses were identified as an association between ISR and endovascular technique factors. Results: According to whether ISR was detected by CT angiography, 97 patients were divided into the ISR group (n = 24) and the non-ISR group (n = 73). The admission baseline features and lesion angiography characteristics were similar, while plasma hs-CRP (mg/L) was higher in the ISR≥ 50% group at admission (8.2 ± 11.4 vs. 2.8 ± 4.1, p = 0.032). Binary logistic regression analysis identified the longer stents (adjusted OR 0.816, 95% CI 0.699-0.953; p = 0.010), balloon-mounted stents (adjusted OR 5.748, 95% CI 1.533-21.546; p = 0.009), and local anesthesia (adjusted OR 6.000, 95% CI 1.693-21.262; p = 0.006) as predictors of ISR at the 1-year follow-up. Conclusions: The longer stents, balloon-mounted stents implanted in the intracranial vertebral or basilar artery, and local anesthesia were significantly associated with in-stent restenosis. Further studies are required to identify accurate biomarkers or image markers associated with ISR in ICAS patients. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT01968122.

Keywords: cerebrovascular disease; endovascular treatment; interventional neurology; intracranial in-stent restenosis; stroke.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed asa potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Guo, Ma, Gao, Mo, Luo and Miao.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the study. Flow chart illustrating the numbers (n) of cases included and excluded in this analysis. ISR, in-stent restenosis; CTA, computed tomography angiography.

