Using simple telehealth in primary care to reduce blood pressure: a service evaluation

Elizabeth Cottrell, Ruth Chambers, Phil O'Connell, Elizabeth Cottrell, Ruth Chambers, Phil O'Connell

Abstract

Objectives: This service evaluation examines how efficiently an innovative, simple and interactive blood pressure (BP) management intervention improves BP control in general practice.

Design: Prospective service evaluation.

Setting: Ten volunteer general practitioner (GP) practices in Stoke on Trent, UK.

Participants: Practice staff identified 124 intervention patients and invited them to participate based on two inclusion criteria: (1) patient has chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3 or 4 with BP persistently >130/85 mm Hg or (2) patient is >50 years-old (without CKD stages 3-5) with BP persistently >140/90 mm Hg despite prescribed antihypertensive medication. Three selected hypertensive control patients per intervention patient underwent usual clinical care (n=364).

Interventions: Intervention patients used 'Florence', a simple, interactive mobile phone texting service with BP management intervention for 3 months, or for less time if their BP became controlled. Patients measured their BP, text their readings to Florence, received an immediate automatic response and had results reviewed by their GP/practice nurse at least weekly.

Main outcome measures: Baseline data including recent BP readings and medications were collected; similar information was obtained for 6 months for both control and intervention patients. Average BP readings and medication usage were determined.

Results: At final data collection, five intervention patients had not yet completed the full programme. Control and intervention patients were well matched except that intervention patients had significantly greater baseline BP. Greatest BP reductions were among hypertensive intervention patients without CKD stages 3-5. Intervention patients had significantly more BP readings and more changes in medication over the 3-month data collection period.

Conclusions: Simple telehealth is acceptable and effective in reducing patients' BP. In future, poorly controlled patients could be targeted to maximise BP reductions or broader use could improve diagnostic accuracy and accessibility for patients who struggle to regularly attend their GP surgery.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Use of Florence and reasons for stopping.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overview of patient details at baseline and 3-month postrecruitment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Blood pressure readings at baseline and months 1, 3 and 6 postrecruitment among all intervention and control patients who had systolic hypertension at baseline (systolic blood pressure (SBP)>130 mm Hg if patients had chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3–4 or SBP>140 mm Hg if no CKD stages 3–5).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Average change in blood pressure (BP) from recruitment to 6-month postrecruitment in intervention and control patients >50 years included due to having BP>140/90 mm Hg despite prescribed antihypertensive medications who had systolic hypertension at baseline.

References

    1. Duggan S, Eccles M, Steen N, et al. Management of older patients with hypertension in primary care: improvement on the rule of halves. Age Aging 2001;30:70–6
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Hypertension clinical management of primary hypertension in adults. London: NICE, 2011
    1. Maric B, Kaan A, Ignaszewski A, et al. A systematic review of telemonitoring technologies in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2009;11:506–17
    1. Jerant AF, Azari R, Nesbitt TS. Reducing the cost of frequent hospital admissions for congestive heart failure: a randomized trial of a home telecare intervention. Med Care 2001;39:1234–45
    1. Meystre S. The current state of telemonitoring: a comment on the literature. Telemed J E Health 2005;11:63–9
    1. Louis AA, Turner T, Gretton M, et al. A systematic review of telemonitoring for the management of heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2003;5:583–90
    1. Benatar D, Bondmass M, Ghitelmann J, et al. Outcomes of chronic heart failure. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:347–52
    1. Delgado-Passler P, McCaffrey R. The influences of postdischarge management by nurse practitioners on hospital readmission for heart failure. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2006;18:154–60
    1. Chaudhry S, Phillips C, Stewart S, et al. Telemonitoring for patients with chronic heart failure: a systematic review. J Card Fail 2007;13:56–62
    1. Clark R, Inglis S, McAlister F, et al. Telemonitoring or structured telephone support programmes for patients with chronic heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2007;334:942–5
    1. Clarke M, Goodwin N. Sustaining innovation in telehealth and telecare. London: WSD Action Network, The Kings Fund, 2010
    1. Bray EP, Holder R, Mant J, et al. Does self-monitoring reduce blood pressure? Meta-analysis with meta-regression of randomised controlled trials. Ann Intern Med 2010;42:371–86
    1. McManus R, Mant J, Bray E, et al. Telemonitoring and self-management in the control of hypertension (TASMINH2): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010;376:163–72
    1. Agarwal R, Bills JE, Hecht TJW, et al. Role of home blood pressure monitoring in overcoming therapeutic inertia and improving hypertension control. A systematic review and meta analysis. Hypertension 2011;57:29–38
    1. Jones MI, Greenfield SM, Bray EP, et al. Patients’ experiences of self-monitoring blood pressure and self-titration of medication: the TASMINH2 trial qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2012;62:e135–42
    1. Cappuccio F, Kerry S, Forbes L, et al. Blood pressure control by home monitoring: meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 2004;329:145–8
    1. McManus R, Mant J, Roalfe A, et al. Targets and self monitoring in hypertension: randomised controlled trial and cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ 2005;331:493–6
    1. Bostock Y, Hanley J, McGown D, et al. The acceptability to patients and professionals of remote blood pressure monitoring using mobile phones. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2009;10:299–308
    1. Kim DH. Differences in blood pressure between arms. BMJ 2012;344:9

Source: PubMed

3
Sottoscrivi