References

    1. Wang Y, Zhao X, Liu L, Soo Y, Pu Y, Pan Y, et al. . Prevalence and outcomes of symptomatic intracranial large artery stenoses and occlusions in China: the Chinese Intracranial Atherosclerosis (CICAS) Study. Stroke. (2014) 45:663–9. 10.1161/strokeaha.113.003508
    1. Jin M, Fu X, Wei Y, Du B, Xu XT, Jiang WJ. Higher risk of recurrent ischemic events in patients with intracranial in-stent restenosis. Stroke. (2013) 44:2990–4. 10.1161/strokeaha.113.001824
    1. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, Turan TN, Fiorella D, Lane BF, et al. . Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. (2011) 365:993–1003. 10.1056/NEJMoa1105335
    1. Zaidat OO, Fitzsimmons BF, Woodward BK, Wang Z, Killer-Oberpfalzer M, Wakhloo A, et al. . Effect of a balloon-expandable intracranial stent vs medical therapy on risk of stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis: the VISSIT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. (2015) 313:1240–8. 10.1001/jama.2015.1693
    1. Alexander MJ, Zauner A, Chaloupka JC, Baxter B, Callison RC, Gupta R, et al. . WEAVE trial: final results in 152 on-label patients. Stroke. (2019) 50:889–94. 10.1161/strokeaha.118.023996
    1. Miao Z, Zhang Y, Shuai J, Jiang C, Zhu Q, Chen K, et al. . Thirty-day outcome of a multicenter registry study of stenting for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis in China. Stroke. (2015) 46:2822–9. 10.1161/strokeaha.115.010549
    1. Ma N, Zhang Y, Shuai J, Jiang C, Zhu Q, Chen K, et al. . Stenting for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis in China: 1-year outcome of a multicentre registry study. Stroke Vasc Neurol. (2018) 3:176–84. 10.1136/svn-2017-000137
    1. Wang Y, Miao Z, Wang Y, Zhao X, Gao P, Liu L, et al. . Protocol for a prospective, multicentre registry study of stenting for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis in China. BMJ Open. (2014) 4:e005175. 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005175
    1. Samuels OB, Joseph GJ, Lynn MJ, Smith HA, Chimowitz MI. A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2000) 21:643–6.
    1. Higashida RT, Furlan AJ, Roberts H, Tomsick T, Connors B, Barr J, et al. . Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. (2003) 34:e109–37. 10.1161/01.Str.0000082721.62796.09
    1. Shuaib A, Butcher K, Mohammad AA, Saqqur M, Liebeskind DS. Collateral blood vessels in acute ischaemic stroke: a potential therapeutic target. Lancet Neurol. (2011) 10 909–21. 10.1016/s1474-4422(11)70195-8
    1. Holmstedt CA, Turan TN, Chimowitz MI. Atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. (2013) 12:1106–14. 10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70195-9
    1. Mori T, Fukuoka M, Kazita K. Follow-up study after intracranial percutaneous transluminal cerebral balloon angioplasty. Interv Neuroradiol. (2000) 6(suppl.1):243–9. 10.1177/15910199000060s141
    1. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Howlett-Smith H, Stern BJ, Hertzberg VS, Frankel MR, et al. . Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. (2005) 352:1305–16. 10.1056/NEJMoa043033
    1. Alexander MJ, Zauner A, Gupta R, Alshekhlee A, Fraser JF, Toth G, et al. . The WOVEN trial: wingspan 1-year vascular events and neurologic outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg. (2020) 1–4. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016208. [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Miao ZR, Feng L, Li S, Zhu F, Ji X, Jiao L, et al. . Treatment of symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis with balloon-mounted stents: long-term follow-up at a single center. Neurosurgery. (2009) 64:79–84; discussion 84–5. 10.1227/01.Neu.0000335648.31874.37
    1. Baik SH, Kwak HS, Chung GH, Hwang SB. Balloon-expandable stents for treatment of symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis: clinical outcomes during long-term follow-up. Interv Neuroradiol. (2018) 24:666–73. 10.1177/1591019918786515
    1. Albuquerque FC, Levy EI, Turk AS, Niemann DB, Aagaard-Kienitz B, Pride GL, Jr, et al. . Angiographic patterns of Wingspan in-stent restenosis. Neurosurgery. (2008) 63:23–7; discussion 27–8. 10.1227/01.Neu.0000335067.53190.A2
    1. Feng Z, Duan G, Zhang P, Chen L, Xu Y, Hong B, et al. . Enterprise stent for the treatment of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: an initial experience of 44 patients. BMC Neurol. (2015) 15:187. 10.1186/s12883-015-0443-9
    1. Ye G, Yin X, Yang X, Wang J, Qi P, Lu J, et al. . Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stent for the intracranial atherosclerotic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci. (2019) 59:112–18. 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.118
    1. Gruber P, Garcia-Esperon C, Berberat J, Kahles T, Hlavica M, Anon J, et al. . Neuro Elutax SV drug-eluting balloon versus Wingspan stent system in symptomatic intracranial high-grade stenosis: a single-center experience. J Neurointerv Surg. (2018) 10:e32. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013699
    1. Brinjikji W, Pasternak J, Murad MH, Cloft HJ, Welch TL, Kallmes DF, et al. . Anesthesia-related outcomes for endovascular stroke revascularization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. (2017) 48:2784–91. 10.1161/strokeaha.117.017786
    1. Wang A, Abramowicz AE. Role of anesthesia in endovascular stroke therapy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. (2017) 30:563–69. 10.1097/aco.0000000000000507
    1. Abou-Chebl A, Krieger DW, Bajzer CT, Yadav JS. Intracranial angioplasty and stenting in the awake patient. J Neuroimaging. (2006) 16:216–23. 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2006.00043.x
    1. Niccoli G, Dato I, Imaeva AE, Antonazzo Panico R, Roberto M, Burzotta F, et al. . Association between inflammatory biomarkers and in-stent restenosis tissue features: an Optical Coherence Tomography Study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. (2014) 15:917–25. 10.1093/ehjci/jeu035
    1. Wasser K, Schnaudigel S, Wohlfahrt J, Psychogios MN, Knauth M, Gröschel K. Inflammation and in-stent restenosis: the role of serum markers and stent characteristics in carotid artery stenting. PLoS ONE. (2011) 6:e22683. 10.1371/journal.pone.0022683
    1. Wentzel JJ, Krams R, Schuurbiers JC, Oomen JA, Kloet J, van Der Giessen WJ, et al. . Relationship between neointimal thickness and shear stress after Wallstent implantation in human coronary arteries. Circulation. (2001) 103:1740–5. 10.1161/01.cir.103.13.1740

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi